|
On November 27 2015 06:26 Sn0_Man wrote:Show nested quote +On November 27 2015 06:24 ANickelDrink wrote:On November 27 2015 06:22 Sn0_Man wrote:
whats "if im scum" got to do with that? Well if you're town you don't have outside information and my point is moot asdlfkj;lsdfhkl;jsdfa how do u base a scummy point on "this poitn is only valid if he's scum but"
I haven't read your filter and never made a conclusion about your alignment. Also, my point IS only valid if you're scum.
|
did u knwo that if ur scum then ur scum?
breaking news
|
When did I say that
I said if you;re scum both wagons are probably town
|
Abstimmung - Tag 1
Vivax (4): Tictock, sicklucker, marvellosity, GlowingBear, Chromatically, boxerfred
Tictock (4): GlowingBear, Vivax, Koshi, Sn0_Man, scott31337, GlowingBear, Sn0_Man
Koshi (1): Onegu, marvellosity
Onegu (1): ObviousOne
Chromatically (1): sicklucker, Koshi
Sn0_Man (1): sicklucker
boxerfred (1): ANickelDrink
ANickelDrink (0): Koshi, sicklucker
ObviousOne (0): Chromatically, ANickelDrink
Im Moment werden wir Vivax von der Tour ausschließen!
Dieser Tag endet in um 22:00 GMT (+00:00).
Bitte geben Sie ihre Stimme hier ab.
Wir werden nur Stimmen berücksichtigen die von dem Stimmzähler erfasst wurden.
(Only votes in the voting thread will be counted.)
Beachten Sie bitte die Wahlfrist! Wenn nicht Sie nicht abstimmen, werden sie vom Spiel entfernt werden.
(Please mind the deadline. Failure to vote will result in a modkill.)
|
On November 27 2015 06:13 ANickelDrink wrote:
Koshi can you point out things I've missed on chrome?
-Tictock avoids talking about him even though he does the same thing as GB and vivax
-marv doesn't talk about chrome
-OO gives chrome an easy town read? More of an agreement with GB
-your scumteam in marv/TT/chrome are all on vivax
-Chrome votes with two of his suspects
That's not a bad list tbh but I think it relies too heavily on association.
I'm more uncomfortable about BF being on vivax than anything at this point
On November 27 2015 05:13 Koshi wrote:Chrom has way more of those really unspoken reads: Show nested quote +On November 25 2015 12:42 Chromatically wrote:On November 25 2015 12:27 ANickelDrink wrote:like if it's not alignment indicative then he can't really push the discussion anywhere since there's nowhere for it to go. If he had just said "I see what you mean but..." instead of "You have a point" it would be saying the same thing, no? besides he actually said On November 25 2015 09:04 Tictock wrote:
Gunna put this down as slightly suspect but possibly NAI for now. I guess my problem with the post is more of the fact that it says nothing at all in so many lines. It's not so much that it's a contradiction -> "gg ez scum", but more of the fact that he says "you might have a point" and then waffles for a while and then says "possibly NAI". That is mafia knowing he is talking bullshit and then goes "I guess it could be this" (but in practice he knows it isn't) Show nested quote +On November 25 2015 12:37 Chromatically wrote:
sicklucker I'm not sure about. I agree he could be mafia for his push over something which I agree wasn't alignment indicative, but I liked that he didn't back down about it when he came under pressure.
Ticktock I agree with your point, plus he just kind of came in and posted those non-opinions on FF and then peaced out.
Koshi I don't have a read on.
Look at how he talks about sl, same shit again: I can see your point BUT yabbyabbayabba. A townie would not always see 2 sides of the story like Chrom seems to do. Especially at the start of the game. dnu, looks like he is pushing an agenda with the TT/Vivax stuff as well. Suddenly he jumps on that topic and NOTHING IS LEFT ABOUT HIS OO READ? He doesn't even mention it.
What is your opinion on this?
|
On November 27 2015 06:29 ANickelDrink wrote:
When did I say that
I said if you;re scum both wagons are probably town
this is definitely the first time u said that
but i got wat ur saying now
good thing i'm town I guess?
|
Yeah chrom is not happening. Great.
|
United Kingdom36156 Posts
On November 27 2015 06:32 Koshi wrote:
Yeah chrom is not happening. Great.
i could give you lessons on actually being convincing if you like
only £25/h
|
On November 27 2015 06:32 Koshi wrote:
Yeah chrom is not happening. Great.
It's not.
If you're certain he is mafia, you should vote Tictock
|
Koshi why not just vote TT?
|
United Kingdom36156 Posts
i'm watching someone teach someone how to stir a cup of tea on tv
could this get any more british
|
On November 27 2015 06:37 marvellosity wrote:
i'm watching someone teach someone how to stir a cup of tea on tv
could this get any more british
Any cake on the table?
|
United Kingdom36156 Posts
On November 27 2015 06:40 GlowingBear wrote:Show nested quote +On November 27 2015 06:37 marvellosity wrote:
i'm watching someone teach someone how to stir a cup of tea on tv
could this get any more british Any cake on the table?
it was high tea
there were scones
|
You're correct sn0 I never said that in as many words.
On November 27 2015 06:30 Koshi wrote:Show nested quote +On November 27 2015 06:13 ANickelDrink wrote:
Koshi can you point out things I've missed on chrome?
-Tictock avoids talking about him even though he does the same thing as GB and vivax
-marv doesn't talk about chrome
-OO gives chrome an easy town read? More of an agreement with GB
-your scumteam in marv/TT/chrome are all on vivax
-Chrome votes with two of his suspects
That's not a bad list tbh but I think it relies too heavily on association.
I'm more uncomfortable about BF being on vivax than anything at this point Show nested quote +On November 27 2015 05:13 Koshi wrote:Chrom has way more of those really unspoken reads: On November 25 2015 12:42 Chromatically wrote:On November 25 2015 12:27 ANickelDrink wrote:like if it's not alignment indicative then he can't really push the discussion anywhere since there's nowhere for it to go. If he had just said "I see what you mean but..." instead of "You have a point" it would be saying the same thing, no? besides he actually said On November 25 2015 09:04 Tictock wrote:
Gunna put this down as slightly suspect but possibly NAI for now. I guess my problem with the post is more of the fact that it says nothing at all in so many lines. It's not so much that it's a contradiction -> "gg ez scum", but more of the fact that he says "you might have a point" and then waffles for a while and then says "possibly NAI". That is mafia knowing he is talking bullshit and then goes "I guess it could be this" (but in practice he knows it isn't) On November 25 2015 12:37 Chromatically wrote:
sicklucker I'm not sure about. I agree he could be mafia for his push over something which I agree wasn't alignment indicative, but I liked that he didn't back down about it when he came under pressure.
Ticktock I agree with your point, plus he just kind of came in and posted those non-opinions on FF and then peaced out.
Koshi I don't have a read on.
Look at how he talks about sl, same shit again: I can see your point BUT yabbyabbayabba. A townie would not always see 2 sides of the story like Chrom seems to do. Especially at the start of the game. dnu, looks like he is pushing an agenda with the TT/Vivax stuff as well. Suddenly he jumps on that topic and NOTHING IS LEFT ABOUT HIS OO READ? He doesn't even mention it. What is your opinion on this?
I see what you mean. I think your first point about him knowing he's talking shit is a better point than him having seen both sides of the story in your second quote. I get that townies don't have info and seeing both sides of the story could be born of extra info but just that he is considering both sides isn't scum indicative imo.
His dropping of OO is kinda odd but it's not like OO is being at all consequential this game. His vote in on a plynch AFKer and he hasn't really brought anything to the table. Either chrome forgot about him or I see your point about those two being partners.
I have to go to work and I start exatcly at deadline.
Koshi you and your 8 page filter have my sword.
##unvote
##vote chromatically
For all the good it will do anyway
|
On November 27 2015 06:41 marvellosity wrote:Show nested quote +On November 27 2015 06:40 GlowingBear wrote:On November 27 2015 06:37 marvellosity wrote:
i'm watching someone teach someone how to stir a cup of tea on tv
could this get any more british Any cake on the table? it was high tea there were scones
I had to google it. I've never eat scones in my life :/
But I tried cake and tea once on England. The cake was delicious but the tea was black tea. The forest sip I took made me sound like a murloc, it was too strong
|
United Kingdom36156 Posts
are OO and onegu really gonna afk their votes on outliers?
lame
|
On November 27 2015 06:43 ANickelDrink wrote:You're correct sn0 I never said that in as many words. Show nested quote +On November 27 2015 06:30 Koshi wrote:On November 27 2015 06:13 ANickelDrink wrote:
Koshi can you point out things I've missed on chrome?
-Tictock avoids talking about him even though he does the same thing as GB and vivax
-marv doesn't talk about chrome
-OO gives chrome an easy town read? More of an agreement with GB
-your scumteam in marv/TT/chrome are all on vivax
-Chrome votes with two of his suspects
That's not a bad list tbh but I think it relies too heavily on association.
I'm more uncomfortable about BF being on vivax than anything at this point On November 27 2015 05:13 Koshi wrote:Chrom has way more of those really unspoken reads: On November 25 2015 12:42 Chromatically wrote:On November 25 2015 12:27 ANickelDrink wrote:like if it's not alignment indicative then he can't really push the discussion anywhere since there's nowhere for it to go. If he had just said "I see what you mean but..." instead of "You have a point" it would be saying the same thing, no? besides he actually said On November 25 2015 09:04 Tictock wrote:
Gunna put this down as slightly suspect but possibly NAI for now. I guess my problem with the post is more of the fact that it says nothing at all in so many lines. It's not so much that it's a contradiction -> "gg ez scum", but more of the fact that he says "you might have a point" and then waffles for a while and then says "possibly NAI". That is mafia knowing he is talking bullshit and then goes "I guess it could be this" (but in practice he knows it isn't) On November 25 2015 12:37 Chromatically wrote:
sicklucker I'm not sure about. I agree he could be mafia for his push over something which I agree wasn't alignment indicative, but I liked that he didn't back down about it when he came under pressure.
Ticktock I agree with your point, plus he just kind of came in and posted those non-opinions on FF and then peaced out.
Koshi I don't have a read on.
Look at how he talks about sl, same shit again: I can see your point BUT yabbyabbayabba. A townie would not always see 2 sides of the story like Chrom seems to do. Especially at the start of the game. dnu, looks like he is pushing an agenda with the TT/Vivax stuff as well. Suddenly he jumps on that topic and NOTHING IS LEFT ABOUT HIS OO READ? He doesn't even mention it. What is your opinion on this? I see what you mean. I think your first point about him knowing he's talking shit is a better point than him having seen both sides of the story in your second quote. I get that townies don't have info and seeing both sides of the story could be born of extra info but just that he is considering both sides isn't scum indicative imo. His dropping of OO is kinda odd but it's not like OO is being at all consequential this game. His vote in on a plynch AFKer and he hasn't really brought anything to the table. Either chrome forgot about him or I see your point about those two being partners. I have to go to work and I start exatcly at deadline. Koshi you and your 8 page filter have my sword. ##unvote
##vote chromaticallyFor all the good it will do anyway
It won't do shit bro. We need to pick between Vivax and TT.
I LITERALLY CANNOT PICK BETWEEN THEM
|
On November 27 2015 06:46 Koshi wrote:Show nested quote +On November 27 2015 06:43 ANickelDrink wrote:You're correct sn0 I never said that in as many words. On November 27 2015 06:30 Koshi wrote:On November 27 2015 06:13 ANickelDrink wrote:
Koshi can you point out things I've missed on chrome?
-Tictock avoids talking about him even though he does the same thing as GB and vivax
-marv doesn't talk about chrome
-OO gives chrome an easy town read? More of an agreement with GB
-your scumteam in marv/TT/chrome are all on vivax
-Chrome votes with two of his suspects
That's not a bad list tbh but I think it relies too heavily on association.
I'm more uncomfortable about BF being on vivax than anything at this point On November 27 2015 05:13 Koshi wrote:Chrom has way more of those really unspoken reads: On November 25 2015 12:42 Chromatically wrote:On November 25 2015 12:27 ANickelDrink wrote:like if it's not alignment indicative then he can't really push the discussion anywhere since there's nowhere for it to go. If he had just said "I see what you mean but..." instead of "You have a point" it would be saying the same thing, no? besides he actually said On November 25 2015 09:04 Tictock wrote:
Gunna put this down as slightly suspect but possibly NAI for now. I guess my problem with the post is more of the fact that it says nothing at all in so many lines. It's not so much that it's a contradiction -> "gg ez scum", but more of the fact that he says "you might have a point" and then waffles for a while and then says "possibly NAI". That is mafia knowing he is talking bullshit and then goes "I guess it could be this" (but in practice he knows it isn't) On November 25 2015 12:37 Chromatically wrote:
sicklucker I'm not sure about. I agree he could be mafia for his push over something which I agree wasn't alignment indicative, but I liked that he didn't back down about it when he came under pressure.
Ticktock I agree with your point, plus he just kind of came in and posted those non-opinions on FF and then peaced out.
Koshi I don't have a read on.
Look at how he talks about sl, same shit again: I can see your point BUT yabbyabbayabba. A townie would not always see 2 sides of the story like Chrom seems to do. Especially at the start of the game. dnu, looks like he is pushing an agenda with the TT/Vivax stuff as well. Suddenly he jumps on that topic and NOTHING IS LEFT ABOUT HIS OO READ? He doesn't even mention it. What is your opinion on this? I see what you mean. I think your first point about him knowing he's talking shit is a better point than him having seen both sides of the story in your second quote. I get that townies don't have info and seeing both sides of the story could be born of extra info but just that he is considering both sides isn't scum indicative imo. His dropping of OO is kinda odd but it's not like OO is being at all consequential this game. His vote in on a plynch AFKer and he hasn't really brought anything to the table. Either chrome forgot about him or I see your point about those two being partners. I have to go to work and I start exatcly at deadline. Koshi you and your 8 page filter have my sword. ##unvote
##vote chromaticallyFor all the good it will do anyway It won't do shit bro. We need to pick between Vivax and TT. I LITERALLY CANNOT PICK BETWEEN THEM
how cn u say that when tt was on ur proposed scumteam and u were screaming "DONT LYNCH VIVAX" like 1 hr ago
|
On November 27 2015 06:43 ANickelDrink wrote:You're correct sn0 I never said that in as many words. Show nested quote +On November 27 2015 06:30 Koshi wrote:On November 27 2015 06:13 ANickelDrink wrote:
Koshi can you point out things I've missed on chrome?
-Tictock avoids talking about him even though he does the same thing as GB and vivax
-marv doesn't talk about chrome
-OO gives chrome an easy town read? More of an agreement with GB
-your scumteam in marv/TT/chrome are all on vivax
-Chrome votes with two of his suspects
That's not a bad list tbh but I think it relies too heavily on association.
I'm more uncomfortable about BF being on vivax than anything at this point On November 27 2015 05:13 Koshi wrote:Chrom has way more of those really unspoken reads: On November 25 2015 12:42 Chromatically wrote:On November 25 2015 12:27 ANickelDrink wrote:like if it's not alignment indicative then he can't really push the discussion anywhere since there's nowhere for it to go. If he had just said "I see what you mean but..." instead of "You have a point" it would be saying the same thing, no? besides he actually said On November 25 2015 09:04 Tictock wrote:
Gunna put this down as slightly suspect but possibly NAI for now. I guess my problem with the post is more of the fact that it says nothing at all in so many lines. It's not so much that it's a contradiction -> "gg ez scum", but more of the fact that he says "you might have a point" and then waffles for a while and then says "possibly NAI". That is mafia knowing he is talking bullshit and then goes "I guess it could be this" (but in practice he knows it isn't) On November 25 2015 12:37 Chromatically wrote:
sicklucker I'm not sure about. I agree he could be mafia for his push over something which I agree wasn't alignment indicative, but I liked that he didn't back down about it when he came under pressure.
Ticktock I agree with your point, plus he just kind of came in and posted those non-opinions on FF and then peaced out.
Koshi I don't have a read on.
Look at how he talks about sl, same shit again: I can see your point BUT yabbyabbayabba. A townie would not always see 2 sides of the story like Chrom seems to do. Especially at the start of the game. dnu, looks like he is pushing an agenda with the TT/Vivax stuff as well. Suddenly he jumps on that topic and NOTHING IS LEFT ABOUT HIS OO READ? He doesn't even mention it. What is your opinion on this? I see what you mean. I think your first point about him knowing he's talking shit is a better point than him having seen both sides of the story in your second quote. I get that townies don't have info and seeing both sides of the story could be born of extra info but just that he is considering both sides isn't scum indicative imo. His dropping of OO is kinda odd but it's not like OO is being at all consequential this game. His vote in on a plynch AFKer and he hasn't really brought anything to the table. Either chrome forgot about him or I see your point about those two being partners. I have to go to work and I start exatcly at deadline. Koshi you and your 8 page filter have my sword. ##unvote
##vote chromaticallyFor all the good it will do anyway
At least hammer Tictock first since if chrom is mafia you can associate him with Tictock and Vivax is probably town.
|
United Kingdom36156 Posts
On November 27 2015 06:46 Koshi wrote:Show nested quote +On November 27 2015 06:43 ANickelDrink wrote:You're correct sn0 I never said that in as many words. On November 27 2015 06:30 Koshi wrote:On November 27 2015 06:13 ANickelDrink wrote:
Koshi can you point out things I've missed on chrome?
-Tictock avoids talking about him even though he does the same thing as GB and vivax
-marv doesn't talk about chrome
-OO gives chrome an easy town read? More of an agreement with GB
-your scumteam in marv/TT/chrome are all on vivax
-Chrome votes with two of his suspects
That's not a bad list tbh but I think it relies too heavily on association.
I'm more uncomfortable about BF being on vivax than anything at this point On November 27 2015 05:13 Koshi wrote:Chrom has way more of those really unspoken reads: On November 25 2015 12:42 Chromatically wrote:On November 25 2015 12:27 ANickelDrink wrote:like if it's not alignment indicative then he can't really push the discussion anywhere since there's nowhere for it to go. If he had just said "I see what you mean but..." instead of "You have a point" it would be saying the same thing, no? besides he actually said On November 25 2015 09:04 Tictock wrote:
Gunna put this down as slightly suspect but possibly NAI for now. I guess my problem with the post is more of the fact that it says nothing at all in so many lines. It's not so much that it's a contradiction -> "gg ez scum", but more of the fact that he says "you might have a point" and then waffles for a while and then says "possibly NAI". That is mafia knowing he is talking bullshit and then goes "I guess it could be this" (but in practice he knows it isn't) On November 25 2015 12:37 Chromatically wrote:
sicklucker I'm not sure about. I agree he could be mafia for his push over something which I agree wasn't alignment indicative, but I liked that he didn't back down about it when he came under pressure.
Ticktock I agree with your point, plus he just kind of came in and posted those non-opinions on FF and then peaced out.
Koshi I don't have a read on.
Look at how he talks about sl, same shit again: I can see your point BUT yabbyabbayabba. A townie would not always see 2 sides of the story like Chrom seems to do. Especially at the start of the game. dnu, looks like he is pushing an agenda with the TT/Vivax stuff as well. Suddenly he jumps on that topic and NOTHING IS LEFT ABOUT HIS OO READ? He doesn't even mention it. What is your opinion on this? I see what you mean. I think your first point about him knowing he's talking shit is a better point than him having seen both sides of the story in your second quote. I get that townies don't have info and seeing both sides of the story could be born of extra info but just that he is considering both sides isn't scum indicative imo. His dropping of OO is kinda odd but it's not like OO is being at all consequential this game. His vote in on a plynch AFKer and he hasn't really brought anything to the table. Either chrome forgot about him or I see your point about those two being partners. I have to go to work and I start exatcly at deadline. Koshi you and your 8 page filter have my sword. ##unvote
##vote chromaticallyFor all the good it will do anyway It won't do shit bro. We need to pick between Vivax and TT. I LITERALLY CANNOT PICK BETWEEN THEM
sheep me for old time's sake
the fact you're not relatively confident vivax is town should say something, no?
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT
