|
Feedback
Now that I've reviewed a fair amount of anime, I feel that feedback is necessary so that I'm able to improve, resulting in more refined and useful reviews.
1. How successful do you think my previous reviews are reviewing the animes in question? No need to be polite, tell me whats wrong and what you would like to see improved.
2. What do you think of the current format / general layout of all my reviews? What can be changed or improved upon? For instance, would it be better to review individual episodes or keep it as a general review. How big do you want to see the reviews, a bunch of a short / quick ones like the two group reviews I just did, or more detailed ones.
3. Do you think I should be more focused as a goal of the reviews to provide a recommendation, such as in my past reviews, or should I take a new direction such as providing mostly commentary with major plot review, or perhaps something else.
4. The rating system, right now I have it as basically a number 1-10 I choose depending on how good overall I feel it is. Would it be better if I put the quality of the anime into groups and averaged the score together for an overall rating? (Similarly to most game reviews. Categories would be stuff like animation, plot, characters, musical score, etc.)
5. It's not a hassle for me to take screencaps and frequently I'll do so just to save funny moments. Would my reviews benefit from adding some pictures? What type of pictures / screencaps would you want to see if I did begin implementing them?
6. Your opinions on spoilers in reviews? This kinda goes along with the focus and general direction I'll be taking in future reviews, but what do you think? Yes? No? Sparing amounts contained in [spoilers]? _______________________________________________________________
Anime Selection
I have taken some requests to review animes before but mostly I've been reviewing random stuff I have on my hard drive. Since I now have space on my HD freed up once more, and nothing really imperative to watch, I'm willing to change how I go about picking which animes I watch.
So far what I have in mind is taking suggestions and compiling a list to download, then I can either go about watching them by popularity (how much they're requested), me just picking them at random, or what I'm most leaning towards is me picking 2-4 requested animes to review, and having them voted in a poll at the end of each review to see which one I go towards next. Thoughts?
Go ahead and request animes for me to review, but please look at the following.
-I haven't already watched it. I can't provide that great of a review if its not fresh in my mind. Here's my previous reviews and my recommendation list, + Show Spoiler +Previous Reviews+ Show Spoiler +Recommendations+ Show Spoiler +-Detroit Metal City -Cromartie High School -Kara no Kyoukai -Neon Genesis Evangelion -Boogiepop Phantom -Hayate no Gotoku! -Serial Experiments Lain -School Rumble -Cowboy Bebop -Samurai Champloo -Haruhi -Lucky Star -Code Geass -Tengen Toppa Gurren Lagann -Miname-ke -Nausicaä -Spirited Away -FLCL -Golden Boy -Full Metal Panic? Fomoffu! (Season 1.5) -Ghost in the Shell (All of them) -Death Note -Akira -Ergo Proxy -The Place Promised in Our Early Days -Paprika -Tekkon Kinkreet -5 Centimeters Per Second -Kannagi
so if you see what you want on there, please don't request a review on it. In general, I've seen a majority of the mainstream animes, but don't be afraid to request something that you aren't sure I've watched or not.
-Nothing above 52ish episodes. I really prefer movies, 13 episode, and 26 episode sized animes.
-While new animes are fine, I also generally prefer it if animes you request reviewing are completely finished, or at done with the season (with more coming). This is because I watch my anime in bulk, 6 episodes at a time mostly. I can't stand waiting every week for a new episode to come out, and the quality of my review will deteriorate with the added gap in time.
-Don't be sad, bitter, angry, or anything similar if I can't get around to your anime in a timely manner, don't choose it, or whatever. Also note that while I'll try to stick with requested animes, I do have my own preferences and likely from time to time will choose my own anime to watch, ignoring popular opinion, for at least a little bit. Furthermore, I'm going through all the Gundams so don't bother requesting those, I'll get through them all eventually (Currently finished 0083 : Stardust Memory)
-Again, no hard feelings if I simply get too bored or disgusted with poor quality that I stop watching an anime like halfway through. This rarely happens but I'm not going to completely waste my time if its awful. On this note, if the art style is really unbearable to me, I likely won't watch it. (This is more rare than the previous sentence) _______________________________________________________________
I'm open to most suggestions and am willing to change. Moreover, I'm also willing to test out new ideas / formats on reviews. Ask if you have any questions. It would benefit everyone if you provided feedback, and hopefully I can begin to create more professional and useful reviews for everyone to utilize.
   
|
www.anidb.net search: type anime name in top right. If score is above 8, consider watching.
|
Ya I've been trying to watch more Anime lately but it's hard to get decent peer reviews.
On April 15 2009 07:58 MYM.Testie wrote:www.anidb.netsearch: type anime name in top right. If score is above 8, consider watching.
Nice thanks for this
|
On April 15 2009 07:58 MYM.Testie wrote:www.anidb.netsearch: type anime name in top right. If score is above 8, consider watching. Hey thanks for not reading and completely missing the point.
|
On April 15 2009 07:58 MYM.Testie wrote:www.anidb.netsearch: type anime name in top right. If score is above 8, consider watching. Searched: Naruto Rating: 7.06 Test 1 passed
Searched: Gundam Wing Rating: 7.31 Test 2 failed
Searched: Ghost in the Shell (all) Rating: 8.35 + 7.62 + 8.73 + 8.78 + 8.37 / 5 = 8.37 Test 3 passed
Card Captor Sakura Rating: 8.02 Test 4 failed
Eh, I would say its 50/50. Go with your gut instead.
|
On April 15 2009 08:32 Chuiu wrote:Searched: Naruto Rating: 7.06 Test 1 passed Searched: Gundam Wing Rating: 7.31 Test 2 failed Searched: Ghost in the Shell (all) Rating: 8.35 + 7.62 + 8.73 + 8.78 + 8.37 / 5 = 8.37 Test 3 passed Card Captor Sakura Rating: 8.02 Test 4 failed Eh, I would say its 50/50. Go with your gut instead. yeahhh nodame and hachikuro both passed easily
|
On April 15 2009 08:32 Chuiu wrote:Card Captor Sakura Rating: 8.02 Test 4 failed
what?! o.O
|
^ Anidb has some pretty amazing reviewers on it.
== Plot Spoilers aren't necessary in reviews... neither are any other spoilers whatsoever for that matter.
I generally skim your reviews, but actually reading the Eva one, it's very shallow. It's a review, not a comment. You should be able to get really, totally deep with what you're talking about. This is especially important in the case of your Eva review, where your justification of it's score as a series "pretty damn close" to perfection is severely lacking. Without proper detail as to why you think that way, someone could hail, say, Tokyo Majin Gakuen Kenpuchou as a timeless classic of the highest caliber. If you've ever watched this trash, you'd know it weren't true and could probably point out every possible error that exists in the series. Hell, the broadcast network themselves flubbed. That being said, I haven't watched Eva and maybe never will.
... everything else I'd have to say kind of goes in the vein of "be more detailed/specific/articulate/etc" but ya. It's an anime, not a movie. Talk about the voice actors, production work... more depth anywhere would be nice.
+ Show Spoiler +CLAYMORE Version: 1.1 - Changed a feature of the review that was requested.
foreword: If you read this review at all, a little bit of critiquing // opinion-leaving would be highly appreciated.
~~~
In the world of Claymore, giant monsters run around called Youma, essentially demons, and happen to like eating human guts. The Claymores, warriors named for the weapons they wield, are half-demon demon slayers (a little like InuYasha, no?) made by an Organization in existence for an unknown period of time.
ANIMATION - 10-1 = 9
Oh my... Oh my, indeed. The job done here by Madhouse was arousing. The actual artwork and details put into the backgrounds and foregrounds were excellent: trees were trees; water rippled and flowed; and, for the most part, people looked like people. The part of this series with the most intense detail would have to be the warriors' eyes. If you take the time to actually look at it, it almost looks like Madhouse did eyes better than Kyoto Animation, and you know those people do a good job with eyes after watching Air (in which eyes > facial proportions).
On top of the details, there was a hefty amount of fighting in Claymore. There would be, of course, seeing as this is somewhat of a seinen/shounen action series. The action scenes were brilliantly crafted until the end. Movements were made totally fluid, special effects accompanied segments where the Claymores would "power up" with demon energy, and the transition from Silver Witch eyes to Demonoid eyes was always great to watch.
The Opening and Ending sequences stayed consistent throughout the series. They seemed to follow the stereotype of other shounen action series in that they showed viewers the primary villains and allies, mixed along with people along the way. In the intro alone, viewers see a One-Horned Monster (someone I refer to on Claymore-related threads as the superbitch) and another person with a Faint Smile. The quality of animation in both was somewhat higher than in the show itself, as is seen with many other shows.
SOUND - 8
The actors and actresses cast for Claymore did the series justice, and then some. They were, for the most part, fantastic, and matched their roles well. Especially radiant in performance would be Riful, a big bad little lady. She is, depending on how you look at is, portrayed as being someone with no real motivation to do things. She can be threatening and dangerous while at the same time maintaing a charm meant only for helpless girls in the snow. Her seiyuu, Mizuki Nana (Hyuuga Hinata from Naruto and Wrath from FullMetal Alchemist) somehow harnessed the traits of previous roles and manifested them as perfection to stand at the mic for Riful.
The other seiyuu performed to high standards as well, let's not forget. Everyone was unique, bringing their own unique vocal ranges and talents to the front. Romi Paku (Hitsuguya Toushirou, Temari, Edward Elric), armed with her vast repertoire of talents, brought Bishou no Teresa in as a brilliant heroine. Yusa Kouji (Ichimaru Gin) gave Easley the voice he needed to match his cool and collected manner. And even Galatea was given the "caring girl" archetype by Orikasa Ai, the woman behind Quatre Rebabba Winner and some some girl from Angel Blade (Punish).
Background music is next, I guess. It was, in a word, extreme. This can be taken with a grain of salt based on your own preferences in background music, but for me I happened to love it. The normal BGM was nice. It seemed to belong with the series, giving off a medieval vibe to match the medieval setting. It was in no way stuck to that single type of music, however, as proven with the BGM leading up to and during fight sequences. Going into them, I was bombarded with some addictive Heavy Metal, lacking in vocals, pumping up the atmosphere for the fight. During the fight, it's toned down a bit to be less extreme. Why? A personal theory would be that Madhouse wished to keep from drawing the viewers' attention into different parts of the episodes while they should keep their focus undivided. But for the pressure-building into-the-fight songs composed by Masanori Takumi, the rest of the soundtrack (also done by Masanori) conveys the emotion set with each scene. At times of peace, slow and melodic tunes would greet the viewers. During the more ominous sequences of Claymore, the music never failed to match.
Finally, we reach the part of the show that hasn't been brought up yet: sound effects. Everything from the swords clashing to the sound of the half-demons charging up their demon energy would go here, and go here it does. Everything was great: when the swords of fellow warriors clashed (they had their own little spats, too, mind you) it was almost never the exact same clash sound repeated for each and every sword impact for the whole series. They seemed to differ between each general encounter, which is to say that the same impact sounds were used during each individual fight. The only real other part of this section would be the noise that warriors made whenever they charged their powers up. It was described by a relative as the sound that "the laser guns in Star Wars" made. Not bad at all, but I don't see HOW this action would make a sound at all.
CHARACTER - 8-2 = 6
Deary me, Norihiro Yagi did a brilliant job with his cast of warrioresses here. Each and every one of the girls (and guys, endangered as they are in Claymore) was totally unique, failing to follow preset character archetypes for a vast majority of the series.
There is, of course, a massive amount of character development in Claymore. Strangely, however, it is distributed fairly evenly between everyone, failing to be done in a cheerleader form (in which one or few characters take up all the development of the series). As viewers, we are drawn closer to characters only to have them ripped away from us, leaving behind a sense of longing for more time with the people created for our pleasure. At other times, we take in the traits of the people moving around on the screen, wishing with every fiber of our beings that they GTFO!!!! as fast as possible for the sake of the computer that you just bought.
Perhaps the greatest character in the series (and my favorite), Bishou no Teresa, was fleshed out in nothing more than three episodes. These episodes were, of course, followed up with tons upon tons upon tons upon tons of allusions to the events that took place during these three episodes. She comes across as somewhat of a wolf in sheep's clothing, but we learn so much about who she is just within the span of time she tells her story. It just goes to show how well done the development in Claymore was.
One who could be called the series' lead heroine would be Clare. She's blonde, short-haired, and the lowest-ranked of all the Claymore of all the world. Despite the injustice done to her with the ranking, we easily find that she takes on the title of "BAMF" with nothing more than a break of sweat (Teresa wouldn't even have to move). It is because of her past, shrouded as it is in despair and pain, that the series follows her quest. It's a quest for a lot of things, really, loaning to the greatness of the story.
STORY - 9-2 = 7
And here we reach another strong point of Claymore. The story, as stated before, follows the path of Clare the demon slayer on her quest to find something. Along the way, we find out about the motive-questionable Organization that creates the half-demons, the origin of the villains of the world (specific villains, at least), and even whether or not Clare reaches her goal.
The story itself moves at a fairly fast pace, leaving no room for people who can't learn to grasp things that are further than a week apart. Clare's journey through the unnamed continent on which her story takes place is one that draws people in, never letting go with a deathgrip stronger than the otter Taggerung's hanging onto the Sword of Martin. On top of the latent captivation being awakened from just watching the first episode, there were no real plot holes to speak of in Claymore. Everything moved with the fluidity of thawed Alps snow down the throat of its drinker. It worked in a fashion built around minisagas, in each of which Clare would add some new ability to her arsenal, all the while pushing forward to meet the goal set before her. With all this, the story would be, of course, far from disappointing.
Surprisingly, however, with all my talk on how brilliantly done Claymore's story was, any random shmuck would be able to get the gist of it without any problems. Sure, it might take a rewatch to fully understand everything and to analyze the show to its nitty gritty guts, but the story works despite this simplicity.
As with any anime, there are episodes that stand out far more than the others. Most of it was worth watching over and over again, don't get me wrong, but a particular episode trio stood out for my far above the rest. These episodes would be *drumroll*: Teresa's story. For all the buildup, that's a really crappy way to sum it up, right? Anyway, everything about this part of the story was brilliant: the fighting, the story itself, voice acting, its purpose, and even the development for characters at the front and on the sides of the show. This is a must-watch portion of the series, by far its best.
Raki and the Volcanoe of the End
In other words, the flaws of the adaptation of Norihiro Yagi's work, and there were many.
For starters, we have the fact that the anime went off on a separate tangent from the manga. Though the source could be inaccurate (and on top of that remains unknown, even to me), I heard that this was because Madhouse was only going to do one season of Claymore. This did not have to be a bad thing, however, and I was almost looking forward to how a revised ending would work. Sadly, it was something that I did not expect. The ending even left me feeling like a baseball bat crashed across my head with the force of a swing from Nagato Yuki.
Next up would be Raki. Any list of hated anime characters would be incomplete if he weren't on it. I don't quite know why, but a vast portion of the anime viewing community finds Ikari Shinji to top their lists. Such is not the case here, as Raki could destroy Shinji with the hate he's fostered as the lead good guy of Claymore. Raki is the epitomy of the word "pathetic": his voice is annoying, capable of bleeding the deafest of ears, his attitude is far too one-dimensional, as are his goals, his voice is annoying, like a chalkboard being scratched with steel nails, and he does (almost) absolutely nothing to move the series forward. He even managed to jump into the ending of the series, telling you either how bad the ending was or how bad Raki was to put up with.
Third, we have the animation quality of the ending part of Claymore. When it was broadcast, I was expecting stupendous quality, something at least par with the work that KyoAni produces. "Too bad," I told myself. When I finally got to watching the end of the series, a lot of things were wrong. The "non-spoiler" fault would be that Madhouse began recycling segments of action during the finale and the bout right before it.
Lastly, we have plot holes. I shudder to think how much better the series could have been if Madhouse had chosen to end the first season and go into a series of OVA (in the same fashion as Hunter x Hunter, I think), but alas, they became the organized human form of PHAIL.
To begin, we would need background information. There are three entities in the world operating independently of the Organization, collectively referred to as the Abyssal Ones. Of this trio, two are introduced, and one is even included in the ending, but what of the third? This here would be the problem. The last member of this triumvirate remained unnamed throughout, only alluded to in the remotest of ways somewhere midway into the series.
To describe more would mean spoiling the series more than I may have already, so this will end here, but be warned that, as great as the series is, there ARE flaws in the series. The only way to fix such monstrous downfalls would be to do a second season that, apparently, won't be done.
VALUE and ENJOYMENT - 7
Well, here we are, ladies and gents, the ending of this little review of mine. Let's end it with a bang.
Claymore was, in a lot of ways, enjoyable for me. I've watched, rewatched, and watched again certain portions of the series, namely the aforementioned story of Bishou no Teresa. Episode eight would have to be my favorite of the series. Sadly, the rest of the series is far from being as rewatchable as this, mostly because this episode was packed with enough action to make Chuck Norris cry.
This is a series that I would DEFINITELY (in caps!!!) recommend to people looking for an action series. It may not be the best to tide one over during the wait between two desired series, but Claymore does more than a good job keeping men interested in women who could kill them with a flick of the wrist and the flash of a giant sword.
- I have no source for whether or not they're doing a second season. It's just something I read on the internet. If it's wrong, it's wrong, but doesn't change the fact that there were flaws in Claymore.
Take this review of mine for instance. I did it on Claymore, and the overall score was about 7.33. See how much bitching I did? Praise? Midst reread of it, I discovered that Mizuki Nana was Riful... holy shit, she can seiyuu like it's the end of the world.
Anyway, having just reread it, I notice a fair bit of redundancy in word choice, typos, and the potentially flies-over-your-head allusion to Suzumiya Haruhi no Taikutsu. Still, this is what I'm talking about. When I'm bitching about Raki, I'm REALLY trying to mentally kill the fucker. I'd get into more but I have somewhere to go. Dunno how much use this'll be tho >.>
|
On April 15 2009 09:30 xxsaznpride wrote:^ Anidb has some pretty amazing reviewers on it. == Plot Spoilers aren't necessary in reviews... neither are any other spoilers whatsoever for that matter. I generally skim your reviews, but actually reading the Eva one, it's very shallow. It's a review, not a comment. You should be able to get really, totally deep with what you're talking about. This is especially important in the case of your Eva review, where your justification of it's score as a series "pretty damn close" to perfection is severely lacking. Without proper detail as to why you think that way, someone could hail, say, Tokyo Majin Gakuen Kenpuchou as a timeless classic of the highest caliber. If you've ever watched this trash, you'd know it weren't true and could probably point out every possible error that exists in the series. Hell, the broadcast network themselves flubbed. That being said, I haven't watched Eva and maybe never will. ... everything else I'd have to say kind of goes in the vein of "be more detailed/specific/articulate/etc" but ya. It's an anime, not a movie. Talk about the voice actors, production work... more depth anywhere would be nice. + Show Spoiler +CLAYMORE Version: 1.1 - Changed a feature of the review that was requested.
foreword: If you read this review at all, a little bit of critiquing // opinion-leaving would be highly appreciated.
~~~
In the world of Claymore, giant monsters run around called Youma, essentially demons, and happen to like eating human guts. The Claymores, warriors named for the weapons they wield, are half-demon demon slayers (a little like InuYasha, no?) made by an Organization in existence for an unknown period of time.
ANIMATION - 10-1 = 9
Oh my... Oh my, indeed. The job done here by Madhouse was arousing. The actual artwork and details put into the backgrounds and foregrounds were excellent: trees were trees; water rippled and flowed; and, for the most part, people looked like people. The part of this series with the most intense detail would have to be the warriors' eyes. If you take the time to actually look at it, it almost looks like Madhouse did eyes better than Kyoto Animation, and you know those people do a good job with eyes after watching Air (in which eyes > facial proportions).
On top of the details, there was a hefty amount of fighting in Claymore. There would be, of course, seeing as this is somewhat of a seinen/shounen action series. The action scenes were brilliantly crafted until the end. Movements were made totally fluid, special effects accompanied segments where the Claymores would "power up" with demon energy, and the transition from Silver Witch eyes to Demonoid eyes was always great to watch.
The Opening and Ending sequences stayed consistent throughout the series. They seemed to follow the stereotype of other shounen action series in that they showed viewers the primary villains and allies, mixed along with people along the way. In the intro alone, viewers see a One-Horned Monster (someone I refer to on Claymore-related threads as the superbitch) and another person with a Faint Smile. The quality of animation in both was somewhat higher than in the show itself, as is seen with many other shows.
SOUND - 8
The actors and actresses cast for Claymore did the series justice, and then some. They were, for the most part, fantastic, and matched their roles well. Especially radiant in performance would be Riful, a big bad little lady. She is, depending on how you look at is, portrayed as being someone with no real motivation to do things. She can be threatening and dangerous while at the same time maintaing a charm meant only for helpless girls in the snow. Her seiyuu, Mizuki Nana (Hyuuga Hinata from Naruto and Wrath from FullMetal Alchemist) somehow harnessed the traits of previous roles and manifested them as perfection to stand at the mic for Riful.
The other seiyuu performed to high standards as well, let's not forget. Everyone was unique, bringing their own unique vocal ranges and talents to the front. Romi Paku (Hitsuguya Toushirou, Temari, Edward Elric), armed with her vast repertoire of talents, brought Bishou no Teresa in as a brilliant heroine. Yusa Kouji (Ichimaru Gin) gave Easley the voice he needed to match his cool and collected manner. And even Galatea was given the "caring girl" archetype by Orikasa Ai, the woman behind Quatre Rebabba Winner and some some girl from Angel Blade (Punish).
Background music is next, I guess. It was, in a word, extreme. This can be taken with a grain of salt based on your own preferences in background music, but for me I happened to love it. The normal BGM was nice. It seemed to belong with the series, giving off a medieval vibe to match the medieval setting. It was in no way stuck to that single type of music, however, as proven with the BGM leading up to and during fight sequences. Going into them, I was bombarded with some addictive Heavy Metal, lacking in vocals, pumping up the atmosphere for the fight. During the fight, it's toned down a bit to be less extreme. Why? A personal theory would be that Madhouse wished to keep from drawing the viewers' attention into different parts of the episodes while they should keep their focus undivided. But for the pressure-building into-the-fight songs composed by Masanori Takumi, the rest of the soundtrack (also done by Masanori) conveys the emotion set with each scene. At times of peace, slow and melodic tunes would greet the viewers. During the more ominous sequences of Claymore, the music never failed to match.
Finally, we reach the part of the show that hasn't been brought up yet: sound effects. Everything from the swords clashing to the sound of the half-demons charging up their demon energy would go here, and go here it does. Everything was great: when the swords of fellow warriors clashed (they had their own little spats, too, mind you) it was almost never the exact same clash sound repeated for each and every sword impact for the whole series. They seemed to differ between each general encounter, which is to say that the same impact sounds were used during each individual fight. The only real other part of this section would be the noise that warriors made whenever they charged their powers up. It was described by a relative as the sound that "the laser guns in Star Wars" made. Not bad at all, but I don't see HOW this action would make a sound at all.
CHARACTER - 8-2 = 6
Deary me, Norihiro Yagi did a brilliant job with his cast of warrioresses here. Each and every one of the girls (and guys, endangered as they are in Claymore) was totally unique, failing to follow preset character archetypes for a vast majority of the series.
There is, of course, a massive amount of character development in Claymore. Strangely, however, it is distributed fairly evenly between everyone, failing to be done in a cheerleader form (in which one or few characters take up all the development of the series). As viewers, we are drawn closer to characters only to have them ripped away from us, leaving behind a sense of longing for more time with the people created for our pleasure. At other times, we take in the traits of the people moving around on the screen, wishing with every fiber of our beings that they GTFO!!!! as fast as possible for the sake of the computer that you just bought.
Perhaps the greatest character in the series (and my favorite), Bishou no Teresa, was fleshed out in nothing more than three episodes. These episodes were, of course, followed up with tons upon tons upon tons upon tons of allusions to the events that took place during these three episodes. She comes across as somewhat of a wolf in sheep's clothing, but we learn so much about who she is just within the span of time she tells her story. It just goes to show how well done the development in Claymore was.
One who could be called the series' lead heroine would be Clare. She's blonde, short-haired, and the lowest-ranked of all the Claymore of all the world. Despite the injustice done to her with the ranking, we easily find that she takes on the title of "BAMF" with nothing more than a break of sweat (Teresa wouldn't even have to move). It is because of her past, shrouded as it is in despair and pain, that the series follows her quest. It's a quest for a lot of things, really, loaning to the greatness of the story.
STORY - 9-2 = 7
And here we reach another strong point of Claymore. The story, as stated before, follows the path of Clare the demon slayer on her quest to find something. Along the way, we find out about the motive-questionable Organization that creates the half-demons, the origin of the villains of the world (specific villains, at least), and even whether or not Clare reaches her goal.
The story itself moves at a fairly fast pace, leaving no room for people who can't learn to grasp things that are further than a week apart. Clare's journey through the unnamed continent on which her story takes place is one that draws people in, never letting go with a deathgrip stronger than the otter Taggerung's hanging onto the Sword of Martin. On top of the latent captivation being awakened from just watching the first episode, there were no real plot holes to speak of in Claymore. Everything moved with the fluidity of thawed Alps snow down the throat of its drinker. It worked in a fashion built around minisagas, in each of which Clare would add some new ability to her arsenal, all the while pushing forward to meet the goal set before her. With all this, the story would be, of course, far from disappointing.
Surprisingly, however, with all my talk on how brilliantly done Claymore's story was, any random shmuck would be able to get the gist of it without any problems. Sure, it might take a rewatch to fully understand everything and to analyze the show to its nitty gritty guts, but the story works despite this simplicity.
As with any anime, there are episodes that stand out far more than the others. Most of it was worth watching over and over again, don't get me wrong, but a particular episode trio stood out for my far above the rest. These episodes would be *drumroll*: Teresa's story. For all the buildup, that's a really crappy way to sum it up, right? Anyway, everything about this part of the story was brilliant: the fighting, the story itself, voice acting, its purpose, and even the development for characters at the front and on the sides of the show. This is a must-watch portion of the series, by far its best.
Raki and the Volcanoe of the End
In other words, the flaws of the adaptation of Norihiro Yagi's work, and there were many.
For starters, we have the fact that the anime went off on a separate tangent from the manga. Though the source could be inaccurate (and on top of that remains unknown, even to me), I heard that this was because Madhouse was only going to do one season of Claymore. This did not have to be a bad thing, however, and I was almost looking forward to how a revised ending would work. Sadly, it was something that I did not expect. The ending even left me feeling like a baseball bat crashed across my head with the force of a swing from Nagato Yuki.
Next up would be Raki. Any list of hated anime characters would be incomplete if he weren't on it. I don't quite know why, but a vast portion of the anime viewing community finds Ikari Shinji to top their lists. Such is not the case here, as Raki could destroy Shinji with the hate he's fostered as the lead good guy of Claymore. Raki is the epitomy of the word "pathetic": his voice is annoying, capable of bleeding the deafest of ears, his attitude is far too one-dimensional, as are his goals, his voice is annoying, like a chalkboard being scratched with steel nails, and he does (almost) absolutely nothing to move the series forward. He even managed to jump into the ending of the series, telling you either how bad the ending was or how bad Raki was to put up with.
Third, we have the animation quality of the ending part of Claymore. When it was broadcast, I was expecting stupendous quality, something at least par with the work that KyoAni produces. "Too bad," I told myself. When I finally got to watching the end of the series, a lot of things were wrong. The "non-spoiler" fault would be that Madhouse began recycling segments of action during the finale and the bout right before it.
Lastly, we have plot holes. I shudder to think how much better the series could have been if Madhouse had chosen to end the first season and go into a series of OVA (in the same fashion as Hunter x Hunter, I think), but alas, they became the organized human form of PHAIL.
To begin, we would need background information. There are three entities in the world operating independently of the Organization, collectively referred to as the Abyssal Ones. Of this trio, two are introduced, and one is even included in the ending, but what of the third? This here would be the problem. The last member of this triumvirate remained unnamed throughout, only alluded to in the remotest of ways somewhere midway into the series.
To describe more would mean spoiling the series more than I may have already, so this will end here, but be warned that, as great as the series is, there ARE flaws in the series. The only way to fix such monstrous downfalls would be to do a second season that, apparently, won't be done.
VALUE and ENJOYMENT - 7
Well, here we are, ladies and gents, the ending of this little review of mine. Let's end it with a bang.
Claymore was, in a lot of ways, enjoyable for me. I've watched, rewatched, and watched again certain portions of the series, namely the aforementioned story of Bishou no Teresa. Episode eight would have to be my favorite of the series. Sadly, the rest of the series is far from being as rewatchable as this, mostly because this episode was packed with enough action to make Chuck Norris cry.
This is a series that I would DEFINITELY (in caps!!!) recommend to people looking for an action series. It may not be the best to tide one over during the wait between two desired series, but Claymore does more than a good job keeping men interested in women who could kill them with a flick of the wrist and the flash of a giant sword.
- I have no source for whether or not they're doing a second season. It's just something I read on the internet. If it's wrong, it's wrong, but doesn't change the fact that there were flaws in Claymore. Take this review of mine for instance. I did it on Claymore, and the overall score was about 7.33. See how much bitching I did? Praise? Midst reread of it, I discovered that Mizuki Nana was Riful... holy shit, she can seiyuu like it's the end of the world. Anyway, having just reread it, I notice a fair bit of redundancy in word choice, typos, and the potentially flies-over-your-head allusion to Suzumiya Haruhi no Taikutsu. Still, this is what I'm talking about. When I'm bitching about Raki, I'm REALLY trying to mentally kill the fucker. I'd get into more but I have somewhere to go. Dunno how much use this'll be tho >.> Thanks, this is the kind of stuff I'm looking for.
|
I am rather curious as to the effectiveness of reviews of the size that xxsaznpride posted. Personally, if I find something good, I'd cite a few basic things and then tell people to watch it. Writing a detailed entry doesn't entice people to watch it, it just tells them everything that they will need to know instead. While the OP's reviews hasn't been particularly useful for me (no fault of his, easier to check Japanese reviews if I have to), they at least reflect the nature of such things properly imo. A medium to short size entry that informs people of the flaws and good parts of the anime and promote people to watch it.
General reviews are better by far, should the quality of the anime be something that varies sharply between episodes, that'd be something one can bring up in a general review. No reason to need to point at things that specific, especially when you easily fall into accidentally spoiling people. As to spoilers, sparse amounts with spoiler tags should do.
|
animenfo.com nice top 200 list while it doesn't register the new anime quite so quickly, I've found the list in the top 30 to be fairly satisfying.
|
Animation: Voice acting: Music: Plot: Interestingness: Target-Audience:
Those would be my guidelines
|
On April 15 2009 10:25 Ecael wrote: I am rather curious as to the effectiveness of reviews of the size that xxsaznpride posted. Personally, if I find something good, I'd cite a few basic things and then tell people to watch it. Writing a detailed entry doesn't entice people to watch it, it just tells them everything that they will need to know instead. While the OP's reviews hasn't been particularly useful for me (no fault of his, easier to check Japanese reviews if I have to), they at least reflect the nature of such things properly imo. A medium to short size entry that informs people of the flaws and good parts of the anime and promote people to watch it.
General reviews are better by far, should the quality of the anime be something that varies sharply between episodes, that'd be something one can bring up in a general review. No reason to need to point at things that specific, especially when you easily fall into accidentally spoiling people. As to spoilers, sparse amounts with spoiler tags should do.
A general review: "SHnY was so good, omg. Haruhi was so great, but Nagato and Mikuru were moe. Omg they were so moe. Oh and Koizumi, he was just sexy. His voice, ughhhh I learned new things about my body listening to it. And the story was really good. Especially the part where flying bunnies filled the sky and she ate them." or something like that.
I personally have never been one for general reviews. No offense to him, but I take xmShake's reviews as general ones and I don't find any actual use for them. Yes, they DO get his point across about what he likes or dislikes about the series at hand, but the problem is that, in the changing climate of anime (wow that sounded so lame) shit gets changed. Animation is (general) increasing in quality, so comparisons and stuff need to be drawn to show what's what. Just because you liked the story in Bokura ga Ita doesn't make it any more or less compelling then Ef ~ A Tale of Memories or Kimi Ga Nozomu Eien.
Dennou Coil (the single most underrated thing I've ever had the grace to watch and one I hope xmShake will review so I can see if our opinions cross and such) took 10 years to make. Is it nice in terms of audio/video quality compared to series that came around when it started? What about when it debuted? In my eyes, a review is supposed to be a person's critique of anything and everything they think is worth critiquing. At the same time, they're meant to persuade/dissuade people into anime they find interesting that simultaneously possesses a past audience. That, or people who don't know what to think read reviews to see where they stand. That Claymore review, for example: a dude in my comments section voted a 10 and proceeded to bemoan Raki in his own right. Other reviews I've done, let's say Kanon (2006), garner attention from people who've both already watched it and wanted to. I myself read a review on AniDB by Keitarou (God-awfully amazing writer) and structured an essay I did in AP English Lit in a style similar to his.
A review should be able to convey what you thought about a series. Your feelings, revelations, revulsion, all that good stuff. Not just say "Oh, ya this was good, I liked this, too. This wasn't so nice, though. Maybe they shoulda done this." It doesn't necessarily take a long-winded chunk of time-taking review like mine to do it, but yeah.
+ Show Spoiler +It is a clear 10. WTF? Can't say to much or i will spoil all the fun. This is a story that i really wanted to hear , if you want to know the anime better even if you seen it you must look on wikipedia for more info. That way you may find out all details about it. This anime is a bout might and magic , about heroic battles. Wonderfull!! Tears come out of my eyes as i write this review , this was such a cool anime. :'] The anime may be a little bit annoying at the begining but in time the story flowers. Watch it , i promise it won't be disapointing.
This is a review by someone who voted mine down... One of them he gave a 1 and said something like "cause it doesnt make me feel like watching the anime". Then I get to this... Quite sure I wrote better than this in the seventh grade. Hell, I got called on plagiarism on the only good essay I did, which a) wasn't, and b) iirc was better than this.
What did we get out of it? Not a damned thing. That Fate/Stay Night (which is what it's about) is about "might and magic," I suppose, but how convincing does that actually sound? Cyborg 009, GitS, -I, Robot-, Metropolis, and Afro Samurai all had something or other to do with robots. Tears came to my eyes watching NHK ni Youkoso (fuckign must-watch), as did Clannad: After Story. What you don't get is why, though. Why ANYTHING. Which is why I don't like general reviews. /lolrant
|
Differences in function, if you want to write reviews like that, feel free. Ultimately it is satisfactory to mostly yourself and few others. Sure, we all get urges like that and you have every right to post entire essays for reviews, but people aren't going to read it. If you feel satisfied even knowing that, then that's just as well.
Really, at the point of you writing something that long, it ceases to be a review and changes to something much closer to a discussion on the anime. There are no problems with something like that, just keep in mind that such works will be responded to in the same way - a discussion, not a promotion to watch.
F/SN the anime might as well as be just about that, read the visual novel. If you have problems with erotic contents, too bad :p
|
I used to watch this one anime called Sekai something, it was about some massive space war and it was pretty good (not that I watch much anime, so I wouldn't know comparatively) so I'd like to request that, if you can find it. It was a while ago that I saw it (like 5? 6 years?) so I'm not sure if it'd be easy to get a copy or torrent it. I also can't remember the name properly. I know the Sekai part is right as the characters in Japanese I remember meaning "starlight" or something.
|
Caller, that's Seikai no Senki (Banner of the Stars). 2 seasons, 13 ep each. III is an OVA. The one that comes before it is Seikai no Monshou (Crest of the Stars), also 13 episodes. I highly recommend the series, excellent anime, even better light novel. Not sure if it triggers OP's rule about nothing too long though. Oh yeah, there is also a movie thing, Rebirth, about the events between Lafiel's (Lamhirh, for any fanatics here) parents leading up to her birth. It was just one of the short stories written for a compilation (that or it was on a serialized magazine, don't have the books handy to check).
星界の戦旗 and 星界の紋章 respectively.
I recommend using KAA's subs for Monshou, since they are the only ones that actually bothered with the Baronh, ANBU also used Baronh for Senki III, but that's just an OVA. Unfortunately, I've yet to be able to find I and II with subbers that actually care, most of them just ripped off the DVDs -.-
|
I've read most, if not all, of your reviews. My only critique is that they seem to be somewhat disorganized and too short.
Go into more detail, especially on technical aspects (animation, drawing style, color palette, storytelling, overall execution). However, don't keep it limited to that. Your reviews seem to target people who have not seen the anime as of yet...your verdict is generally whether you'd recommend it or not to others. I would include a plot synopsis/summary (without spoilers), and keep spoilers out of your review as much as possible.
In addition, don't be afraid to comment more closely on the anime. A review on media such as anime (like games, movies, music, etc) are, no matter how hard you try, not objective. They are your own personal take matching your own personal tastes. Make your preferences known and stick to them. Even if a reader disagrees with them, if you can justify and defend them properly, it'll still be enjoyable to read.
|
On April 15 2009 13:15 Ecael wrote: Differences in function, if you want to write reviews like that, feel free. Ultimately it is satisfactory to mostly yourself and few others. Sure, we all get urges like that and you have every right to post entire essays for reviews, but people aren't going to read it. If you feel satisfied even knowing that, then that's just as well.
Really, at the point of you writing something that long, it ceases to be a review and changes to something much closer to a discussion on the anime. There are no problems with something like that, just keep in mind that such works will be responded to in the same way - a discussion, not a promotion to watch.
F/SN the anime might as well as be just about that, read the visual novel. If you have problems with erotic contents, too bad :p
People who actually want to get something out of a review would be willing to read the long ones as they're a lot more useful. The short ones are, if anything, recommendations. You're going to watch a comedy because of how funny it is, let's say. Someone says that so and so (let's say ToraDora!) is really good at being funny. Okay, that's general. A review should go into what else happens outside the funny: the tragic stuff, why everyone's so angsty or excited all the time or why they're who they are in general; animation; seiyuu work. Take Keitarou's review of TokiKake: that's an amazing essay. Not only does he read well (delivery helps a lot with reviews), but back when I was into doing this to kill time, I would read his among others because they were the pinnacle, I thought. Didn't actually reread this one, but I remember thinking about how great it was.
Before, I read a review of... some book... by some other writer. Mighta been one of the Harry Potter books as seen by that mystery writer who got his shit turned into movies on USA, I don't remember. John Grisham? Anyway, that thing was annoyingly long and I only read it because I had to. It only bothered me because I had no interest in what he was talking about. If you want a real review, then it's worth every second reading a good long one. I'm not saying mine are good, hell I think they're terribad compared to where I wanted to be, but people liked them and that's enough to satisfy me.
|
Don't mock Grisham, he wrote good stuff. Being poor and cheap I haven't been able to keep up with his stuff as well as I'd like, but what I had read of him were quite good for legal thrillers. Well, like most modern authors, he falls into a pattern after a couple of books, but decent for that. Well, no idea how his reviews would look though~
At that, what is the point that you are pointing at for that paragraph, that people, when they don't enjoy the subject in question, might find the piece in general boring? Considering that is my very point about extremely lengthy reviews having particular, but narrow niches, that really doesn't add much. If I want a real discussion, I'll read a long review like yours. If I simply want to watch something, I'll take something that points at some basic strengths and weaknesses of the show so I can enjoy the show on my own and not be dictated by your preferences. If I really liked the show, sure, stuff like what you write can be a good guide with which to rewatch the show with focuses on certain spots, but it is too much information for someone who has yet to even watch it.
Yes, shorter ones are much closer to recommendations, but that looks to me like it is the point that the OP is reaching at, with specific recommendations. You don't start watching a show because someone goes into an in-depth explanation about every aspect of the show. Note that you never answered my question about function, and instead insisted that people who want to "get something out of a review" should put the work into it. But why do people read reviews? Half of the people here wants recommendations, other half wants to see how their favorite shows are viewed by this person. Up until this point, these blogs have not generated large discussions in any way (PMs are another story), do you really think the kind of style that you are advocating here will be useful?
About the point concerning general review from the post before last, which I accidentally missed, I was advocating a general review in place of an episode-by-episode review, certainly you aren't asking for that? In terms of details...eh, if I actually used these reviews I'd have a proper opinion on it, except I don't. As I much prefer watching something, forming my opinion and then discuss as I rewatch, I doubt I'd care too much for the lack of details. That said, the last group of reviews were quite slack to be honest.
EDIT - To your claymore review, what allusion to Taikutsu? I assume the novels, can't recall off the top of my head which episode got named that.
|
I wasn't mocking Grisham. I was literally trying but failing to remember who wrote the review I was reading in the first place. I'm pretty sure the person who wrote the review I was reading was the same one who got his story (about a girl and a wolf in a hotel or something... seriously can't remember, but it had the dude from Sideways iirc in it) turned into a mini-movie kind of deal.
I'm not saying that he should make absurdly long reviews like Keitarou's or mine, but that he should be a little more detailed in what he's looking at. It doesn't take that much length to convey more info (I'm wordy as fuck myself), but if you're too general about it then what you wrote can suddenly apply to everything and your opinions start getting generic or bland or some such... can't think of the right word to express it.
Taikutsu = the Baseball episode in the anime, I think.
I'll address more later but I have to get ready fo school. =\
|
|
|
|