|
On March 30 2014 12:33 kitaman27 wrote:
Probably not. He clearly isn't aware, so why ask twice whether he should be expected? Doesn't seem very relevant to me.
I was curious cause you transitioned that early game reaction into a read on him maybe its relevant maybe it isn't.
How do you feel that he threw his vote on Slam without even mentioning it in this thread?
|
kita do you really think i'm mafia? really? put on your serious face
|
kitaman27
United States9244 Posts
On March 30 2014 12:37 Tehpoofter wrote:Show nested quote +On March 30 2014 12:33 kitaman27 wrote:
Probably not. He clearly isn't aware, so why ask twice whether he should be expected? Doesn't seem very relevant to me. I was curious cause you transitioned that early game reaction into a read on him maybe its relevant maybe it isn't. How do you feel that he threw his vote on Slam without even mentioning it in this thread?
I don't find it to be a real issue?
Is that something you're trying to spin as scummy by getting me to say as much or what?
|
On March 30 2014 12:39 kitaman27 wrote:Show nested quote +On March 30 2014 12:37 Tehpoofter wrote:On March 30 2014 12:33 kitaman27 wrote:
Probably not. He clearly isn't aware, so why ask twice whether he should be expected? Doesn't seem very relevant to me. I was curious cause you transitioned that early game reaction into a read on him maybe its relevant maybe it isn't. How do you feel that he threw his vote on Slam without even mentioning it in this thread? I don't find it to be a real issue? Is that something you're trying to spin as scummy by getting me to say as much or what?
You brought up the point that its something you do every game why bring it up if it didn't matter? I have a hard time imagining that something that small would be a scummy or townie thing either way leaning super neutral to me I was just wondering if it was a meta thing I don't know.
|
kitaman27
United States9244 Posts
On March 30 2014 12:42 Tehpoofter wrote:Show nested quote +On March 30 2014 12:39 kitaman27 wrote:On March 30 2014 12:37 Tehpoofter wrote:On March 30 2014 12:33 kitaman27 wrote:
Probably not. He clearly isn't aware, so why ask twice whether he should be expected? Doesn't seem very relevant to me. I was curious cause you transitioned that early game reaction into a read on him maybe its relevant maybe it isn't. How do you feel that he threw his vote on Slam without even mentioning it in this thread? I don't find it to be a real issue? Is that something you're trying to spin as scummy by getting me to say as much or what? You brought up the point that its something you do every game why bring it up if it didn't matter? I have a hard time imagining that something that small would be a scummy or townie thing either way leaning super neutral to me I was just wondering if it was a meta thing I don't know.
I'm actually questioning your statement about the slam vote.
|
What kita did is referred to as RVS. Basically randomly voting someone for a bullshit reason at the beginning of the game to spur discussion. It is a tactic of dubious merits in my opinion, but it is very popular on other sites, especially mafiascum.
I am also concerned about thawn's response to kita. Thrawn have you never experienced RVS before? It seems fake that you would press kita for his reasoning for a vote that is obviously based on nothing.
|
kitaman27
United States9244 Posts
On March 30 2014 12:38 thrawn2112 wrote: kita do you really think i'm mafia? really? put on your serious face
Facial expressions were never really my strong suit.
I'm comfortable sticking with a buddy heuristic until something better comes up.
|
kitaman27
United States9244 Posts
On March 30 2014 12:45 kushm4sta wrote: What kita did is referred to as RVS. Basically randomly voting someone for a bullshit reason at the beginning of the game to spur discussion. It is a tactic of dubious merits in my opinion, but it is very popular on other sites, especially mafiascum.
I am also concerned about thawn's response to kita. Thrawn have you never experienced RVS before? It seems fake that you would press kita for his reasoning for a vote that is obviously based on nothing.
What do you think about hopeless's response kush?
|
On March 30 2014 12:44 kitaman27 wrote:Show nested quote +On March 30 2014 12:42 Tehpoofter wrote:On March 30 2014 12:39 kitaman27 wrote:On March 30 2014 12:37 Tehpoofter wrote:On March 30 2014 12:33 kitaman27 wrote:
Probably not. He clearly isn't aware, so why ask twice whether he should be expected? Doesn't seem very relevant to me. I was curious cause you transitioned that early game reaction into a read on him maybe its relevant maybe it isn't. How do you feel that he threw his vote on Slam without even mentioning it in this thread? I don't find it to be a real issue? Is that something you're trying to spin as scummy by getting me to say as much or what? You brought up the point that its something you do every game why bring it up if it didn't matter? I have a hard time imagining that something that small would be a scummy or townie thing either way leaning super neutral to me I was just wondering if it was a meta thing I don't know. I'm actually questioning your statement about the slam vote.
Oh roger, I actually think it could be something scummy. It definitely isn't townie. IF one was to give out points for things I feel like voting someone without providing a reason especially in a thread where your vote is done in a different place (I'd have never known if I didn't have the thread in another tab open.) is a scummy thing to do. If you think someone is worth voting at least give a reason.
|
the issue I had with it is that it seemed halfway between a "rvs" vote and a real vote
On March 30 2014 06:36 kitaman27 wrote:Not providing an explanation for my vote, though someone should totally join me. Show nested quote +On March 30 2014 06:27 Alakaslam wrote: Rayn likely town but you guys make me think this gaem b ez What makes you say that?
he implies that he has a reason for voting rayn but that he doesn't want to say it yet
he also asks people to sheep him
So I obliged his sheep request and asked for the real reason, to try and figure out exactly how much of his vote was random and how much of it wa because he had a real reason to vote rayn.
Apparently it was completely an rvs vote, and now he thinks I'm scummy for obliging his request to sheep his rvs vote.
I still haven't gotten an answer as to why he asks people to sheep him, and then he votes for the people that sheep him. Especially since it all meant nothing anyway, I don't know how he turned it into a scumread on me.
|
kita, I don't have any relevant opinions on hopeless atm.
On March 30 2014 12:51 thrawn2112 wrote:the issue I had with it is that it seemed halfway between a "rvs" vote and a real vote Show nested quote +On March 30 2014 06:36 kitaman27 wrote:Not providing an explanation for my vote, though someone should totally join me. On March 30 2014 06:27 Alakaslam wrote: Rayn likely town but you guys make me think this gaem b ez What makes you say that? he implies that he has a reason for voting rayn but that he doesn't want to say it yet he also asks people to sheep him So I obliged his sheep request and asked for the real reason, to try and figure out exactly how much of his vote was random and how much of it wa because he had a real reason to vote rayn. Apparently it was completely an rvs vote, and now he thinks I'm scummy for obliging his request to sheep his rvs vote. I still haven't gotten an answer as to why he asks people to sheep him, and then he votes for the people that sheep him. Especially since it all meant nothing anyway, I don't know how he turned it into a scumread on me.
The boldified is pure misrepresentation. He didn't vote for you for sheeping him.
|
You people
You want me defend or not? You just decide to lynch the survivor because Murphy fine, my stats suck that ba anyway. Just do it or maf NK me I could care less now. Nothing I do or say works so fine I lose
|
it was the buddying reason right? but what i did was nothing like buddying, I sheeped his vote, which he actually requested.
it can't be buddying because i did not buddy him
|
|
Hey where is Devourke? I need to Balrog with him
|
kitaman27
United States9244 Posts
Are you claiming survivor?
I can tolerate the craziness, but lying if you're not crosses the line.
|
On March 30 2014 13:05 thrawn2112 wrote: it was the buddying reason right? but what i did was nothing like buddying, I sheeped his vote, which he actually requested.
it can't be buddying because i did not buddy him
His reasoning is that you took RVS seriously.
|
|
Ya I'm planar dragon of interplanetary mega bamcis NK POWAH, I will NK the whole scumteam in one fell swoop
Make sure u lynch me or NK watch this
|
See skum must PHEEAR
I have mega 10 kp watch this
U wanna fite
|
|
|
|