• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 18:13
CEST 00:13
KST 07:13
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
Code S RO8 Preview: Rogue, GuMiho, Solar, Maru2BGE Stara Zagora 2025: Info & Preview27Code S RO12 Preview: GuMiho, Bunny, SHIN, ByuN3The Memories We Share - Facing the Final(?) GSL47Code S RO12 Preview: Cure, Zoun, Solar, Creator4
Community News
BGE Stara Zagora 2025 - Replay Pack0Weekly Cups (June 2-8): herO doubles down1[BSL20] ProLeague: Bracket Stage & Dates9GSL Ro4 and Finals moved to Sunday June 15th13Weekly Cups (May 27-June 1): ByuN goes back-to-back0
StarCraft 2
General
Code S RO8 Preview: Rogue, GuMiho, Solar, Maru BGE Stara Zagora 2025 - Replay Pack Jim claims he and Firefly were involved in match-fixing The SCII GOAT: A statistical Evaluation StarCraft 1 & 2 Added to Xbox Game Pass
Tourneys
[GSL 2025] Code S:Season 2 - RO8 - Group A Sea Duckling Open (Global, Bronze-Diamond) Bellum Gens Elite: Stara Zagora 2025 $3,500 WardiTV European League 2025 Sparkling Tuna Cup - Weekly Open Tournament
Strategy
[G] Darkgrid Layout Simple Questions Simple Answers [G] PvT Cheese: 13 Gate Proxy Robo
Custom Maps
[UMS] Zillion Zerglings
External Content
Mutation # 477 Slow and Steady Mutation # 476 Charnel House Mutation # 475 Hard Target Mutation # 474 Futile Resistance
Brood War
General
BGH auto balance -> http://bghmmr.eu/ FlaSh Witnesses SCV Pull Off the Impossible vs Shu BW General Discussion StarCraft & BroodWar Campaign Speedrun Quest Will foreigners ever be able to challenge Koreans?
Tourneys
[ASL19] Grand Finals [BSL20] GosuLeague RO16 - Tue & Wed 20:00+CET NA Team League 6/8/2025 [Megathread] Daily Proleagues
Strategy
I am doing this better than progamers do. [G] How to get started on ladder as a new Z player
Other Games
General Games
Path of Exile Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread What do you want from future RTS games? Armies of Exigo - YesYes? Nintendo Switch Thread
Dota 2
Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
LiquidLegends to reintegrate into TL.net
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
TL Mafia Community Thread Vanilla Mini Mafia
Community
General
US Politics Mega-thread Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine Russo-Ukrainian War Thread Vape Nation Thread European Politico-economics QA Mega-thread
Fan Clubs
Maru Fan Club Serral Fan Club
Media & Entertainment
Korean Music Discussion [Manga] One Piece
Sports
2024 - 2025 Football Thread Formula 1 Discussion NHL Playoffs 2024
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread
TL Community
The Automated Ban List
Blogs
A Better Routine For Progame…
TrAiDoS
StarCraft improvement
iopq
Heero Yuy & the Tax…
KrillinFromwales
I was completely wrong ab…
jameswatts
Need Your Help/Advice
Glider
Trip to the Zoo
micronesia
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 26398 users

Socialism Anyone? - Page 5

Blogs > GreenHorizons
Post a Reply
Prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Next All
Nebuchad
Profile Blog Joined December 2012
Switzerland12081 Posts
February 22 2025 01:15 GMT
#81
On February 22 2025 09:44 WombaT wrote:
Show nested quote +
On February 22 2025 08:38 Nebuchad wrote:
On February 05 2025 08:54 Nebuchad wrote:
Thoughts on the thread, it is (obviously) not true that Americans have chosen racism. They're being faced with a choice between not racism and racism, and every four years they keep changing their pick. If racism was the important factor in their pick, they would either always pick Democrats (because of antiracism) or Republicans (because of racism). Clearly the fact that they keep changing their vote demonstrates that this isn't very important to them and they are dissatisfied with something else, perhaps the one thing that both parties have complete agreement on, which is gross, open neoliberal elitism?


Wanted to harp on this a little because it's such an important point. For some reason the Georgia town hall didn't make it to the main thread, here are a bunch of republicans who aren't satisfied with their elected officials even though they still promise them that they'll hurt Mexicans and trans people.

Now I understand that around october 2023 Kwark's brain broke a little and on some topics he can't think straight anymore, and that's a shame, but for everyone else it is seriously insane that you think what happened in that election is the US public agreed with republicans on social issues. First of all, the US public isn't a thing, people will vote for one candidate or the other for absolutely different reasons, most of them very bad. That's every election. The idea that there is a direct correlation between candidates' platforms and the will of the voters is childish. Second, the american public ISN'T VOTING FOR REPUBLICANS, why is this discussion even happening am I going crazy? You elect a guy from the other party every four years, and even then you need serious levels of gerrymandering and voter suppression for Republicans to be competitive. What was happening in 2020, was the american public suddenly protrans and antiracist, but in the last four years they changed their mind? The theory doesn't even match the facts.

What is actually happening is that both parties are offering a governance that the public isn't satisfied with, so every time they get an opportunity to tell them that, they do. Obviously. Isn't it absolutely amazing to you guys that the Democrats are willing to give up on immigrants and trans people before they are willing to try any populist policy? Doesn't it tell you that what they care about above all is maintaining capitalism, as opposed to making sure that the capitalist system we are under espouses liberal values?

I largely agree, I think you underestimate quite how effective things like trans scaremongering have been over the years though, and quite deliberately injected.

Quite serious flips can happen, quite bloody quickly.

One obvious example would be Muslims in the Western world pre and post 9/11, and we’re still feeling those effects to this day. Many an average Joe is still tolerant of our Muslim brothers and sisters, but for others well, 9/11 opened up a gate of prejudice that’s never been closed.


I think it's a bit different with muslims cause there's a large milestone event there, which obviously it was wrong to blame "muslims" for but we all knew that would happen. Similarly I'm sure there's more hatred of Russians as a people in Europe today.

I'm willing to say that trans messaging isn't as effective for two reasons, one because in 2022 the same messaging was there and Republicans lost an election that they were supposed to win, and two because of the way trans messaging is used in conversations, unless you're talking to Joanne it's always basically a way of dismissing someone. You think what you said makes sense, but lol you can't even define woman, lol. I'm fairly convinced that if someone was running on, like, minecrafting the US healthcare system, and the other guy was running on transphobia, you would even get some transphobes voting for the Minecraft guy. Even within transphobes, there's only a minority that cares a lot about transphobia.
"It is capitalism that is incentivizing me to lazily explain this to you while at work because I am not rewarded for generating additional value."
WombaT
Profile Blog Joined May 2010
Northern Ireland24825 Posts
February 22 2025 01:30 GMT
#82
On February 22 2025 10:15 Nebuchad wrote:
Show nested quote +
On February 22 2025 09:44 WombaT wrote:
On February 22 2025 08:38 Nebuchad wrote:
On February 05 2025 08:54 Nebuchad wrote:
Thoughts on the thread, it is (obviously) not true that Americans have chosen racism. They're being faced with a choice between not racism and racism, and every four years they keep changing their pick. If racism was the important factor in their pick, they would either always pick Democrats (because of antiracism) or Republicans (because of racism). Clearly the fact that they keep changing their vote demonstrates that this isn't very important to them and they are dissatisfied with something else, perhaps the one thing that both parties have complete agreement on, which is gross, open neoliberal elitism?


Wanted to harp on this a little because it's such an important point. For some reason the Georgia town hall didn't make it to the main thread, here are a bunch of republicans who aren't satisfied with their elected officials even though they still promise them that they'll hurt Mexicans and trans people.

Now I understand that around october 2023 Kwark's brain broke a little and on some topics he can't think straight anymore, and that's a shame, but for everyone else it is seriously insane that you think what happened in that election is the US public agreed with republicans on social issues. First of all, the US public isn't a thing, people will vote for one candidate or the other for absolutely different reasons, most of them very bad. That's every election. The idea that there is a direct correlation between candidates' platforms and the will of the voters is childish. Second, the american public ISN'T VOTING FOR REPUBLICANS, why is this discussion even happening am I going crazy? You elect a guy from the other party every four years, and even then you need serious levels of gerrymandering and voter suppression for Republicans to be competitive. What was happening in 2020, was the american public suddenly protrans and antiracist, but in the last four years they changed their mind? The theory doesn't even match the facts.

What is actually happening is that both parties are offering a governance that the public isn't satisfied with, so every time they get an opportunity to tell them that, they do. Obviously. Isn't it absolutely amazing to you guys that the Democrats are willing to give up on immigrants and trans people before they are willing to try any populist policy? Doesn't it tell you that what they care about above all is maintaining capitalism, as opposed to making sure that the capitalist system we are under espouses liberal values?

I largely agree, I think you underestimate quite how effective things like trans scaremongering have been over the years though, and quite deliberately injected.

Quite serious flips can happen, quite bloody quickly.

One obvious example would be Muslims in the Western world pre and post 9/11, and we’re still feeling those effects to this day. Many an average Joe is still tolerant of our Muslim brothers and sisters, but for others well, 9/11 opened up a gate of prejudice that’s never been closed.


I think it's a bit different with muslims cause there's a large milestone event there, which obviously it was wrong to blame "muslims" for but we all knew that would happen. Similarly I'm sure there's more hatred of Russians as a people in Europe today.

I'm willing to say that trans messaging isn't as effective for two reasons, one because in 2022 the same messaging was there and Republicans lost an election that they were supposed to win, and two because of the way trans messaging is used in conversations, unless you're talking to Joanne it's always basically a way of dismissing someone. You think what you said makes sense, but lol you can't even define woman, lol. I'm fairly convinced that if someone was running on, like, minecrafting the US healthcare system, and the other guy was running on transphobia, you would even get some transphobes voting for the Minecraft guy. Even within transphobes, there's only a minority that cares a lot about transphobia.

It’s been 24 years and there’s still a lot of anti-Muslim sentiment that didn’t exist before, outside of regular ‘I don’t like brown people’ racism

As per your other points, I think over time the backlash has intensified, so 2022 and the cultural lay of the land isn’t necessary 2025.

To put myself in the boots of a transphobe, it’s the difference between thinking they’re weird, I don’t like them but it’s kinda niche, I don’t encounter many versus they’re running around sexually assaulting our women in bathrooms. And I think attitudes have shifted with this deliberately cultivated attack vector.

I think you are correct in that head-to-head, however that dichotomy isn’t going to come up any time soon. Transphobia will be either mask on or off a part of the right’s general platform, and minecrafting the US healthcare system doesn’t seem likely to be a big Dem staple anytime soon.

Gun to the head, yeah I think people maybe go that way, but nobody’s going to be forced into that binary choice anytime soon.
'You'll always be the cuddly marsupial of my heart, despite the inherent flaws of your ancestry' - Squat
JimmyJRaynor
Profile Blog Joined April 2010
Canada16665 Posts
Last Edited: 2025-02-23 20:45:06
February 23 2025 20:35 GMT
#83
On February 22 2025 10:15 Nebuchad wrote:
You think what you said makes sense, but lol you can't even define woman, lol. I'm fairly convinced that if someone was running on, like, minecrafting the US healthcare system, and the other guy was running on transphobia, you would even get some transphobes voting for the Minecraft guy. Even within transphobes, there's only a minority that cares a lot about transphobia.

According to the LBGT community a biological woman is someone who doesn't buy poppers. Of course, this is a necessary but insufficient condition; so, it is not a complete definition. Lots of transwomen buy poppers.

What is transphobia any way? The security guys working at the Adult Store Retail Chain contracting my software services get called transphobes every night.
Ray Kassar To David Crane : "you're no more important to Atari than the factory workers assembling the cartridges"
Nebuchad
Profile Blog Joined December 2012
Switzerland12081 Posts
February 23 2025 23:05 GMT
#84
On February 24 2025 05:35 JimmyJRaynor wrote:
Show nested quote +
On February 22 2025 10:15 Nebuchad wrote:
You think what you said makes sense, but lol you can't even define woman, lol. I'm fairly convinced that if someone was running on, like, minecrafting the US healthcare system, and the other guy was running on transphobia, you would even get some transphobes voting for the Minecraft guy. Even within transphobes, there's only a minority that cares a lot about transphobia.

According to the LBGT community a biological woman is someone who doesn't buy poppers. Of course, this is a necessary but insufficient condition; so, it is not a complete definition. Lots of transwomen buy poppers.

What is transphobia any way? The security guys working at the Adult Store Retail Chain contracting my software services get called transphobes every night.


Obviously we won't get baited by this weak-ass post. I guess we could have a little laugh at objectivism instead?

"Objectivism's main tenets are that reality exists independently of consciousness, that human beings have direct contact with reality through sense perception (see direct and indirect realism), that one can attain objective knowledge from perception through the process of concept formation and inductive logic, that the proper moral purpose of one's life is the pursuit of one's own happiness (see rational egoism), that the only social system consistent with this morality is one that displays full respect for individual rights embodied in laissez-faire capitalism, and that the role of art in human life is to transform humans' metaphysical ideas by selective reproduction of reality into a physical form—a work of art—that one can comprehend and to which one can respond emotionally."

"reality exists independently of consciousness" => True!
"human beings have direct contact with reality through sense perception" => True!
"that one can attain objective knowledge from perception through the process of concept formation and inductive logic" => True!

"that the proper moral purpose of one's life is the pursuit of one's own happiness" => wait what? Lol? That's like a complete 180? Suddenly we don't care about the real world and how it exists, we don't care about logic, we only care about our own perceptions and we're establishing moral goals for others? So what was the point of saying all those other things earlier? Clearly the real world, concept formation and inductive logic are going to get in the way of the pursuit of our own happiness.

"that the only social system consistent with this morality is one that displays full respect for individual rights embodied in laissez-faire capitalism" => loooooooool that's such a comically silly thing to believe If we use the fact that we have direct contact with reality through sense perception, we can observe very easily that
1) capitalism isn't consistent with this morality at all, it constantly attacks the human rights of individuals for profit.
2) capitalism is obviously not the only social system consistent with this morality as there is no connexion between a capitalist class existing and the following of this morality. Let's pretend that capitalism was following that morality, if we kept the system exactly the same but removed the capitalist class, that morality would still be followed.
3) laissez-faire capitalism is obviously worse at respecting individual rights than regulated capitalism. The whole point of the regulations is to make it so that it's harder for the capitalists to behave in a way that is harmful to humans.

"and that the role of art in human life is to transform humans' metaphysical ideas by selective reproduction of reality into a physical form—a work of art—that one can comprehend and to which one can respond emotionally."
=> Completely random thing to throw in, sounds like this whole thing was thought of after a few drinks and Ayn just went on a tangent there.

I like this paragraph a lot because it portrays the comically large contradiction that is at the root of objectivism. First, a stated belief that reality matters and that logic is important. And then, seemingly with no trigger at all, we're abandoning all of this talk about logic and reality and we're veering off entirely into idealism and whatever dumb shit Ayn Rand believes about morals and capitalism, both of which have absolutely no connexion with reality or logic.

"Academic philosophers have generally paid little attention to or dismissed Rand's philosophy" => well yeah because only an idiot would pay a lot of attention to it, that makes sense :o)
"It is capitalism that is incentivizing me to lazily explain this to you while at work because I am not rewarded for generating additional value."
GreenHorizons
Profile Blog Joined April 2011
United States23068 Posts
February 24 2025 15:31 GMT
#85
On February 24 2025 08:05 Nebuchad wrote:
Show nested quote +
On February 24 2025 05:35 JimmyJRaynor wrote:
On February 22 2025 10:15 Nebuchad wrote:
You think what you said makes sense, but lol you can't even define woman, lol. I'm fairly convinced that if someone was running on, like, minecrafting the US healthcare system, and the other guy was running on transphobia, you would even get some transphobes voting for the Minecraft guy. Even within transphobes, there's only a minority that cares a lot about transphobia.

According to the LBGT community a biological woman is someone who doesn't buy poppers. Of course, this is a necessary but insufficient condition; so, it is not a complete definition. Lots of transwomen buy poppers.

What is transphobia any way? The security guys working at the Adult Store Retail Chain contracting my software services get called transphobes every night.


Obviously we won't get baited by this weak-ass post. I guess we could have a little laugh at objectivism instead?

+ Show Spoiler +
"Objectivism's main tenets are that reality exists independently of consciousness, that human beings have direct contact with reality through sense perception (see direct and indirect realism), that one can attain objective knowledge from perception through the process of concept formation and inductive logic, that the proper moral purpose of one's life is the pursuit of one's own happiness (see rational egoism), that the only social system consistent with this morality is one that displays full respect for individual rights embodied in laissez-faire capitalism, and that the role of art in human life is to transform humans' metaphysical ideas by selective reproduction of reality into a physical form—a work of art—that one can comprehend and to which one can respond emotionally."

"reality exists independently of consciousness" => True!
"human beings have direct contact with reality through sense perception" => True!
"that one can attain objective knowledge from perception through the process of concept formation and inductive logic" => True!

"that the proper moral purpose of one's life is the pursuit of one's own happiness" => wait what? Lol? That's like a complete 180? Suddenly we don't care about the real world and how it exists, we don't care about logic, we only care about our own perceptions and we're establishing moral goals for others? So what was the point of saying all those other things earlier? Clearly the real world, concept formation and inductive logic are going to get in the way of the pursuit of our own happiness.

"that the only social system consistent with this morality is one that displays full respect for individual rights embodied in laissez-faire capitalism" => loooooooool that's such a comically silly thing to believe If we use the fact that we have direct contact with reality through sense perception, we can observe very easily that
1) capitalism isn't consistent with this morality at all, it constantly attacks the human rights of individuals for profit.
2) capitalism is obviously not the only social system consistent with this morality as there is no connexion between a capitalist class existing and the following of this morality. Let's pretend that capitalism was following that morality, if we kept the system exactly the same but removed the capitalist class, that morality would still be followed.
3) laissez-faire capitalism is obviously worse at respecting individual rights than regulated capitalism. The whole point of the regulations is to make it so that it's harder for the capitalists to behave in a way that is harmful to humans.

"and that the role of art in human life is to transform humans' metaphysical ideas by selective reproduction of reality into a physical form—a work of art—that one can comprehend and to which one can respond emotionally."
=> Completely random thing to throw in, sounds like this whole thing was thought of after a few drinks and Ayn just went on a tangent there.

I like this paragraph a lot because it portrays the comically large contradiction that is at the root of objectivism. First, a stated belief that reality matters and that logic is important. And then, seemingly with no trigger at all, we're abandoning all of this talk about logic and reality and we're veering off entirely into idealism and whatever dumb shit Ayn Rand believes about morals and capitalism, both of which have absolutely no connexion with reality or logic.


"Academic philosophers have generally paid little attention to or dismissed Rand's philosophy" => well yeah because only an idiot would pay a lot of attention to it, that makes sense :o)
Well said and lol.

You read/reading anything good lately?
"People like to look at history and think 'If that was me back then, I would have...' We're living through history, and the truth is, whatever you are doing now is probably what you would have done then" "Scratch a Liberal..."
Nebuchad
Profile Blog Joined December 2012
Switzerland12081 Posts
February 24 2025 17:08 GMT
#86
Eh, not that recently I'm afraid. Last I read was probably The Shock Doctrine, which I've had for a while but hadn't taken the time to finish. But that must have been at least a year ago.
"It is capitalism that is incentivizing me to lazily explain this to you while at work because I am not rewarded for generating additional value."
GreenHorizons
Profile Blog Joined April 2011
United States23068 Posts
February 26 2025 15:55 GMT
#87
On February 25 2025 02:08 Nebuchad wrote:
Eh, not that recently I'm afraid. Last I read was probably The Shock Doctrine, which I've had for a while but hadn't taken the time to finish. But that must have been at least a year ago.

You read the bit on Project Cybersyn by chance? Or have a preexisting familiarity with the project generally?
"People like to look at history and think 'If that was me back then, I would have...' We're living through history, and the truth is, whatever you are doing now is probably what you would have done then" "Scratch a Liberal..."
Nebuchad
Profile Blog Joined December 2012
Switzerland12081 Posts
February 26 2025 18:56 GMT
#88
No, never heard of this. I'll check it out
"It is capitalism that is incentivizing me to lazily explain this to you while at work because I am not rewarded for generating additional value."
GreenHorizons
Profile Blog Joined April 2011
United States23068 Posts
February 26 2025 20:17 GMT
#89
On February 27 2025 03:56 Nebuchad wrote:
No, never heard of this. I'll check it out

Should be mandatory reading for people that ask some variation of the question "how come socialism never works huh!?"
"People like to look at history and think 'If that was me back then, I would have...' We're living through history, and the truth is, whatever you are doing now is probably what you would have done then" "Scratch a Liberal..."
WombaT
Profile Blog Joined May 2010
Northern Ireland24825 Posts
February 27 2025 00:40 GMT
#90
On February 27 2025 05:17 GreenHorizons wrote:
Show nested quote +
On February 27 2025 03:56 Nebuchad wrote:
No, never heard of this. I'll check it out

Should be mandatory reading for people that ask some variation of the question "how come socialism never works huh!?"

One of a rather long list, albeit a blooming depressing one. Pretty fascinating, first I’d heard of this one!

'You'll always be the cuddly marsupial of my heart, despite the inherent flaws of your ancestry' - Squat
GreenHorizons
Profile Blog Joined April 2011
United States23068 Posts
February 27 2025 01:38 GMT
#91
On February 27 2025 09:40 WombaT wrote:
Show nested quote +
On February 27 2025 05:17 GreenHorizons wrote:
On February 27 2025 03:56 Nebuchad wrote:
No, never heard of this. I'll check it out

Should be mandatory reading for people that ask some variation of the question "how come socialism never works huh!?"

One of a rather long list, albeit a blooming depressing one. Pretty fascinating, first I’d heard of this one!

I'm okay with reading it ~1 minute at a time, then sharing some thoughts. I think we can all manage that?

In 1970 Chilean voters opted to pursue a democratic road to socialist change under the guidance of Salvador Allende. As Chile’s first democratically elected Socialist president, Allende proposed a political third way, something different from the politics and ideology of either the United States or the Soviet Union during the Cold War.

Allende wanted to make Chile a socialist nation, but he also wanted change to occur peacefully and in a way that respected the nation’s existing democratic processes and institutions. Moving property ownership from foreign multinationals and the Chilean oligarchy to the state, redistributing income, and creating mechanisms for worker participation were among the top priorities of the Allende government. Among the democratic institutions that Allende wished to preserve were respect for election results, individual freedoms (such as the freedom of thought, speech, press, and assembly), and the rule of law. His commitment to socialist change through constitutional means set Chile’s socialism apart from that of Cuba or the Soviet Union. His platform became known as the “Chilean road to socialism.”

Chile was an exceptional nation within Latin America. From 1932 to 1973 Chile boasted the longest period of uninterrupted democratic rule in Latin America. Allende’s outward commitment to peaceful socialist change and the free expression of ideas stood in sharp contrast to the political situation in neighboring countries such as Argentina and Brazil. In 1970 these two nations had repressive military governments that had seized control, ostensibly to stop the threat of communism. Chile was also a battleground in the global cold war and a focus of U.S. attention. From 1962 to 1969 Chile received more than a billion dollars in U.S. aid, more than any other nation in Latin America, as part of the Alliance for Progress. The United States believed such levels of aid would help raise living standards for Chileans and thus stop members of the poor and working classes from turning to communism.


thereader.mitpress.mit.edu

The first thing that leaps out to me is just how few people have heard of it or the context it existed in.

Poll: Familiar with Project Cybersyn/Allende before reading about them here?

You must be logged in to vote in this poll.

☐ Yes, Both
☐ No, Neither
☐ Yes Cybersyn
☐ Yes Allende


"People like to look at history and think 'If that was me back then, I would have...' We're living through history, and the truth is, whatever you are doing now is probably what you would have done then" "Scratch a Liberal..."
WombaT
Profile Blog Joined May 2010
Northern Ireland24825 Posts
February 28 2025 14:46 GMT
#92
Yeah I’m broadly familiar with Allende, not this specific program. Interesting read

One has to ask the question that if socialism is doomed to fail, why not leave it to fail?

If there’s a genuinely socialist nation that wanted socialism, was left to implement it and that tanked without outside interference, I’ve yet to encounter it.

Maybe there is one, as I say, I just haven’t encountered it.

It’s like saying ‘being a nice guy’ can’t work based on a school where ruthless bullies beat the shit out of every nice guy in the playground.

In an alternative universe where being a nice guy had failed millions of times with no such beatings, then yeah maybe you can parse that data in a certain way.
'You'll always be the cuddly marsupial of my heart, despite the inherent flaws of your ancestry' - Squat
GreenHorizons
Profile Blog Joined April 2011
United States23068 Posts
Last Edited: 2025-02-28 16:20:36
February 28 2025 15:52 GMT
#93
On February 28 2025 23:46 WombaT wrote:
Yeah I’m broadly familiar with Allende, not this specific program. Interesting read

One has to ask the question that if socialism is doomed to fail, why not leave it to fail?

+ Show Spoiler +
If there’s a genuinely socialist nation that wanted socialism, was left to implement it and that tanked without outside interference, I’ve yet to encounter it.

Maybe there is one, as I say, I just haven’t encountered it.

It’s like saying ‘being a nice guy’ can’t work based on a school where ruthless bullies beat the shit out of every nice guy in the playground.

In an alternative universe where being a nice guy had failed millions of times with no such beatings, then yeah maybe you can parse that data in a certain way.

The simple answer seems to be "Because it isn't". That anyone working from that narrative is either too oblivious or operating in bad faith.

Not sure how much you read, but there's plenty in there that can help us think about the issues that we're dealing with today.

EDIT: Just from the first minute there, it is an example of how the US explicitly opposes socialism/communism more than authoritarianism. It also opposes socialism/communism more than than it supports democracy. Given the choice (or by insisting on taking it) between democratic socialism and fascistic capitalism, it repeatedly and unambiguously chooses the latter in a bipartisan fashion. It can help us recognize that the US is probably the biggest threat to human rights on the planet right now.
"People like to look at history and think 'If that was me back then, I would have...' We're living through history, and the truth is, whatever you are doing now is probably what you would have done then" "Scratch a Liberal..."
GreenHorizons
Profile Blog Joined April 2011
United States23068 Posts
March 01 2025 17:34 GMT
#94
On February 27 2025 10:38 GreenHorizons wrote:
Show nested quote +
On February 27 2025 09:40 WombaT wrote:
On February 27 2025 05:17 GreenHorizons wrote:
On February 27 2025 03:56 Nebuchad wrote:
No, never heard of this. I'll check it out

Should be mandatory reading for people that ask some variation of the question "how come socialism never works huh!?"

One of a rather long list, albeit a blooming depressing one. Pretty fascinating, first I’d heard of this one!

I'm okay with reading it ~1 minute at a time, then sharing some thoughts. I think we can all manage that?

Show nested quote +
In 1970 Chilean voters opted to pursue a democratic road to socialist change under the guidance of Salvador Allende. As Chile’s first democratically elected Socialist president, Allende proposed a political third way, something different from the politics and ideology of either the United States or the Soviet Union during the Cold War.

Allende wanted to make Chile a socialist nation, but he also wanted change to occur peacefully and in a way that respected the nation’s existing democratic processes and institutions. Moving property ownership from foreign multinationals and the Chilean oligarchy to the state, redistributing income, and creating mechanisms for worker participation were among the top priorities of the Allende government. Among the democratic institutions that Allende wished to preserve were respect for election results, individual freedoms (such as the freedom of thought, speech, press, and assembly), and the rule of law. His commitment to socialist change through constitutional means set Chile’s socialism apart from that of Cuba or the Soviet Union. His platform became known as the “Chilean road to socialism.”

Chile was an exceptional nation within Latin America. From 1932 to 1973 Chile boasted the longest period of uninterrupted democratic rule in Latin America. Allende’s outward commitment to peaceful socialist change and the free expression of ideas stood in sharp contrast to the political situation in neighboring countries such as Argentina and Brazil. In 1970 these two nations had repressive military governments that had seized control, ostensibly to stop the threat of communism. Chile was also a battleground in the global cold war and a focus of U.S. attention. From 1962 to 1969 Chile received more than a billion dollars in U.S. aid, more than any other nation in Latin America, as part of the Alliance for Progress. The United States believed such levels of aid would help raise living standards for Chileans and thus stop members of the poor and working classes from turning to communism.


thereader.mitpress.mit.edu

The first thing that leaps out to me is just how few people have heard of it or the context it existed in.

Poll: Familiar with Project Cybersyn/Allende before reading about them here?

You must be logged in to vote in this poll.

☐ Yes, Both
☐ No, Neither
☐ Yes Cybersyn
☐ Yes Allende





People are welcome to share their thoughts about the previous minute but I'm also going to move on to the next minute. The first bit is something that came to my mind while people were talking about Russia influencing US elections. The second bit is our introduction to the thinking behind starting Cybersyn

The United States responded to Allende’s election by adopting a “non-overt course” to prevent Chile from turning socialist. This included funding government opposition parties and opposition-owned media outlets and sabotaging the Chilean economy. For example, the United States established an invisible financial blockade and significantly reduced its aid to Chile. It also used its substantial influence to cut international and bilateral aid and private bank credit to Chile, prevented Allende from renegotiating the national debt he had inherited from his predecessor, and decreased the value of U.S. exports to Chile. Allende’s commitment to changing Chile’s long-standing social and economic structures also met with strong opposition from members of Chile’s privileged classes. Nevertheless, Chile’s long and solid commitment to its democratic institutions led Chileans and onlookers from around the world to wonder whether Allende and his government might succeed in pioneering a new political model.

This political experiment set the stage for an innovative and ambitious technological experiment, known as Project Cybersyn. Bringing Chile’s most important industries under state control constituted a key plank in Allende’s political platform, and it soon challenged the management capabilities of the Allende government. Members of the Chilean government thought that electronic computers and the interdisciplinary science of cybernetics might help the government gain control over the country’s economic transition.

An Unexpected Invitation

In July 1971, the British cybernetician Stafford Beer received an unexpected letter from Chile. Its contents would dramatically change Beer’s life. The writer was a young Chilean engineer named Fernando Flores, who was working for the government of newly elected Socialist president Salvador Allende. Flores worked for the Chilean State Development Corporation, the agency responsible for leading the nationalization effort. Although Flores was only 28 when he wrote Beer, he held the third-highest position in the development agency and a leadership role in the Chilean nationalization process. Flores wrote that he was familiar with Beer’s work in management cybernetics and was “now in a position from which it is possible to implement on a national scale — at which cybernetic thinking becomes a necessity — scientific views on management and organization.” Flores asked Beer for advice on how to apply cybernetics to the management of the Chilean economy, which was expanding quickly because of Allende’s aggressive nationalization policy.


thereader.mitpress.mit.edu
"People like to look at history and think 'If that was me back then, I would have...' We're living through history, and the truth is, whatever you are doing now is probably what you would have done then" "Scratch a Liberal..."
dastyark9mak300
Profile Joined March 2025
1 Post
March 01 2025 19:48 GMT
#95
--- Nuked ---
Fleetfeet
Profile Blog Joined May 2014
Canada2526 Posts
March 01 2025 21:17 GMT
#96
As someone who listens more than speaks, just chiming in to say thank you for taking the time to put this together, and thanks to those who have contributed so far.
WombaT
Profile Blog Joined May 2010
Northern Ireland24825 Posts
March 01 2025 22:01 GMT
#97
On March 02 2025 02:34 GreenHorizons wrote:
Show nested quote +
On February 27 2025 10:38 GreenHorizons wrote:
On February 27 2025 09:40 WombaT wrote:
On February 27 2025 05:17 GreenHorizons wrote:
On February 27 2025 03:56 Nebuchad wrote:
No, never heard of this. I'll check it out

Should be mandatory reading for people that ask some variation of the question "how come socialism never works huh!?"

One of a rather long list, albeit a blooming depressing one. Pretty fascinating, first I’d heard of this one!

I'm okay with reading it ~1 minute at a time, then sharing some thoughts. I think we can all manage that?

In 1970 Chilean voters opted to pursue a democratic road to socialist change under the guidance of Salvador Allende. As Chile’s first democratically elected Socialist president, Allende proposed a political third way, something different from the politics and ideology of either the United States or the Soviet Union during the Cold War.

Allende wanted to make Chile a socialist nation, but he also wanted change to occur peacefully and in a way that respected the nation’s existing democratic processes and institutions. Moving property ownership from foreign multinationals and the Chilean oligarchy to the state, redistributing income, and creating mechanisms for worker participation were among the top priorities of the Allende government. Among the democratic institutions that Allende wished to preserve were respect for election results, individual freedoms (such as the freedom of thought, speech, press, and assembly), and the rule of law. His commitment to socialist change through constitutional means set Chile’s socialism apart from that of Cuba or the Soviet Union. His platform became known as the “Chilean road to socialism.”

Chile was an exceptional nation within Latin America. From 1932 to 1973 Chile boasted the longest period of uninterrupted democratic rule in Latin America. Allende’s outward commitment to peaceful socialist change and the free expression of ideas stood in sharp contrast to the political situation in neighboring countries such as Argentina and Brazil. In 1970 these two nations had repressive military governments that had seized control, ostensibly to stop the threat of communism. Chile was also a battleground in the global cold war and a focus of U.S. attention. From 1962 to 1969 Chile received more than a billion dollars in U.S. aid, more than any other nation in Latin America, as part of the Alliance for Progress. The United States believed such levels of aid would help raise living standards for Chileans and thus stop members of the poor and working classes from turning to communism.


thereader.mitpress.mit.edu

The first thing that leaps out to me is just how few people have heard of it or the context it existed in.

Poll: Familiar with Project Cybersyn/Allende before reading about them here?

You must be logged in to vote in this poll.

☐ Yes, Both
☐ No, Neither
☐ Yes Cybersyn
☐ Yes Allende





People are welcome to share their thoughts about the previous minute but I'm also going to move on to the next minute. The first bit is something that came to my mind while people were talking about Russia influencing US elections. The second bit is our introduction to the thinking behind starting Cybersyn

Show nested quote +
The United States responded to Allende’s election by adopting a “non-overt course” to prevent Chile from turning socialist. This included funding government opposition parties and opposition-owned media outlets and sabotaging the Chilean economy. For example, the United States established an invisible financial blockade and significantly reduced its aid to Chile. It also used its substantial influence to cut international and bilateral aid and private bank credit to Chile, prevented Allende from renegotiating the national debt he had inherited from his predecessor, and decreased the value of U.S. exports to Chile. Allende’s commitment to changing Chile’s long-standing social and economic structures also met with strong opposition from members of Chile’s privileged classes. Nevertheless, Chile’s long and solid commitment to its democratic institutions led Chileans and onlookers from around the world to wonder whether Allende and his government might succeed in pioneering a new political model.

This political experiment set the stage for an innovative and ambitious technological experiment, known as Project Cybersyn. Bringing Chile’s most important industries under state control constituted a key plank in Allende’s political platform, and it soon challenged the management capabilities of the Allende government. Members of the Chilean government thought that electronic computers and the interdisciplinary science of cybernetics might help the government gain control over the country’s economic transition.

An Unexpected Invitation

In July 1971, the British cybernetician Stafford Beer received an unexpected letter from Chile. Its contents would dramatically change Beer’s life. The writer was a young Chilean engineer named Fernando Flores, who was working for the government of newly elected Socialist president Salvador Allende. Flores worked for the Chilean State Development Corporation, the agency responsible for leading the nationalization effort. Although Flores was only 28 when he wrote Beer, he held the third-highest position in the development agency and a leadership role in the Chilean nationalization process. Flores wrote that he was familiar with Beer’s work in management cybernetics and was “now in a position from which it is possible to implement on a national scale — at which cybernetic thinking becomes a necessity — scientific views on management and organization.” Flores asked Beer for advice on how to apply cybernetics to the management of the Chilean economy, which was expanding quickly because of Allende’s aggressive nationalization policy.


thereader.mitpress.mit.edu

I find this especially interesting as I’ve pondered ‘with modern tools, specifically IT solutionsare some of the issues in trying to plan elements of the economy, more resolvable’?

But apparently folks were trying this half a century ago, it’s extremely interesting. Thanks for pushing me onto it.

The thing I find somewhat lacking in this article is how successful these efforts were, but also I guess the whole deposition of Allende saw to that overall.

I feel we’re almost in a paradoxical time. It feels to me there’s never been a better time to give it a proper shot, but yet we’re seemingly as far from it as ever. A shame if you ask me.

And I really must say I don’t fully understand why. I grasp many elements of why, but in totality less so
'You'll always be the cuddly marsupial of my heart, despite the inherent flaws of your ancestry' - Squat
GreenHorizons
Profile Blog Joined April 2011
United States23068 Posts
March 03 2025 21:03 GMT
#98
On March 02 2025 07:01 WombaT wrote:
Show nested quote +
On March 02 2025 02:34 GreenHorizons wrote:
On February 27 2025 10:38 GreenHorizons wrote:
On February 27 2025 09:40 WombaT wrote:
On February 27 2025 05:17 GreenHorizons wrote:
On February 27 2025 03:56 Nebuchad wrote:
No, never heard of this. I'll check it out

Should be mandatory reading for people that ask some variation of the question "how come socialism never works huh!?"

One of a rather long list, albeit a blooming depressing one. Pretty fascinating, first I’d heard of this one!

I'm okay with reading it ~1 minute at a time, then sharing some thoughts. I think we can all manage that?

In 1970 Chilean voters opted to pursue a democratic road to socialist change under the guidance of Salvador Allende. As Chile’s first democratically elected Socialist president, Allende proposed a political third way, something different from the politics and ideology of either the United States or the Soviet Union during the Cold War.

Allende wanted to make Chile a socialist nation, but he also wanted change to occur peacefully and in a way that respected the nation’s existing democratic processes and institutions. Moving property ownership from foreign multinationals and the Chilean oligarchy to the state, redistributing income, and creating mechanisms for worker participation were among the top priorities of the Allende government. Among the democratic institutions that Allende wished to preserve were respect for election results, individual freedoms (such as the freedom of thought, speech, press, and assembly), and the rule of law. His commitment to socialist change through constitutional means set Chile’s socialism apart from that of Cuba or the Soviet Union. His platform became known as the “Chilean road to socialism.”

Chile was an exceptional nation within Latin America. From 1932 to 1973 Chile boasted the longest period of uninterrupted democratic rule in Latin America. Allende’s outward commitment to peaceful socialist change and the free expression of ideas stood in sharp contrast to the political situation in neighboring countries such as Argentina and Brazil. In 1970 these two nations had repressive military governments that had seized control, ostensibly to stop the threat of communism. Chile was also a battleground in the global cold war and a focus of U.S. attention. From 1962 to 1969 Chile received more than a billion dollars in U.S. aid, more than any other nation in Latin America, as part of the Alliance for Progress. The United States believed such levels of aid would help raise living standards for Chileans and thus stop members of the poor and working classes from turning to communism.


thereader.mitpress.mit.edu

The first thing that leaps out to me is just how few people have heard of it or the context it existed in.

Poll: Familiar with Project Cybersyn/Allende before reading about them here?

You must be logged in to vote in this poll.

☐ Yes, Both
☐ No, Neither
☐ Yes Cybersyn
☐ Yes Allende





People are welcome to share their thoughts about the previous minute but I'm also going to move on to the next minute. The first bit is something that came to my mind while people were talking about Russia influencing US elections. The second bit is our introduction to the thinking behind starting Cybersyn

The United States responded to Allende’s election by adopting a “non-overt course” to prevent Chile from turning socialist. This included funding government opposition parties and opposition-owned media outlets and sabotaging the Chilean economy. For example, the United States established an invisible financial blockade and significantly reduced its aid to Chile. It also used its substantial influence to cut international and bilateral aid and private bank credit to Chile, prevented Allende from renegotiating the national debt he had inherited from his predecessor, and decreased the value of U.S. exports to Chile. Allende’s commitment to changing Chile’s long-standing social and economic structures also met with strong opposition from members of Chile’s privileged classes. Nevertheless, Chile’s long and solid commitment to its democratic institutions led Chileans and onlookers from around the world to wonder whether Allende and his government might succeed in pioneering a new political model.

This political experiment set the stage for an innovative and ambitious technological experiment, known as Project Cybersyn. Bringing Chile’s most important industries under state control constituted a key plank in Allende’s political platform, and it soon challenged the management capabilities of the Allende government. Members of the Chilean government thought that electronic computers and the interdisciplinary science of cybernetics might help the government gain control over the country’s economic transition.

An Unexpected Invitation

In July 1971, the British cybernetician Stafford Beer received an unexpected letter from Chile. Its contents would dramatically change Beer’s life. The writer was a young Chilean engineer named Fernando Flores, who was working for the government of newly elected Socialist president Salvador Allende. Flores worked for the Chilean State Development Corporation, the agency responsible for leading the nationalization effort. Although Flores was only 28 when he wrote Beer, he held the third-highest position in the development agency and a leadership role in the Chilean nationalization process. Flores wrote that he was familiar with Beer’s work in management cybernetics and was “now in a position from which it is possible to implement on a national scale — at which cybernetic thinking becomes a necessity — scientific views on management and organization.” Flores asked Beer for advice on how to apply cybernetics to the management of the Chilean economy, which was expanding quickly because of Allende’s aggressive nationalization policy.


thereader.mitpress.mit.edu

I find this especially interesting as I’ve pondered ‘with modern tools, specifically IT solutionsare some of the issues in trying to plan elements of the economy, more resolvable’?

But apparently folks were trying this half a century ago, it’s extremely interesting. Thanks for pushing me onto it.

The thing I find somewhat lacking in this article is how successful these efforts were, but also I guess the whole deposition of Allende saw to that overall.

I feel we’re almost in a paradoxical time. It feels to me there’s never been a better time to give it a proper shot, but yet we’re seemingly as far from it as ever. A shame if you ask me.

And I really must say I don’t fully understand why. I grasp many elements of why, but in totality less so

In some ways it is as simple as people just not stopping to consider how all of the data social media, online shopping, google, etc. could be used to better provide what we actually want/need as humans instead of being used to deliver hundreds of billions of dollars of systemic professional psychological warfare to convince us we're bad humans if we aren't constantly consuming. We're failing as individuals if we don't have the latest models of the latest useless things that identify us as part of the right group under capitalism. That we're failing society if we don't spend every spare moment measuring and judging everyone around us by those metrics.

I feel like the Dodge Ram Super Bowl commercial

+ Show Spoiler +


Juxtaposed to what MLK Jr actually thought about something like the commercial is a good example of what I'm talking about.

+ Show Spoiler +
"People like to look at history and think 'If that was me back then, I would have...' We're living through history, and the truth is, whatever you are doing now is probably what you would have done then" "Scratch a Liberal..."
WombaT
Profile Blog Joined May 2010
Northern Ireland24825 Posts
March 03 2025 21:17 GMT
#99
On March 04 2025 06:03 GreenHorizons wrote:
Show nested quote +
On March 02 2025 07:01 WombaT wrote:
On March 02 2025 02:34 GreenHorizons wrote:
On February 27 2025 10:38 GreenHorizons wrote:
On February 27 2025 09:40 WombaT wrote:
On February 27 2025 05:17 GreenHorizons wrote:
On February 27 2025 03:56 Nebuchad wrote:
No, never heard of this. I'll check it out

Should be mandatory reading for people that ask some variation of the question "how come socialism never works huh!?"

One of a rather long list, albeit a blooming depressing one. Pretty fascinating, first I’d heard of this one!

I'm okay with reading it ~1 minute at a time, then sharing some thoughts. I think we can all manage that?

In 1970 Chilean voters opted to pursue a democratic road to socialist change under the guidance of Salvador Allende. As Chile’s first democratically elected Socialist president, Allende proposed a political third way, something different from the politics and ideology of either the United States or the Soviet Union during the Cold War.

Allende wanted to make Chile a socialist nation, but he also wanted change to occur peacefully and in a way that respected the nation’s existing democratic processes and institutions. Moving property ownership from foreign multinationals and the Chilean oligarchy to the state, redistributing income, and creating mechanisms for worker participation were among the top priorities of the Allende government. Among the democratic institutions that Allende wished to preserve were respect for election results, individual freedoms (such as the freedom of thought, speech, press, and assembly), and the rule of law. His commitment to socialist change through constitutional means set Chile’s socialism apart from that of Cuba or the Soviet Union. His platform became known as the “Chilean road to socialism.”

Chile was an exceptional nation within Latin America. From 1932 to 1973 Chile boasted the longest period of uninterrupted democratic rule in Latin America. Allende’s outward commitment to peaceful socialist change and the free expression of ideas stood in sharp contrast to the political situation in neighboring countries such as Argentina and Brazil. In 1970 these two nations had repressive military governments that had seized control, ostensibly to stop the threat of communism. Chile was also a battleground in the global cold war and a focus of U.S. attention. From 1962 to 1969 Chile received more than a billion dollars in U.S. aid, more than any other nation in Latin America, as part of the Alliance for Progress. The United States believed such levels of aid would help raise living standards for Chileans and thus stop members of the poor and working classes from turning to communism.


thereader.mitpress.mit.edu

The first thing that leaps out to me is just how few people have heard of it or the context it existed in.

Poll: Familiar with Project Cybersyn/Allende before reading about them here?

You must be logged in to vote in this poll.

☐ Yes, Both
☐ No, Neither
☐ Yes Cybersyn
☐ Yes Allende





People are welcome to share their thoughts about the previous minute but I'm also going to move on to the next minute. The first bit is something that came to my mind while people were talking about Russia influencing US elections. The second bit is our introduction to the thinking behind starting Cybersyn

The United States responded to Allende’s election by adopting a “non-overt course” to prevent Chile from turning socialist. This included funding government opposition parties and opposition-owned media outlets and sabotaging the Chilean economy. For example, the United States established an invisible financial blockade and significantly reduced its aid to Chile. It also used its substantial influence to cut international and bilateral aid and private bank credit to Chile, prevented Allende from renegotiating the national debt he had inherited from his predecessor, and decreased the value of U.S. exports to Chile. Allende’s commitment to changing Chile’s long-standing social and economic structures also met with strong opposition from members of Chile’s privileged classes. Nevertheless, Chile’s long and solid commitment to its democratic institutions led Chileans and onlookers from around the world to wonder whether Allende and his government might succeed in pioneering a new political model.

This political experiment set the stage for an innovative and ambitious technological experiment, known as Project Cybersyn. Bringing Chile’s most important industries under state control constituted a key plank in Allende’s political platform, and it soon challenged the management capabilities of the Allende government. Members of the Chilean government thought that electronic computers and the interdisciplinary science of cybernetics might help the government gain control over the country’s economic transition.

An Unexpected Invitation

In July 1971, the British cybernetician Stafford Beer received an unexpected letter from Chile. Its contents would dramatically change Beer’s life. The writer was a young Chilean engineer named Fernando Flores, who was working for the government of newly elected Socialist president Salvador Allende. Flores worked for the Chilean State Development Corporation, the agency responsible for leading the nationalization effort. Although Flores was only 28 when he wrote Beer, he held the third-highest position in the development agency and a leadership role in the Chilean nationalization process. Flores wrote that he was familiar with Beer’s work in management cybernetics and was “now in a position from which it is possible to implement on a national scale — at which cybernetic thinking becomes a necessity — scientific views on management and organization.” Flores asked Beer for advice on how to apply cybernetics to the management of the Chilean economy, which was expanding quickly because of Allende’s aggressive nationalization policy.


thereader.mitpress.mit.edu

I find this especially interesting as I’ve pondered ‘with modern tools, specifically IT solutionsare some of the issues in trying to plan elements of the economy, more resolvable’?

But apparently folks were trying this half a century ago, it’s extremely interesting. Thanks for pushing me onto it.

The thing I find somewhat lacking in this article is how successful these efforts were, but also I guess the whole deposition of Allende saw to that overall.

I feel we’re almost in a paradoxical time. It feels to me there’s never been a better time to give it a proper shot, but yet we’re seemingly as far from it as ever. A shame if you ask me.

And I really must say I don’t fully understand why. I grasp many elements of why, but in totality less so

In some ways it is as simple as people just not stopping to consider how all of the data social media, online shopping, google, etc. could be used to better provide what we actually want/need as humans instead of being used to deliver hundreds of billions of dollars of systemic professional psychological warfare to convince us we're bad humans if we aren't constantly consuming. We're failing as individuals if we don't have the latest models of the latest useless things that identify us as part of the right group under capitalism. That we're failing society if we don't spend every spare moment measuring and judging everyone around us by those metrics.

I feel like the Dodge Ram Super Bowl commercial

+ Show Spoiler +
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QUsz51Ep39U&t=1s


Juxtaposed to what MLK Jr actually thought about something like the commercial is a good example of what I'm talking about.

+ Show Spoiler +
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l_v1h6Zoi-Q

That’s the odd thing. Ya ask people what they really value, it tends not to be that.

But, much behaviour says otherwise.
'You'll always be the cuddly marsupial of my heart, despite the inherent flaws of your ancestry' - Squat
GreenHorizons
Profile Blog Joined April 2011
United States23068 Posts
March 04 2025 00:44 GMT
#100
On March 04 2025 06:17 WombaT wrote:
Show nested quote +
On March 04 2025 06:03 GreenHorizons wrote:
On March 02 2025 07:01 WombaT wrote:
On March 02 2025 02:34 GreenHorizons wrote:
On February 27 2025 10:38 GreenHorizons wrote:
On February 27 2025 09:40 WombaT wrote:
On February 27 2025 05:17 GreenHorizons wrote:
On February 27 2025 03:56 Nebuchad wrote:
No, never heard of this. I'll check it out

Should be mandatory reading for people that ask some variation of the question "how come socialism never works huh!?"

One of a rather long list, albeit a blooming depressing one. Pretty fascinating, first I’d heard of this one!

I'm okay with reading it ~1 minute at a time, then sharing some thoughts. I think we can all manage that?

In 1970 Chilean voters opted to pursue a democratic road to socialist change under the guidance of Salvador Allende. As Chile’s first democratically elected Socialist president, Allende proposed a political third way, something different from the politics and ideology of either the United States or the Soviet Union during the Cold War.

Allende wanted to make Chile a socialist nation, but he also wanted change to occur peacefully and in a way that respected the nation’s existing democratic processes and institutions. Moving property ownership from foreign multinationals and the Chilean oligarchy to the state, redistributing income, and creating mechanisms for worker participation were among the top priorities of the Allende government. Among the democratic institutions that Allende wished to preserve were respect for election results, individual freedoms (such as the freedom of thought, speech, press, and assembly), and the rule of law. His commitment to socialist change through constitutional means set Chile’s socialism apart from that of Cuba or the Soviet Union. His platform became known as the “Chilean road to socialism.”

Chile was an exceptional nation within Latin America. From 1932 to 1973 Chile boasted the longest period of uninterrupted democratic rule in Latin America. Allende’s outward commitment to peaceful socialist change and the free expression of ideas stood in sharp contrast to the political situation in neighboring countries such as Argentina and Brazil. In 1970 these two nations had repressive military governments that had seized control, ostensibly to stop the threat of communism. Chile was also a battleground in the global cold war and a focus of U.S. attention. From 1962 to 1969 Chile received more than a billion dollars in U.S. aid, more than any other nation in Latin America, as part of the Alliance for Progress. The United States believed such levels of aid would help raise living standards for Chileans and thus stop members of the poor and working classes from turning to communism.


thereader.mitpress.mit.edu

The first thing that leaps out to me is just how few people have heard of it or the context it existed in.

Poll: Familiar with Project Cybersyn/Allende before reading about them here?

You must be logged in to vote in this poll.

☐ Yes, Both
☐ No, Neither
☐ Yes Cybersyn
☐ Yes Allende





People are welcome to share their thoughts about the previous minute but I'm also going to move on to the next minute. The first bit is something that came to my mind while people were talking about Russia influencing US elections. The second bit is our introduction to the thinking behind starting Cybersyn

The United States responded to Allende’s election by adopting a “non-overt course” to prevent Chile from turning socialist. This included funding government opposition parties and opposition-owned media outlets and sabotaging the Chilean economy. For example, the United States established an invisible financial blockade and significantly reduced its aid to Chile. It also used its substantial influence to cut international and bilateral aid and private bank credit to Chile, prevented Allende from renegotiating the national debt he had inherited from his predecessor, and decreased the value of U.S. exports to Chile. Allende’s commitment to changing Chile’s long-standing social and economic structures also met with strong opposition from members of Chile’s privileged classes. Nevertheless, Chile’s long and solid commitment to its democratic institutions led Chileans and onlookers from around the world to wonder whether Allende and his government might succeed in pioneering a new political model.

This political experiment set the stage for an innovative and ambitious technological experiment, known as Project Cybersyn. Bringing Chile’s most important industries under state control constituted a key plank in Allende’s political platform, and it soon challenged the management capabilities of the Allende government. Members of the Chilean government thought that electronic computers and the interdisciplinary science of cybernetics might help the government gain control over the country’s economic transition.

An Unexpected Invitation

In July 1971, the British cybernetician Stafford Beer received an unexpected letter from Chile. Its contents would dramatically change Beer’s life. The writer was a young Chilean engineer named Fernando Flores, who was working for the government of newly elected Socialist president Salvador Allende. Flores worked for the Chilean State Development Corporation, the agency responsible for leading the nationalization effort. Although Flores was only 28 when he wrote Beer, he held the third-highest position in the development agency and a leadership role in the Chilean nationalization process. Flores wrote that he was familiar with Beer’s work in management cybernetics and was “now in a position from which it is possible to implement on a national scale — at which cybernetic thinking becomes a necessity — scientific views on management and organization.” Flores asked Beer for advice on how to apply cybernetics to the management of the Chilean economy, which was expanding quickly because of Allende’s aggressive nationalization policy.


thereader.mitpress.mit.edu

I find this especially interesting as I’ve pondered ‘with modern tools, specifically IT solutionsare some of the issues in trying to plan elements of the economy, more resolvable’?

But apparently folks were trying this half a century ago, it’s extremely interesting. Thanks for pushing me onto it.

The thing I find somewhat lacking in this article is how successful these efforts were, but also I guess the whole deposition of Allende saw to that overall.

I feel we’re almost in a paradoxical time. It feels to me there’s never been a better time to give it a proper shot, but yet we’re seemingly as far from it as ever. A shame if you ask me.

And I really must say I don’t fully understand why. I grasp many elements of why, but in totality less so

In some ways it is as simple as people just not stopping to consider how all of the data social media, online shopping, google, etc. could be used to better provide what we actually want/need as humans instead of being used to deliver hundreds of billions of dollars of systemic professional psychological warfare to convince us we're bad humans if we aren't constantly consuming. We're failing as individuals if we don't have the latest models of the latest useless things that identify us as part of the right group under capitalism. That we're failing society if we don't spend every spare moment measuring and judging everyone around us by those metrics.

I feel like the Dodge Ram Super Bowl commercial

+ Show Spoiler +
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QUsz51Ep39U&t=1s


Juxtaposed to what MLK Jr actually thought about something like the commercial is a good example of what I'm talking about.

+ Show Spoiler +
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l_v1h6Zoi-Q

That’s the odd thing. Ya ask people what they really value, it tends not to be that.

But, much behaviour says otherwise.

Fighting through decades of ubiquitous, scientifically engineered, psychological/behavioral manipulation reinforced with trillions of dollars in propaganda is unsurprisingly pretty tough both individually and societally.

A lot of people's identity is wrapped up in their perceived value based on the system as it is. Dramatically changing the system threatens their personal identities and self-perception in potentially catastrophic ways.
"People like to look at history and think 'If that was me back then, I would have...' We're living through history, and the truth is, whatever you are doing now is probably what you would have done then" "Scratch a Liberal..."
Prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Next All
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
BSL: GosuLeague
19:15
Quarter Finals
Hejek vs Herbmon
Semih vs Kyrie
cavapoo vs TousaN
ZZZero.O107
Liquipedia
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
UpATreeSC 179
JuggernautJason75
EnDerr 38
StarCraft: Brood War
Britney 15844
Sea 1257
Artosis 217
ZZZero.O 116
Aegong 59
Dota 2
PGG 417
League of Legends
tarik_tv11834
Counter-Strike
fl0m7181
olofmeister3413
rGuardiaN111
Super Smash Bros
PPMD100
Heroes of the Storm
Grubby3410
Liquid`Hasu445
Khaldor114
Other Games
summit1g6624
FrodaN992
shahzam115
ViBE8
Organizations
Dota 2
PGL Dota 2 - Main Stream4205
Other Games
BasetradeTV145
StarCraft 2
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
sctven
[ Show 19 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• davetesta48
• RyuSc2 41
• IndyKCrew
• sooper7s
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• Migwel
• intothetv
• LaughNgamezSOOP
• Kozan
StarCraft: Brood War
• FirePhoenix8
• Diggity2
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
• BSLYoutube
Dota 2
• masondota22143
League of Legends
• TFBlade1454
• Shiphtur609
Other Games
• imaqtpie1252
• Scarra863
Upcoming Events
PiGosaur Monday
1h 47m
GSL Code S
11h 17m
Rogue vs GuMiho
Maru vs Solar
Online Event
1d 1h
Replay Cast
1d 3h
GSL Code S
1d 11h
herO vs Zoun
Classic vs Bunny
The PondCast
1d 11h
Replay Cast
2 days
WardiTV Invitational
2 days
OSC
2 days
Korean StarCraft League
3 days
[ Show More ]
SOOP
3 days
CranKy Ducklings
3 days
WardiTV Invitational
3 days
Cheesadelphia
3 days
CSO Cup
3 days
GSL Code S
4 days
Sparkling Tuna Cup
4 days
Replay Cast
5 days
Wardi Open
5 days
Replay Cast
6 days
Replay Cast
6 days
RSL Revival
6 days
Cure vs Percival
ByuN vs Spirit
Liquipedia Results

Completed

CSL Season 17: Qualifier 2
BGE Stara Zagora 2025
Heroes 10 EU

Ongoing

JPL Season 2
BSL 2v2 Season 3
BSL Season 20
KCM Race Survival 2025 Season 2
NPSL S3
Rose Open S1
CSL 17: 2025 SUMMER
2025 GSL S2
BLAST.tv Austin Major 2025
ESL Impact League Season 7
IEM Dallas 2025
PGL Astana 2025
Asian Champions League '25
BLAST Rivals Spring 2025
MESA Nomadic Masters
CCT Season 2 Global Finals
IEM Melbourne 2025
YaLLa Compass Qatar 2025
PGL Bucharest 2025
BLAST Open Spring 2025

Upcoming

Copa Latinoamericana 4
CSLPRO Last Chance 2025
CSLPRO Chat StarLAN 3
K-Championship
SEL Season 2 Championship
Esports World Cup 2025
HSC XXVII
Championship of Russia 2025
Murky Cup #2
Esports World Cup 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall Qual
IEM Cologne 2025
FISSURE Playground #1
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2025 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.