|
On January 01 2014 08:14 Coagulation wrote: /replacement
unless I get WAFFLED ON THE COUNTER
Hope I dont get
WEINERED OVER TINY CRITICISMS Your subtlety astounds me, good sir. How come you keep replacing into games rather than just signing up?
|
On January 01 2014 10:40 kushm4sta wrote:Show nested quote +On January 01 2014 10:30 WaveofShadow wrote:On January 01 2014 08:14 Coagulation wrote: /replacement
unless I get WAFFLED ON THE COUNTER
Hope I dont get
WEINERED OVER TINY CRITICISMS Your subtlety astounds me, good sir. How come you keep replacing into games rather than just signing up? it's a backdoor to avoid getting WotC because no onewould bother to WotC a replacement He was doing it in the last few games before WotC was even brought up.
|
I am a big fan of this signup list so far.
/in
LSB play! I want to play in a game with you after witnessing your performance in PYP.
|
Disclaimers before the game begins: I will likely not be around for deadlines as it coincides with bedtime ritual for my little guy, though I will be around shortly after. ...think that's about it. Not going to pre-emptively apologize for gaps in activity because I know that without them I'd be one of the most if not THE most active person in the game as is (after Rayn, of course. And maybe gumshoe if he actually plays ).
|
ohai ladies. I town, just for a change.
Anything interesting happening?
|
On January 07 2014 11:03 iamperfection wrote:Show nested quote +On January 07 2014 10:59 WaveofShadow wrote: ohai ladies. I town, just for a change.
Anything interesting happening? why dont you read and tell us? Just an idea I did. Nothin' yet, but I was curious if there was anything anyone else found worth discussing aside from what's going on currently, 'cause it bores me just a lil'.
|
On January 07 2014 11:08 gumshoe wrote:Show nested quote +On January 07 2014 10:59 Mr. Cheesecake wrote:On January 07 2014 10:57 Artanis[Xp] wrote:On January 07 2014 10:53 gumshoe wrote:On January 07 2014 10:45 Artanis[Xp] wrote:On January 07 2014 10:41 gumshoe wrote:On January 07 2014 10:32 Artanis[Xp] wrote:On January 07 2014 10:29 gumshoe wrote:On January 07 2014 10:19 Artanis[Xp] wrote: Gum, do you feel I'm the scummiest person so far or is there someone that jumped on the heat you find more suspicious because of it? I can't really tell from your post. I found what you did curios, not scummy, cheesecakes jump on you though isn't as simple, cause it happened through me which leads me to believe he cared more about how I responded to the question then how you play in voice. Which isn't alignment indicative, it just means he's started playing the game. Right now I think there are focus points in the thread, but no actual indications of scum intent, something that is sure to change so long as we keep talking ( : So basically you wrote 4 sentences about something you said you thought was curious, then another four sentences on why it isn't alignment indicative. You gain scumpointsᵀᴹ! Do I level up? Btw curios doesn't mean scummy, it just means I wanna know what other people think about you, and I'll put forth my actual thoughts on you to do that and get responses that way instead of just asking bland questions. Besides, just because I'm town doesn't mean I have to tell you everything I'm thinking : P and just because I'm super awesome doesn't mean I'll have scum reads out the gate, so chew on the null reads for a while, if you actually read the process instead of sneering at the conclusion youll find both worth, and proof that I am at the very least trying to think about the game from a townie perspective. You can level up if you accumulate enough points to lynch with fire status. Currently you're at prod with a glowstick status. My problem is that you're saying a lot of things without saying anything of worth that helps us get further. On voice mafia you tend to rant a lot as well, both as town and scum, but I believe you put in more effort to push town forward and ask questions as town than as scum. I don't see you trying to figure out alignments, you're just saying nothing. The best way to prove you're town is to hunt for scum. Actual Scum hunting is townie, building and pushing a case against someone because that's what townies do is not. What do you think of Iam pushing a reckless Yamato ? ( sigh, boring question alert.) Yeah, so do actual scumhunting rather than feigning contributions. I'd actually like you to stop with this discourse as it's not leading us anywhere. iamp's prodding of Yamato is protown but not alignment indicative as it's very easy to do as either alignment. Artanis I feel like this is contradictory. You call out Gumshoe for saying stuff that isn't alignment indicative, but here we are. I fail to see the point of the last sentence. I get what he's saying, he means the act of prodding the sleeping lion doesn't say anything about Iams alignment but is in of itself pro town, because it encourages Yamato to play, which I don't neccecairely agree with, because the way iam called out Yamato was in A very accusatory tone that suggests he wouldn't actually listen to what Yamato would have to say, despite how scummy he finds him not saying anything to be. Also going by this and earlier dialogue it feels like Artanis and iam are pretty chummy / : Artanis how is Iam more townie than me in this game? What has he done to earn your subtle approval? Also welcome to the game Wos, what do you think of the way cheese pushes Artanis and soft defends me? I think Cheese is tres sexy, and Artanis is right---I'm totes scum because law of averages states I had to roll it this game after not getting it for the past 10 or so.
Actually though let me look a little closer but my initial thoughts on everything that's happened so far is nothing is particularly alignment indicative. Gut feeling is there is one scum amongst the actives atm but it could also be gas.
|
Yeah I'm really not finding much. Yamato wassup? We should totally create a fun conversation. How about this: if by this time tomorrow or maybe 36h in or so there are people who have not contributed/posted/whatever, would you support a lynch of those people?
Cheese (or anyone else really) is welcome to discuss as well.
|
For the record if you want to get yamato to contribute, just threaten to lynch him for a really bad reason. Works every time. ^.^
Welcome Rayn and Cora.
Cheese I as well have seen that happen multiple times. Sadly I have seen games where most of the inactives are town just as often if not more often than the ones where the inactives are scum.
|
On January 07 2014 11:37 raynpelikoneet wrote: WaveofShadow why are you not pissed off for rolling town? Because this is my first game in a fair amount of time and I'm kinda just happy to be playing. It's ok, the rage will set in for my next game.
|
On January 07 2014 11:40 gumshoe wrote:Show nested quote +On January 07 2014 11:38 WaveofShadow wrote: For the record if you want to get yamato to contribute, just threaten to lynch him for a really bad reason. Works every time. ^.^
Welcome Rayn and Cora.
Cheese I as well have seen that happen multiple times. Sadly I have seen games where most of the inactives are town just as often if not more often than the ones where the inactives are scum. Not this time, does that make him scum you think? Or is Yamato waiting for the last possible moment to regale us with his glorious reads? It's way too early. He's not threatened.
On January 07 2014 11:42 Mr. Cheesecake wrote:Show nested quote +On January 07 2014 11:38 WaveofShadow wrote: For the record if you want to get yamato to contribute, just threaten to lynch him for a really bad reason. Works every time. ^.^
Welcome Rayn and Cora.
Cheese I as well have seen that happen multiple times. Sadly I have seen games where most of the inactives are town just as often if not more often than the ones where the inactives are scum. I see those games as well, problem is nobody ever gives any fucks about it. Every game there is a discussion whether to lynch lurkers and then it fades away like a distant memory so the lurkers just do what they do.
The question is will it happen this game too? This conversation is getting really meta
|
On January 07 2014 11:45 raynpelikoneet wrote: What's this lurker discussion? There is not going to be lurkers in this game, right fuba? You know it's funny, I was looking through the list and was about to say something like 'I am hopeful in thinking that it actually might not be an issue this game,' and then yeah, I saw fuba's name.
Fubadooba I <3 you and all but you do seem like the most likely lurker candidate (barring some sort of thing happening to one of the more consistently active people). Do your very best, but yeah you may very well be on the back of my mind as a backup lynch as the hours wind down depending on your performance today.
|
On January 07 2014 11:47 Mr. Cheesecake wrote:Show nested quote +On January 07 2014 11:44 WaveofShadow wrote:On January 07 2014 11:40 gumshoe wrote:On January 07 2014 11:38 WaveofShadow wrote: For the record if you want to get yamato to contribute, just threaten to lynch him for a really bad reason. Works every time. ^.^
Welcome Rayn and Cora.
Cheese I as well have seen that happen multiple times. Sadly I have seen games where most of the inactives are town just as often if not more often than the ones where the inactives are scum. Not this time, does that make him scum you think? Or is Yamato waiting for the last possible moment to regale us with his glorious reads? It's way too early. He's not threatened. On January 07 2014 11:42 Mr. Cheesecake wrote:On January 07 2014 11:38 WaveofShadow wrote: For the record if you want to get yamato to contribute, just threaten to lynch him for a really bad reason. Works every time. ^.^
Welcome Rayn and Cora.
Cheese I as well have seen that happen multiple times. Sadly I have seen games where most of the inactives are town just as often if not more often than the ones where the inactives are scum. I see those games as well, problem is nobody ever gives any fucks about it. Every game there is a discussion whether to lynch lurkers and then it fades away like a distant memory so the lurkers just do what they do. The question is will it happen this game too? This conversation is getting really meta meta as fuck, as such just lynch all of the lurkers and win the game. You take their post count for the game, minus any posts that say "hi just got home catching up" and divide it by the number of letters in their TL username, then you have a concrete way of numbering one's inactiveness. Then you lynch the dude with the lowest (highest?) score. Quoting for filter; I am actually going to do this at some point and see what happens.
|
Nope nothing else has really interested me. Oh there was one thing I wanted to mention but I didn't find it relevant anymore so I didn't btoher. I'll say it now anyway just for kicks.
Gumshoe/Artanis's discussion points regarding analysis of voice mafia play v. forum mafia play made me go 'ehhhhhhhhh,' because voice mafia and forum mafia are incredibly different and there is very little you can do to directly compare the two. I don't really have a conclusion to draw from that either but it was one thing that struck me for whatever reason.
|
On January 07 2014 12:00 raynpelikoneet wrote: Yeah that's what at least (unfortunately) gumshoe does as town, he did the same thing in Extractor trick mafia start aswell. Dunno why Artanis went with it - that's slighty suspicious. I think I'm with you on gumshoe being town btw---the accusation of CC trying to pit him and Artanis against each other seems like a really silly point to force as scum.
|
On January 07 2014 12:12 raynpelikoneet wrote: gumshoe you really should not compare voice mafia "meta" to forum mafia, those things are totally different. Rayn would you have any idea why this post of yours has a scum alarm ringing in my head?
|
On January 07 2014 12:19 raynpelikoneet wrote: Not really WoS, no. This could be one of those things I feel like I remember you did in a recent scumgame but I'm not really sure why I think that. Essentially boils down to the 'coaching' thing---really easy to do as scum to make yourself look good. I think you may have done it in PYP though as well so I dunno. Just didn't like the post. Carry on.
|
Reaction voting? Come on, thrawn.
|
On January 07 2014 13:36 thrawn2112 wrote: ##Vote: raynpelikoneet
On January 07 2014 13:48 thrawn2112 wrote: wow what a tough crowd... I can only assume you popping into the thread, tossing that vote down with no explanation and then complaining when nobody reacts means this was a weak attempt at starting something in order to gauge reactions?
Unless of course you'd like to correct my assumption.
|
On January 07 2014 23:44 iamperfection wrote: also that fucker kush hasn't graced us with his presence despite being able to i believe. so we still have to figure him out. Lol I totally dare him to continue as such I will policy lynch him so fast. Thrawn if you're around, where exactly did your line of questioning toward me go, and why am I not scum anymore? Or will you be dismissing it along with the other stuff you did while apparently high?
|
|
|
|