|
On October 06 2014 23:34 batsnacks wrote:Show nested quote +On October 06 2014 23:28 Oatsmaster wrote:On October 06 2014 23:26 batsnacks wrote:
Oats if you are in fact "contributing" shouldn't you be thanking me? I did enable these "contributions" of yours. I feel like you're annoyed with me for allowing you to contribute.
Or are you annoyed with being in the spotlight this early? You dont get to claim credit for something that happened accidentally. What are your reads, mainly holyflare and me? I agreed with HF a lot last game and he was town. I'm agreeing with him this game already so, tentatively town. I'm voting you because I think you're scummy. Also lol at "accidentally" You claimed on accident now?
The whole argument is not planned by you, therefore it's an accident.
Holy flare, there have been a grand total of 10 pages in this game. Why do you want me to come up with a page long sheet of nonsense? You only have one scumread. And all your reasons are weak as hell and based on your misunderstanding of the situation. The reason why I think that is scummy is because you are stuck in a mindset that is biased. You want to call me scum and are looking for reasons to back that up. Town would do it the other way around.
|
On October 06 2014 23:37 Damdred wrote:
When I first read the interchange I was pretty sure that it was a joke, but oats reactions throughout the rest of the thread is just weird. Oats why are you so defensive? I've never seen you play like this after getting called scum, you usually do not react at all just go on about your day, so whats up
Read the thread.
|
Game didn't start on page 1
Bat traps too strong
|
You know what?
This is all poof except that oats called you lucky.
How is bat lucky oats?
|
United Kingdom10443 Posts
Bats and Oats are both town to me, "Bats trap" seems like a good town angle to me, I don't think Oats is faking frustration and it feels town to me.
Ala is town, I like how he pointed out how HF just stepped in and started flinging shit.
Grack seems really jokey and happy and posting a lot so probably town.
I don't like HF because of the aforementioned reason and the early vote just felt like he was totally misreading the thread.
On October 06 2014 22:03 Hopeless1der wrote:
Morning guys. We need to liven this place up a bit. Who's ready for some FOOTBALL?
@batsnacks how sure are you that you've caught mafia there...?
I also really didn't like this at all. I think it was such a meaningless and stupid question that no one bothered to respond to it. it just felt like a question to ask to appear active and buddy someone.
|
On October 07 2014 00:16 batsnacks wrote:
Game didn't start on page 1
Bat traps too strong
I was guessing. Sue me.
Slam, bats is lucky because although his plan didn't produce his desired result or any result he would've expected, it produced something that isn't useless. So he unintentionally helped us. Which makes him lucky.
It isn't a very big point, I don't know why you guys keep harping about it
|
Oats I can't unvote you if you sincerely believe my plan did not produce my desired result or any result I would have expected. Not that I haven't already said this: I just wanted to get conversation going and this is my way of doing it. Like, I had a similar exchange with grack. Do you see the difference between you and grack?
|
I dont think we can scum read oats based on him agreeing to the mass claim when in the first place it was bats who suggested it. Although his reactions afterwards seems a little over reactive . But I do believe that he was joking when he claimed town. I mean theres no other option but to claim vt. You cant scrutinize him for that.
Also I find it strange everyone agrees on the fact that it was a trap set by bats. Its the perfect excuse for scum to say something was a trap and point fingers at random people.
|
On October 07 2014 00:51 liancourt wrote:
I dont think we can scum read oats based on him agreeing to the mass claim when in the first place it was bats who suggested it. Although his reactions afterwards seems a little over reactive . But I do believe that he was joking when he claimed town. I mean theres no other option but to claim vt. You cant scrutinize him for that.
Also I find it strange everyone agrees on the fact that it was a trap set by bats. Its the perfect excuse for scum to say something was a trap and point fingers at random people.
If I was serious about a mass claim I would have claimed in the same post. I didn't. In the next post I said there is no benefit in mass claiming, something oats agrees with yet he still felt the end to claim.
|
Ebwop also how am I pointing fingers at random people? I'm only pointing fingers at people who claimed. I didn't make them claim. Also, I'm not scum reading anyone for claiming. Grack claimed and I don't scum read him. I am scum reading people for scummy reactions.
|
im a little scared of HF at the moment. Not that he is doing anything outright scummy, just the way he is handling the situation is just all to "well off?"
i'd probably lynch slam first.
|
o and maybe this smurf too
liancourt
|
On October 07 2014 00:55 batsnacks wrote:Show nested quote +On October 07 2014 00:51 liancourt wrote:
I dont think we can scum read oats based on him agreeing to the mass claim when in the first place it was bats who suggested it. Although his reactions afterwards seems a little over reactive . But I do believe that he was joking when he claimed town. I mean theres no other option but to claim vt. You cant scrutinize him for that.
Also I find it strange everyone agrees on the fact that it was a trap set by bats. Its the perfect excuse for scum to say something was a trap and point fingers at random people. If I was serious about a mass claim I would have claimed in the same post. I didn't. In the next post I said there is no benefit in mass claiming, something oats agrees with yet he still felt the end to claim.
But it was a joke claim I dont think you can really read anything into it. Unless he actually claimed something other than vt I might agree with you.
|
On October 07 2014 01:05 liancourt wrote:Show nested quote +On October 07 2014 00:55 batsnacks wrote:On October 07 2014 00:51 liancourt wrote:
I dont think we can scum read oats based on him agreeing to the mass claim when in the first place it was bats who suggested it. Although his reactions afterwards seems a little over reactive . But I do believe that he was joking when he claimed town. I mean theres no other option but to claim vt. You cant scrutinize him for that.
Also I find it strange everyone agrees on the fact that it was a trap set by bats. Its the perfect excuse for scum to say something was a trap and point fingers at random people. If I was serious about a mass claim I would have claimed in the same post. I didn't. In the next post I said there is no benefit in mass claiming, something oats agrees with yet he still felt the end to claim. But it was a joke claim I dont think you can really read anything into it. Unless he actually claimed something other than vt I might agree with you.
I didn't scum read him for claiming though.
|
On October 06 2014 13:56 liancourt wrote:
it must be because i like vanilla ice cream
plain as can be
Hmm claims in first post
On October 07 2014 00:51 liancourt wrote:
I dont think we can scum read oats based on him agreeing to the mass claim when in the first place it was bats who suggested it. Although his reactions afterwards seems a little over reactive . But I do believe that he was joking when he claimed town. I mean theres no other option but to claim vt. You cant scrutinize him for that.
Also I find it strange everyone agrees on the fact that it was a trap set by bats. Its the perfect excuse for scum to say something was a trap and point fingers at random people.
i don't see why we couldn't read oats for the interaction.
I think you can look into it, the he is reacting is very in the opposite direction of his "joke" so much so that its odd he even did the joke in the first place if he really truly feels like that.
I disagree that bats looks scummy for something like this. Comes from a town mindset in my eyes, to be catching scum.
I think you have actually moved up to my #1 scum
|
On October 07 2014 00:58 batsnacks wrote:
Ebwop also how am I pointing fingers at random people? I'm only pointing fingers at people who claimed. I didn't make them claim. Also, I'm not scum reading anyone for claiming. Grack claimed and I don't scum read him. I am scum reading people for scummy reactions.
Although oats' reaction is slightly over the top which does make me wary and I do agree his reactions compared to gracks is somewhat more lets say lively I dont get the feeling he is scummy. Seems natural for town to react that way when someone questions your joke claim.
|
United Kingdom30774 Posts
lol storr reads me as weird but then says exactly the same thing that I have already said about oats' reaction ~_~
kelsier reads me as scummy for "flinging shit like slam said" but doesn't really explain how exactly I have been flinging shit and neither does he explain anything to do with oats such as why he'd be frustrated in the first place and then then further brings up the EXACT point I had already raised on hopeless.
In essence kelsier's post is a list post with the added scummy bonus of giving out free and easy town reads based on things that shouldn't be free and easy town reads
|
United Kingdom30774 Posts
nor does anyone even mention how I haven't even voted for oats
|
On October 07 2014 01:13 liancourt wrote:Show nested quote +On October 07 2014 00:58 batsnacks wrote:
Ebwop also how am I pointing fingers at random people? I'm only pointing fingers at people who claimed. I didn't make them claim. Also, I'm not scum reading anyone for claiming. Grack claimed and I don't scum read him. I am scum reading people for scummy reactions. Although oats' reaction is slightly over the top which does make me wary and I do agree his reactions compared to gracks is somewhat more lets say lively I dont get the feeling he is scummy. Seems natural for town to react that way when someone questions your joke claim.
It seems natural to start screaming when someone questions your joke claim?
Does it also seem natural to claim and then immediately after say that claiming is "NEVER FUCKING BENEFICIAL [sic]"
|
On October 07 2014 01:07 batsnacks wrote:Show nested quote +On October 07 2014 01:05 liancourt wrote:On October 07 2014 00:55 batsnacks wrote:On October 07 2014 00:51 liancourt wrote:
I dont think we can scum read oats based on him agreeing to the mass claim when in the first place it was bats who suggested it. Although his reactions afterwards seems a little over reactive . But I do believe that he was joking when he claimed town. I mean theres no other option but to claim vt. You cant scrutinize him for that.
Also I find it strange everyone agrees on the fact that it was a trap set by bats. Its the perfect excuse for scum to say something was a trap and point fingers at random people. If I was serious about a mass claim I would have claimed in the same post. I didn't. In the next post I said there is no benefit in mass claiming, something oats agrees with yet he still felt the end to claim. But it was a joke claim I dont think you can really read anything into it. Unless he actually claimed something other than vt I might agree with you. I didn't scum read him for claiming though.
I see you claiming him as defensive and questioning his joke claim. You didnt need to scum read him. You were like the catalyst others did it for you.
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT
