EPTwas this BM? - Page 3
| Blogs > Shattered |
|
Jonoman92
United States9104 Posts
| ||
|
Shauni
4077 Posts
On May 28 2009 02:14 Jonoman92 wrote: lifting buildings in perfectly legit strategy, there's always the chance his internet could go out or he breaks his computer in anger... I'm pretty surprised he just left in a ladder game though, that's pretty unusual. I've also started doing it lately. If someone starts being lame as lifting buildings, lagging uncontrollably past 2 minutes or pausing for long, I usually just leave. I think most foreigners are taking iccup ladder way too seriously, it's just a tool for practise. | ||
|
HooHa!
United States688 Posts
| ||
|
arb
Noobville17921 Posts
| ||
|
Frits
11782 Posts
On May 28 2009 04:40 arb wrote: i float my buildings alot when they cheese or gg for me. It's funny when people who can't defend cheese get all pissy about it, as if it is unfair in any way. | ||
|
Judicator
United States7270 Posts
On May 27 2009 13:42 omninmo wrote: just goes to show that your opponent doesnt care about winning but rather playing. if you get proxy gated and you have no marines to deal with it.. you lose. he just wanted to play. his strat beat yours and so he quit to do it again. the 50 points he lost means nothing to him since he prolly played 12 games after you lifted your CC... btw, where were you gonna relocate to? just GG and try again man that argument is fine except the opposing player is being a douche, i would have done the same thing in his position and just alt-tabbed, talking after the game is w/e, talking during the game is just pointless douchebaggery. | ||
FakeSteve[TPR]
Valhalla18444 Posts
lol nice strawman argument man anyway, heres six paragraphs about my point again | ||
|
MasterReY
Germany2708 Posts
On May 27 2009 12:28 Shattered wrote: okay  thanks everyone was really worried here ^_^you won't get reported, but still you should be worried because of ur manners. Because it WAS indeed very BM. I don't even understand how people can do such shit. And even if he was BM before, what is this attitude to BM back? How old are you guys? | ||
|
Frits
11782 Posts
On May 28 2009 20:24 FakeSteve[TPR] wrote: i dont know what a strawman argument is, to me its basically just a term people use during arguments so they dont have to explain themselves lol nice strawman argument man anyway, heres six paragraphs about my point again A strawman is the second most used fallacy by people and it's best defined as the following: "Disputing a position by exaggerating it, or otherwise distorting it. Pulling negative spin on an opponent's ideas." Like comparing the saying 'two wrongs don't make a right' with someone randomly smashing you in the face and not being allowed to do anything back. I did actually point out why it was a strawman, I only accompanied it with the word strawman to make it easier for the other side to realize the weakness of the argument so the other person doesn't endlessly repeat the argument anyway. | ||
|
Geo.Rion
7377 Posts
| ||
|
gettodaroflchoppa
104 Posts
On May 27 2009 19:07 Nytefish wrote: It's not about right or wrong it's about growing up and ignoring whatever bullshit some little nerd is flinging at you online. This is just one particular sub-forum, it doesn't mean icc ignores disc etc. OP asked if he could be reported for bm. I quoted the subforum for BM reporting. On May 27 2009 16:01 LxRogue wrote: No you can't... By the time a 4 pool or any rush arrives at your base, it will be past 2 minutes. I think iCCup does give wins if your opponent leaves under 2 mins and he was at a disadvantage, just not extra points for BM. You don't get a win for reporting leavers under 2 minutes but they will be subtracted -100, and increased amounts of 100 per offense. | ||
|
FakeSteve[TPR]
Valhalla18444 Posts
On May 28 2009 22:37 Frits wrote: A strawman is the second most used fallacy by people and it's best defined as the following: "Disputing a position by exaggerating it, or otherwise distorting it. Pulling negative spin on an opponent's ideas." Like comparing the saying 'two wrongs don't make a right' with someone randomly smashing you in the face and not being allowed to do anything back. I did actually point out why it was a strawman, I only accompanied it with the word strawman to make it easier for the other side to realize the weakness of the argument so the other person doesn't endlessly repeat the argument anyway. so why dont you tell them whats wrong with what they said instead of using a phrase that makes you look like an ass (ps i know what a strawman argument is it just appears in every other post where people are arguing and im preeeeetty sick of it  ) | ||
|
VIB
Brazil3567 Posts
This time I do agree with Frits because it was indeed a ridiculously bad analogy that had nothing to do with the subject lol | ||
|
fusionsdf
Canada15390 Posts
If people knew that initiating BM would lead to longer more annoying games and BM back at them they would be less likely to do it. Not BMing back is just being an enabler. | ||
|
FakeSteve[TPR]
Valhalla18444 Posts
On May 29 2009 03:05 VIB wrote: Strawman is just a bad analogy. Sometimes the guy calling a strawman is right and it's indeed a bad analogy. But sometimes the guy calling strawman is wrong because it was actually a good analogy that he just couldn't understand. This time I do agree with Frits because it was indeed a ridiculously bad analogy that had nothing to do with the subject lol the phrase itself is what's annoying | ||
|
AttackZerg
United States7454 Posts
WHAT THE FUCK! Without them I could never be considered well endowed.... Steve your a bad person, nothing done in game besides vulture drops can be called bm. Strawmen > tinmen 2-0 GG NO RE, Neck Snap EZ noob. | ||
|
ishob
Norway143 Posts
On May 28 2009 00:16 jello_biafra wrote: Of course I have, that doesn't mean I'd just walk away if attacked by some guy, that would be called being the pussy. Actually I was very recently punched in the face by some guy for no reason whatsoever, that's why I used it as an example, my point was that his gay little idiom thing, while technically true, will deliver injustice in many instances. The two hardly compare you know. And even if someone were to punch you in the face why would you hit back? I've been punched several times for no reason because i work part-time as a bouncer, but I've never punched anyone back. | ||
|
Chef
10810 Posts
On May 28 2009 22:37 Frits wrote: A strawman is the second most used fallacy by people and it's best defined as the following: "Disputing a position by exaggerating it, or otherwise distorting it. Pulling negative spin on an opponent's ideas." Like comparing the saying 'two wrongs don't make a right' with someone randomly smashing you in the face and not being allowed to do anything back. I did actually point out why it was a strawman, I only accompanied it with the word strawman to make it easier for the other side to realize the weakness of the argument so the other person doesn't endlessly repeat the argument anyway. Dude... That's probably the worst way to define a strawman argument... Strawman argument is just when you compare an argument to something else, and then attack the something else instead of the argument (hence the name  ). It has nothing to do with distorting the argument, it's ignoring the argument altogether.EX: 1: two wrongs don't make a right 2: saying two wrongs don't make a right is like saying -2 x -2 doesn't equal 4, and that's clearly wrong. 1: What? Person one is obviously talking about moral issues. Person two then claims that person one's argument is just like this other argument, and then proceeds to claim victory attacking the much weaker, but irrelevant argument. @ OP... If you would have done that whether he called you a noob or not, you're a BM little jerkoff... There's no way you can come back from something like that... However... Whenever someone offensive gg's or is otherwise 'verbally' insulting you, you can pretty much do whatever you want and call it karma. Their strategy and what they chose to build (proxy gateway cheese) is not a reason to do this though. | ||
|
Shattered
United States267 Posts
On May 29 2009 08:22 Chef wrote: @ OP... If you would have done that whether he called you a noob or not, you're a BM little jerkoff... There's no way you can come back from something like that... However... Whenever someone offensive gg's or is otherwise 'verbally' insulting you, you can pretty much do whatever you want and call it karma. Their strategy and what they chose to build (proxy gateway cheese) is not a reason to do this though. did u read the part where he was doing both :/? he did a gay proxy gate wich is very annoying and before that he asked where i was from so i said usa and he said lol noob usa noob.so it was a combo of both of those things | ||
|
jello_biafra
United Kingdom6637 Posts
On May 29 2009 06:47 ishob wrote: The two hardly compare you know. And even if someone were to punch you in the face why would you hit back? I've been punched several times for no reason because i work part-time as a bouncer, but I've never punched anyone back. No in terms of seriousness they don't compare, but the principle is the same and the point remains, if someone punches you in the face you're ENTITLED to hit them back, if someone BMs you you're ENTITLED to BM back, simple fact. | ||
| ||
