|
Tricked me into fucking writing a big WoT that game as scum.
Eh,
I mean, I see more paraells from storm here, than I do Nut. From a meta point.
I honestly have no clue about the treatment of Marv (never played with marv except once, in hydra) or that marv pushings who ever goes after him.
But nothing strikes me as off going into his filter.
|
On May 05 2016 00:52 nnn_thekushmountains wrote: palmar plynch lookin better and better, amirite? You aren't.
You just admitted that you don't think Palmar is lying about his rl stuff. Why do you want to lynch him then? What makes him a better target than the people who do not have an excuse like that?
|
On May 05 2016 00:52 nnn_thekushmountains wrote: palmar plynch lookin better and better, amirite?
Why not Dr Thrawn?
jat is right about plynch on Palmar.
|
On May 05 2016 00:52 nnn_thekushmountains wrote: palmar plynch lookin better and better, amirite? Keep talking, I'll make you QQ again over my sick plays.
|
On May 05 2016 00:55 Shapelog wrote:Tricked me into fucking writing a big WoT that game as scum. Eh, I mean, I see more paraells from storm here, than I do Nut. From a meta point. I honestly have no clue about the treatment of Marv (never played with marv except once, in hydra) or that marv pushings who ever goes after him. But nothing strikes me as off going into his filter. Lol immediately read that as
|
On May 05 2016 00:59 Alakaslam wrote:Show nested quote +On May 05 2016 00:55 Shapelog wrote:Tricked me into fucking writing a big WoT that game as scum. Eh, I mean, I see more paraells from storm here, than I do Nut. From a meta point. I honestly have no clue about the treatment of Marv (never played with marv except once, in hydra) or that marv pushings who ever goes after him. But nothing strikes me as off going into his filter. Lol immediately read that as
|
On May 05 2016 00:55 Shapelog wrote:Tricked me into fucking writing a big WoT that game as scum. Eh, I mean, I see more paraells from storm here, than I do Nut. From a meta point. I honestly have no clue about the treatment of Marv (never played with marv except once, in hydra) or that marv pushings who ever goes after him. But nothing strikes me as off going into his filter.
It was a really nice WoT though! Not as nice as the one where you tracked TicTock though...
|
Those tanks were so nice! Bertie, O-I, KV-2, all the kings of... Ah, you mean wall of text don't you? How boring...
|
On May 05 2016 01:04 Tubesock wrote:Show nested quote +On May 05 2016 00:55 Shapelog wrote:Tricked me into fucking writing a big WoT that game as scum. Eh, I mean, I see more paraells from storm here, than I do Nut. From a meta point. I honestly have no clue about the treatment of Marv (never played with marv except once, in hydra) or that marv pushings who ever goes after him. But nothing strikes me as off going into his filter. It was a really nice WoT though! Not as nice as the one where you tracked TicTock though... Tbf you could of won that game. Even after the track.
|
On May 05 2016 00:52 Tubesock wrote:Show nested quote +On May 04 2016 20:40 marvellosity wrote:On May 04 2016 09:20 Tubesock wrote:On May 04 2016 03:39 marvellosity wrote:On May 04 2016 02:12 nnn_thekushmountains wrote:On May 04 2016 00:55 marvellosity wrote:On May 04 2016 00:53 RiceyKins wrote: the way he said it made me think it was specific to Palmar. my mistake then Marv. so why did you use a question mark when you were talking about what shape said had you genuinely forgot who it was in the 50 posts the game has? could you not have checked if you weren't sure? etc<script id="gpt-impl-0.7793814496370671" src="http://partner.googleadservices.com/gpt/pubads_impl_85.js"></script> At first I was like damn marv's being perceptive. And then I was like ... really though? I would speak about what Shape said about Palmar with the same vagueness and uncertainty. Shape alluded to his last game with Palmar but included none of the specifics, as far as I remember. So I'm kinda sus of you for making such a big deal about it. no harm in seeing how it went, is there? Did it go anywhere? Did your opinion of Killing change at all after his response? i thought he was town before and i still do
ah ok I can't tell if you meant to say me but said Killing instead there but fair enough.
Kush if we're going to policy lynch I'd rather it be Dr.P I'll copy JAT a bit here is there any reason to lynch Palmar over DrP or any of the others who haven't given us a reason for their absence?
|
Hey guys, I apologize for not posting nearly enough. I didn't expect there to be this much activity in terms of discussion, making me pretty overwhelmed. I'm going to take an hour or so later today to catch up on reading the thread so I can get a proper grasp on what's going on in the game. Again, I am very sorry for my inactivity and I will fill everything I can to both check and post to the thread more often from here on out. Cheers.
|
I said this before jat.
Palmer has stated his intent to vote. That saves him from a potential modkill or replacement. Whereas Drp is probably going to get replaced.
|
On May 05 2016 01:12 nnn_thekushmountains wrote: I said this before jat.
Palmer has stated his intent to vote. That saves him from a potential modkill or replacement. Whereas Drp is probably going to get replaced. I said this before kush.
The lurkers most likely will not be replaced day1. And if they are mafia then nothing stops them from voting/posting eod. It is not hard to understand.
|
The policy is not lynch people who lie about irl. The policy is lynch people who are unreadable due to lack of content.
|
On May 05 2016 01:14 nnn_thekushmountains wrote: The policy is not lynch people who lie about irl. The policy is lynch people who are unreadable due to lack of content. Nice deflection.
|
On May 05 2016 01:13 justanothertownie wrote:Show nested quote +On May 05 2016 01:12 nnn_thekushmountains wrote: I said this before jat.
Palmer has stated his intent to vote. That saves him from a potential modkill or replacement. Whereas Drp is probably going to get replaced. I said this before kush. The lurkers most likely will not be replaced day1. And if they are mafia then nothing stops them from voting/posting eod. It is not hard to understand.
Who is more likely to get replaced, either tomorrow of eventually? DrP or Palmar? Dr P. That's why Palmar makes a better plynch.
"Nothing stops them from voting/posting eod" No but it would make them look scummy if they were afk except to put down a vote, so scum don't tend to do that.
|
On May 05 2016 01:23 nnn_thekushmountains wrote:Show nested quote +On May 05 2016 01:13 justanothertownie wrote:On May 05 2016 01:12 nnn_thekushmountains wrote: I said this before jat.
Palmer has stated his intent to vote. That saves him from a potential modkill or replacement. Whereas Drp is probably going to get replaced. I said this before kush. The lurkers most likely will not be replaced day1. And if they are mafia then nothing stops them from voting/posting eod. It is not hard to understand. Who is more likely to get replaced, either tomorrow of eventually? DrP or Palmar? Dr P. That's why Palmar makes a better plynch. "Nothing stops them from voting/posting eod" No but it would make them look scummy if they were afk except to put down a vote, so scum don't tend to do that. Never ever ever base your play on potential replacements/modkills. It's fucking idiotic.
|
It's the reality of the situation. You can play in an idealized JATland but I play in the real world.
|
wahtever i dont want to argue about this with you. I do want to consolidate on someone sensible so we can maximize our chances to get a claim.
|
On May 05 2016 01:26 nnn_thekushmountains wrote: It's the reality of the situation. You can play in an idealized JATland but I play in the real world. In the real world you give up lynching someone who can defend himself or has chosen to be inactive in order to lynch someone completely at random. That is retarded.
|
|
|
|