• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EST 06:18
CET 12:18
KST 20:18
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
RSL Season 3 - Playoffs Preview0RSL Season 3 - RO16 Groups C & D Preview0RSL Season 3 - RO16 Groups A & B Preview2TL.net Map Contest #21: Winners12Intel X Team Liquid Seoul event: Showmatches and Meet the Pros10
Community News
Weekly Cups (Nov 24-30): MaxPax, Clem, herO win2BGE Stara Zagora 2026 announced15[BSL21] Ro.16 Group Stage (C->B->A->D)4Weekly Cups (Nov 17-23): Solar, MaxPax, Clem win3RSL Season 3: RO16 results & RO8 bracket13
StarCraft 2
General
Chinese SC2 server to reopen; live all-star event in Hangzhou Maestros of the Game: Live Finals Preview (RO4) BGE Stara Zagora 2026 announced Weekly Cups (Nov 24-30): MaxPax, Clem, herO win SC2 Proleague Discontinued; SKT, KT, SGK, CJ disband
Tourneys
Sparkling Tuna Cup - Weekly Open Tournament RSL Offline Finals Info - Dec 13 and 14! StarCraft Evolution League (SC Evo Biweekly) Sea Duckling Open (Global, Bronze-Diamond) $5,000+ WardiTV 2025 Championship
Strategy
Custom Maps
Map Editor closed ?
External Content
Mutation # 502 Negative Reinforcement Mutation # 501 Price of Progress Mutation # 500 Fright night Mutation # 499 Chilling Adaptation
Brood War
General
The top three worst maps of all time Foreign Brood War BGH Auto Balance -> http://bghmmr.eu/ Data analysis on 70 million replays BW General Discussion
Tourneys
Small VOD Thread 2.0 [Megathread] Daily Proleagues [BSL21] RO16 Group D - Sunday 21:00 CET [BSL21] RO16 Group A - Saturday 21:00 CET
Strategy
Current Meta Game Theory for Starcraft How to stay on top of macro? PvZ map balance
Other Games
General Games
Nintendo Switch Thread Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread Path of Exile ZeroSpace Megathread The Perfect Game
Dota 2
Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Deck construction bug Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
Mafia Game Mode Feedback/Ideas TL Mafia Community Thread
Community
General
European Politico-economics QA Mega-thread US Politics Mega-thread Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine Russo-Ukrainian War Thread The Big Programming Thread
Fan Clubs
White-Ra Fan Club
Media & Entertainment
Anime Discussion Thread [Manga] One Piece Movie Discussion!
Sports
2024 - 2026 Football Thread Formula 1 Discussion
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread
TL Community
Where to ask questions and add stream? The Automated Ban List
Blogs
I decided to write a webnov…
DjKniteX
Physical Exertion During Gam…
TrAiDoS
James Bond movies ranking - pa…
Topin
Thanks for the RSL
Hildegard
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 1400 users

Math Problem: Placing Numbers

Blogs > micronesia
Post a Reply
1 2 Next All
micronesia
Profile Blog Joined July 2006
United States24745 Posts
July 02 2009 20:05 GMT
#1
Someone I met on irc proposed a math problem and asked me to help him construct a computer program to solve it. I have some ideas about how to make the code, but I don't have the time to try to make the program, and he is a coding beginner so he can't do it himself. I can't think of any way to solve it without a computer, but I'd love to offer the problem to the community.

The Problem: (proposed by Joseph)

Imagine nine boxes equally spaced along the perimeter of a circle. We'll call the top-most position position #1. The next position clockwise is position #2, etc. through to #9. The goal is to place the numbers 1-9 in the boxes such that they obey the following:

If you place the number 3 in position one, then you have to count 3 boxes clockwise and place the next number in position 4. Then, if you put a '2' in that box your next number would have to go in position 6, etc. Essentially, if you place a number n in a box, then your next number goes n places clockwise from that position. You need to place 1-8 such that they don't overlap and previous numbers, and then 9 goes in the final position.

Solutions?

How many, if any, possible sequences of numbers can you use in order to solve this? Is there a mathematical way to solve it without using a computer program? If not, how would you construct a program to do this?

Disclaimer: this problem is for pure intellectual curiosity and is not assigned work

****
ModeratorThere are animal crackers for people and there are people crackers for animals.
Pawsom
Profile Blog Joined February 2009
United States928 Posts
July 02 2009 20:26 GMT
#2
Seems like a fairly straightforward backtracking problem unless I'm missing something.
Dromar
Profile Blog Joined June 2007
United States2145 Posts
July 02 2009 20:30 GMT
#3
My solution:

+ Show Spoiler +
Not possible. Since 9 would make a full circle and land on itself, it must be placed last. That means 1-8 must be placed first, but 1-8 sum up to 36, which is a multiple of 9, and so after placing the first 8 numbers, you will land on the first square you started at, which already has a number.
Pawsom
Profile Blog Joined February 2009
United States928 Posts
July 02 2009 20:30 GMT
#4
On July 03 2009 05:30 Dromar wrote:
My solution:

+ Show Spoiler +
Not possible. Since 9 would make a full circle and land on itself, it must be placed last. That means 1-8 must be placed first, but 1-8 sum up to 36, which is a multiple of 9, and so after placing the first 8 numbers, you will land on the first square you started at, which already has a number.


You need to place 1-8 such that they don't overlap and previous numbers, and then 9 goes in the final position.
Dromar
Profile Blog Joined June 2007
United States2145 Posts
Last Edited: 2009-07-02 20:37:58
July 02 2009 20:34 GMT
#5
On July 03 2009 05:30 Pawsom wrote:
Show nested quote +
On July 03 2009 05:30 Dromar wrote:
My solution:

+ Show Spoiler +
Not possible. Since 9 would make a full circle and land on itself, it must be placed last. That means 1-8 must be placed first, but 1-8 sum up to 36, which is a multiple of 9, and so after placing the first 8 numbers, you will land on the first square you started at, which already has a number.


You need to place 1-8 such that they don't overlap and previous numbers, and then 9 goes in the final position.


I'm aware.

+ Show Spoiler +
After placing the first 8 in such a manner, your only possible outcome is to have jumped 36 spaces, landing on an already filled space (specifically, the one you started on).


+ Show Spoiler +
In fact, this is impossible not for just 9 boxes and numbers 1-9, but for any number n boxes and numbers 1-n where n is odd. The proof is is simple as showing that for any n odd, the sum of 1 through (n-1) mod n is 0
micronesia
Profile Blog Joined July 2006
United States24745 Posts
July 02 2009 20:34 GMT
#6
Dromar I think you are correct. It makes sense.
ModeratorThere are animal crackers for people and there are people crackers for animals.
Pawsom
Profile Blog Joined February 2009
United States928 Posts
Last Edited: 2009-07-02 20:40:09
July 02 2009 20:35 GMT
#7
Ah I see what you mean. Silly me!

Looking at this further, there are only 8 possible solutions.

1 2 _ 3 _ _ 4 _ _. And here the five would "land" on the two. So four must be placed before two.

3 _ _ 4 _ _ _ 5 _. And here the six would land on the four. So six must be placed before five.

6 _ _ 9 8 _ 7 _ _. And here the nine lands on itself. Which brings us to what Dromar said about 9 having to be placed last.
armed_
Profile Joined November 2008
Canada443 Posts
July 02 2009 20:35 GMT
#8
Yeah, unless you described something wrong, Dromar's right.
TanGeng
Profile Blog Joined January 2009
Sanya12364 Posts
Last Edited: 2009-07-02 21:05:45
July 02 2009 21:02 GMT
#9
Partial Solution:
I'm not going to tackle the computer programming portion just yet.

+ Show Spoiler +

The goal is to produce a sequence that produces a partial sum value that is always a different modulo with respect to 9 at all points in the series.

First of all the sum of 1-8 is 36 which is a multiple of 9 - equivalent of modulo 0.

Since the sequence always returns to the first position at the end, the sequence is cyclical. The starting point of any sequence that works doesn't matter. Inversion of the order also only results in inversion of the sign with respect to modulo, resulting in yet another valid sequence.

For example:
8-2-6-4-3-7-1-5 works so
2-6-4-3-7-1-5-8 also works and
5-1-7-3-4-6-2-8 also works

There's 16 derived solutions coming out of any one unique cycle.

This can be seen as creating 2 unique cyclical paths around the circle. One consisting of just the number 9, and one consisting of 1-8.
Moderator我们是个踏实的赞助商模式俱乐部
vAltyR
Profile Blog Joined July 2008
United States581 Posts
July 02 2009 21:14 GMT
#10
On July 03 2009 06:02 TanGeng wrote:
Partial Solution:
I'm not going to tackle the computer programming portion just yet.

+ Show Spoiler +

The goal is to produce a sequence that produces a partial sum value that is always a different modulo with respect to 9 at all points in the series.

First of all the sum of 1-8 is 36 which is a multiple of 9 - equivalent of modulo 0.

Since the sequence always returns to the first position at the end, the sequence is cyclical. The starting point of any sequence that works doesn't matter. Inversion of the order also only results in inversion of the sign with respect to modulo, resulting in yet another valid sequence.

For example:
8-2-6-4-3-7-1-5 works so
2-6-4-3-7-1-5-8 also works and
5-1-7-3-4-6-2-8 also works

There's 16 derived solutions coming out of any one unique cycle.

This can be seen as creating 2 unique cyclical paths around the circle. One consisting of just the number 9, and one consisting of 1-8.


Where does 9 lie in your given solutions? Unless I missed something, that needs to be included as well.
내 호버크라프트는 장어로 가득 차 있어요
TanGeng
Profile Blog Joined January 2009
Sanya12364 Posts
July 02 2009 21:17 GMT
#11
On July 03 2009 06:14 vAltyR wrote:
Show nested quote +
On July 03 2009 06:02 TanGeng wrote:
Partial Solution:
I'm not going to tackle the computer programming portion just yet.

+ Show Spoiler +

The goal is to produce a sequence that produces a partial sum value that is always a different modulo with respect to 9 at all points in the series.

First of all the sum of 1-8 is 36 which is a multiple of 9 - equivalent of modulo 0.

Since the sequence always returns to the first position at the end, the sequence is cyclical. The starting point of any sequence that works doesn't matter. Inversion of the order also only results in inversion of the sign with respect to modulo, resulting in yet another valid sequence.

For example:
8-2-6-4-3-7-1-5 works so
2-6-4-3-7-1-5-8 also works and
5-1-7-3-4-6-2-8 also works

There's 16 derived solutions coming out of any one unique cycle.

This can be seen as creating 2 unique cyclical paths around the circle. One consisting of just the number 9, and one consisting of 1-8.

Where does 9 lie in your given solutions? Unless I missed something, that needs to be included as well.

1-8 is part of one cycle. 9 is its own cycle. That's how the problem is posed. There is no need to worry about 9 since it'll just occupy the only space that remains.
Moderator我们是个踏实的赞助商模式俱乐部
Dromar
Profile Blog Joined June 2007
United States2145 Posts
July 02 2009 21:20 GMT
#12
On July 03 2009 06:17 TanGeng wrote:
Show nested quote +
On July 03 2009 06:14 vAltyR wrote:
On July 03 2009 06:02 TanGeng wrote:
Partial Solution:
I'm not going to tackle the computer programming portion just yet.

+ Show Spoiler +

The goal is to produce a sequence that produces a partial sum value that is always a different modulo with respect to 9 at all points in the series.

First of all the sum of 1-8 is 36 which is a multiple of 9 - equivalent of modulo 0.

Since the sequence always returns to the first position at the end, the sequence is cyclical. The starting point of any sequence that works doesn't matter. Inversion of the order also only results in inversion of the sign with respect to modulo, resulting in yet another valid sequence.

For example:
8-2-6-4-3-7-1-5 works so
2-6-4-3-7-1-5-8 also works and
5-1-7-3-4-6-2-8 also works

There's 16 derived solutions coming out of any one unique cycle.

This can be seen as creating 2 unique cyclical paths around the circle. One consisting of just the number 9, and one consisting of 1-8.

Where does 9 lie in your given solutions? Unless I missed something, that needs to be included as well.

1-8 is part of one cycle. 9 is its own cycle. That's how the problem is posed. There is no need to worry about 9 since it'll just occupy the only space that remains.


There is one worry: you need to land on that "only space" in order to place the 9 there.
TanGeng
Profile Blog Joined January 2009
Sanya12364 Posts
July 02 2009 21:22 GMT
#13
On July 03 2009 06:20 Dromar wrote:
Show nested quote +
On July 03 2009 06:17 TanGeng wrote:
On July 03 2009 06:14 vAltyR wrote:
On July 03 2009 06:02 TanGeng wrote:
Partial Solution:
I'm not going to tackle the computer programming portion just yet.

+ Show Spoiler +

The goal is to produce a sequence that produces a partial sum value that is always a different modulo with respect to 9 at all points in the series.

First of all the sum of 1-8 is 36 which is a multiple of 9 - equivalent of modulo 0.

Since the sequence always returns to the first position at the end, the sequence is cyclical. The starting point of any sequence that works doesn't matter. Inversion of the order also only results in inversion of the sign with respect to modulo, resulting in yet another valid sequence.

For example:
8-2-6-4-3-7-1-5 works so
2-6-4-3-7-1-5-8 also works and
5-1-7-3-4-6-2-8 also works

There's 16 derived solutions coming out of any one unique cycle.

This can be seen as creating 2 unique cyclical paths around the circle. One consisting of just the number 9, and one consisting of 1-8.

Where does 9 lie in your given solutions? Unless I missed something, that needs to be included as well.

1-8 is part of one cycle. 9 is its own cycle. That's how the problem is posed. There is no need to worry about 9 since it'll just occupy the only space that remains.


There is one worry: you need to land on that "only space" in order to place the 9 there.

9 goes in the final position - the only one that remains. There is no stipulation that the 8th number in the sequence leads you to where you need to place 9.
Moderator我们是个踏实的赞助商模式俱乐部
cichli
Profile Joined August 2006
Sweden84 Posts
Last Edited: 2009-07-02 22:20:46
July 02 2009 21:31 GMT
#14
Placing numbers 1 to 9 on a circle according to your description has been solved by others on this thread, but if we generalize the problem to sequence of length n rather than length 9, we find the following solutions:

+ Show Spoiler +

Numbers 1-1 has one solution:
- [1]
Numbers 1-2 has one solutions:
- [1, 2]
Numbers 1-3 has no solutions.
Numbers 1-4 has two solutions:
- [1, 2, 4, 3]
- [3, 1, 4, 2]
Numbers 1-5 has no solutions.
Numbers 1-6 has four solutions:
- [1, 4, 2, 6, 5, 3]
- [2, 3, 5, 6, 1, 4]
- [4, 2, 5, 6, 1, 3]
- [5, 3, 1, 6, 4, 2]
Numbers 1-7 has no solutions.
Numbers 1-8 has 24 solutions:
- [1, 2, 5, 3, 8, 7, 4, 6]
- [1, 5, 2, 4, 8, 6, 7, 3]
- [1, 6, 2, 3, 8, 5, 7, 4]
- [1, 6, 4, 2, 8, 7, 5, 3]
- [2, 4, 5, 1, 8, 6, 3, 7]
- [2, 4, 7, 3, 8, 6, 1, 5]
- [2, 6, 1, 3, 8, 4, 7, 5]
- [2, 6, 3, 1, 8, 4, 5, 7]
- [3, 1, 4, 6, 8, 2, 7, 5]
- [3, 1, 5, 2, 8, 4, 6, 7]
- [3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 1, 6, 2]
- [3, 6, 7, 2, 8, 1, 4, 5]
- [5, 1, 2, 4, 8, 6, 3, 7]
- [5, 3, 1, 6, 8, 2, 4, 7]
- [5, 3, 4, 7, 8, 6, 1, 2]
- [5, 6, 2, 7, 8, 1, 3, 4]
- [6, 1, 3, 4, 8, 7, 5, 2]
- [6, 1, 5, 2, 8, 7, 3, 4]
- [6, 3, 1, 4, 8, 5, 7, 2]
- [6, 3, 7, 2, 8, 5, 1, 4]
- [7, 2, 4, 1, 8, 5, 3, 6]
- [7, 4, 1, 3, 8, 5, 6, 2]
- [7, 5, 1, 2, 8, 4, 6, 3]
- [7, 5, 3, 1, 8, 6, 4, 2]


I solved this by writing a simple SML program that does it by brute force: for each permutation of the numbers 1 through n, check if it's a valid sequence as defined in this thread. Thus, I ran out of memory when I tried solving it for sequence size 10 or larger.

Interesting observation:

+ Show Spoiler +

It seems that so far, only even sequence sizes yield solutions. Perhaps this holds some useful clue to the nature of these sequences?
The Internet will not listen to reason
coltrane
Profile Blog Joined June 2008
Chile988 Posts
July 02 2009 21:42 GMT
#15
Im gonna check this using group algebra, then in something about half an hour i can give you a good solution aplicable to summative groups of n elements...
Jävla skit
micronesia
Profile Blog Joined July 2006
United States24745 Posts
July 02 2009 22:14 GMT
#16
On July 03 2009 06:22 TanGeng wrote:
Show nested quote +
On July 03 2009 06:20 Dromar wrote:
On July 03 2009 06:17 TanGeng wrote:
On July 03 2009 06:14 vAltyR wrote:
On July 03 2009 06:02 TanGeng wrote:
Partial Solution:
I'm not going to tackle the computer programming portion just yet.

+ Show Spoiler +

The goal is to produce a sequence that produces a partial sum value that is always a different modulo with respect to 9 at all points in the series.

First of all the sum of 1-8 is 36 which is a multiple of 9 - equivalent of modulo 0.

Since the sequence always returns to the first position at the end, the sequence is cyclical. The starting point of any sequence that works doesn't matter. Inversion of the order also only results in inversion of the sign with respect to modulo, resulting in yet another valid sequence.

For example:
8-2-6-4-3-7-1-5 works so
2-6-4-3-7-1-5-8 also works and
5-1-7-3-4-6-2-8 also works

There's 16 derived solutions coming out of any one unique cycle.

This can be seen as creating 2 unique cyclical paths around the circle. One consisting of just the number 9, and one consisting of 1-8.

Where does 9 lie in your given solutions? Unless I missed something, that needs to be included as well.

1-8 is part of one cycle. 9 is its own cycle. That's how the problem is posed. There is no need to worry about 9 since it'll just occupy the only space that remains.


There is one worry: you need to land on that "only space" in order to place the 9 there.

9 goes in the final position - the only one that remains. There is no stipulation that the 8th number in the sequence leads you to where you need to place 9.

I think I was unclear in describing the problem. Although I didn't come up with it, I think the 9 is supposed to be landed on as a result of placing 8.
ModeratorThere are animal crackers for people and there are people crackers for animals.
ReMiiX
Profile Blog Joined April 2009
United States338 Posts
July 02 2009 22:18 GMT
#17
The code would be easy to do. PM me and we should discuss. My main language is Java but I do C++ and Python also. And this other thing called Fortran, stupid punch cards.
GaTech CSL fighting!
Crunchums
Profile Blog Joined December 2008
United States11144 Posts
July 02 2009 22:43 GMT
#18
It's not possible, Dromar is 100% correct.
brood war for life, brood war forever
cichli
Profile Joined August 2006
Sweden84 Posts
July 02 2009 23:13 GMT
#19
On July 03 2009 07:14 micronesia wrote:
Show nested quote +
On July 03 2009 06:22 TanGeng wrote:
9 goes in the final position - the only one that remains. There is no stipulation that the 8th number in the sequence leads you to where you need to place 9.

I think I was unclear in describing the problem. Although I didn't come up with it, I think the 9 is supposed to be landed on as a result of placing 8.


When you say 8 here, are you referring to the 8th number in the sequence, or the actual number 8? If you mean the actual number 8, does this also generalize so that the number n must be landed on as a result of placing n-1?
The Internet will not listen to reason
micronesia
Profile Blog Joined July 2006
United States24745 Posts
July 02 2009 23:53 GMT
#20
On July 03 2009 08:13 cichli wrote:
Show nested quote +
On July 03 2009 07:14 micronesia wrote:
On July 03 2009 06:22 TanGeng wrote:
9 goes in the final position - the only one that remains. There is no stipulation that the 8th number in the sequence leads you to where you need to place 9.

I think I was unclear in describing the problem. Although I didn't come up with it, I think the 9 is supposed to be landed on as a result of placing 8.


When you say 8 here, are you referring to the 8th number in the sequence, or the actual number 8? If you mean the actual number 8, does this also generalize so that the number n must be landed on as a result of placing n-1?

I meant 9 should be placed as a result of laying all numbers 1-8 in any order.... 8 could be first or fifth it don't matter.
ModeratorThere are animal crackers for people and there are people crackers for animals.
1 2 Next All
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
Sparkling Tuna Cup
10:00
Weekly #114
Classic vs MilkiCowLIVE!
TBD vs Percival
TriGGeR vs TBD
CranKy Ducklings165
LiquipediaDiscussion
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
trigger 88
SpeCial 27
StarCraft: Brood War
Hyuk 1472
BeSt 1419
Jaedong 733
firebathero 377
EffOrt 279
Stork 276
Killer 275
Last 220
910 184
Hyun 166
[ Show more ]
sorry 130
ZerO 121
Dewaltoss 102
Barracks 77
Bale 72
zelot 69
Shinee 55
Mini 50
Mind 44
Sharp 43
ggaemo 18
Noble 18
Sea.KH 14
Terrorterran 14
HiyA 7
Dota 2
singsing4792
XcaliburYe309
Counter-Strike
x6flipin221
Super Smash Bros
C9.Mang0590
hungrybox251
AZ_Axe38
Heroes of the Storm
Khaldor227
Other Games
B2W.Neo202
RotterdaM159
ZerO(Twitch)14
Organizations
StarCraft: Brood War
CasterMuse 26
lovetv 5
StarCraft 2
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
sctven
[ Show 14 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• LUISG 34
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• intothetv
• Kozan
• IndyKCrew
• LaughNgamezSOOP
• Migwel
• sooper7s
StarCraft: Brood War
• BSLYoutube
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
Dota 2
• C_a_k_e 1145
• lizZardDota262
League of Legends
• Jankos3646
Upcoming Events
WardiTV 2025
42m
OSC
3h 42m
IPSL
5h 42m
Bonyth vs KameZerg
BSL 21
8h 42m
Bonyth vs StRyKeR
Tarson vs Dandy
Replay Cast
21h 42m
Wardi Open
1d
StarCraft2.fi
1d 4h
Monday Night Weeklies
1d 5h
Replay Cast
1d 12h
WardiTV 2025
2 days
[ Show More ]
StarCraft2.fi
2 days
PiGosaur Monday
2 days
StarCraft2.fi
3 days
Tenacious Turtle Tussle
3 days
The PondCast
3 days
WardiTV 2025
4 days
StarCraft2.fi
4 days
WardiTV 2025
5 days
StarCraft2.fi
5 days
RSL Revival
5 days
IPSL
6 days
Sziky vs JDConan
RSL Revival
6 days
Classic vs TBD
herO vs Zoun
Liquipedia Results

Completed

Proleague 2025-12-04
RSL Revival: Season 3
Light HT

Ongoing

C-Race Season 1
IPSL Winter 2025-26
KCM Race Survival 2025 Season 4
YSL S2
BSL Season 21
CSCL: Masked Kings S3
Slon Tour Season 2
Acropolis #4 - TS3
WardiTV 2025
META Madness #9
Kuram Kup
SL Budapest Major 2025
ESL Impact League Season 8
BLAST Rivals Fall 2025
IEM Chengdu 2025
PGL Masters Bucharest 2025
Thunderpick World Champ.
CS Asia Championships 2025
ESL Pro League S22

Upcoming

BSL 21 Non-Korean Championship
Acropolis #4
IPSL Spring 2026
Bellum Gens Elite Stara Zagora 2026
HSC XXVIII
Big Gabe Cup #3
RSL Offline Finals
PGL Cluj-Napoca 2026
IEM Kraków 2026
BLAST Bounty Winter 2026
BLAST Bounty Winter Qual
eXTREMESLAND 2025
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2025 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.