|
On April 03 2018 02:56 Seeker wrote:Show nested quote +On April 03 2018 02:55 Aveng3r wrote: I see, I notice his red hammer is also gone That I cannot comment on. Your discretion is legendary
|
The odds that Stealth is legitimately a robot are going up, it would seem.
|
I always had my suspicions.
|
But what does it say about TL if their mods were infiltrated by robots? How many other mods are robots?
|
SB posts in other threads, such as the Nintendo Switch thread, so this is all puzzling. Whatever. This wouldn't be the first time I've been in an internet community and had to just conclude "Ya know, I may never develop a complete model as to who this person is".
|
Seeker
Where dat snitch at?36921 Posts
On April 03 2018 04:47 Plansix wrote: But what does it say about TL if their mods were infiltrated by robots? How many other mods are robots? How many other mods are actual humans?
|
On April 03 2018 07:03 Seeker wrote:Show nested quote +On April 03 2018 04:47 Plansix wrote: But what does it say about TL if their mods were infiltrated by robots? How many other mods are robots? How many other mods are actual humans? I think its safe to assume you are the only one.
|
Seeker
Where dat snitch at?36921 Posts
On April 03 2018 10:25 Plansix wrote:Show nested quote +On April 03 2018 07:03 Seeker wrote:On April 03 2018 04:47 Plansix wrote: But what does it say about TL if their mods were infiltrated by robots? How many other mods are robots? How many other mods are actual humans? I think its safe to assume you are the only one. Oo;; What makes me the only human?
|
what what does it truly mean to be human?
|
it means passing a Turing test
|
Do the POTUS own tweets really need explanation why they are relevant to US politics when it is his main method of communication?
|
FueledUpAndReadyToGo wrote:
Well he's angry today. DoJ, the Post Office and more fake news cries. Totally stable.
I think the goal is to start discussion on why you think they're particularly newsworthy. You could post the same "this tweet shows Trump is now totally unhinged" every week for the entire presidency in the thread.
|
The tweets are news worthy since most of them are false, lead to a stock market dive and trump continuing to try to influence the justice department. The commentary is less than ideal.
|
On April 03 2018 11:09 Seeker wrote:Show nested quote +On April 03 2018 10:25 Plansix wrote:On April 03 2018 07:03 Seeker wrote:On April 03 2018 04:47 Plansix wrote: But what does it say about TL if their mods were infiltrated by robots? How many other mods are robots? How many other mods are actual humans? I think its safe to assume you are the only one. Oo;; What makes me the only human? Good point, you could just be a robot trying to cover your tracks.
|
Seeker
Where dat snitch at?36921 Posts
On April 03 2018 17:23 FueledUpAndReadyToGo wrote: Do the POTUS own tweets really need explanation why they are relevant to US politics when it is his main method of communication?
Yes. We can't make exceptions just because Trump is the one that's tweeting.
Granted, if he's making a string of tweets on one certain topic, then it's fine to post them all at once with only one supporting statement for all those tweets.
|
On April 03 2018 19:09 Danglars wrote:Show nested quote +FueledUpAndReadyToGo wrote:
Well he's angry today. DoJ, the Post Office and more fake news cries. Totally stable. I think the goal is to start discussion on why you think they're particularly newsworthy. You could post the same "this tweet shows Trump is now totally unhinged" every week for the entire presidency in the thread. Fair enough. I feel like this is more Trumps fault than mine though, but I guess I'll have to accept the new 'normal' in modern presidency.
|
It's more of a sad indictment that a message from the President of USA needs an explanation as to why they would be relevant to US politics. Mostly they need an explanation as to why they are both relevant and not random thoughtless falsehoods or attacks on the independence of the judiciary. This wouldn't be the case in previous adminstrations.
|
Yeah, no. Calling bullshit.
It's quite clear why I thought it needed to be discussed, and in fact spawned that very discussion. There may be another reason for this action, but the one provided is indefensible.
Original Message From TL.net Bot: This is a Warning! Show nested quote +Abolish the police, disarm them and most of them will leave on their own. New York City police officers shot and killed a black man who was known to be mentally ill on a Brooklyn street corner on Wednesday afternoon after he pointed what the officers claim they thought was a gun at them, the authorities said. The object, however, turned out to be a metal pipe with a knob on it.
[Angie described Mr. Vassell as a quiet man who often sat outside near a barbershop and sometimes worked odd jobs at her beauty salon for a few dollars.
“He would just walk and bob his head,” she said. “If we ask him to do our chores, he’d come and do it.”
Rocky Brown, 45, who knew him for years, said he was a friendly man who was mentally ill.
“He’s harmless,” Mr. Brown said. “A very willing guy, a very nice guy, a good guy.”
Betty Weaver, 71, said Mr. Vassell would often greet her when she was on her way to church.
Another woman, Nicole Williams, said she had given him $2 earlier on Wednesday afternoon. His last words to her, she said, were “Thank you, God.”] moved this section to the top
The shooting drew a tense, charged crowd of dozens to the streets of Crown Heights. The Police Department had encountered the man before and classified him as emotionally disturbed, and the shooting raised questions about what the officers at the scene knew about him.
four of the officers — the three in street clothes and one uniformed officer — fired 10 bullets in all. The man, identified by his father as Saheed Vassell, 34, was pronounced dead after being taken to Kings County Medical Center.
In an interview at his home late Wednesday night, Mr. Vassell’s father, Eric Vassell, said his son had bipolar disorder and had been admitted to the hospital multiple times in recent years, sometimes after encounters with the police. The younger Mr. Vassell, who was born in Jamaica and came to the United States when he was 6, lived with his family in a Crown Heights apartment and had worked as a welder. He also had a 15-year-old son.
Mr. Vassell’s father said he had never seen his son act as if he had a gun.
He would “just walk around the neighborhood and help people,” the father said.
Area residents said Mr. Vassell was a familiar figure on the corner and a caring father who begged for money in a nearby subway station and did odd jobs for shopkeepers. He loved to dance and was widely known to be mentally ill. People said he had a penchant for picking things up off the street — cigarette lighters, empty bottles and other curbside flotsam — and playing with them like toys.
John Fuller, 59, said that he had known Mr. Vassell for years and that local police officers had, too. He echoed a common refrain: The officers should have known him well enough to not simply shoot him to death. “Every cop in this neighborhood knows him,” Mr. Fuller said.
Witnesses said the police officers appeared to fire almost immediately after they got to the corner around 4:45 p.m. Some of the witnesses said they did not hear the officers say anything to the man before firing, while another witness said she heard the officers and the man exchange some words.
The killing held echoes of the shooting less than three weeks ago in Sacramento in which the police shot and killed a black man who they believed was pointing a gun at them, but who, it turned out, was actually holding a cellphone.
On Wednesday in Brooklyn, Jaccpot Hinds, 40, was walking south on Utica Avenue near Montgomery Street when he saw an unmarked police car pass him and pull across two lanes of traffic near where a man was standing on a street corner. Mr. Hinds said a plainclothes officer got out of the passenger seat of the car and fired at the man several times. The officer appeared to shoot him in the neck, chest and right arm, Mr. Hinds said, and then walked over to the man and prodded his chest with the service weapon.
www.nytimes.comShooting unarmed people is a failure of policing point blank, period, no excuses. Per the new rules and guidelines set forth by the moderation team, we are going to be harsher on articles/news sources that are posted without a supporting comment on why the article(s)/news source(s) is/are relevant and why they need to be discussed. Thanks in advance for your cooperation, Seeker
Who even reported that anyway?
|
No, the new rules are clear. it doesn't matter how obvious the article is, you must add to it.
|
On April 06 2018 03:01 Gorsameth wrote: No, the new rules are clear. it doesn't matter how obvious the article is, you must add to it.
Pretty sure I clearly did. Hence the discussion that followed until it abruptly ended with a different news post.
|
|
|
|