|
On September 02 2014 05:12 mderg wrote:Show nested quote +On September 02 2014 05:03 kitaman27 wrote: Hi Hi.
Hmm, the only thing that I can think of for a mafia "mission" is something along the lines of, player X must receive at least # votes or player Y must be convinced to vote for player Z. Or maybe identify the player with role Z. Mafia dying if they fail these seems is pretty harsh, so I think we should pay extra attention of players voting certain ways without explanation after the 24 hour mark. I'd also be less willing to believe cop checks for the sake of mafia needing to use a fake one to complete their mission, but I guess it's too early to worry about something like that. I think it's too early to really worry about the missions as we have absolutely no idea what those missions look like. Thinking too much about the missions may just lead to focusing on unimportant details without getting good reads. IMO proper reads > catching people on missions
I think the point is that the missions could make mafia even more awkward than they otherwise might be.
|
kitaman27
United States9244 Posts
On September 02 2014 05:12 mderg wrote: IMO proper reads > catching people on missions
True, though at this point nobody has any proper reads for at least a few more hours. I'd prefer to to speculate to see if we can come up with any policies to break the system.
For example, if we all agree to cut the day cycle short by one hour as if that were the deadline and then all move our votes to whoever had the majority at that point, we might be able to trigger a failure on a vote related mission.
Something else to keep in mind may be getting baited into using certain trigger words. For instance, perhaps the mafia player needs 3 people to say the phrase "OMGUS" during the cycle or something.
|
On September 02 2014 05:25 kitaman27 wrote:Show nested quote +On September 02 2014 05:12 mderg wrote: IMO proper reads > catching people on missions True, though at this point nobody has any proper reads for at least a few more hours. I'd prefer to to speculate to see if we can come up with any policies to break the system. For example, if we all agree to cut the day cycle short by one hour as if that were the deadline and then all move our votes to whoever had the majority at that point, we might be able to trigger a failure on a vote related mission.Something else to keep in mind may be getting baited into using certain trigger words. For instance, perhaps the mafia player needs 3 people to say the phrase "OMGUS" during the cycle or something.
Yeah this could be a good idea. Potentially although activity at the 2 hours ish before is paramount! So we would all need to figure out if we can be here for this.
I'm going to stick away from saying any buzz words. I think maybe we could do something like referring to each other as "Villagers" and "wolves" instead of "Town and mafia" might potentially break a mission where maybe they have to be called town by a certain number of people or something.
|
WHERE ALL MY VILLAGERS AT?
|
I'm here, but you voted me to die.
I thought we were friends, Banks.
Damn, that vote hurts.
As for the rest of you scrubs, hi.
So here's how we are going to do it. Tehpoof has 3 chances to say wolf. When he hits number 4 I'm voting him.
You've already said it once. 3 more, and you are out buddy.
|
On September 02 2014 06:10 27ninjabunnies wrote: I'm here, but you voted me to die.
I thought we were friends, Banks.
Damn, that vote hurts.
As for the rest of you scrubs, hi.
So here's how we are going to do it. Tehpoof has 3 chances to say wolf. When he hits number 4 I'm voting him.
You've already said it once. 3 more, and you are out buddy.
wolf wolf wolf
did you complete your mission?
|
On September 02 2014 05:25 kitaman27 wrote:Show nested quote +On September 02 2014 05:12 mderg wrote: IMO proper reads > catching people on missions True, though at this point nobody has any proper reads for at least a few more hours. I'd prefer to to speculate to see if we can come up with any policies to break the system. For example, if we all agree to cut the day cycle short by one hour as if that were the deadline and then all move our votes to whoever had the majority at that point, we might be able to trigger a failure on a vote related mission.Something else to keep in mind may be getting baited into using certain trigger words. For instance, perhaps the mafia player needs 3 people to say the phrase "OMGUS" during the cycle or something. I like the idea behind this. If we try to make the missions fail, it has to be a collective town effort. That way scum would be forced to stand out, if they want to complete their mission.
On September 02 2014 05:29 Tehpoofter wrote: I'm going to stick away from saying any buzz words. I think maybe we could do something like referring to each other as "Villagers" and "wolves" instead of "Town and mafia" might potentially break a mission where maybe they have to be called town by a certain number of people or something. I find it highly unlikely that something like this could break a mission.
|
On September 02 2014 06:20 mderg wrote:Show nested quote +On September 02 2014 05:25 kitaman27 wrote:On September 02 2014 05:12 mderg wrote: IMO proper reads > catching people on missions True, though at this point nobody has any proper reads for at least a few more hours. I'd prefer to to speculate to see if we can come up with any policies to break the system. For example, if we all agree to cut the day cycle short by one hour as if that were the deadline and then all move our votes to whoever had the majority at that point, we might be able to trigger a failure on a vote related mission.Something else to keep in mind may be getting baited into using certain trigger words. For instance, perhaps the mafia player needs 3 people to say the phrase "OMGUS" during the cycle or something. I like the idea behind this. If we try to make the missions fail, it has to be a collective town effort. That way scum would be forced to stand out, if they want to complete their mission. Show nested quote +On September 02 2014 05:29 Tehpoofter wrote: I'm going to stick away from saying any buzz words. I think maybe we could do something like referring to each other as "Villagers" and "wolves" instead of "Town and mafia" might potentially break a mission where maybe they have to be called town by a certain number of people or something. I find it highly unlikely that something like this could break a mission.
I agree we should definitely up the deadline. I think thats really town favored if the mission is vote oriented. We however can't assume that the mission involves just votes. It could involve lots of things like post count/reads/claims loads of stuff.
If the mission was to do something like be called mafia by x number of people or be called town by y number of people changing the words would fix that issue as they're not being called that unless its considered a technicality.
|
On September 02 2014 06:17 Tehpoofter wrote:Show nested quote +On September 02 2014 06:10 27ninjabunnies wrote: I'm here, but you voted me to die.
I thought we were friends, Banks.
Damn, that vote hurts.
As for the rest of you scrubs, hi.
So here's how we are going to do it. Tehpoof has 3 chances to say wolf. When he hits number 4 I'm voting him.
You've already said it once. 3 more, and you are out buddy. wolf wolf wolf did you complete your mission?
##Vote:Tehpoofter
I don't have a mission, but you deserve to die
|
On September 02 2014 06:23 Tehpoofter wrote:Show nested quote +On September 02 2014 06:20 mderg wrote:On September 02 2014 05:25 kitaman27 wrote:On September 02 2014 05:12 mderg wrote: IMO proper reads > catching people on missions True, though at this point nobody has any proper reads for at least a few more hours. I'd prefer to to speculate to see if we can come up with any policies to break the system. For example, if we all agree to cut the day cycle short by one hour as if that were the deadline and then all move our votes to whoever had the majority at that point, we might be able to trigger a failure on a vote related mission.Something else to keep in mind may be getting baited into using certain trigger words. For instance, perhaps the mafia player needs 3 people to say the phrase "OMGUS" during the cycle or something. I like the idea behind this. If we try to make the missions fail, it has to be a collective town effort. That way scum would be forced to stand out, if they want to complete their mission. On September 02 2014 05:29 Tehpoofter wrote: I'm going to stick away from saying any buzz words. I think maybe we could do something like referring to each other as "Villagers" and "wolves" instead of "Town and mafia" might potentially break a mission where maybe they have to be called town by a certain number of people or something. I find it highly unlikely that something like this could break a mission. I agree we should definitely up the deadline. I think thats really town favored if the mission is vote oriented. We however can't assume that the mission involves just votes. It could involve lots of things like post count/reads/claims loads of stuff. If the mission was to do something like be called mafia by x number of people or be called town by y number of people changing the words would fix that issue as they're not being called that unless its considered a technicality. We can do that, if you want. I don't like your alternative words, though. I'd rather have "good guys" and "bad guys"
|
On September 02 2014 06:27 27ninjabunnies wrote:Show nested quote +On September 02 2014 06:17 Tehpoofter wrote:On September 02 2014 06:10 27ninjabunnies wrote: I'm here, but you voted me to die.
I thought we were friends, Banks.
Damn, that vote hurts.
As for the rest of you scrubs, hi.
So here's how we are going to do it. Tehpoof has 3 chances to say wolf. When he hits number 4 I'm voting him.
You've already said it once. 3 more, and you are out buddy. wolf wolf wolf did you complete your mission? ##Vote:TehpoofterI don't have a mission, but you deserve to die
what do you think about the mission conversation me kita mderg were having?
|
On September 02 2014 06:29 mderg wrote:Show nested quote +On September 02 2014 06:23 Tehpoofter wrote:On September 02 2014 06:20 mderg wrote:On September 02 2014 05:25 kitaman27 wrote:On September 02 2014 05:12 mderg wrote: IMO proper reads > catching people on missions True, though at this point nobody has any proper reads for at least a few more hours. I'd prefer to to speculate to see if we can come up with any policies to break the system. For example, if we all agree to cut the day cycle short by one hour as if that were the deadline and then all move our votes to whoever had the majority at that point, we might be able to trigger a failure on a vote related mission.Something else to keep in mind may be getting baited into using certain trigger words. For instance, perhaps the mafia player needs 3 people to say the phrase "OMGUS" during the cycle or something. I like the idea behind this. If we try to make the missions fail, it has to be a collective town effort. That way scum would be forced to stand out, if they want to complete their mission. On September 02 2014 05:29 Tehpoofter wrote: I'm going to stick away from saying any buzz words. I think maybe we could do something like referring to each other as "Villagers" and "wolves" instead of "Town and mafia" might potentially break a mission where maybe they have to be called town by a certain number of people or something. I find it highly unlikely that something like this could break a mission. I agree we should definitely up the deadline. I think thats really town favored if the mission is vote oriented. We however can't assume that the mission involves just votes. It could involve lots of things like post count/reads/claims loads of stuff. If the mission was to do something like be called mafia by x number of people or be called town by y number of people changing the words would fix that issue as they're not being called that unless its considered a technicality. We can do that, if you want. I don't like your alternative words, though. I'd rather have "good guys" and "bad guys"
to each his own but picking different words than me = wolfie.
|
On September 02 2014 06:29 Tehpoofter wrote:Show nested quote +On September 02 2014 06:27 27ninjabunnies wrote:On September 02 2014 06:17 Tehpoofter wrote:On September 02 2014 06:10 27ninjabunnies wrote: I'm here, but you voted me to die.
I thought we were friends, Banks.
Damn, that vote hurts.
As for the rest of you scrubs, hi.
So here's how we are going to do it. Tehpoof has 3 chances to say wolf. When he hits number 4 I'm voting him.
You've already said it once. 3 more, and you are out buddy. wolf wolf wolf did you complete your mission? ##Vote:TehpoofterI don't have a mission, but you deserve to die what do you think about the mission conversation me kita mderg were having?
Meh, possible, but unlikely....I mean the word part atleast.
|
your Country52796 Posts
Seems like I am playing then. Will start looking at the game in~30 minutes when I get back to my dorm
|
On September 02 2014 06:31 27ninjabunnies wrote:Show nested quote +On September 02 2014 06:29 Tehpoofter wrote:On September 02 2014 06:27 27ninjabunnies wrote:On September 02 2014 06:17 Tehpoofter wrote:On September 02 2014 06:10 27ninjabunnies wrote: I'm here, but you voted me to die.
I thought we were friends, Banks.
Damn, that vote hurts.
As for the rest of you scrubs, hi.
So here's how we are going to do it. Tehpoof has 3 chances to say wolf. When he hits number 4 I'm voting him.
You've already said it once. 3 more, and you are out buddy. wolf wolf wolf did you complete your mission? ##Vote:TehpoofterI don't have a mission, but you deserve to die what do you think about the mission conversation me kita mderg were having? Meh, possible, but unlikely....I mean the word part atleast.
Would you be down for EoD being artificially early by an hour? I think that the ideas are very pro town. My initial vote on you was a troll but I'm not liking your reaction.
|
On September 02 2014 06:42 Tehpoofter wrote:Show nested quote +On September 02 2014 06:31 27ninjabunnies wrote:On September 02 2014 06:29 Tehpoofter wrote:On September 02 2014 06:27 27ninjabunnies wrote:On September 02 2014 06:17 Tehpoofter wrote:On September 02 2014 06:10 27ninjabunnies wrote: I'm here, but you voted me to die.
I thought we were friends, Banks.
Damn, that vote hurts.
As for the rest of you scrubs, hi.
So here's how we are going to do it. Tehpoof has 3 chances to say wolf. When he hits number 4 I'm voting him.
You've already said it once. 3 more, and you are out buddy. wolf wolf wolf did you complete your mission? ##Vote:TehpoofterI don't have a mission, but you deserve to die what do you think about the mission conversation me kita mderg were having? Meh, possible, but unlikely....I mean the word part atleast. Would you be down for EoD being artificially early by an hour? I think that the ideas are very pro town. My initial vote on you was a troll but I'm not liking your reaction.
Yeah, I vote usually before then anyway.
That's okay. You can not like me all you want
I am curious though as to why I was the first vote.
|
On September 02 2014 06:40 The_Templar wrote: Seems like I am playing then. Will start looking at the game in~30 minutes when I get back to my dorm
Welcome to the game.
What are your thoughts on the mission? Have you read Obiwan's airtight case on 27ninjabunnies?
Also are you templar that plays video mafia often? I feel like you're not but was checking.
|
That's not templar, I don't think.
Also, I thought me and obiwan were StarWars buddies, but apparently not.
|
On September 02 2014 06:45 27ninjabunnies wrote:Show nested quote +On September 02 2014 06:42 Tehpoofter wrote:On September 02 2014 06:31 27ninjabunnies wrote:On September 02 2014 06:29 Tehpoofter wrote:On September 02 2014 06:27 27ninjabunnies wrote:On September 02 2014 06:17 Tehpoofter wrote:On September 02 2014 06:10 27ninjabunnies wrote: I'm here, but you voted me to die.
I thought we were friends, Banks.
Damn, that vote hurts.
As for the rest of you scrubs, hi.
So here's how we are going to do it. Tehpoof has 3 chances to say wolf. When he hits number 4 I'm voting him.
You've already said it once. 3 more, and you are out buddy. wolf wolf wolf did you complete your mission? ##Vote:TehpoofterI don't have a mission, but you deserve to die what do you think about the mission conversation me kita mderg were having? Meh, possible, but unlikely....I mean the word part atleast. Would you be down for EoD being artificially early by an hour? I think that the ideas are very pro town. My initial vote on you was a troll but I'm not liking your reaction. Yeah, I vote usually before then anyway. That's okay. You can not like me all you want I am curious though as to why I was the first vote.
I think this will sum up why you were voted quite nicely:
On September 02 2014 04:43 ObiWanShinobi wrote: Reporting in.
##vote 27nb
Glad you're down to vote early.
|
On September 02 2014 06:47 27ninjabunnies wrote: That's not templar, I don't think.
Also, I thought me and obiwan were StarWars buddies, but apparently not.
I didn't think so but I was curious.
|
|
|
|