Your discretion is legendary
US Politics Feedback Thread - Page 113
| Forum Index > Website Feedback |
|
Aveng3r
United States2411 Posts
Your discretion is legendary | ||
|
farvacola
United States18838 Posts
| ||
|
Dangermousecatdog
United Kingdom7084 Posts
| ||
|
Plansix
United States60190 Posts
| ||
|
Mohdoo
United States15723 Posts
| ||
|
Seeker
Where dat snitch at?37043 Posts
On April 03 2018 04:47 Plansix wrote: But what does it say about TL if their mods were infiltrated by robots? How many other mods are robots? How many other mods are actual humans? | ||
|
Plansix
United States60190 Posts
I think its safe to assume you are the only one. | ||
|
Seeker
Where dat snitch at?37043 Posts
On April 03 2018 10:25 Plansix wrote: I think its safe to assume you are the only one. Oo;; What makes me the only human? | ||
|
ticklishmusic
United States15977 Posts
| ||
|
IgnE
United States7681 Posts
| ||
|
FueledUpAndReadyToGo
Netherlands30548 Posts
| ||
|
Danglars
United States12133 Posts
FueledUpAndReadyToGo wrote: Well he's angry today. DoJ, the Post Office and more fake news cries. Totally stable. I think the goal is to start discussion on why you think they're particularly newsworthy. You could post the same "this tweet shows Trump is now totally unhinged" every week for the entire presidency in the thread. | ||
|
Plansix
United States60190 Posts
| ||
|
Plansix
United States60190 Posts
Good point, you could just be a robot trying to cover your tracks. | ||
|
Seeker
Where dat snitch at?37043 Posts
On April 03 2018 17:23 FueledUpAndReadyToGo wrote: Do the POTUS own tweets really need explanation why they are relevant to US politics when it is his main method of communication? Yes. We can't make exceptions just because Trump is the one that's tweeting. Granted, if he's making a string of tweets on one certain topic, then it's fine to post them all at once with only one supporting statement for all those tweets. | ||
|
FueledUpAndReadyToGo
Netherlands30548 Posts
On April 03 2018 19:09 Danglars wrote: I think the goal is to start discussion on why you think they're particularly newsworthy. You could post the same "this tweet shows Trump is now totally unhinged" every week for the entire presidency in the thread. Fair enough. I feel like this is more Trumps fault than mine though, but I guess I'll have to accept the new 'normal' in modern presidency. | ||
|
Dangermousecatdog
United Kingdom7084 Posts
| ||
|
GreenHorizons
United States23456 Posts
It's quite clear why I thought it needed to be discussed, and in fact spawned that very discussion. There may be another reason for this action, but the one provided is indefensible. Original Message From TL.net Bot: This is a Warning! Per the new rules and guidelines set forth by the moderation team, we are going to be harsher on articles/news sources that are posted without a supporting comment on why the article(s)/news source(s) is/are relevant and why they need to be discussed. Thanks in advance for your cooperation, Seeker Who even reported that anyway? | ||
|
Gorsameth
Netherlands21950 Posts
| ||
|
GreenHorizons
United States23456 Posts
On April 06 2018 03:01 Gorsameth wrote: No, the new rules are clear. it doesn't matter how obvious the article is, you must add to it. Pretty sure I clearly did. Hence the discussion that followed until it abruptly ended with a different news post. | ||
| ||