|
Day 5 Votecount
Fazers (1): RiceyKins
Not Voting (5): Mig, Fazers, Etellex, justanothertownie, Killing
Day 5 ends Monday, May 16 9:00pm GMT (GMT+00:00) in . TL countdown synchronizes with your device local time and not with the TL server time. It might be inaccurate.
|
|
On May 16 2016 12:21 Etellex wrote: Killing: 80/20 Townie. This guy is weird because everything about him from his tone to his intentionally confusing posts to his weird obsession with Ricey is countered by the fact that he outed both Palmar and Sandroba as mafia and said that both Marv and Kush were town. I don't know if this guy is just trolling or if he's pulling of some next-level meta shit. Going with the former for now.
Can you explain what you mean by that (the bolded)? I don't remember Killing outing any mafia and townreading obvious townies isn't something mafia can't do either.
|
Day 5 Votecount
Fazers (2): RiceyKins, justanothertownie
Not Voting (4): Mig, Fazers, Etellex, Killing
Day 5 ends Monday, May 16 9:00pm GMT (GMT+00:00) in . TL countdown synchronizes with your device local time and not with the TL server time. It might be inaccurate.
|
|
Day 5 Votecount
Fazers (3): RiceyKins, justanothertownie, Fazers
Not Voting (3): Mig, Etellex, Killing
Day 5 ends Monday, May 16 9:00pm GMT (GMT+00:00) in . TL countdown synchronizes with your device local time and not with the TL server time. It might be inaccurate.
|
On May 16 2016 23:39 Fazers wrote: ##vote Fazers
Ah the classic concede. I knew it all along.
##vote Fazers
|
Day 5 Votecount
Fazers (4): RiceyKins, justanothertownie, Fazers, Killing
Not Voting (2): Mig, Etellex
Day 5 ends Monday, May 16 9:00pm GMT (GMT+00:00) in . TL countdown synchronizes with your device local time and not with the TL server time. It might be inaccurate.
|
United States4714 Posts
I am back broskis. Yea it is impossible for me to be mafia. Seriously no chance I ever shoot shape over kush. Shape was still under suspicion from a couple people. Down the road he could be a potential mislynch at the end. Kush is a confirmed townie. Even for the mindfuck possibilities I wouldnt make that shot. And besides if I were mafia and knew I could be stuck here until the end no way I would shoot the most entertaining person left.
|
United States4714 Posts
I am nervous about a fazers lynch. Definitely doesnt seem to be very concerned with how his posts look. But looking at his only other game he sounded nicer there and he was town so meh. Fazers if you are town and you just vote yourself and quit then you seriously shouldnt even be playing mafia games. Ruins the game for everyone else when people post 10 times over 5 days then just quit.
|
On May 17 2016 01:55 Mig wrote: I am nervous about a fazers lynch. Definitely doesnt seem to be very concerned with how his posts look. But looking at his only other game he sounded nicer there and he was town so meh. Fazers if you are town and you just vote yourself and quit then you seriously shouldnt even be playing mafia games. Ruins the game for everyone else when people post 10 times over 5 days then just quit. So what do you propose we do instead then? This isn't very helpful.
|
yeah I agree. I think we've got it though.
|
You don't think he's just town giving up Killing?
|
On May 17 2016 02:20 RiceyKins wrote: You don't think he's just town giving up Killing?
Nope because that would be against the rules. So if he is, he can kindly go fuck himself.
|
On May 17 2016 02:51 Killing wrote:Show nested quote +On May 17 2016 02:20 RiceyKins wrote: You don't think he's just town giving up Killing? Nope because that would be against the rules. So if he is, he can kindly go fuck himself. True.
|
United States4714 Posts
I dont really have a better play that fazers. If one of the last mafia are ricey/killing/jat I would predict the town is going to lose
|
this is projecting a little bit but I'm just looking through everything and seeing if it fits.
On May 04 2016 10:31 Fazers wrote:To address your questions: I want to lynch Killing possibly, he's making a bit of noise. I guess activity is pretty good early on to form initiative, but a lot of bold accusations imo. I don't care about people who are inactive in this game so far. It's been a little quiet. I have a strong opinion about Shapelog - imo he's a strong player from my observations. Thus I will not vote to lynch him on Day 1. However, that may change as days pass.
we agreed his thing on Killing was kind of bad and didn't make him scum. He didn't want to go after the inactive players (turns out there were two mafia in Palmar/Dr.P in there and those were being pushed by Kush and Myself so it was likely if we did go for a lynch on the inactive players it would be one of them)
On May 04 2016 11:09 Fazers wrote: Yeah I was just throwing it out there. I don't actually have any determination to make sure Killing gets lynched. However, why are the accusations not bold? He's making reads off such little information. He even admits he may sound like an idiot for not like a few posters on his list...it's baseless.
Activity and making reads though is definitely awesome on his part though!
he backs off Killing quickly and then
On May 04 2016 22:49 Fazers wrote: ##vote Mig
Happens to go after an inactive player that just happens to be different from Palmar/Dr.P
I should add he was the only person to vote for Mig at any point in time and it would go with my theory earlier that I talked to JAT about where Mafia actually had no part in the tubesock lynch and that we just happened to lynch a fellow townie all by our selves.
Fazers goes on to talk about killing but never actually addresses the Mig vote again and only says he should have voted for Etellex instead of him in retrospect after Tube flips town.
then goes after Etellex for voting without a reason and sheeping people and as I've posted earlier all of Fazers votes have been the same if not worse.
Am I making sense to people?
|
On May 17 2016 04:29 RiceyKins wrote:this is projecting a little bit but I'm just looking through everything and seeing if it fits. Show nested quote +On May 04 2016 10:31 Fazers wrote:To address your questions: I want to lynch Killing possibly, he's making a bit of noise. I guess activity is pretty good early on to form initiative, but a lot of bold accusations imo. I don't care about people who are inactive in this game so far. It's been a little quiet. I have a strong opinion about Shapelog - imo he's a strong player from my observations. Thus I will not vote to lynch him on Day 1. However, that may change as days pass. we agreed his thing on Killing was kind of bad and didn't make him scum. He didn't want to go after the inactive players (turns out there were two mafia in Palmar/Dr.P in there and those were being pushed by Kush and Myself so it was likely if we did go for a lynch on the inactive players it would be one of them) Show nested quote +On May 04 2016 11:09 Fazers wrote: Yeah I was just throwing it out there. I don't actually have any determination to make sure Killing gets lynched. However, why are the accusations not bold? He's making reads off such little information. He even admits he may sound like an idiot for not like a few posters on his list...it's baseless.
Activity and making reads though is definitely awesome on his part though! he backs off Killing quickly and then Happens to go after an inactive player that just happens to be different from Palmar/Dr.P You are just listing things fazers did. Why wouldn't that make sense? I especially love the part where he says "Activity and making reads though is definitely awesome on his part though!" about Killing when he himself hasn't done anything like that all fucking game. I should add he was the only person to vote for Mig at any point in time and it would go with my theory earlier that I talked to JAT about where Mafia actually had no part in the tubesock lynch and that we just happened to lynch a fellow townie all by our selves. Fazers goes on to talk about killing but never actually addresses the Mig vote again and only says he should have voted for Etellex instead of him in retrospect after Tube flips town. then goes after Etellex for voting without a reason and sheeping people and as I've posted earlier all of Fazers votes have been the same if not worse. Am I making sense to people?
|
Fail.
On May 17 2016 04:29 RiceyKins wrote:this is projecting a little bit but I'm just looking through everything and seeing if it fits. Show nested quote +On May 04 2016 10:31 Fazers wrote:To address your questions: I want to lynch Killing possibly, he's making a bit of noise. I guess activity is pretty good early on to form initiative, but a lot of bold accusations imo. I don't care about people who are inactive in this game so far. It's been a little quiet. I have a strong opinion about Shapelog - imo he's a strong player from my observations. Thus I will not vote to lynch him on Day 1. However, that may change as days pass. we agreed his thing on Killing was kind of bad and didn't make him scum. He didn't want to go after the inactive players (turns out there were two mafia in Palmar/Dr.P in there and those were being pushed by Kush and Myself so it was likely if we did go for a lynch on the inactive players it would be one of them) Show nested quote +On May 04 2016 11:09 Fazers wrote: Yeah I was just throwing it out there. I don't actually have any determination to make sure Killing gets lynched. However, why are the accusations not bold? He's making reads off such little information. He even admits he may sound like an idiot for not like a few posters on his list...it's baseless.
Activity and making reads though is definitely awesome on his part though! he backs off Killing quickly and then Happens to go after an inactive player that just happens to be different from Palmar/Dr.P I should add he was the only person to vote for Mig at any point in time and it would go with my theory earlier that I talked to JAT about where Mafia actually had no part in the tubesock lynch and that we just happened to lynch a fellow townie all by our selves. Fazers goes on to talk about killing but never actually addresses the Mig vote again and only says he should have voted for Etellex instead of him in retrospect after Tube flips town. then goes after Etellex for voting without a reason and sheeping people and as I've posted earlier all of Fazers votes have been the same if not worse. Am I making sense to people? You are just listing things fazers did. Why wouldn't that make sense?
I especially love the part where he says "Activity and making reads though is definitely awesome on his part though!" about Killing when he himself hasn't done anything like that all fucking game.
|
I'm asking more just to have a second opinion and see if you come to the same conclusion that in retrospect this stuff makes him look very much like the last mafia
but yeah he seems to try to label people for things he's been doing himself all game long.
|
|
|
|