EPTwe want to play together again ^^ i'll try to refrain posting every thought that comes into my head this time -_-
Student Mafia V
| Forum Index > TL Mafia |
|
rsoultin
Netherlands15308 Posts
we want to play together again ^^ i'll try to refrain posting every thought that comes into my head this time -_- | ||
|
rsoultin
Netherlands15308 Posts
3 games, same ones as Trfel | ||
|
rsoultin
Netherlands15308 Posts
^noob question of the day | ||
|
rsoultin
Netherlands15308 Posts
| ||
|
rsoultin
Netherlands15308 Posts
| ||
|
rsoultin
Netherlands15308 Posts
are you playing? I thought you were replacing this game? | ||
|
rsoultin
Netherlands15308 Posts
 yeah, the gungan is brand new ^^ still developing his algorithms lol | ||
|
rsoultin
Netherlands15308 Posts
| ||
|
rsoultin
Netherlands15308 Posts
why do a self-imposed posting limit, geript? | ||
|
rsoultin
Netherlands15308 Posts
It's certainly a convenient excuse to not have to post much as scum xP | ||
|
rsoultin
Netherlands15308 Posts
On January 16 2015 11:22 geript wrote: After doing my review, it struck me how interesting it could be to focus on posting the most content and least fluff. hmm...if all you're doing is passively evaluating everyone else, I could see that working, but wouldn't it be hard to ask questions/pressure/push a lynch if you only have 10 posts in a 48hr period? | ||
|
rsoultin
Netherlands15308 Posts
It would certainly be tricky xP Good luck. | ||
|
rsoultin
Netherlands15308 Posts
On January 17 2015 07:20 Trfel wrote: He said that he would only be making 10 posts per day. I personally feel that it will be extremely hard for him to play effectively with 10 posts per day. If he is purposefully handicapping himself with a very strict post limit and that causes him to play poorly and be lynched, that's his fault; we can't allow for players to intentionally play badly. I will remove my vote if he proves himself useful. ##vote Tfel You're new but not bad. Not to mention I think you effectively posted with about that much (or less) in Carol and got us our first scum lynch. BS meter going off.  | ||
|
rsoultin
Netherlands15308 Posts
On January 17 2015 10:24 LightningStrike wrote: It was to make a meta read on her and WarWaffle I only played 1 game with him and he seemed to be posting the same way he did in the last newbie game when he was Vet. Damdred's entrance post is all he got atm so I need to wait for a meta read on him. Although rsoultins only entrance was to vote you she didn't explain her reasoning for why she votign for you now. rsoultin welcome to the game now why calling BS on Tfrel's post? If it's a joke vote I can maybe understand but I don't see anything totally wrong with his vote except for the fact that gerpit had not posted yet so (shrugs) What's wrong with it is that the Trfel, before a single word was spoken...in fact practically the second the game started...decided to vote for someone because they are "intentionally playing bad". Not only has geript not posted at all in this thread, but Trfel himself has been very effective with quite minimal posts, and is usually very slow to vote or scumread people until he is sure. It may well be a pressure vote (the second the game started!) but not only is it more aggressive than I've come to expect from him, but his explanation is inherently false which he should know based on his own play in the last two games. Thus, BS meter. | ||
|
rsoultin
Netherlands15308 Posts
On January 17 2015 10:31 Trfel wrote: I ended Carol of the Bells with a 3 page filter, 53 posts (plus or minus one, I lost count.. not going back to check since the exact number is irrelevant). Seeing as I skipped nearly all of Day 1 and Night 1, those posts came almost entirely from Day 2 and Night 2. Probably 45 of my posts at least were in that time period, which is three times as many as geript is suggesting. And of all people, I thought you knew how to spell my name? XD Typo. <3 you Trfel, lol. Game face back on. Now, much as I'd love to quibble with you about how may posts you made each day (and 45 is definitely wrong xP) the real point is that you have demonstrated yourself that high content, low post count play can be effective. I also have never seen this level of aggression from you...ever. So. I think that your explanation post is BS. And I said so by voting you here in-thread, where even I, as aggressive as I usually play, have never started off a game with a vote. ^^ | ||
|
rsoultin
Netherlands15308 Posts
On January 17 2015 10:38 DarthPunk wrote: Why would scum put the spotlight on himself from the get go for no reason? Shit like this always looks bad but the underlying point ends up being that they don't give a fuck what they look like which is a townie trait because scum ALWAYS care what they look like due to their inherent feelings of guilt. Do you think Trfel is scum? Cause he is my biggest town read in the game so far. What does BS meter mean exactly? Why does Trefel's early vote fit with the mafia agenda? It means that his explanation does not line up with what I know of him. The vote I could really care less about. I think it's preemptive but not alignment indicative. His explanation for it directly contradicts the simple fact that Trfel plays effectively with a low post count, and LS is right in that I don't think I've ever seen him policy lynch. (Note that my vote never made it to the voting thread. I don't necessarily think he's scum but I want him to explain to me why the sudden near-180 in his play.) | ||
|
rsoultin
Netherlands15308 Posts
On January 17 2015 10:45 Trfel wrote: There is no voting thread XD someone is really prepared for this game haha LightningStrike, you played in Carol of the Bells. So did LoneMeow. Any thoughts on him? Lolol, oops. Well, explain then. -cracks whip- Seriously, you've dodged twice now. First quibbling over how many posts you posted in Carol on Day 2, then commenting that I didn't read the OP. (Which is true >> probably should go do that now.) | ||
|
rsoultin
Netherlands15308 Posts
On January 17 2015 10:47 LightningStrike wrote: I don't think there is a voting thread for this game fyi guys. Also what is the BS Meter? I never heard you use this term before can you explain it please? I used it in our last game, Night 1, with -Celestial-. It means that what he's saying strikes me as bullshit, or BS. On January 17 2015 10:47 DarthPunk wrote: So you are saying he is being a hypocrite? How does that affect his alignment? Like can only scum be Hypocrites? If so, what is your rationale for that belief? It means that I don't think he actually believes what he is saying. That is different from being a hypocrite, and if true, would in fact make him scum. | ||
|
rsoultin
Netherlands15308 Posts
On January 17 2015 10:53 LightningStrike wrote: rsoultin can you tell me why you think JarJar your brother would ask for a no lynch? No se. Better to ask him. He isn't going to have anything to base his dead peoples' votes algorithm on without voting data...but I do know he detests Day 1 so -shrugs-. | ||
|
rsoultin
Netherlands15308 Posts
On January 17 2015 10:59 Trfel wrote: I explained it already. I feel that geript is purposefully handicapping himself. Yes, his decision to use 10 posts per day was made before the game began, therefore before he knew his alignment. That doesn't matter though, since if he really is going to handicap himself, he deserves to get lynched for it. If he either stops using this self-imposed restriction or proves that he can play successfully using it, great for him. I generally try to be careful with calling people scum, that is true. But voting someone and calling them scum are very different things. Votes can be done in jest or for a wide variety of reasons, surely I don't need to provide examples for you. So you are telling me that he deserves to get lynched regardless of alignment. Are you planning on scumhunting this game? Will you change your vote if you do scumread someone, or will it stay so long as geript doesn't break the 10 post barrier? | ||
| ||
