No Country For Old Men...why is it good? - Page 2
Blogs > HamerD |
homeless_guy
United States321 Posts
| ||
HamerD
United Kingdom1922 Posts
On December 31 2008 08:00 Murlox wrote: I didnt read much, but : Why in the hell would you HAVE to like it ? I just hate being out of possession of all the facts. With some analysis, and all of the opinions of other people, I could at least be given an informed viewpoint from which to make a judgement. But aside from that I genuinely want to like it just so Jimmy and I can talk about its good parts rather than argue about it. | ||
![]()
Hot_Bid
Braavos36369 Posts
i mean, 50% at living is better than 0% | ||
HamerD
United Kingdom1922 Posts
On December 31 2008 08:19 Xeris wrote: The movie takes a really bleak view on life - ultimately it's not really the struggle of good vs. evil, but it is the bleak realization of evil in the world, and the fact that no matter how hard people try to fight or combat it, evil really can't be understood, explained, or stopped. Jones' character is the narrator - he's dedicated his life to being a sheriff, upholding the law, and combating evil. Bardem's character is purely evil, a psychopath. There is no real rhyme or reason to what he does, he's driven by his own perverse code. Jones can't understand it and is frightened by him. It's why he's always reluctant to put a lot of effort into searching for him, because he knows that ultimately he won't be stopped or aprehended, And ya, Tommy Lee Jones is really the main character, Josh Brolin is really less than a support character, he just serves to drive the actual story of the movie. Why it's good is that there is much more than just the story, which by its nature, is really plain and simple (like the country). - A guy finds money, people are looking for the money, they hired someone to find the money and bring it back. He runs, he's chased by the bad guy, he dies... Again, that really isn't the main focus, it's more about Tommy Lee Jones and his monologues, and the fact that although Bardem's character is inherently evil, he is still guided by some sort of principles, although a normal person isn't truly able to comprehend exactly what they are. Cool. This is more like it! I Shall watch this movie again and like that other guy suggested, view TLJ as the main character. I've always been quite an unperceptive person and so should probably take the time to watch it again anyway. Awesome. This exact story happened to me with the Wicker Man and it ended up being a favourite of mine ![]() | ||
geometryb
United States1249 Posts
On December 31 2008 08:16 yaoherm50 wrote: The biggest hint is the title of the film. | ||
sqwert
United States781 Posts
| ||
Doctorasul
Romania1145 Posts
Anyway, I thought No Country for Old Men was awesome, I loved it. | ||
Mastermind
Canada7096 Posts
On December 31 2008 09:49 Doctorasul wrote: Have you guys ever watched a movie and thought it was crap but couldn't admit to wasting time and money on it so you just made up some reasons why it was awesome? And then when you finally got the nerve to admit you didn't get it, all your friends confessed they were pretending to love it too? Anyway, I thought No Country for Old Men was awesome, I loved it. what? I could never imagine being such a phony loser. You have some serious personal issues you need to work out. Xeris did a great job explaining the movie. Watch it again with what he said it mind. I thought it was the best movie of the last 5 years, but I know a couple people who didnt like it, so dont feel like you need to like it. Some movies arent for everyone. | ||
Frits
11782 Posts
On December 31 2008 08:31 Hot_Bid wrote: imo that chick should've flipped for her life at the end i mean, 50% at living is better than 0% Yeah but this way she totally owned the serial killer, he was probably pretty annoyed at that. Besides they dont show if he actually kills her right? | ||
Track
United States217 Posts
The Joker is motivated by certain things, materialism mixed with an enjoyment of crime. He is predictable to an extent because he cares about what he is doing. Shighur doesn't give a shit. About anything. This is the absolute scariest thing in the world, and it IS that way because nobody can understand it. Shighur kills without rhyme or reason, simply because it's something to do, or the person got in his way, or it somehow came across his mind to kill them, or to prove a point. This apathy towards life can be seen in the scene where he randomly forces the gas station attendant to flip a coin(obviously intending to kill him if he called the coin wrong) and then teaching him a lesson about the randomness of life(Don't put the coin back in your pocket. It's your lucky quarter. Put it on your pocket and it'll mix in with all the others and be just another coin. Which it is.) Shighur cannot be bargained with, cannot be bought, cannot be dissuaded in any way. This is because he simply does not care whether he lives or dies, or for ANY material or ideological purpose whatsoever. Shighur's character is the most frightening thing for me.. I'd rather have a hate-crazed maniac chasing me than Anton Shighur. At least the maniac is driven by things I can understand, and has reasons for his behavior, and may stop given certain circumstances. People that are apathetic to the degree of Shighur.. There's no dealing with them. His character is a commentary on the randomness of life. The car crash at the end displays that perfectly. While Jones and the other supporting characters have been trying to harm Shighur throughout the movie, they cannot. A random car, however, breaks Shighur's arm. | ||
lwstupidus
United States74 Posts
On December 31 2008 08:12 ForVengeance wrote: The reason why people like movies is because human beings are bored, dumb animals. A "movie" is like life, only fast food style. Its a "McLife". People cannot imagine things on their own, they need a film to do it for them. The proof in this is that people can sit and watch children dying of cancer, countries in need, all the horrors of the world, and they still at the end of the day desire more drama. To me if people really want to lead epic lives they could just take up a position and help real human beings. What more epic struggle is there than real life problems? They are all around us and yet we sit and watch a "Mcdrama" instead. Long story short, people are too lazy to live their own lives, and they live through movies/music. Its no different than a teenage kid thinking a heavy metal record will make him a badass, or a 40 year old guy in midlife crisis thinking a fast car will make him young again. I know im in the minority, but id rather be dead than sit around waiting for some movie to define for me what fear, love, sex, morality, etc are. I define that in my own mind. Movies are money making scams and they are all the story of jesus christ retold over and over, just as the bible itself is a retelling of that same story that existed before christianity was invented. Every movie is a rearranged version of the story of jesus christ, with all the subplots being mini versions of that same story. Dont believe me? "Happy Feet" is a perfect recent example. So is "the Pirates of the Carribbean". You will always see the main character coming from uncertain or emotionally charged origins, making their way through conflicts, a sacrifice will be made through either story events or symbolism, and then they will symbolically come full circle etc etc. So fucking boring. And yet people line up year after year for every turd hollywood shits out. Every now and then I run into some moron like you, who goes off on some retarded tangent about how they don't watch TV or listen to music or something retarded. You're just a fucking idiot. Very first sentence: The reason why people like movies is because human beings are bored, dumb animals. News flash kid, you're posting on an internet forum. Why are you posting here, why did you click this thread, you are wasting time right fucking now. I'm going to assume you also play Starcraft, how is that NOT just a "video game" that serves to pass the time. Seriously you are one dumbshit moron, people don't watch movies to "define" themselves, they watch them to be entertained. The McDonald's references are very appropriate you geek. You aren't unique. You are not special. You're a fucking nobody, so get off your high horse. You're a dumb bored animal like the rest of us. | ||
Deleted User 3420
24492 Posts
| ||
![]()
FakeSteve[TPR]
Valhalla18444 Posts
On December 31 2008 11:37 travis wrote: hey man, im not an animal! im a PERSON i wrote this for you: i'm a pissant here's my pissant pants oh gee whiz i pissed my pissant pants | ||
Frits
11782 Posts
On December 31 2008 08:12 ForVengeance wrote: The reason why people like movies is because human beings are bored, dumb animals. A "movie" is like life, only fast food style. Its a "McLife". People cannot imagine things on their own, they need a film to do it for them. The proof in this is that people can sit and watch children dying of cancer, countries in need, all the horrors of the world, and they still at the end of the day desire more drama. To me if people really want to lead epic lives they could just take up a position and help real human beings. What more epic struggle is there than real life problems? They are all around us and yet we sit and watch a "Mcdrama" instead. Long story short, people are too lazy to live their own lives, and they live through movies/music. Its no different than a teenage kid thinking a heavy metal record will make him a badass, or a 40 year old guy in midlife crisis thinking a fast car will make him young again. I know im in the minority, but id rather be dead than sit around waiting for some movie to define for me what fear, love, sex, morality, etc are. I define that in my own mind. Movies are money making scams and they are all the story of jesus christ retold over and over, just as the bible itself is a retelling of that same story that existed before christianity was invented. Every movie is a rearranged version of the story of jesus christ, with all the subplots being mini versions of that same story. Dont believe me? "Happy Feet" is a perfect recent example. So is "the Pirates of the Carribbean". You will always see the main character coming from uncertain or emotionally charged origins, making their way through conflicts, a sacrifice will be made through either story events or symbolism, and then they will symbolically come full circle etc etc. So fucking boring. And yet people line up year after year for every turd hollywood shits out. I enjoy movies because usually the story has some pretentious douche like you that gets killed off in a comical way. | ||
SaveYourSavior
United States1071 Posts
On December 31 2008 10:54 Frits wrote: Yeah but this way she totally owned the serial killer, he was probably pretty annoyed at that. Besides they dont show if he actually kills her right? Chigure (the killer) wipes his feet as he walks out the door which alludes to the fact that he killed her and most likely got himself slightly dirty. Also, before the camera cuts to him walking outside of the house he says that flipping is the only thing he can do while Brolin's wife refuses to flip. It would completely break Chigure's character and be nonsensical if he didn't kill her at that point. I'm not really sure why I'm talking about such an unimportant part of the film edit: but it seems out of everything in this film, people argue about this the most, my friends at least | ||
Brett
Australia3820 Posts
Average movie in my eyes: 6/10. | ||
Chuiu
3470 Posts
On December 31 2008 11:37 FakeSteve[TPR] wrote: i wrote this for you: i'm a pissant here's my pissant pants oh gee whiz i pissed my pissant pants Best poem I've ever read. So deep and thoughtful with careful planning and execution. | ||
Xeris
Iran17695 Posts
On December 31 2008 10:54 Frits wrote: Yeah but this way she totally owned the serial killer, he was probably pretty annoyed at that. Besides they dont show if he actually kills her right? Actually, that is one of the cooler parts of the movie (IMO), here's why: I think it really highlights why Tommy Lee Jones is so terrified of him, because he just can't for the life of him understand Bardem's character. She thinks that he is going to kill her. She thinks that he went through all this trouble to find her and go there, that he was deadset on killing her and that the coin toss is "just a game" - that he'd kill her regardless of the result. So, she refuses to go through with it. It shows how she doesn't really understand him either, he never deviates from his "code", which is a point they tried to really hammer home throughout the movie. He doesn't give a shit whether she lives or dies, he said that he would kill her, but he's giving her an opportunity to live if she makes the right call. What she does has no consequence to him. She refused to call the coin, she died. He just walked right out of the house and moved forward. | ||
Xeris
Iran17695 Posts
If you remove Heath Ledger's performance of the Joker from the movie - the movie as a whole would be good, at best. His performance particularly was off the charts, but as far as thematically and symbolically, it didn't deliver the same punch as No Country, although having similar underlying themes. | ||
HamerD
United Kingdom1922 Posts
On December 31 2008 11:12 Track wrote: Shighur is the ULTIMATE bad guy, and in my opinion he is by far scarier than a villain like the Joker from Batman. The Joker is motivated by certain things, materialism mixed with an enjoyment of crime. He is predictable to an extent because he cares about what he is doing. Shighur doesn't give a shit. About anything. This is the absolute scariest thing in the world, and it IS that way because nobody can understand it. Shighur kills without rhyme or reason, simply because it's something to do, or the person got in his way, or it somehow came across his mind to kill them, or to prove a point. This apathy towards life can be seen in the scene where he randomly forces the gas station attendant to flip a coin(obviously intending to kill him if he called the coin wrong) and then teaching him a lesson about the randomness of life(Don't put the coin back in your pocket. It's your lucky quarter. Put it on your pocket and it'll mix in with all the others and be just another coin. Which it is.) Shighur cannot be bargained with, cannot be bought, cannot be dissuaded in any way. This is because he simply does not care whether he lives or dies, or for ANY material or ideological purpose whatsoever. Shighur's character is the most frightening thing for me.. I'd rather have a hate-crazed maniac chasing me than Anton Shighur. At least the maniac is driven by things I can understand, and has reasons for his behavior, and may stop given certain circumstances. People that are apathetic to the degree of Shighur.. There's no dealing with them. His character is a commentary on the randomness of life. The car crash at the end displays that perfectly. While Jones and the other supporting characters have been trying to harm Shighur throughout the movie, they cannot. A random car, however, breaks Shighur's arm. I guess the reason he doesn't scare me is that I always play this sort of character in role playing games in my second play through. Entirely whimsically evil, killing whenever I feel like it lol. It just felt quite normal to me haha. But I understand where you're coming from. My point was that I could relate to the Joker whereas with Shigurh Im just like meh. So where I should be fearing him, im just trying to work him out. | ||
| ||