|
On October 13 2014 23:37 GlowingBear wrote:Show nested quote +On October 13 2014 23:34 Oatsmaster wrote:On October 13 2014 23:32 GlowingBear wrote:On October 13 2014 23:21 Oatsmaster wrote:On October 13 2014 23:09 GlowingBear wrote:On October 13 2014 23:08 Oatsmaster wrote:On October 13 2014 22:46 GlowingBear wrote: I mean, the guy isn't even trying to figure the game properly and simply drops a vote on me and says UNTIL TUESDAY.
Lol... Tell me why scum does that. Because he doesn't care. He just drops his vote and whoever gets lynched, it's fine, because there is already townies being voted. He simply does not care. but he has to know its gonna cause huge controversy. How many scum players you know claim scum in their first post, then play like this? The "too scum to be scum" player They dont exist. They do. I'm one. If you keep believing someone is "too scum to be scum", you'll let a lot of obvious scum slip through your fingers so far, nope.
|
TALK TO ME GUYS. WHY ARE YOU NOT LYNCHING RIKOTY?
|
I don't understand why people sign in to play the game when they actually are not going to play the game.
|
Lynch sqrt with me oats. You won't get people to lynch ritoky and we can always reevaluate our reads on him during d2 since he posted a fair amount of information
|
@VE. How sure are you of that meta read on GB? Also what you think of oats?
|
On October 14 2014 01:03 geript wrote: @VE. How sure are you of that meta read on GB? Also what you think of oats?
I'll anticipate his answer: not so sure.
He played with me like.. 2 times? And he only reviewed my most recent town game. There's no much difference between then
|
There's no much difference between these, btw*
|
On October 14 2014 00:59 GlowingBear wrote: Lynch sqrt with me oats. You won't get people to lynch ritoky and we can always reevaluate our reads on him during d2 since he posted a fair amount of information no fuck no info no sucks no what the fuck no please no.
|
On October 14 2014 01:29 Oatsmaster wrote:Show nested quote +On October 14 2014 00:59 GlowingBear wrote: Lynch sqrt with me oats. You won't get people to lynch ritoky and we can always reevaluate our reads on him during d2 since he posted a fair amount of information no fuck no info no sucks no what the fuck no please no.
Sigh...
Is he your mafia partner? Do you really think he is town?
|
On October 14 2014 01:03 geript wrote: @VE. How sure are you of that meta read on GB? Also what you think of oats? It's not a meta read - it's an observational read. How sure am I that I read his filter from 2p2 game and this game and they look different? I'm positive that they look different. Why don't you go look at the filters and tell me what /you/ think?
|
Oh, hey DP! You said I should prove I'm not posting fluff. Here is the proof:
See? There's no fluff posts inside the quote. You're welcome.
(This is how stupid proving the absence of something is)
|
I did. I agree it looks different but he gave a bunch of shitty reasons for calling people scum. Maybe not as bad as in this game. I'm torn honestly. Like there's lots of worlds where he could be this bad as town. I can't remember why I had a townread on him. But he's been super active. Has GB done that before as mafia?
Talk to me about oats. Do you agree with my read on him? You were the one that brought up how to read him is based off of the reasons for his reads. Like he has no good reasons I've seen. Plus no strong reads.
|
T.T...
None of my reasonings are bad... God...
|
On October 13 2014 23:04 GlowingBear wrote:Show nested quote +On October 13 2014 22:18 Oatsmaster wrote:On October 13 2014 22:14 GlowingBear wrote:On October 13 2014 22:03 Oatsmaster wrote: It makes me feel bad to lynch angry people. Can you go quietly to your death GlowingBear?
Btw, passivity is hardly a scumtell.
Passivity is mostly a scumtell I'm starting to not care anymore. 13 people in the game, only 5 or 6 are active. I'm wasting my breath with people that are already convinced I'm scum, even if I'm showing I'm not. I'm voting sqrt and I'm not taking my vote out of him unless if it is to lynch you or DP. I want to clarify anything that makes you guys say I'm mafia. But I can't even understand why are you reading me that way. Nobody pointed out a fluff of mine. I've already explained my blue tell/scum tell on DP. I'm constantly evaluating lynch options. I can't do more, really. You could make a slamdunk case on practically anyone in the game, be around a bit before deadline, post a shitton and convince either VE/rayn or DP not to lynch you but lynch the dude you posted about. Other than that, its a bit hard. What you said, 6-7 people are inactive therefore passive. not all of them are scum. At most 50% are. Therefore passivity isnt exclusive to scum and isnt a scumtell. I can't make a slamdunk case when I'm arguing that someone has a lack of posting. The hugest problem in sqrt is that he lacks posting AND when he posts he fakes contributing when he is not. So, regarding sqrt: 1) He is constantly lurking 2) When he comes to the thread, he doesn't contribute to he ongoing discussion. Just says hi and goes lurking. 3) When he posts reads, he does not explain motives behind it. Just makes a list and goes into lurking again 4) When inquired to explain reads, arguments are forced (CR trying to inflate filter was too much for my heart) 5) Votes on a townie and says won't be posting until day2 Come on...
Geript, give me your impression on this read.
|
When did I say anything like that about Oats? I'm not sure what to think about Oats, historically I've had a hard time reading him. I will say though that from my experience with him he's posting a lot more freely than in games where he's mafia...leaving me thinking he's town this game.
Your reasoning for townreading GB was ballsack dude, you referred back to a post where he's calling you out about tryharding and you're all "Oh this looks townie I guess, even though he made this post to begin with and I've known he made it, NOW it makes him town"
Something a little bit like....
On October 12 2014 15:30 geript wrote:Show nested quote +On October 12 2014 06:33 GlowingBear wrote:On October 12 2014 06:27 geript wrote:On October 12 2014 06:26 Damdred wrote: Geript is now in my town circle because I never know how to take his plans.
GB if I said you might be scum what would you say? Why would you say he might be scum instead of just flat out calling him scum? I think you are trying hard here. 1st page of thread and you raise this kind of suspicion. Do you really believe he should be calling me scum instead saying I might be scum in the first page of the game? On my reread, I found this post interesting. GB doesn't call me mafia for my push on a weak read. Rather it comes off as semi-inquisitive which I like. Kinda seems like he might be thinking about the game. Sleightly towny.
|
Can you also answer my read on sqrt, VE?
|
On October 14 2014 01:48 GlowingBear wrote:Show nested quote +On October 13 2014 23:04 GlowingBear wrote:On October 13 2014 22:18 Oatsmaster wrote:On October 13 2014 22:14 GlowingBear wrote:On October 13 2014 22:03 Oatsmaster wrote: It makes me feel bad to lynch angry people. Can you go quietly to your death GlowingBear?
Btw, passivity is hardly a scumtell.
Passivity is mostly a scumtell I'm starting to not care anymore. 13 people in the game, only 5 or 6 are active. I'm wasting my breath with people that are already convinced I'm scum, even if I'm showing I'm not. I'm voting sqrt and I'm not taking my vote out of him unless if it is to lynch you or DP. I want to clarify anything that makes you guys say I'm mafia. But I can't even understand why are you reading me that way. Nobody pointed out a fluff of mine. I've already explained my blue tell/scum tell on DP. I'm constantly evaluating lynch options. I can't do more, really. You could make a slamdunk case on practically anyone in the game, be around a bit before deadline, post a shitton and convince either VE/rayn or DP not to lynch you but lynch the dude you posted about. Other than that, its a bit hard. What you said, 6-7 people are inactive therefore passive. not all of them are scum. At most 50% are. Therefore passivity isnt exclusive to scum and isnt a scumtell. I can't make a slamdunk case when I'm arguing that someone has a lack of posting. The hugest problem in sqrt is that he lacks posting AND when he posts he fakes contributing when he is not. So, regarding sqrt: 1) He is constantly lurking 2) When he comes to the thread, he doesn't contribute to he ongoing discussion. Just says hi and goes lurking. 3) When he posts reads, he does not explain motives behind it. Just makes a list and goes into lurking again 4) When inquired to explain reads, arguments are forced (CR trying to inflate filter was too much for my heart) 5) Votes on a townie and says won't be posting until day2 Come on... Geript, give me your impression on this read. I think it's terrible. I have no clue if lurking is alignment indicative for sqrt. Point 2 is ok-ish. Point 3 is wtf? List reads followed by lurking is bad play; but it's bad play from both alignments and not terribly specific. Point 4 is a supposition not an actual objective fact. Wasn't it Sn0 who said he wouldn't be posting until day 2?
|
On October 14 2014 01:59 geript wrote:Show nested quote +On October 14 2014 01:48 GlowingBear wrote:On October 13 2014 23:04 GlowingBear wrote:On October 13 2014 22:18 Oatsmaster wrote:On October 13 2014 22:14 GlowingBear wrote:On October 13 2014 22:03 Oatsmaster wrote: It makes me feel bad to lynch angry people. Can you go quietly to your death GlowingBear?
Btw, passivity is hardly a scumtell.
Passivity is mostly a scumtell I'm starting to not care anymore. 13 people in the game, only 5 or 6 are active. I'm wasting my breath with people that are already convinced I'm scum, even if I'm showing I'm not. I'm voting sqrt and I'm not taking my vote out of him unless if it is to lynch you or DP. I want to clarify anything that makes you guys say I'm mafia. But I can't even understand why are you reading me that way. Nobody pointed out a fluff of mine. I've already explained my blue tell/scum tell on DP. I'm constantly evaluating lynch options. I can't do more, really. You could make a slamdunk case on practically anyone in the game, be around a bit before deadline, post a shitton and convince either VE/rayn or DP not to lynch you but lynch the dude you posted about. Other than that, its a bit hard. What you said, 6-7 people are inactive therefore passive. not all of them are scum. At most 50% are. Therefore passivity isnt exclusive to scum and isnt a scumtell. I can't make a slamdunk case when I'm arguing that someone has a lack of posting. The hugest problem in sqrt is that he lacks posting AND when he posts he fakes contributing when he is not. So, regarding sqrt: 1) He is constantly lurking 2) When he comes to the thread, he doesn't contribute to he ongoing discussion. Just says hi and goes lurking. 3) When he posts reads, he does not explain motives behind it. Just makes a list and goes into lurking again 4) When inquired to explain reads, arguments are forced (CR trying to inflate filter was too much for my heart) 5) Votes on a townie and says won't be posting until day2 Come on... Geript, give me your impression on this read. I think it's terrible. I have no clue if lurking is alignment indicative for sqrt. Point 2 is ok-ish. Point 3 is wtf? List reads followed by lurking is bad play; but it's bad play from both alignments and not terribly specific. Point 4 is a supposition not an actual objective fact. Wasn't it Sn0 who said he wouldn't be posting until day 2?
Point three, the main factor is that he post his lists but does not explain them. He just drops names and a vote on me. Just like "hi, look, I'm contributing. Bye bye".
And no, it was sqrt who said he was going to vote me and just come back on Tuesday.
|
On October 14 2014 01:54 VisceraEyes wrote:When did I say anything like that about Oats? I'm not sure what to think about Oats, historically I've had a hard time reading him. I will say though that from my experience with him he's posting a lot more freely than in games where he's mafia...leaving me thinking he's town this game. Your reasoning for townreading GB was ballsack dude, you referred back to a post where he's calling you out about tryharding and you're all "Oh this looks townie I guess, even though he made this post to begin with and I've known he made it, NOW it makes him town" Something a little bit like.... Show nested quote +On October 12 2014 15:30 geript wrote:On October 12 2014 06:33 GlowingBear wrote:On October 12 2014 06:27 geript wrote:On October 12 2014 06:26 Damdred wrote: Geript is now in my town circle because I never know how to take his plans.
GB if I said you might be scum what would you say? Why would you say he might be scum instead of just flat out calling him scum? I think you are trying hard here. 1st page of thread and you raise this kind of suspicion. Do you really believe he should be calling me scum instead saying I might be scum in the first page of the game? On my reread, I found this post interesting. GB doesn't call me mafia for my push on a weak read. Rather it comes off as semi-inquisitive which I like. Kinda seems like he might be thinking about the game. Sleightly towny. Once you brought that post back up I like the read again. Doesn't mean it's right. Why do you think that post would stick in my head as important on the first reading VE?
|
On October 14 2014 01:56 GlowingBear wrote: Can you also answer my read on sqrt, VE? Your entire case is "He said X and then lurked" which people do regardless of their alignment. Howcome you're not calling out Sn0_Man for lurking? Is it simply because he refuses to play rather than "promise content" like sqrt?
|
|
|
|