A normal game just for JAT <3 - Page 178

justanothertownie

16316 Posts

May 02 2016 11:54 GMT

#3541

On May 02 2016 20:49 raynpelikoneet wrote:

Because there are literally zero votes on Glowingbear and your post where you vote for him you imply you don't even wanna lynch him because you are "tired of choosing D1 lynches". It is not an unreasonable to assume that Superbia (your mafia read) can get lynched if you vote for him. It is not unreasonable to assume that Tumblewood (not your mafia read) can get lynched if you don't do anything about it. Both of the assumptions above are at that point more likely than that Glowingbear (your mafia read) gets lynched if you vote for him, especially when you say you don't even care if other people follow you or not.

So regardless of any of those three people's alignments you, at that point of the game, chose to not take a stance on a lynch when it's likely one of Superbia/Tumble gets lynched - when one of them is your scumread and the other one is not. What happens after, or whatever you would have done based on things that didn't happen is irrelevant.

I am not sure why i have to even explain why this can be seen (and should be seen) as scummy....

You are making the assumption that I could never change my vote again once I voted GB.
Which is obviously extremely retarded. Of course I would have voted Super again if it came down to a 1v1 between him and tumble and I was literally about to. And as you can see people sheeped me instead so from your "things that didn't happen are irrelevant point of view" I did everything right by lynching my scumread GB and making my vote count.

I am not even sure why I have to explain this to you.

justanothertownie

16316 Posts

May 02 2016 11:57 GMT

#3542

But this is seriously the last thing I will say to this. You are clearly grasping at straws to justify your awful stance on my play this game and won't let facts or reasonable thinking get in your way.
Good thing you weren't in this game as town. We would have lost incredibly hard.

raynpelikoneet

Finland43226 Posts

May 02 2016 11:59 GMT

#3543

Yeah you are right, you did nothing wrong. Only super townie things. You're perfect.
Carry on.

rsoultin

Netherlands15308 Posts

May 02 2016 12:46 GMT

#3544

@rels, rit mentioned to me that n2 gum was going to save me but then switched to you, and also suggested that he'd saved you n1 as well

beyond that i don't know ^^

-flicks peanuts at both rayn and jat- your argument to me basically reads as
* i thought you were scummy for x
* but i was town so clearly it wasn't scummy

like maybe there's more to it than that but you both are kiiiinda right in that jat you obviously could be scumread for wanting to vote gb instead of super when super flips scum and yet rayn, that obv doesn't make him scum cause he was town

not really sure why this argument is even taking place tbh

i mean it's not really like jat played bad. the lynchpin of your argument about gb was that his afking was nai, yet you're ignoring that what he posted while in thread actually was closer to how he normally plays scum than how he plays town. there was no reason for anyone to townread gb here and town obv doesn't have full info any more than you did while scumreading two town players who arguably would become two of the most townread, rayn

rsoultin

Netherlands15308 Posts

May 02 2016 12:49 GMT

#3545

anyway lol i should start getting some work done ^^ (if you want to argue with me rayn you can just poke me in skype where we won't clutter the thread xP)

raynpelikoneet

Finland43226 Posts

May 02 2016 12:51 GMT

#3546

On May 02 2016 21:46 rsoultin wrote:
the lynchpin of your argument about gb was that his afking was nai, yet you're ignoring that what he posted while in thread actually was closer to how he normally plays scum than how he plays town

well it was a lynch based on obviously NAI things because GB did them as town, right? so a super fucking terrible bs bad lynch...