EPTOn March 14 2009 15:08 IntoTheWow wrote:
sorry tasteless but VULTURES AND TURRETS, not bikes and towers.
sorry tasteless but VULTURES AND TURRETS, not bikes and towers.
Are vultures not bikes? Are turrets not towers? Just putting that out there.
Commentary Catchphrase Rant - Page 4
| Blogs > Chill |
|
Pieguy314
Canada262 Posts
Are vultures not bikes? Are turrets not towers? Just putting that out there. | ||
|
SpiritoftheTunA
United States20903 Posts
On March 14 2009 15:58 Pieguy314 wrote: Are vultures not bikes? Are turrets not towers? Just putting that out there. are zerglings not creatures? are ultralisk not bigger creatures? are high templar not psychics? just putting that out there | ||
|
Grobyc
Canada18410 Posts
On March 14 2009 15:58 Pieguy314 wrote: Are vultures not bikes? Are turrets not towers? Just putting that out there. What are you talking about? Of course they aren't. + Show Spoiler + ...... + Show Spoiler + /sarcasm + Show Spoiler + You honestly don't think there is a problem with units not being called by their actual name in commentating for professional Starcraft? Maybe it's just me... Seriously, it's not a long enough word where it needs to be abbreviated or anything. That's like called marines "gunners" and firebats "flamethrowers". Just doesn't work that well in the eyes of most people. | ||
|
Vivi57
United States6599 Posts
but psionic reaver: BRILLIANT STORMS! | ||
|
The_Australian
Australia458 Posts
| ||
|
blapsd
England121 Posts
On March 14 2009 13:50 Frits wrote: Is it me or do commentators often get certain phrases in their head which they really like to overuse? YES! "<player> got caught with his pants down" LOL | ||
BroOd
Austin10833 Posts
| ||
|
Chef
10810 Posts
They're called ACID SPITTERS, damn it. | ||
|
TryThis
Canada1522 Posts
On March 14 2009 23:57 Chef wrote: "Hydralisks" They're called ACID SPITTERS, damn it. really? ive been lied too for the past 8 years.... | ||
|
Chef
10810 Posts
| ||
|
meathook
1289 Posts
Admittedly, it was funny the first couple of times: "He is building a proxy in the middle, only the pandabear knows" But now he is making that joke every time Andromeda is played. Just stop. And stop saying "pandabearguy" randomly when it appears on the screen. | ||
|
Epicfailguy
Norway893 Posts
The first attack with less than one controll group, but more than 2 units, in the early game, its a timing push, even if its 4 goons trying to wear down the first terran PUSH. "Looks like bisu is doing a 4 goon with range timing attack, and at the SAAAAAAAAAME TIIIIME...AT THE SAAAAME --- TIIIIMMMEEEE, flash is doing a 4 marine, 2 tank-vulture timing attack" The first attack with 1 controll group or more, its the <insert names of units>-timing attack. "Bisu is doing a speedlot,goon,high templar-timing attack up saviors main now...AND AT THE SAMMMMMME TIIIIIIIME..etcetc" As the game goes on, each opponent are "replenishing their armies". It isnt that hard, guys! | ||
|
erin[go]bragh
United States815 Posts
I disagree about the usage of the word push though. Push has a different meaning in Starcraft? If anything, using the term push for goon/zeals or hydras or whatever makes more sense than for tanks... The Greek Phalanx is a good example of strategic pushing. Two phalanxes would go head to head and...push. Literally. You didn't charge for a bit... Stop... Shield up... Leapfrog ahead some more... Turtle up again. You pushed. You pushed until one of the lines faltered, thus breaking the formation, thus opening the path to victory. Very similar to how a player will engage his opponents units and "push" them back into their main/expansion or what have you. Granted its a pretty literal take on the word, but it just never bothered me personally. | ||
|
Zortch
Canada635 Posts
This is a very technical build/map/strategy/game/rush etcetc. Apparently anything can be technical and I'm not even positive what it means other than very precise... | ||
|
Kyo Yuy
United States1286 Posts
Can someone with a better knowledge of the game confirm/deny this for me? | ||
OneOther
United States10774 Posts
| ||
|
Zoler
Sweden6339 Posts
On March 15 2009 06:54 Kyo Yuy wrote: I heard that Tasteless incorrectly labels a lot of things as "hold position micro" when the actual tactic does not involve the use of hold position. As in the case of Flash's tactic to have Goliaths take down Interceptors instead of Carriers. Can someone with a better knowledge of the game confirm/deny this for me? I'm not sure but when you use hold position with goliaths often they will not attack at all. Attack moving is much more efficient against interceptors. | ||
|
nofAcedAgent
United States952 Posts
These people are doing something in their free time for themselves and others, if they pronounce something differently than you (perhaps cause its the 'proper' way in their language or other simmilar reasons) or call something by the wrong name in the midst of things I just really think its selfish to complain about this.. Now if they are getting paid for commentary or are doing it for major community events (tsl, ect) than I can understand holding people to a higher standard. quit letting stupid little shit in life bother you or watch the god damn korean version. /rant *smile* | ||
|
pandabearguy
United States252 Posts
On March 15 2009 00:58 meathook wrote: Oh, I forgot the most annoying word ever coined in SC commentary - PANDABEARGUY ...! Admittedly, it was funny the first couple of times: "He is building a proxy in the middle, only the pandabear knows" But now he is making that joke every time Andromeda is played. Just stop. And stop saying "pandabearguy" randomly when it appears on the screen. seriously this is one of those things that really ticks me off | ||
thedeadhaji
39489 Posts
 | ||
| ||
