On March 07 2018 13:11 Fecalfeast wrote:
I think tubesock is town
I think tubesock is town
elaborate please
Forum Index > TL Mafia |
MoosyDoosy
United States4519 Posts
On March 07 2018 13:11 Fecalfeast wrote: I think tubesock is town elaborate please | ||
Tubesock
United States2726 Posts
On March 07 2018 05:57 MoosyDoosy wrote: Metagame. Damdred said this is what he'd expect from town rsoultin so she might be doing it as scum to make him she's town. I might be getting super tinfoily here which is why I'm asking for feedback. On March 07 2018 05:48 MoosyDoosy wrote: If anything, rsoultin changes her reads to conform to Damdred's over time. Considering how hard Damdred townread rsoultin I think she's metagaming him to seem townie and working around his reads because she knows he can read her. I didn't see the FecalFeast response. But are these the quotes? I don't see how the hardness of Damdred's read is relevant to Rsoultins alignment. Sure, it speaks to the success of the metagame sure but you are not answering why town Rsoultin wouldn't do the same thing? If Rsoultin as town acts X way, wouldn't it stand to reason she would do X regardless of Damdred's expectation? I didn't have any problems with her changing of reads. I don't think it aligned with Damdred since he didn't exactly leave a bunch. Why wouldn't she try to align with you since you are making a big deal about soulreading? You also remarked how you thought exactly the same as her concerning me. So, doesn't seem you're entirely on different planets. Like you and I are on different planets for sure. AMG also. Doesn't really make for mafia though. Which led me to asking you why you townread Damdred. The only thing I saw was the post I already pointed out and asked about. Cause it's a little weird that you are hard towning Damdred for very little. For your tinfoil to work, Damdred must be town...so you obviously are hard towning him. So, what did I miss about that "Good man, it won't be me (it was)" speak to you so deeply? | ||
n00bKing
United States1202 Posts
On March 07 2018 06:25 rsoultin wrote: Vivax is prob the best counterwagon to Tubesock. There's a very real possibility that I may change my vote, but as I said...of the afker's, his absence is the most alignment indicative. ##vote: Vivax On March 07 2018 06:25 rsoultin wrote: Who are the other scum with me, then? Would have to be chaoser or Kelsier, right? That's why Vivax is the afker you want to lynch. lol | ||
n00bKing
United States1202 Posts
On March 07 2018 06:32 MoosyDoosy wrote: Show nested quote + On March 07 2018 06:04 n00bKing wrote: On March 07 2018 05:57 MoosyDoosy wrote: On March 07 2018 05:53 n00bKing wrote: On March 07 2018 05:48 MoosyDoosy wrote: If anything, rsoultin changes her reads to conform to Damdred's over time. Considering how hard Damdred townread rsoultin I think she's metagaming him to seem townie and working around his reads because she knows he can read her. If rsoul were scum and "knows damdred can read her" then why would she draw his eyes to her by making him her early scumread and pushing for his lynch? Metagame. Damdred said this is what he'd expect from town rsoultin so she might be doing it as scum to make him she's town. *shrug* You can ask Damdred whether he thinks that's something she's likely to try. Anyway, she seems willing to engage with you (even while simultaneously saying there's no way you could get her lynched) so feel free to keep needling her (she's at least giving us plenty of content to try and nail her with later, if she IS scum) but don't let yourself fall into the "tunnel" she talked about. You haven't placed a vote, right? If the day ended in 2 hours instead of 26 hours, who do you think should get the noose? meh. I'm holding my vote until Damdred comes back and responds to my thoughts. But I am probably going to vote for Tubesock here. There aren't really any other convincing arguments for me other than him and my own suspicions on rsoultin. For anyone to purposely be "holding their vote" at this stage just seems dumb to me. If Tubesock would be your lynch, put your vote on him. If it would be someone else, put your vote on them instead. If you're Town, you should want the voting record to be reflective of people's intentions. I'm tired of reading about what you kinda/sorta/maybe want to do, except that you have to talk to daddy damdred first. | ||
n00bKing
United States1202 Posts
On March 07 2018 07:25 darthfoley wrote: Like I can see myself having a similar weak scum read on someone who did what I did. At least to stir the pot a bit cuz at the time she made that read, the thread was a "poop on tubesock" fest iirc You're *this* close, darthfoley... You're *THIS* close to making me just call him "poopsock" from here on out. lol | ||
n00bKing
United States1202 Posts
On March 07 2018 10:18 Tubesock wrote: Show nested quote + On March 07 2018 05:50 AMG wrote: On March 06 2018 16:47 Tubesock wrote: On March 06 2018 16:45 AMG wrote: Tubesock, I implied you were mafia by your reaction and said someone you thought was scummy was almost certainly town.. you dont think either of those warrants further investigation or a response? Nope. I think the idea that only scum get salty is hilarious. You also don't seem to understand why I was "pricky". Do you understand what I didn't like about n00bking? I'm trying to wrap my head around what you took issue with with n00bking prior to this post. He says talking strategy is fine early, and he does so, but discussing a d2 mass claim is a discussion better had on day 2, I assume, because there are still things to unfold before day 2, I.e the lynch and the night actions. I don't see hypocracy or inconsistency in what n00bking is saying. Since this happened and there's been a pretty big pushback on your attempt to cast shade on him, you're now townreading him because he's too nitpicky with finer details, so he's now town. Is that an accurate summation of your read progression on n00bking? And now if noobking is town, where to from here, who is your next prime suspect? This is what I said: Show nested quote + On March 06 2018 09:15 Tubesock wrote: Hola I like the idea of the coordinating medic shot via vote. A lot more information. I am not sure about the mass claiming bit D2 though. I think it would be better for town to have the medics be unknown for a couple cycles before they claim. It was more a response to Fecalfeast's idea of mass claiming D2, but it also advises town what I think town should do concerning mass claiming. In fact I wasn't specific because I understand the reality that when things change town players will start thinking it's a good idea/time and then it will present itself. The sentence prior even shows uncertainty about D2 claiming which would indicate I'm open to it if the conditions are right. So, he then zeros in on my D2 comment and is just "No discussion of D2" and then goes on about the setup and pregame conversation. Like he nitpicked 1 thing, and ignored the rest. I don't think he thought about my post. I thought that was scummy. Like I don't think wanting to just talk about D1 mass claiming is inconsistent. But my post answers that question also, so he wasn't really looking to talk about it. Like he wanted to PUSH the mass claim D1. He even later tries to throw shade on Holyflare for shutting down claim talk. Clearly people are not into claiming D1. As far as the nitpicky bit goes. In my experience, I'll say something weird and then people jump on my ass for it. Then a mafia sees thread sentiment and nitpicks to "lead" the charge. In this case I think n00b did that first so wasn't following thread sentiment. So, he's acting more like a Rels used to, rather than an opportunistic mafiosa. Yeah...I really "zeroed in" on your D2 comment....your post was 3 lines long, and one of the lines was "Hola." Then one of the lines was what I considered to be simple common sense, and didn't really need stating. Sorry for not quoting the part I thought was common sense and saying "Look at this, this is common sense!" So yeah, I focused on 1 thing, and ignored the rest. I focused on the 1 thing I actually thought needed anything said about it. Think that's pretty normal. And I didn't "throw shade" at HF for trying to shut down the claim conversation. I only said that anyone who has something to say about it should still do so, and not let themselves be silenced by him. How is it that you've come back and made more posts, without responding to the post where I went from just talking with you, to actually voting against you? I've already expressed that I didn't love the fact that the moment you switched from answering each post that came in, to disappearing for 16 hours or whatever it was, was also the moment I went from just having a conversation with you, to actually putting a vote on you. Could that have just been coincidence? Yeah, maybe. But it doesn't look like it, when upon your return to the thread, you STILL never acknowledge that post in any way, shape, or form. Did that part of Page 12 just magically escape your notice? "splain yourself." | ||
n00bKing
United States1202 Posts
On March 07 2018 10:45 Tubesock wrote: I like how he did it too. As mafia I don't think he would have defended me like he did. I think he would have been more firm in either the defense or attack. So being wishy-washy is a Town trait now? There's nothing to like about Prpl's play, in my opinion. All he's done is claim Cop, be vague and non-committal about whether he thinks you should be pushed, be vague and non-committal about suspicions that AMG's reads feel forced, and talk about a SK role that we know isn't in the game. I never like it when people say something like "I'm interested in seeing where this goes though." Just means they have no plans of making it go somewhere themselves...so I think to myself....then what good are you? | ||
Tubesock
United States2726 Posts
On March 07 2018 14:58 n00bKing wrote: Show nested quote + On March 07 2018 10:18 Tubesock wrote: On March 07 2018 05:50 AMG wrote: On March 06 2018 16:47 Tubesock wrote: On March 06 2018 16:45 AMG wrote: Tubesock, I implied you were mafia by your reaction and said someone you thought was scummy was almost certainly town.. you dont think either of those warrants further investigation or a response? Nope. I think the idea that only scum get salty is hilarious. You also don't seem to understand why I was "pricky". Do you understand what I didn't like about n00bking? I'm trying to wrap my head around what you took issue with with n00bking prior to this post. He says talking strategy is fine early, and he does so, but discussing a d2 mass claim is a discussion better had on day 2, I assume, because there are still things to unfold before day 2, I.e the lynch and the night actions. I don't see hypocracy or inconsistency in what n00bking is saying. Since this happened and there's been a pretty big pushback on your attempt to cast shade on him, you're now townreading him because he's too nitpicky with finer details, so he's now town. Is that an accurate summation of your read progression on n00bking? And now if noobking is town, where to from here, who is your next prime suspect? This is what I said: On March 06 2018 09:15 Tubesock wrote: Hola I like the idea of the coordinating medic shot via vote. A lot more information. I am not sure about the mass claiming bit D2 though. I think it would be better for town to have the medics be unknown for a couple cycles before they claim. It was more a response to Fecalfeast's idea of mass claiming D2, but it also advises town what I think town should do concerning mass claiming. In fact I wasn't specific because I understand the reality that when things change town players will start thinking it's a good idea/time and then it will present itself. The sentence prior even shows uncertainty about D2 claiming which would indicate I'm open to it if the conditions are right. So, he then zeros in on my D2 comment and is just "No discussion of D2" and then goes on about the setup and pregame conversation. Like he nitpicked 1 thing, and ignored the rest. I don't think he thought about my post. I thought that was scummy. Like I don't think wanting to just talk about D1 mass claiming is inconsistent. But my post answers that question also, so he wasn't really looking to talk about it. Like he wanted to PUSH the mass claim D1. He even later tries to throw shade on Holyflare for shutting down claim talk. Clearly people are not into claiming D1. As far as the nitpicky bit goes. In my experience, I'll say something weird and then people jump on my ass for it. Then a mafia sees thread sentiment and nitpicks to "lead" the charge. In this case I think n00b did that first so wasn't following thread sentiment. So, he's acting more like a Rels used to, rather than an opportunistic mafiosa. Yeah...I really "zeroed in" on your D2 comment....your post was 3 lines long, and one of the lines was "Hola." Then one of the lines was what I considered to be simple common sense, and didn't really need stating. Sorry for not quoting the part I thought was common sense and saying "Look at this, this is common sense!" So yeah, I focused on 1 thing, and ignored the rest. I focused on the 1 thing I actually thought needed anything said about it. Think that's pretty normal. And I didn't "throw shade" at HF for trying to shut down the claim conversation. I only said that anyone who has something to say about it should still do so, and not let themselves be silenced by him. How is it that you've come back and made more posts, without responding to the post where I went from just talking with you, to actually voting against you? I've already expressed that I didn't love the fact that the moment you switched from answering each post that came in, to disappearing for 16 hours or whatever it was, was also the moment I went from just having a conversation with you, to actually putting a vote on you. Could that have just been coincidence? Yeah, maybe. But it doesn't look like it, when upon your return to the thread, you STILL never acknowledge that post in any way, shape, or form. Did that part of Page 12 just magically escape your notice? "splain yourself." Lol, I already said why I didn’t interact with AMG at first and even he later said I’m not coherent In any way so clearly it isn’t just me. Maybe at the time I didn’t have the energy because I was doing something else too? As for 16 hours afk. Hahahaha think of two activities that generally use up 8 hours at a time. My sincere apologies that my gaming time doesn’t align with your desires your highness. | ||
Tubesock
United States2726 Posts
| ||
Tubesock
United States2726 Posts
| ||
n00bKing
United States1202 Posts
On March 07 2018 11:12 AMG wrote: Show nested quote + On March 07 2018 10:58 MoosyDoosy wrote: On March 07 2018 10:53 AMG wrote: You don't feel like mafia. My vote is in the wrong place. ##Unvote What about what Tubesock said makes you think he's not Mafia? Hes not squirming like mafia do. That and hes advocating a 'wait and see' approach on the only other wagon to himself.... which is a person who hasn't even posted yet. From that Ill extrapolate that they're either mafia together, or Tubesock isn't mafia Too big a leap in logic, for my tastes. Advocating "wait and see" with 20 hours left in the Phase isn't like saying it with 2 hours left. And whether a Mafia player squirms under pressure or not just depends on the circumstances, and their own personality type. Only the Mafia players know coming into the game that there are other players in the game who don't want to see them lynched. This makes them tougher to lynch than Town players, and can sometimes result in them being "cool under pressure." Some Town players will totally spaz in that same position, because they know nobody has their back. Other Town players can themselves be "cool under pressure" because they have a measure of boldness that comes from being certain of their own innocence. | ||
n00bKing
United States1202 Posts
On March 07 2018 15:14 Tubesock wrote: Show nested quote + On March 07 2018 14:58 n00bKing wrote: On March 07 2018 10:18 Tubesock wrote: On March 07 2018 05:50 AMG wrote: On March 06 2018 16:47 Tubesock wrote: On March 06 2018 16:45 AMG wrote: Tubesock, I implied you were mafia by your reaction and said someone you thought was scummy was almost certainly town.. you dont think either of those warrants further investigation or a response? Nope. I think the idea that only scum get salty is hilarious. You also don't seem to understand why I was "pricky". Do you understand what I didn't like about n00bking? I'm trying to wrap my head around what you took issue with with n00bking prior to this post. He says talking strategy is fine early, and he does so, but discussing a d2 mass claim is a discussion better had on day 2, I assume, because there are still things to unfold before day 2, I.e the lynch and the night actions. I don't see hypocracy or inconsistency in what n00bking is saying. Since this happened and there's been a pretty big pushback on your attempt to cast shade on him, you're now townreading him because he's too nitpicky with finer details, so he's now town. Is that an accurate summation of your read progression on n00bking? And now if noobking is town, where to from here, who is your next prime suspect? This is what I said: On March 06 2018 09:15 Tubesock wrote: Hola I like the idea of the coordinating medic shot via vote. A lot more information. I am not sure about the mass claiming bit D2 though. I think it would be better for town to have the medics be unknown for a couple cycles before they claim. It was more a response to Fecalfeast's idea of mass claiming D2, but it also advises town what I think town should do concerning mass claiming. In fact I wasn't specific because I understand the reality that when things change town players will start thinking it's a good idea/time and then it will present itself. The sentence prior even shows uncertainty about D2 claiming which would indicate I'm open to it if the conditions are right. So, he then zeros in on my D2 comment and is just "No discussion of D2" and then goes on about the setup and pregame conversation. Like he nitpicked 1 thing, and ignored the rest. I don't think he thought about my post. I thought that was scummy. Like I don't think wanting to just talk about D1 mass claiming is inconsistent. But my post answers that question also, so he wasn't really looking to talk about it. Like he wanted to PUSH the mass claim D1. He even later tries to throw shade on Holyflare for shutting down claim talk. Clearly people are not into claiming D1. As far as the nitpicky bit goes. In my experience, I'll say something weird and then people jump on my ass for it. Then a mafia sees thread sentiment and nitpicks to "lead" the charge. In this case I think n00b did that first so wasn't following thread sentiment. So, he's acting more like a Rels used to, rather than an opportunistic mafiosa. Yeah...I really "zeroed in" on your D2 comment....your post was 3 lines long, and one of the lines was "Hola." Then one of the lines was what I considered to be simple common sense, and didn't really need stating. Sorry for not quoting the part I thought was common sense and saying "Look at this, this is common sense!" So yeah, I focused on 1 thing, and ignored the rest. I focused on the 1 thing I actually thought needed anything said about it. Think that's pretty normal. And I didn't "throw shade" at HF for trying to shut down the claim conversation. I only said that anyone who has something to say about it should still do so, and not let themselves be silenced by him. How is it that you've come back and made more posts, without responding to the post where I went from just talking with you, to actually voting against you? I've already expressed that I didn't love the fact that the moment you switched from answering each post that came in, to disappearing for 16 hours or whatever it was, was also the moment I went from just having a conversation with you, to actually putting a vote on you. Could that have just been coincidence? Yeah, maybe. But it doesn't look like it, when upon your return to the thread, you STILL never acknowledge that post in any way, shape, or form. Did that part of Page 12 just magically escape your notice? "splain yourself." Lol, I already said why I didn’t interact with AMG at first and even he later said I’m not coherent In any way so clearly it isn’t just me. Maybe at the time I didn’t have the energy because I was doing something else too? As for 16 hours afk. Hahahaha think of two activities that generally use up 8 hours at a time. My sincere apologies that my gaming time doesn’t align with your desires your highness. You said why you didn't interact with AMG over the issue of whether players being prickly is scum-indicative. You did NOT answer to this: On March 06 2018 18:01 n00bKing wrote: even if you thought you had "no common ground" with him about what makes players prickly (and even if you thought discussing the disagreement with him wouldn't help you determine whether he actually sees it differently, or is just pretending to) you could have just talked to him about something else instead. Like...you could have talked to him about the thing you were "more interested in." ME! Why not ask him why he has the townread on me? He might share something that changes your mind. Or you might share something that changes his. Having NO desire to discuss me with someone who takes the opposite opinion just makes it look like you already know my allegiance. Would talking to him about that also have been pointless? And if so, why? RE: 16 hours, I said the timing of your disappearance could be coincidental. But the timing of your disappearance LOOKS BAD. You're talking, talking, talking, answering, answering, answering...until the moment I say you've made a post that makes me willing to actually go from just talking with you, to voting against you. That was when you vanished for a third of the Phase. It doesn't help me think better of you. | ||
n00bKing
United States1202 Posts
On March 07 2018 12:39 MoosyDoosy wrote: Show nested quote + On March 07 2018 12:34 Tubesock wrote: I don't understand why you towned Damdred for that "Good man, it won't be me (but it was)" comment. Can you expand that please? Add this question too to the list of things Tube seems like he's just throwing out trying to make stick. I'm going to leave to finish my essay I actually have to do by tonight but I want feedback from other people on what they think. If anyone legitimately wants me to explain this read though also, just say so and I will when I get back. Sure, I'll raise my hand for this one. If you think explaining it will be counter-productive for the Town, say that. Otherwise...stop avoiding Tubesock's question? | ||
Tubesock
United States2726 Posts
And frankly, I’m not asking for permission to leave the thread. If you want to read into the timing that’s all you. | ||
n00bKing
United States1202 Posts
Does anyone agree or disagree with rsoul's assessment that the silence from Vivax and Kelsier (and especially Vivax) is more alignment-indicative than it is for chaoser? Does anyone even know chaoser? I think it's also worth discussing whether any of those players are strong Town assets *when* they are Town. For example, let's say people generally agree that Vivax is more likely than the average player, to no-show a thread while Scum. If it just so happens that he had done it as Town this time, would we be shooting ourselves in the foot in a major way by mislynching him, and losing the services of Town Vivax, cuz maybe he was going to show up later and be a Scum-wrecking machine? Or is it big upside and only small downside? And then same question regarding our other 2 no-shows. | ||
n00bKing
United States1202 Posts
On March 07 2018 15:44 Tubesock wrote: Uh it was pretty clear you were going to vote me so the timing wasn’t relevant at all. It wasn't clear to ME that I was going to vote against you, until you made the post that I identified as being the one that actually caused me to place the vote. Tubesock wrote: I’ll even go a step further, you’re not going to vote anyone else today. lol, guess we'll see, huh? Meanwhile, you're still not answering the question. Third time: In addition to not wanting to talk to AMG about whether it's scum-indicative for players to be prickly, why did you also not want to talk to him about me, the thing you claimed to be "more interested in" at the time, and a topic where you knew he had a differing opinion? Why would you not want to bounce your thoughts about me off of other players, unless you already knew my allegiance? | ||
Tubesock
United States2726 Posts
On March 07 2018 15:58 n00bKing wrote: Show nested quote + On March 07 2018 15:44 Tubesock wrote: Uh it was pretty clear you were going to vote me so the timing wasn’t relevant at all. It wasn't clear to ME that I was going to vote against you, until you made the post that I identified as being the one that actually caused me to place the vote. Show nested quote + Tubesock wrote: I’ll even go a step further, you’re not going to vote anyone else today. lol, guess we'll see, huh? Meanwhile, you're still not answering the question. Third time: In addition to not wanting to talk to AMG about whether it's scum-indicative for players to be prickly, why did you also not want to talk to him about me, the thing you claimed to be "more interested in" at the time, and a topic where you knew he had a differing opinion? Why would you not want to bounce your thoughts about me off of other players, unless you already knew my allegiance? I didn’t think it would be a beneficial conversation. While I will bounce off ideas with people I trust, I generally talk with people to get a read on them not the subject of the conversation. While even asking him to clarify things about you, they would not likely change or affect my read on you. Especially considering AMG’s and my differences. And I didn’t think what he said would offer me any insights on him. Take FecalFeast as an example. I have no idea about his alignment and it’s obvious others are similiar. But trying to interact with him has a very low probability of gainful insight. On his alignment or whoever we talk about. So you should scum me for not interacting with FF also but it’s basically the same. And Darthfolley probably. And HF to some extent also. That’s going to have to be enough for you cause that’s all you’re trying. | ||
Tubesock
United States2726 Posts
| ||
Tubesock
United States2726 Posts
HF has said in thread that that is bullshit however. So, maybe others will chime in on what they think. | ||
AMG
Australia298 Posts
On March 07 2018 15:51 n00bKing wrote: Meanwhile, Does anyone agree or disagree with rsoul's assessment that the silence from Vivax and Kelsier (and especially Vivax) is more alignment-indicative than it is for chaoser? Does anyone even know chaoser? I think it's also worth discussing whether any of those players are strong Town assets *when* they are Town. For example, let's say people generally agree that Vivax is more likely than the average player, to no-show a thread while Scum. If it just so happens that he had done it as Town this time, would we be shooting ourselves in the foot in a major way by mislynching him, and losing the services of Town Vivax, cuz maybe he was going to show up later and be a Scum-wrecking machine? Or is it big upside and only small downside? And then same question regarding our other 2 no-shows. Chaoser has been on this forum even longer than I have. Back when PM games used to be the norm and you used to get clues from the host every cycle. Hes pretty good/reasonable when he can resist the urge to troll, but that urge strikes him pretty often. | ||
| ||
Next event in 11h 16m
[ Submit Event ] |
StarCraft 2 StarCraft: Brood War Dota 2 League of Legends Counter-Strike Super Smash Bros Heroes of the Storm Other Games summit1g14309 Grubby4195 Liquid`RaSZi1493 shahzam675 Fuzer 585 ToD353 Skadoodle348 TKL 254 ArmadaUGS182 UpATreeSC83 Trikslyr70 QueenE30 Organizations
StarCraft 2 • davetesta262 StarCraft: Brood War• musti20045 31 • maralekos19 • Kozan • LaughNgamezSOOP • sooper7s • Migwel • AfreecaTV YouTube • intothetv • Laughngamez YouTube • IndyKCrew League of Legends Other Games |
Sparkling Tuna Cup
WardiTV Festival
Online Event
BSL: Nation Wars
dxtr13 vs Tarson
MadiNho vs ZZZero
Sziky vs Bonyth
izu vs kogeT
Tenacious Turtle Tussle
SOOP StarCraft League
Snow vs Speed
Mini vs Rain
Wardi Open
Starcraft League
DaveTesta Events
SOOP StarCraft League
Sharp vs Stork
Light vs Royal
[ Show More ] The PondCast
Korean StarCraft League
Premier Star League
CranKy Ducklings
|
|