|
On May 02 2016 19:31 Palmar wrote: I am sorry that I didn't kick and scream to lynch superbia day 1.
If a person claims blue to save himself ALWAYS, ALWAYS lynch him. It is always the right play. Lol that is 100% wrong bro, especially when town knows all existing roles
|
|
On May 02 2016 19:40 raynpelikoneet wrote: Yes it is, even if he fucked up on D1 as town, there is no way he fucks up like that as N1. I mean like ofc you can never be 100% certain, but there is no reason to counter-claim him in a situation like that or assume a real power role that plays properly cc's him. Even if it Vivax, just always shoot them. No, no, no. Yes, he should do stuff in the night but not everyone does that. Vigging a claimed powerrole without a cc in an OPEN setup is insanely dumb.
|
On May 02 2016 19:43 justanothertownie wrote:Show nested quote +On May 02 2016 19:40 raynpelikoneet wrote: Yes it is, even if he fucked up on D1 as town, there is no way he fucks up like that as N1. I mean like ofc you can never be 100% certain, but there is no reason to counter-claim him in a situation like that or assume a real power role that plays properly cc's him. Even if it Vivax, just always shoot them. No, no, no. Yes, he should do stuff in the night but not everyone does that. Vigging a claimed powerrole without a cc in an OPEN setup is insanely dumb. So let's say Superbia actually played his A-game on D2. I am gonna come out and say that you would have lynched Obi the doctor over him there and oh boy you would have felt stupid. If you also count his D1 and N1 play here -- on the lynch on D2, why do you need to counter-claim / would not shoot him again?
|
On May 02 2016 19:45 raynpelikoneet wrote:Show nested quote +On May 02 2016 19:43 justanothertownie wrote:On May 02 2016 19:40 raynpelikoneet wrote: Yes it is, even if he fucked up on D1 as town, there is no way he fucks up like that as N1. I mean like ofc you can never be 100% certain, but there is no reason to counter-claim him in a situation like that or assume a real power role that plays properly cc's him. Even if it Vivax, just always shoot them. No, no, no. Yes, he should do stuff in the night but not everyone does that. Vigging a claimed powerrole without a cc in an OPEN setup is insanely dumb. So let's say Superbia actually played his A-game on D2. I am gonna come out and say that you would have lynched Obi the doctor over him there and oh boy you would have felt stupid. If you also count his D1 and N1 play here -- on the lynch on D2, why do you need to counter-claim / would not shoot him again? erm, what?
If super played his A-game on D2 then gumshoe would cc him and we would lynch superbia. And it is very different if you don't do much as claimed pr in the night vs. when you are being lynched the day after. How you can argue anything else is beyond me.
|
nvm it was gumshoe in fact. Maybe people would not have lynched gumshoe.
|
People wouldn't have lynched either of them because a cc on day2 makes 0 sense as mafia.
|
Palmar are you proud of me ? I learned from my mistake! I didn't let you live long enough to fuck me like in pyp!
|
Btw what were the doc targets ?
|
On May 02 2016 19:48 justanothertownie wrote:Show nested quote +On May 02 2016 19:45 raynpelikoneet wrote:On May 02 2016 19:43 justanothertownie wrote:On May 02 2016 19:40 raynpelikoneet wrote: Yes it is, even if he fucked up on D1 as town, there is no way he fucks up like that as N1. I mean like ofc you can never be 100% certain, but there is no reason to counter-claim him in a situation like that or assume a real power role that plays properly cc's him. Even if it Vivax, just always shoot them. No, no, no. Yes, he should do stuff in the night but not everyone does that. Vigging a claimed powerrole without a cc in an OPEN setup is insanely dumb. So let's say Superbia actually played his A-game on D2. I am gonna come out and say that you would have lynched Obi the doctor over him there and oh boy you would have felt stupid. If you also count his D1 and N1 play here -- on the lynch on D2, why do you need to counter-claim / would not shoot him again? erm, what? If super played his A-game on D2 then gumshoe would cc him and we would lynch superbia. And it is very different if you don't do much as claimed pr in the night vs. when you are being lynched the day after. How you can argue anything else is beyond me. Because if Superbia is mafia which is likely you don't out a power role and waste D2 into talking about nothing but him (which the town did -- it always happens).
If Superbia is town he will get shot anyways on N1 because he is a good player AND a power role.
Like he was clearly the scummiest player in the game besides the claim and therefore the best shot. Shooting him as vigi doesn't make it any worse since he will almost always get shot by scum if he is town as it is expected he will play on D2 and if he is mafia there is clearly profit in shooting him.
|
On May 02 2016 19:53 raynpelikoneet wrote:Show nested quote +On May 02 2016 19:48 justanothertownie wrote:On May 02 2016 19:45 raynpelikoneet wrote:On May 02 2016 19:43 justanothertownie wrote:On May 02 2016 19:40 raynpelikoneet wrote: Yes it is, even if he fucked up on D1 as town, there is no way he fucks up like that as N1. I mean like ofc you can never be 100% certain, but there is no reason to counter-claim him in a situation like that or assume a real power role that plays properly cc's him. Even if it Vivax, just always shoot them. No, no, no. Yes, he should do stuff in the night but not everyone does that. Vigging a claimed powerrole without a cc in an OPEN setup is insanely dumb. So let's say Superbia actually played his A-game on D2. I am gonna come out and say that you would have lynched Obi the doctor over him there and oh boy you would have felt stupid. If you also count his D1 and N1 play here -- on the lynch on D2, why do you need to counter-claim / would not shoot him again? erm, what? If super played his A-game on D2 then gumshoe would cc him and we would lynch superbia. And it is very different if you don't do much as claimed pr in the night vs. when you are being lynched the day after. How you can argue anything else is beyond me. Because if Superbia is mafia which is likely you don't out a power role and waste D2 into talking about nothing but him (which the town did -- it always happens). If Superbia is town he will get shot anyways on N1 because he is a good player AND a power role. Like he was clearly the scummiest player in the game besides the claim and therefore the best shot. Shooting him as vigi doesn't make it any worse since he will almost always get shot by scum if he is town as it is expected he will play on D2 and if he is mafia there is clearly profit in shooting him. No, he does not always get shot. They can just rb him. And it doesn't even matter since what you are saying is that in case he is town we should just waste our vigshot. Great plan.
|
You can criticize this town for quite a few things but how we handled superbia was 100 % correct.
|
Actually it would have been funny to see what happens if gumshoe cc'd Superbia on D2. gumshoe the doctor argues at the start of D2 that he knows if Superbia claims vigi, his play was to shoot Palmar on N1 and therefore he ended up NOT protecting Palmar(???). Oh boy that would've been a good case and a good clusterfuck for D2. ^^
|
On May 02 2016 19:56 justanothertownie wrote:Show nested quote +On May 02 2016 19:53 raynpelikoneet wrote:On May 02 2016 19:48 justanothertownie wrote:On May 02 2016 19:45 raynpelikoneet wrote:On May 02 2016 19:43 justanothertownie wrote:On May 02 2016 19:40 raynpelikoneet wrote: Yes it is, even if he fucked up on D1 as town, there is no way he fucks up like that as N1. I mean like ofc you can never be 100% certain, but there is no reason to counter-claim him in a situation like that or assume a real power role that plays properly cc's him. Even if it Vivax, just always shoot them. No, no, no. Yes, he should do stuff in the night but not everyone does that. Vigging a claimed powerrole without a cc in an OPEN setup is insanely dumb. So let's say Superbia actually played his A-game on D2. I am gonna come out and say that you would have lynched Obi the doctor over him there and oh boy you would have felt stupid. If you also count his D1 and N1 play here -- on the lynch on D2, why do you need to counter-claim / would not shoot him again? erm, what? If super played his A-game on D2 then gumshoe would cc him and we would lynch superbia. And it is very different if you don't do much as claimed pr in the night vs. when you are being lynched the day after. How you can argue anything else is beyond me. Because if Superbia is mafia which is likely you don't out a power role and waste D2 into talking about nothing but him (which the town did -- it always happens). If Superbia is town he will get shot anyways on N1 because he is a good player AND a power role. Like he was clearly the scummiest player in the game besides the claim and therefore the best shot. Shooting him as vigi doesn't make it any worse since he will almost always get shot by scum if he is town as it is expected he will play on D2 and if he is mafia there is clearly profit in shooting him. No, he does not always get shot. They can just rb him. And it doesn't even matter since what you are saying is that in case he is town we should just waste our vigshot. Great plan. I am pretty sure this town wasted a mislynch because they shot a completely null player who ended up being town.
Like if you wanna talk theory then talk theory. But don't talk theory and ignore what actually happened when it suits you and vice versa. In theory, regardless of Superbia's alignment, first of all when he claimed, if you want to make him accountable of his claim, make him claim a ROLE and not just blue. When noone counter-claims him on D1 it is expected noone will counter-claim him on D2 either. If someone counter-claims him, you either have to discount everything Superbia did on D1 and N1, or otherwise there is no need for counter-claim. If Superbia is town, any mafia up for lynch on D2 will obviously counter-claim him 100% of the time. Then you end up again in a dumb spot where at worst you have lynched a townie (GB here) and a blue role -- possibly even shot another fucking townie on N1 aswell. Instead of just.. shooting the scum on N1. Again, if you do not discount what Superbia did on D1 and N1, why cc anyways?
|
On May 02 2016 19:59 raynpelikoneet wrote:Show nested quote +On May 02 2016 19:56 justanothertownie wrote:On May 02 2016 19:53 raynpelikoneet wrote:On May 02 2016 19:48 justanothertownie wrote:On May 02 2016 19:45 raynpelikoneet wrote:On May 02 2016 19:43 justanothertownie wrote:On May 02 2016 19:40 raynpelikoneet wrote: Yes it is, even if he fucked up on D1 as town, there is no way he fucks up like that as N1. I mean like ofc you can never be 100% certain, but there is no reason to counter-claim him in a situation like that or assume a real power role that plays properly cc's him. Even if it Vivax, just always shoot them. No, no, no. Yes, he should do stuff in the night but not everyone does that. Vigging a claimed powerrole without a cc in an OPEN setup is insanely dumb. So let's say Superbia actually played his A-game on D2. I am gonna come out and say that you would have lynched Obi the doctor over him there and oh boy you would have felt stupid. If you also count his D1 and N1 play here -- on the lynch on D2, why do you need to counter-claim / would not shoot him again? erm, what? If super played his A-game on D2 then gumshoe would cc him and we would lynch superbia. And it is very different if you don't do much as claimed pr in the night vs. when you are being lynched the day after. How you can argue anything else is beyond me. Because if Superbia is mafia which is likely you don't out a power role and waste D2 into talking about nothing but him (which the town did -- it always happens). If Superbia is town he will get shot anyways on N1 because he is a good player AND a power role. Like he was clearly the scummiest player in the game besides the claim and therefore the best shot. Shooting him as vigi doesn't make it any worse since he will almost always get shot by scum if he is town as it is expected he will play on D2 and if he is mafia there is clearly profit in shooting him. No, he does not always get shot. They can just rb him. And it doesn't even matter since what you are saying is that in case he is town we should just waste our vigshot. Great plan. I am pretty sure this town wasted a mislynch because they shot a completely null player who ended up being town. That's exactly what vigshots are good for. Getting rid of lurkers/question marks. They should not be used to stack with mafia.
|
idk, maybe it's just me. Keep the game simple. A lot of games nowadays people don't keep the game simple. And town loses.
|
On May 02 2016 19:59 raynpelikoneet wrote:Show nested quote +On May 02 2016 19:56 justanothertownie wrote:On May 02 2016 19:53 raynpelikoneet wrote:On May 02 2016 19:48 justanothertownie wrote:On May 02 2016 19:45 raynpelikoneet wrote:On May 02 2016 19:43 justanothertownie wrote:On May 02 2016 19:40 raynpelikoneet wrote: Yes it is, even if he fucked up on D1 as town, there is no way he fucks up like that as N1. I mean like ofc you can never be 100% certain, but there is no reason to counter-claim him in a situation like that or assume a real power role that plays properly cc's him. Even if it Vivax, just always shoot them. No, no, no. Yes, he should do stuff in the night but not everyone does that. Vigging a claimed powerrole without a cc in an OPEN setup is insanely dumb. So let's say Superbia actually played his A-game on D2. I am gonna come out and say that you would have lynched Obi the doctor over him there and oh boy you would have felt stupid. If you also count his D1 and N1 play here -- on the lynch on D2, why do you need to counter-claim / would not shoot him again? erm, what? If super played his A-game on D2 then gumshoe would cc him and we would lynch superbia. And it is very different if you don't do much as claimed pr in the night vs. when you are being lynched the day after. How you can argue anything else is beyond me. Because if Superbia is mafia which is likely you don't out a power role and waste D2 into talking about nothing but him (which the town did -- it always happens). If Superbia is town he will get shot anyways on N1 because he is a good player AND a power role. Like he was clearly the scummiest player in the game besides the claim and therefore the best shot. Shooting him as vigi doesn't make it any worse since he will almost always get shot by scum if he is town as it is expected he will play on D2 and if he is mafia there is clearly profit in shooting him. No, he does not always get shot. They can just rb him. And it doesn't even matter since what you are saying is that in case he is town we should just waste our vigshot. Great plan. Like if you wanna talk theory then talk theory. But don't talk theory and ignore what actually happened when it suits you and vice versa. In theory, regardless of Superbia's alignment, first of all when he claimed, if you want to make him accountable of his claim, make him claim a ROLE and not just blue. When noone counter-claims him on D1 it is expected noone will counter-claim him on D2 either. If someone counter-claims him, you either have to discount everything Superbia did on D1 and N1, or otherwise there is no need for counter-claim. If Superbia is town, any mafia up for lynch on D2 will obviously counter-claim him 100% of the time. Then you end up again in a dumb spot where at worst you have lynched a townie (GB here) and a blue role -- possibly even shot another fucking townie on N1 aswell. Instead of just.. shooting the scum on N1. Again, if you do not discount what Superbia did on D1 and N1, why cc anyways? It was too late to reliably get a cc day1. No point in making him commit to a role if it only helps mafia if he is town and also outs the real powerrole during the night.
|
On May 02 2016 20:07 raynpelikoneet wrote: idk, maybe it's just me. Keep the game simple. A lot of games nowadays people don't keep the game simple. And town loses. We did keep it simple and this certainly wasn't why town lost.
|
Like, if gumshoe gets a save at any point in time then we win this game. He had 3 nights to do so...
|
o.0 oh good lord
super was a fine lynch, especially because doc didn't need to cc and we didn't pussy out
i personally would have shot him but that was for his overall play which had me 100% convinced he was mafia fake-claiming, particularly how he reacted to jat's comment when he was supposedly trying to wifom scum. i'm not sure that shooting anyone who claims d1 would have been the right move
but honestly, jat, rayn scumreads me on the regular for bad things (like the gb progression which he either didn't understand or didn't read closely enough, or my not scumreading you because he would have for reasons similar to why i was scumreading tumble). that doesn't make him bad, though, lol. neither of you are bad
and i'm pretty sure no one was terribly right at that time...
|
|
|
|