EPTLiquipedia Feedback Thread - Page 13
| Forum Index > Website Feedback |
|
vnlegend
United States1389 Posts
| ||
|
kennfusion
2 Posts
Like I was trying to follow the Reactor Hellion Expand build since it was Noob friendly, but then I cannot even figure out what the numbers next to the build items mean. 10 Supply Depot 12 Barracks Does that mean build 9 SCV's first? Which cannot be, because you would need the new supply depot first. So maybe a guide that says: Start Here You Total Noob thanks! | ||
|
Julmust
Sweden4867 Posts
10 Supply Depot means you buy it at 10 supply. You can see your supply in the top right corner of the game should say something like 6/11 (iirc) at the beginning of the game. | ||
|
kennfusion
2 Posts
ok...see I get that now, and was totally lost on that and tried to even read the instructions on how to create the guides and it was lost. But it makes sense with what you just said and makes those build orders totally look different now in my eyes. They make much more sense. So FYI, I read an article on a mainstream site that lead me here...so I will not be the only clueless person here. We just need a good primer, and it will all fall into place. | ||
tofucake
Hyrule19213 Posts
On August 03 2010 05:19 kennfusion wrote: Could you please make an even Noob-ier thread in the strategy section? I am doing fine in the solo campaign, but when I try to play 1v1 vs the computer I must be doing something totally wrong. Like I was trying to follow the Reactor Hellion Expand build since it was Noob friendly, but then I cannot even figure out what the numbers next to the build items mean. 10 Supply Depot 12 Barracks Does that mean build 9 SCV's first? Which cannot be, because you would need the new supply depot first. So maybe a guide that says: Start Here You Total Noob thanks! http://wiki.teamliquid.net/starcraft2/Strategy_Article_Policy#Builds Most of the time people won't put the max supply, only the supply when you start building the unit/structure. | ||
Flicky
England2670 Posts
 How To: Read Build Orders | ||
|
tofucake
Hyrule19213 Posts
| ||
|
Erik383
Sweden6 Posts
| ||
|
Eggcake
Switzerland722 Posts
| ||
|
Shankapotamus
United States428 Posts
| ||
|
LarJarsE
United States1378 Posts
| ||
|
aletoledo
United States1 Post
| ||
|
Fiel
United States587 Posts
- Inclusion of challenge missions into the campaign section - Use a separate page for all spells, then use bracket includes to include them everywhere that they're needed. Right now, if you want to edit a spell you have to edit about 10 different places to keep things accurate. I'd be happy to make this change so everything stays consistent. - For spells/abilities, include their hotkey with it (or is that already included?) - Standardize ALL times to be game seconds and enforce this within articles. Calculating DPS is difficult when no standard is used (especially problematic for the Void Ray article) | ||
Aesop
Hungary11305 Posts
On August 16 2010 04:51 Fiel wrote: Here are some other features I'd like to see: - Inclusion of challenge missions into the campaign section - Use a separate page for all spells, then use bracket includes to include them everywhere that they're needed. Right now, if you want to edit a spell you have to edit about 10 different places to keep things accurate. I'd be happy to make this change so everything stays consistent. - For spells/abilities, include their hotkey with it (or is that already included?) - Standardize ALL times to be game seconds and enforce this within articles. Calculating DPS is difficult when no standard is used (especially problematic for the Void Ray article) 1) and 2) are very nice propositions, we just need the manpower, i.e. someone to do it. I think hotkeys are included in most cases. About the game seconds, we are technically enforcing it and should probably be a bit more strict. | ||
|
Spaceninja
United States211 Posts
| ||
|
quasit
Sweden49 Posts
On August 16 2010 04:51 Fiel wrote: Use a separate page for all spells, then use bracket includes to include them everywhere that they're needed. Right now, if you want to edit a spell you have to edit about 10 different places to keep things accurate. I've fixed this. Abilities are under http://wiki.teamliquid.net/starcraft2/SCAbility/ Spells are under http://wiki.teamliquid.net/starcraft2/SCSpell/ Upgrades are under http://wiki.teamliquid.net/starcraft2/SCUpgrade/ If you wanna list the pages added under e.g. "SCAbility" go to http://wiki.teamliquid.net/starcraft2/Special:PrefixIndex and type "SCAbility". A few things though. I haven't checked the actual abilities/spells/upgrades for errors (like if "duration" is correct), I just used the existing data on LP. As someone else did the protoss spells they are actually mixed with abilities under SCAbility, and I can only move pages I've created it seems. So some admin has to move the protoss spells to SCSpell. "then use bracket includes to include them everywhere that they're needed" Well, I haven't fixed THAT yet. That's gonna take some time. Btw, it's quite annoying I only can move/rename my own pages. It makes it harder to fix things. As everything must be checked by admins first before it becomes stable why would it matter if people could suggest to move pages? Only other option is to make a new page and delete the text on the old one, but you said in IRC you don't like that. | ||
|
Owoc
Poland2 Posts
Creating the actual vector images wouldn't be a problem, but I don't know how much work it would take for the staff to actually enable SVG support. The MediaWiki manual says it varies (link). | ||
Carnac
Germany / USA16648 Posts
On August 17 2010 03:19 Spaceninja wrote: I don't think there is anything about staff icons in the Wiki, but here is some info:Is there a list of forum icons and such? I know what the star and the red hammer mean but I have no idea what anything else means, besides that they contribute a lot. I couldn't find anything regarding this in the liquipedia. http://www.teamliquid.net/about/ | ||
|
BlackMagister
United States5834 Posts
http://wiki.teamliquid.net/starcraft2/General_2v2_strategy There is a huge emphasis on 1v1 strategy on TL but 2v2 seems neglected. | ||
|
Zona
40426 Posts
| ||
| ||
