EPTwill you just reject it, does he die without doing anything or will he kill the bodyguard/s?
also is he restricted to doing it at night, or can he do it whenever?
TL Mafia 2 [GG]
| Forum Index > TL Mafia |
|
SoMuchBetter
Australia10606 Posts
will you just reject it, does he die without doing anything or will he kill the bodyguard/s? also is he restricted to doing it at night, or can he do it whenever? | ||
|
SoMuchBetter
Australia10606 Posts
On March 18 2008 20:45 Bockit wrote: My thoughts... randombum: He showed his skills in the previous game (one of the vigilantes who did an amazing job), his voting pattern was good (according to a quote earlier in the thread, I haven't checked maybe I should) and I actually liked the mass PM, not because of the content but because of the effort involved in actually doing that. It shows he's dedicated, and that's something we need for the mayor. there is no effort involved in mass PM's. to prove a point i PM'd everyone on the page where his pm was posted with my parody of randombum's PM in like 10 seconds flat. if anyone is curious, my pm looked like this + Show Spoiler + Hello. Now i know what you're thinking. What's a flawed man such as myself doing PMing mankid's monument to pure unkempt overfollowing testosterone, dashing good looks and large phalli, yourself (pictured below). ![[image loading]](http://img163.imagevenue.com/img.php?image=11333_you_122_1093lo.JPG) I want you to give me a chance as the mayor of Liquida. A. I've been around TL.net longer than randombum, making me a more valuable member of the community than he is. B. I will always double lynch if town asks (i'm told this is a good thing) C. My post count is really big. D. I took the time writing this PM because randombum made one, and I personally think I'm cooler. Oh yeah, and spam in thread or something like that. Thanks, SoMuchBetter | ||
|
SoMuchBetter
Australia10606 Posts
Last time around I tried running for mafia under the pretext of being the most trustworthy mayor in town. Apparently that angle didn't work, so I decided this time to take my campaign in a completely different direction! Without further adieu, I present my new image and latest electoral poster! ![[image loading]](http://img210.imageshack.us/img210/2664/dodgysmbyq7.png) | ||
|
SoMuchBetter
Australia10606 Posts
Say Ghar is mafia, which the clues seem to point to at this point in time (although keep in mind that the clues don't mean anything and won't until at least a couple of day/night cycles). Since it is impossible for the detectives to know who each other are at this point in time, it's impossible for them to agree on just one detective to talk with Ghar. Thus, in the best case scenario, all 4 detectives PM him and he is able to rely this information back to his mafia pals. Once the word is out that he is mafia and the town lynches the detective to confirm it, the mafia will be able to kill the rest of the detectives and eliminate one of the most useful town roles completely from the game. This may even lead to the town's ultimate demise. I urge everyone to think about his plan a little more before voting for him | ||
|
SoMuchBetter
Australia10606 Posts
On March 18 2008 22:22 Puosu wrote: I'm currently thinking about voting for Empyrean, its true that a Detective Mayor would be just imba good. Obviously still thinking and taking a look at the other candidates. i'm sorry but i don't buy even for a second that empyrean is actually a detective. there is no way to prove that he is a detective unless he is elected mayor and he follows through with ghar's plan. if not, the mafia kills him on the first night then the town is out an important role. he is basically forcing us to vote him for mayor or we lose a detective for no good reason. if he's not a detective and just a lying townie trying to get a role, then why would we want him in a position of significance like the pardoner or mayor? or worse, he could be lying mafia. | ||
|
SoMuchBetter
Australia10606 Posts
On March 18 2008 22:54 araav wrote: Now, what Empy did is very stupid too... He put us in a situation where we cannot let him just die. If he is a real detective, then he must be voted as a Mayor or Pardoner. He would be awesome. If he's a mafia, we just lose the role of mayor or pardoner. Now, I think while the townies outnumber the mafias by a lot, the mafia pardoner is not that dangerous for the town. He will be dangerous only when each mafia pardoning will mean very critical for the town... So I propose to make Empyrean the pardoner and never the Mayor How can you possibly conclude that we must make empy the pardoner to save him? the strategic thought processes he must have went through to decide that his ridiculous ultimatum would be a good idea are so bad that he can't possibly be of any benefit to the town whatsoever, detective or not. then you go on to say that the mafia pardoner isn't dangerous? making him immune from vigilante action is bad enough, but having the mafia as a pardoner in late game is a very bad situation to be in for the town edit: i accept that the elections are more or less random, but please don't elect the guy who cut his own brake fluids and is now speeding down the footpath yelling at everyone to jump out of his way or else | ||
|
SoMuchBetter
Australia10606 Posts
On March 18 2008 23:45 Hittegods wrote: Wouldn't that mean outing the four real DTs though? For the price of one mafia member they could possibly get a list of all DTs? Unless the mayor plans on doing all the investigation himself, which could work I guess. Also, even if Empyrean did a bad move and outed himself, wouldn't an incompetent DT be better for the town, than a dead one? the idea is they don't PM him until they've checked that he is innocent first | ||
|
SoMuchBetter
Australia10606 Posts
On March 18 2008 23:50 Hittegods wrote: I get that part, but if let's say five people message him, after checking that he's not mafia. Obviously one of them would be mafia, or just a really dumb towny, but how would you know which one without stating to everyone which five persons that are suspects? The mayor just saying "vote for xxx" could work, provided that the townies trust the mayor enough to be telling the truth. if no detective comes out and tries to argue against the mayor then we can assume that he is innocent (or that none of the detectives are active/followed his plan). thus, there should be reason to trust the mayor. if 5 people msg him then its obvious that one of them is mafia and the mayor has a good suspect list to start with. | ||
|
SoMuchBetter
Australia10606 Posts
On March 20 2008 20:43 RowdierBob wrote: I have no idea what's going on. When do we vote for lynching / get more Mafia clues? to put it briefly, the town acts during the day, the mafia acts at night. for now we just sit tight and hope we're still around in the morning | ||
|
SoMuchBetter
Australia10606 Posts
On March 23 2008 09:37 Ace wrote: Ghar disappeared because (allegedly) he isn't here. He told me a day or 2 ago he'd be going camping for the weekend and won't be able to post. I know that could just be a Mafia ploy to lay low, but it explains why I won't use my vote to lynch him right now. But keep investigating, you guys are helping me a lot with your PMs and public discussion a lot more than you know. Once again, since it's obvious I'm innocent right now PM me your role and any other relevant information if asap even if you're a vanilla townie because it helps! ghar went interstate for his martial arts | ||
|
SoMuchBetter
Australia10606 Posts
On March 23 2008 11:27 ShaLLoW[baY] wrote: Mr. Pink found the rest of the fight easy as OneBlueAugust struggled to defend himself against an able fighter Martial arts you say? Although I don't think Chuiu could have known that, unless I missed a post somewhere (entirely possible) no he didn't. i know ghar personally so im vouching for the fact that he isn't lurking and is actually not here | ||
|
SoMuchBetter
Australia10606 Posts
| ||
| ||
