EPT[March GSL] Code A Ro16 Day 2 - Page 37
| Forum Index > StarCraft 2 Tournaments |
|
Taf the Ghost
United States11751 Posts
| ||
|
flexy
United States182 Posts
 | ||
|
Vorlik
1522 Posts
On March 04 2011 20:06 Sukuranburu wrote: Oh my god. Please think about this before you do it. The only reason those players were able to participate in IEM was because they all lost spectacularly in the Code A Ro32. None of those players deserve, let alone good enough, to be a part of Code S. Furthermore, these players were sent down to qualifiers and doing this will give them an automatic spot in Code A again. Of course, I understand the quandary you're in, and I don't have an actual suggestion short of having the Code A losers playing it out for the last spot, but I can say that this is highly unfair for everyone involved. Saying none of those players deserve code S is a bold statement. If they can take down a code S player in the up/downs they're just as good as if they were bad for losing in the first round of code A. | ||
|
eviltomahawk
United States11133 Posts
alive has the 3/4 o clock gold base up and running. Supernova attempts to push, but gets owned by alive's superior forces. Supernova GGs. | ||
|
Moonwrath
United States9568 Posts
| ||
|
silentsaint
Germany540 Posts
On March 04 2011 20:11 flexy wrote: I say we have a community vote and get MVP back in He is already in the "up and down" matches. That would be redundant | ||
|
Clare
United States372 Posts
 | ||
|
anatem
Romania1369 Posts
| ||
|
vrok
Sweden2541 Posts
On March 04 2011 20:08 Resolve wrote: Losing a single BO3 in Code A before the RO8 means you don't deserve to be in the Up/Down matches. So do you also think inviting Huk was a mistake? Since he's never been able to qualify into Code A on his own? Yet now he's managed to reach Ro8 once he finally got in. This decision solves a problem. The current final 4 of IEM are all Code A level anyway. It's simple, it's easy and it's safe. Unless anyone has a better solution they should be quiet. This is a pretty good solution considering. | ||
|
Vorlik
1522 Posts
On March 04 2011 20:12 anatem wrote: the terrans today were pathetic for this level, all 5 of them. if they keep playing like this i don't see them making into code s unless they get real lucky The terrans in code S haven't been all that great lately either... | ||
|
eviltomahawk
United States11133 Posts
Supernova spawns in the bottom left. alive spawns in the top left. | ||
|
Weirdkid
Singapore2431 Posts
Game 2 : Proxy Fact/Port Game 3 : Proxy CC? | ||
|
flexy
United States182 Posts
On March 04 2011 20:12 anatem wrote: the terrans today were pathetic for this level, all 5 of them. if they keep playing like this i don't see them making into code s unless they get real lucky why? what would you recommend they do? you realize theres alot of stress right? | ||
|
brentsen
1252 Posts
On March 04 2011 20:06 Sukuranburu wrote: Oh my god. Please think about this before you do it. The only reason those players were able to participate in IEM was because they all lost spectacularly in the Code A Ro32. None of those players deserve, let alone good enough, to be a part of Code S. Furthermore, these players were sent down to qualifiers and doing this will give them an automatic spot in Code A again. Of course, I understand the quandary you're in, and I don't have an actual suggestion short of having the Code A losers playing it out for the last spot, but I can say that this is highly unfair for everyone involved. On the other hand, if this really was the case the Code A winner and Code S 3rd placer should have no problem beating them down. And they were already giving out free Code A spots. | ||
|
FarbrorAbavna
Sweden4856 Posts
| ||
|
Hellhammer
Canada144 Posts
| ||
|
Redox
Germany24794 Posts
On March 04 2011 20:06 Sukuranburu wrote: Oh my god. Please think about this before you do it. The only reason those players were able to participate in IEM was because they all lost spectacularly in the Code A Ro32. None of those players deserve, let alone good enough, to be a part of Code S. Furthermore, these players were sent down to qualifiers and doing this will give them an automatic spot in Code A again. Of course, I understand the quandary you're in, and I don't have an actual suggestion short of having the Code A losers playing it out for the last spot, but I can say that this is highly unfair for everyone involved. Oh my god please inform yourself before spreading nonsense. These players were invited to IEM before they lost. GSL had it organised that these players can go to IEM even if they are still in code A, there would have been rescheduling. When Ace and Squirtle were invited they were believed to be among the strongest Code A players based on their GSTL games. And even if they lost a bo3 I think that this might still be true. | ||
|
Mastermind
Canada7096 Posts
| ||
|
cordlc
United States360 Posts
It just so happens that the Korean invites ended up dominating the tournament. | ||
|
Ouga
Finland645 Posts
| ||
| ||
