EPTI main pikachu in melee, Lucario in brawl :3 I used to be good with Roy too.
Rage - Page 2
| Blogs > Riku |
|
Ruffian
United States369 Posts
I main pikachu in melee, Lucario in brawl :3 I used to be good with Roy too. | ||
Jibba
United States22883 Posts
On November 10 2011 12:44 Chef wrote: Sore loser is the correct term. Don't try to twist it into something positive or inspirational like 'losing is not an option.' All it means is that you can't appreciate and respect your opponents and that you think too highly of yourself. It's not always the case, but I usually find people who are okay with losing have the most capacity to learn from their mistakes and become truly skillful. People who are not okay with losing tend to learn much slower. I have had games which were very intense and emotionally charged, but that is exactly it. It's just exciting. I don't get mad at my opponent or at myself because of the game. The only time I feel frustration from playing a game is if I was already frustrated before playing, went to play the game to try and relax/take my mind off it, and instead just played horrible and felt shitty the whole game thus wasting time. But that really has nothing to do with the game. It's interesting. I was an extremely poor loser when I was a little kid (I would say much worse than most) but I got over it and I usually take losses in stride now. I'm not exactly sure what happened within my maturation. | ||
|
turdburgler
England6749 Posts
jaws boss On November 10 2011 13:19 Jibba wrote: It's interesting. I was an extremely poor loser when I was a little kid (I would say much worse than most) but I got over it and I usually take losses in stride now. I'm not exactly sure what happened within my maturation. without knowing you at all id guess you just care about games less. you are probably more emotionally invested in something else now. either your job or girls or a hobby. when u are a kid games are your life, when you grow up something else tops the podium of things you give a fuck about. what im saying is that dying at the last boss age 7 is like getting cock blocked age 20 : D | ||
|
igotmyown
United States4291 Posts
If you're competitive at games, you should be beating yourself up over missing larva injects or not last hitting a creep perfectly, or losing a track of an enemy hero while you're csing. | ||
|
Riku
United States1064 Posts
On November 10 2011 12:22 Hot_Bid wrote: Melee or Brawl, if Melee, what character, and were you good? If Brawl, ignore my question lol In Melee I played Marth and Mewtwo. I was pretty decent back when I played a lot. In Brawl, I can drunkenly mash at a controller while playing Lucario and never die. Brawl is fun, but they made it way too easy to recover. On November 10 2011 12:26 Mr. Wiggles wrote: Don't you ever use /ignore? I raged for the first time in several years last night, when I played mid Veigar, and died a couple times to a roaming Twitch that my allies decided to feed 11 kills to, so that he could 3-shot me. They then proceeded to spend 5 minutes calling me terrible and bad before I just /ignore all'ed. Soooooooo useful. :p I do use /ignore but only in dire circumstances. Generally, I like to report the worst ones, so the more specific complaints I have, the better. On November 10 2011 12:44 Chef wrote: Sore loser is the correct term. Don't try to twist it into something positive or inspirational like 'losing is not an option.' All it means is that you can't appreciate and respect your opponents and that you think too highly of yourself. It's not always the case, but I usually find people who are okay with losing have the most capacity to learn from their mistakes and become truly skillful. People who are not okay with losing tend to learn much slower. I have had games which were very intense and emotionally charged, but that is exactly it. It's just exciting. I don't get mad at my opponent or at myself because of the game. The only time I feel frustration from playing a game is if I was already frustrated before playing, went to play the game to try and relax/take my mind off it, and instead just played horrible and felt shitty the whole game thus wasting time. But that really has nothing to do with the game. 1) As always, I exaggerated. 2) My father literally says things like "losing is not an option" and "there is doing and not doing, there is no 'try.'" I wasn't trying to be inspirational. 3) I really only get noticeably frustrated when I make a fool of myself in front of my boyfriend. Not sure why, because I can just royally suck in front of my friends and shrug it off. On November 10 2011 13:22 igotmyown wrote: There's a difference between being a sore loser and being competitive. In sports, you can drop the ball or miss someone, but it's the things that nobody will blame you for which makes you lose. Not putting in that extra effort in a run, or not covering your guy tightly because you're tired, having your feet in the wrong position. If you're competitive at games, you should be beating yourself up over missing larva injects or not last hitting a creep perfectly, or losing a track of an enemy hero while you're csing. I curse loudly over missed CS all of the time. Haha, never really get upset over it, just swear a lot. | ||
|
LoLAdriankat
United States4307 Posts
I only rage at my own mistakes though and I knew I wasn't playing at high enough level for race balance to matter so I never raged about balance. I have friends who rage at LoL/Dota if they have bad teammates, but if I'm in a situation like that, I take comfort in thinking that I'm not as bad as my teammates are. I feel horrible when I play like trash in front of my teammates though. My little brother rages hard at Gears of War 3 though, I should set up a hidden camera. :D | ||
|
Mobius_1
United Kingdom2763 Posts
I don't rage much at SC2, never raged much in Dota (mostly just utterly sad and frustrated, since there comes a point after your 25th death that you just realise there's no point to, well, anything). I rage like f**k on a golf course, though. If I was rich I'd probably be smashing half of my clubs every round in anger. | ||
|
iGrok
United States5142 Posts
On November 10 2011 12:22 Hot_Bid wrote: Melee or Brawl, if Melee, what character, and were you good? If Brawl, ignore my question lol Why not 64? | ||
|
Jibba
United States22883 Posts
On November 10 2011 13:19 turdburgler wrote: 007 for the megadrive jaws boss without knowing you at all id guess you just care about games less. you are probably more emotionally invested in something else now. either your job or girls or a hobby. when u are a kid games are your life, when you grow up something else tops the podium of things you give a fuck about. what im saying is that dying at the last boss age 7 is like getting cock blocked age 20 : D Partially true, but I also played competitive CS, which occupied my life in high school, and hardcore raiding. Perhaps losing a lot changed it. Getting humbled on iCCup is a pretty valuable experience. | ||
|
actionbastrd
Congo598 Posts
If there is one thing i learned throughout the years its this - No one plays the 64 version. Melee is fine and all, and brawl was..... yea.. But nothings tops the 64 for me ^__^ I wish i could meet someone who could beat me in 64 smash.... D: Its like my dream friend. hah. Link + ness 64 ftw! Half the people i meet who play smash have not even played the 64 version before, or have like once. Makes me a saaaaad panda. | ||
|
MrDudeMan
Canada973 Posts
On November 10 2011 13:04 Whole wrote: Normally, if I start to rage I'm kind of half-joking or if I do something silly (slam desk, throw something, ect.) I laugh at it immediately after. I don't really understand the point of legitimately getting mad while playing a video game on a non-pro level. You're supposed to be having fun. Being competitive isn't really an excuse because if someone was truly competitive, then they'd know that raging doesn't help at all. Why is playing a game on a non pro level a reason not to get upset? Just because something isn't being played on a pro level, doesn't mean it can't be a serious competition. If anything, playing at a pro level should mean you try to control your emotion, because you are playing for money. Also, winning is a lot of fun. | ||
|
red_
United States8474 Posts
On November 10 2011 12:44 Chef wrote: It's not always the case, but I usually find people who are okay with losing have the most capacity to learn from their mistakes and become truly skillful. People who are not okay with losing tend to learn much slower.. My experience in athletics is the exact opposite. People that take losses devastatingly hard seem to work the hardest to prevent them from happening again. That is of course unless they just quit all together, but then they won't be continuing to learn at any rate so I assume that 2nd scenario should be tossed out. Side note: taking a loss hard does not have to equal tears and depression. | ||
|
Whole
United States6046 Posts
On November 10 2011 14:33 MrDudeMan wrote: Why is playing a game on a non pro level a reason not to get upset? Just because something isn't being played on a pro level, doesn't mean it can't be a serious competition. If anything, playing at a pro level should mean you try to control your emotion, because you are playing for money. Also, winning is a lot of fun. because when you're playing on a non-pro level, it doesn't mean anything. winning is fun and being competitive (while not being pro) is fun, but when people take the losses so seriously and deeply, it sucks out the fun of competition and if you're playing a team game, it usually annoys other people as well. they're making a big deal out of something that means nothing. Just to clarify, I'm talking about legitimate and lengthy rage fits, not short outburst. | ||
Hot_Bid
Braavos36402 Posts
On November 10 2011 14:28 actionbastrd wrote: If there is one thing i learned throughout the years its this - No one plays the 64 version. Melee is fine and all, and brawl was..... yea.. But nothings tops the 64 for me ^__^ I wish i could meet someone who could beat me in 64 smash.... D: Its like my dream friend. hah. Link + ness 64 ftw! Half the people i meet who play smash have not even played the 64 version before, or have like once. Makes me a saaaaad panda. In my dorm we played 64 a lot, but switched to melee when someone bought a game cube. Ahh those were the days, smash every day. Senior year I played melee vs my roommate 1v1 every day loser walks out to buy lunch/dinner, it was fucking intense. | ||
|
actionbastrd
Congo598 Posts
On November 10 2011 14:41 Hot_Bid wrote: In my dorm we played 64 a lot, but switched to melee when someone bought a game cube. Ahh those were the days, smash every day. Senior year I played melee vs my roommate 1v1 every day loser walks out to buy lunch/dinner, it was fucking intense. Hah nice, yeah we used to do drinking games with smash 64, do bets all the time. Sometimes someone would walk out with $100 in their pocket. I guess my problem is ive never owned a gamecube! I did sport the dreamcast tho. There was only 3-5 of us that played it that much tho back in the day. The drinking games got really ridic..... hah. I did love the in-game tourny options with melee tho, that was a super nice addition. | ||
|
Riku
United States1064 Posts
On November 10 2011 14:52 actionbastrd wrote: Hah nice, yeah we used to do drinking games with smash 64, do bets all the time. Sometimes someone would walk out with $100 in their pocket. I guess my problem is ive never owned a gamecube! I did sport the dreamcast tho. There was only 3-5 of us that played it that much tho back in the day. The drinking games got really ridic..... hah. I did love the in-game tourny options with melee tho, that was a super nice addition. We rarely bet when we played, but we did lots of Smash Bros drinking games. Only for Melee and Brawl, though, 64 was srs bsnss. I actually own my own gamecube controller, though not a gamecube. The controllers most people owned tended to be messed up, so I would always bring my own over with me to play with. | ||
|
cvlsfts
Canada17 Posts
| ||
|
iGrok
United States5142 Posts
On November 10 2011 14:28 actionbastrd wrote: If there is one thing i learned throughout the years its this - No one plays the 64 version. Melee is fine and all, and brawl was..... yea.. But nothings tops the 64 for me ^__^ I wish i could meet someone who could beat me in 64 smash.... D: Its like my dream friend. hah. Link + ness 64 ftw! Half the people i meet who play smash have not even played the 64 version before, or have like once. Makes me a saaaaad panda. I'm happy to take you on, if we ever meet. You play T2 champs - I play DK, supposed to be the 2nd worst. But his edge-guarding is ridiculous | ||
|
MrDudeMan
Canada973 Posts
On November 10 2011 14:41 Whole wrote: because when you're playing on a non-pro level, it doesn't mean anything. winning is fun and being competitive (while not being pro) is fun, but when people take the losses so seriously and deeply, it sucks out the fun of competition and if you're playing a team game, it usually annoys other people as well. they're making a big deal out of something that means nothing. Just to clarify, I'm talking about legitimate and lengthy rage fits, not short outburst. I guess we just have different definitions of what being upset means. I think of it as playing video games is something I invest my time into, while winning may be just as much a waste of time as losing, I definitely have a lot more fun when I'm winning. Its not a legitimate reason to ever get angry to the point where you make other people feel like shit because of it, but I don't see much wrong in being upset at yourself (especially in SC2 where I know what mistakes I made). | ||
|
ETisME
12879 Posts
the level of flame is huge. If you are being ganked heavily, you will be behind throughout the whole game and your team will flame you non-stop | ||
| ||
