Newbie Mini Mafia L - Page 26
Forum Index > TL Mafia |
JonnyLaw
United States3482 Posts
| ||
JonnyLaw
United States3482 Posts
| ||
Balla24
2322 Posts
##vote OdinOfPergo Jonny has been reacting well under pressure and he is still pushing his lynch. This will be a great lynch: - Possible scum - Information and pressure. - Mostly inactive. | ||
July617
United States72 Posts
On November 01 2013 05:16 cakemanofdoom wrote: I don't like how July suddenly picked poofter (who had 0 votes beforehand) out of the lurky people to vote for. It can only cause confusion at this point. I wanna keep my vote on July atm. I guess I'm suspicious of odin enough to vote for him if it comes down to him. I don't have a lot of trust for the current voters, but I'm not trusting a lot people in the game period so I guess there's no way around that. Cake i picked him because he's inactive and I though lynching inactive was a priority|? | ||
StorrZerg
United States13910 Posts
the biggest votes right now are on E00e who has had the most people vote on him or pull off voting, and still in the lead with 3 then OdinOfPergo with 3 as well, and then July617 with 2. With the current listed as of right now, i am happy voting one of the 3, so i am content with focusing the rest of today on just these 3. Ill be looking at OdinOfPergo and E00e next to decide if i want to switch with them or stay on july. Regardless a lynch needs to happen, and anyone with a vote not on those 3 imo is hurting town. also @jonnylaw, idk what your complaining for, all your last post did was do nothing and complain that you need more from me. I personally feel i have been stepping up today. and calling me out for asking for a vote count lol? really... | ||
StorrZerg
United States13910 Posts
On November 01 2013 05:26 July617 wrote: Cake i picked him because he's inactive and I though lynching inactive was a priority|? Sure but at this point, unless you have some damning evidence as to why we should switch to cake, its not happening. Too many people are needed to switch to ride a vote on him, and its questionable if we even have enough active people on right now that would be willing to switch to someone like cake. | ||
cakemanofdoom
336 Posts
July's posts are erratic, but I can see mafia motivations behind his most recent one so I like the lynch. Odin's chaos wasn't that close to voting deadline, and I think conversation starting was still a good idea at the time. | ||
Balla24
2322 Posts
| ||
cakemanofdoom
336 Posts
Storr, July's voting/pushing poofter not me. | ||
Balla24
2322 Posts
Maybe you're right though, let me find that post that i'm referencing though. | ||
cakemanofdoom
336 Posts
No lynch would prevent town from getting information from a town-directed flip, while giving mafia a free kill and the ability to try the same thing the next day. Voting for someone with 0 votes makes it less likely for any vote to pass, leading to the same result. Plus, if anyone jumps on poofter with him (maybe he was hoping me since I've suspected poofter pretty heavily) that just divides town's votes even more. | ||
Balla24
2322 Posts
| ||
Balla24
2322 Posts
| ||
cakemanofdoom
336 Posts
I think split votes also confuses town, and makes them more desperate for any bandwagon to prevent a no vote. Might make it easier for scum to lead a vote on a target of their choice, even if town normally wouldn't consider that target a top lynch candidate. There are 3 hours till voting deadline, which is still enough for mafia to try and pull something. | ||
Balla24
2322 Posts
| ||
StorrZerg
United States13910 Posts
need to look more, but his last post is just bleh | ||
JonnyLaw
United States3482 Posts
@storr I said that because I've been saying to give you time to help us. I'm not salty about you asking for the votecount I just want some meat in your posts you know? As is, you could be lurking as casual scum happy to see me pushing odin hard. You've said you'd go over the filters during LoL queues. That's 10 minutes or so between games. What's your opinion on Odin? What was your opinion on July? You said you were reading that filter and it's very short. | ||
Tehpoofter
United States2911 Posts
On November 01 2013 05:26 July617 wrote: Cake i picked him because he's inactive and I though lynching inactive was a priority|? I have easily double the amount of posts than you with defenses, questions, summations, accusations and discussion. Your posts have been very short (excluding the post you made to unvote where I think not voting is an awful idea and don't agree with) and all over the place. This to me either reads as very sloppy town play or confusion based mafia play. We have basically 3 people who had a decent amount of votes when you voted for me and at the time I had none point being not that it was on me but because it goes against getting a majority lynch which is the goal of today. However, your accusation on me is silly as I have clearly been posting a lot it seems like you just looked back and saw the person who hadn't posted in the longest amount of time and picked them. Also even if people think I haven't been active who said lynching inactive was priority? Its more of a if we can't get a scum read we go with an inactive that could be scum first. Catching scum is priority over someone who doesn't talk. (Which I have been.) I also would like to point out that your post right before was: Where you referenced a circle which rereading the post I'm not 100% sure on who you were even claiming in your circle if you're going to make an accusation put it down, dropping hints like that is scummy and only causes confusion. Make your reads clear. But, from what I gather of the possibilities of circles from the post you quoted I was not in any of them So why in your very next post would you suddenly switch your vote to me? It doesn't make sense. I have more to say about E00e's defense and I will explain that in my next post but don't want a large wall of text cause I know this is already pretty big. ##Unvote ##Vote July617 | ||
Obzy
United States525 Posts
Jonny, the way that you've said a few times now that lynching Odin is a good move "because at least we're lynching a liability" ... I dislike that quite a bit, I'd much rather lynch a lurker over Odin unless what he is doing is objectively scummy, rather than "He's not here, he's hard to understand, and I don't like him much." | ||
July617
United States72 Posts
On November 01 2013 05:54 Tehpoofter wrote: I'm just getting into the meat of this and seeing that we're actually getting discussion going and seem to be narrowing in on some lynches which is good for town we need to get a lynch today and with majority being in favor its going to take some cooperation. I have easily double the amount of posts than you with defenses, questions, summations, accusations and discussion. Your posts have been very short (excluding the post you made to unvote where I think not voting is an awful idea and don't agree with) and all over the place. This to me either reads as very sloppy town play or confusion based mafia play. We have basically 3 people who had a decent amount of votes when you voted for me and at the time I had none point being not that it was on me but because it goes against getting a majority lynch which is the goal of today. However, your accusation on me is silly as I have clearly been posting a lot it seems like you just looked back and saw the person who hadn't posted in the longest amount of time and picked them. Also even if people think I haven't been active who said lynching inactive was priority? Its more of a if we can't get a scum read we go with an inactive that could be scum first. Catching scum is priority over someone who doesn't talk. (Which I have been.) I also would like to point out that your post right before was: Where you referenced a circle which rereading the post I'm not 100% sure on who you were even claiming in your circle if you're going to make an accusation put it down, dropping hints like that is scummy and only causes confusion. Make your reads clear. But, from what I gather of the possibilities of circles from the post you quoted I was not in any of them So why in your very next post would you suddenly switch your vote to me? It doesn't make sense. I have more to say about E00e's defense and I will explain that in my next post but don't want a large wall of text cause I know this is already pretty big. ##Unvote ##Vote July617 I switched my vote to you because you were inactive, and apparently people don't like a no lynch, they wanted me to vote for someone so i voted for the person who I thought was a safe vote (I.E I knew you wouldn't get lynched) | ||
| ||