The New GSL Format Explained - Page 24
Forum Index > SC2 General |
paschl
Germany666 Posts
| ||
blackbrrd
Norway477 Posts
On November 09 2011 22:00 paschl wrote: are the code s ro16 groups also bo1? :o Yes, they didn't have more time this season. They are looking into going for Bo3 for next season for both ro32 and ro16. | ||
Markwerf
Netherlands3728 Posts
On November 09 2011 22:07 blackbrrd wrote: Yes, they didn't have more time this season. They are looking into going for Bo3 for next season for both ro32 and ro16. This would be awesome. GSL format has always been poor simply because there were too few games played. This is also part of the reason the finals were often bad as it's too easy for a fluke too happen (a relatively bad player reaching the finals like inca or top). | ||
bittman
Australia8759 Posts
On November 09 2011 22:14 Markwerf wrote: This would be awesome. GSL format has always been poor simply because there were too few games played. This is also part of the reason the finals were often bad as it's too easy for a fluke too happen (a relatively bad player reaching the finals like inca or top). You mean good players like Inca and TOP? Even MMA can make it to the finals and make it a terrible finals. TOP's final was no less disappointing than MVP's most recent final. Inca is actually better at BoX due to build order mind games, him making the finals in that season was no fluke, though a bit of bracket luck certainly helped. Still agree of course, Bo1's I hate D= | ||
Corsica
Ukraine1854 Posts
| ||
Ineedaname
47 Posts
How are they deciding the Ro. 16 groups players, are they random, or are they based on say, Player 1 from Group A ro.32 goes into Group D Ro. 16 kinda system? | ||
| ||