|
On January 26 2006 09:06 EntertainMe wrote:
랭킹이 변경되면 프로리그에서 활약한 선수들이 대폭 상위권으로 뛰어 오른다. 반면 프로리그에 출전하지 않았거나 출전 경기가 적었던 선수는 기존 랭킹에서 대폭 떨어진다.
As the system changes, players who participates in Proleague will increase in their rankings. Oppose to this, players who have participated but few times, and who have not participated at all are bound to fall.
2006년 1월 KeSPA 랭킹을 변경안을 적용시켜 만들어보니 프로리그 활약에 따른 성적 변동이 심했다. GO 변형태는 14계단이나 상승했고, POS 박지호는 10계단, KTF 박정석은 6계단을 상승했다. 반면 GO 이재훈, KTF 이병민, SK텔레콤 박태민 같은 경우 프로리그에서 출전 못 했거나 활약이 적어 10계단에서 18계단 하락하기도 했다.
There were severe changes in the rankings due to the new system in Jan. 2006. Byun Hyun Te, aka. Iris, rose up 14 ranks, Park JiHo, aka. Pusan, 10 ranks, Park Jun Suk, aka. Reach, 6 ranks. However, Lee JeHoon(ForU), Lee ByungMin(GoodFriends), Park TeMin(GoRush) were pushed down 10 to 18 ranks.
|
Go Rush Dropped 18 places... that cant be good... ouch...
|
Jan. 2006 Ranking (As We Know)
1 박성준 July_Zerg POS 719.0 -
2 박태민 GoRush SKT T1 560.5 -
3 서지훈 XellOs[yG] G.O 484.5 ▲ 1
4 이윤열 [ReD]NaDa P&C 444.5 ▼ 1
5 최연성 Iloveoov SKT T1 417.0 ▲ 1
6 이재훈 fOru G.O 399.6 ▼ 1
7 이병민 GoodFriend KTF 373.5 -
8 박정석 [Oops]Reach KTF 371.0 -
9 조용호 ChoJJa KTF 352.5 -
10 마재윤 IPXZERG G.O 327.0 -
11 임요환 SlayerS_'BoxeR' SKT T1 314.0 -
12 오영종 Anytime[gm] Plus 278.0 -
13 전상욱 Midas[gm] SKT T1 233.5 ▲ 1
14 변은종 [Gsp]JJu+__+ Samsung Khan 225.0 ▲ 1
15 홍진호 [NC]...YellOw KTF 207.5 ▼ 2
16 박지호 Pusan[S.G] POS 202.0 -
17 박용욱 Kingdom SKT T1 185.0 -
18 송병구 stork[gm] Samsung Khan 147.0 ▲ 2
19 안기효 The_Rock P&C 131.5 ▼ 1
20 김준영 GGPlay Hanbit stars 131.0 ▼ 1
Jan. 2006 Ranking (With New System Enforced)
1 박성준 July_Zerg POS 1,606.0 -
2 박정석 [Oops]Reach KTF 1,383.5 ▲ 6
3 최연성 Iloveoov SKT T1 1,310.0 ▲ 2
4 서지훈 XellOs[yG] G.O 1,291.3 ▼ 1
5 마재윤 IPXZERG G.O 1,238.9 ▲ 5
6 박지호 Pusan[S.G] POS 1,236.3 ▲ 10
7 오영종 Anytime[gm] Plus 1,138.3 ▲ 5
8 조용호 ChoJJa KTF 1,132.8 ▲ 1
8 이윤열 [ReD]NaDa P&C 1,132.8 ▼ 4
10 임요환 SlayerS_'BoxeR' SKT T1 1,110.3 ▲ 1
11 변형태 iris[gm] G.O 1,014.4 ▲ 14
12 변은종 [Gsp]JJu+__+ Samsung Khan 961.5 ▲ 2
13 전상욱 Midas[gm] SKT T1 944.8 -
14 강 민 Nal_rA KTF 942.0 ▲ 7
15 송병구 stork[gm] Samsung Khan 922.9 ▲ 3
16 이재훈 fOru G.O 875.4 ▼ 10
17 이병민 GoodFriend KTF 837.0 ▼ 10
18 홍진호 [NC]...YellOw KTF 829.1 ▼ 3
19 박용욱 Kingdom SKT T1 792.0 ▼ 2
20 박태민 GoRush SKT T1 772.9 ▼ 18
|
The new rankings seem a bit more accurate to me, I think.
|
IMO proleague individual matches can't compare to starleague matches. With Starleague, you lose, you're out. With Proleague, you lose... well u have partners to win it. Also there are times you have no idea who your opponent is. Nor their race!
|
WoW ! Reach ftw ! I love this new system ^^ Also the differece in points is smaller now , so hopefully there would B more changes from month 2 month.
btw 2x2 games R also counted right? And Y R there only 20 positions ???
|
oooooooooooooooooomg gorush fell 18 spots down!!!!!!!!!!!!! wtf he was number 2 last i cheked!!!!!!!!!!!!!1
|
On January 26 2006 02:41 Manifesto7 wrote:
This is very very good news. I hope the new system is more innovative and reactionary than the 12 month kespa. It should be based on the results from the past 4 months imo, especially if they are taking proleague games into account.
4 months is way too short. A starleague lasts around 4 months. It's not indicative enough of player skill levels. Any players can beat each other on any day depending on various luck factors. A measurement over an extended period of time will more appropriately measure level of performance. Perhaps 12 months is too long, but at least 6 months is a must.
|
The new rating system is unfair in a way that if a player doesn't get chosen to participate in Proleague, his ratings fall. Well, being chosen to participate in proleague is dependant on each team's manager.
Nal_rA for example, mostly doesn't get chosen to play for KTF until the 5th deciding game. Therefore unless any KTF team games go to the 5th deciding game, it'll be recorded as Nal_rA didn't participate, therefore negatively affecting his rankings. This applies to many other players.
Then there are players such as Anytime, who participates a lot in Proleague. But his performance in Proleague is not good. However since he participates a lot, he gets a huge boost in points.
Nal_rA's performance in proleague is miles ahead of Anytime, but since rA mostly only plays in 5th games, he missed out on many series. In the end, both attained about the same number of points for their proleague performance, which is totally unfair.
I'm just using this specific case as an example. There are so many other players that this will apply to. I think this new rating system has a lot of rooms for improvement.
|
I like the new one better:D
|
|
|
yes, reach # 2 with the new system, hero toss fighting
|
how the hell did reach get number 2 in rankings, that i dont understand. this new system is kinda dumb.
|
Consistency? -___-;; I dunno...
There are a lot more points and the gaps are smaller tho..
which I like I guess.. MORE EXCITING WOO GO CRAK
|
With proleague results factored in, would a win over say... Oov be worth the same number of points over a win over Rainbow?
|
Aotearoa39261 Posts
sweet, Ra/Stork in top 15 and anytime/pusan in top 10 and reach 2nd!? protoss ftw!
|
On January 26 2006 12:04 Plexa wrote:
sweet, Ra/Stork in top 15 and anytime/pusan in top 10 and reach 2nd!? protoss ftw!
Definately!
|
Valhalla18444 Posts
On January 26 2006 10:44 tfeign wrote:
The new rating system is unfair in a way that if a player doesn't get chosen to participate in Proleague, his ratings fall. Well, being chosen to participate in proleague is dependant on each team's manager.
Nal_rA for example, mostly doesn't get chosen to play for KTF until the 5th deciding game. Therefore unless any KTF team games go to the 5th deciding game, it'll be recorded as Nal_rA didn't participate, therefore negatively affecting his rankings. This applies to many other players.
Then there are players such as Anytime, who participates a lot in Proleague. But his performance in Proleague is not good. However since he participates a lot, he gets a huge boost in points.
Nal_rA's performance in proleague is miles ahead of Anytime, but since rA mostly only plays in 5th games, he missed out on many series. In the end, both attained about the same number of points for their proleague performance, which is totally unfair.
I'm just using this specific case as an example. There are so many other players that this will apply to. I think this new rating system has a lot of rooms for improvement.
I guess the logic behind it is that the 5th match players are the team aces, and thus its expected they do exceptionally well in the single leagues as well.
July has got it easy, being team ace as well as a 2v2 player, as well as an incredible single-league zerg
|
ok... i know u guys arse saying the previous kespa rankings were not indicative of player skills (or perhaps didnt reflect the most current standings)... but like pete sampras, monika seles (however u spell her name), using tennis as an example, kept their world no.1 rankings for AGES after they stopped playing. I mean... if someone shows skill, it doesn't matter if they retire, their name should still be on the board to remember their greatness. Besides, most of these "rookie hot shots" will play a bunch of games, win some tournaments, their luck will run out (or the same strategies they use over and over again will get old) and then it'll be up to people like yellow, chojja, boxer etc. to re-invent starcraft play so MORE (new) rookies can copy them and come in and own..... is it just me who feels this way or what? I really really don't like these newcomers to the ranks like anytime etc. I'd much rather have Ra, Reach, JulyZerg, GoRush (especially), Boxer, Yellow (especially) up there. They have battled FOR YEARS to not just keep starcraft alive but to keep inventing new gameplay.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT
