/in
TL Mafia LXIII: Time to Die
Forum Index > TL Mafia |
LoneMeow
Finland1396 Posts
/in | ||
LoneMeow
Finland1396 Posts
This one, maybe: | ||
LoneMeow
Finland1396 Posts
| ||
LoneMeow
Finland1396 Posts
I read my role and it said to send the PM "at the beginning of cycle". It already being quite a few hours since the cycle started when I woke up, I just looked at the player list and picked someone before reading the thread. | ||
LoneMeow
Finland1396 Posts
On November 15 2013 22:57 Mocsta wrote: LoneMeow Is it safe to assume you have caught up on the thread? Yes, I'm caught up now. | ||
LoneMeow
Finland1396 Posts
On November 15 2013 23:06 Mocsta wrote: Anything sticking out to you worth discussing? Do you have an opinion Storrzergs play? I'd like to hear if you think yamato outing me is alignment indicative or not. Something about raynpelikoneet is bothering me, but I can't pin it down on any specific post. I didn't like how strongly he defended me, though. I was really surprised to hear StorrZerg is not a new player, considering he's played in newbies recently. That makes me a bit confused about how to read him. As the StorrZerg I watched play in newbie game, I'd give him a null, but if he's supposed to be more experienced I'm not so sure if I should be instead leaning scum on him. | ||
LoneMeow
Finland1396 Posts
On November 15 2013 23:12 Koshi wrote: rofl. Nha. Why Yamato? Because I got the impression that he's pretty solid player when he's town from LXII, so I want to know if he's town in this one, and I think I stand a better chance outside the thread. | ||
LoneMeow
Finland1396 Posts
On November 15 2013 23:14 raynpelikoneet wrote: I don't understand this. Are saying you are acting scummy? No, I'm saying your logic isn't sound enough to be so sure I'm town. | ||
LoneMeow
Finland1396 Posts
On November 15 2013 23:19 raynpelikoneet wrote: yamato you are the only person who i am confident can actually read me on D1. Can you tell these fuckers to look somewhere else because atm the thread is about which one of these two townies (me/lonemeow) is scum and it really does not help. Who's your top scum suspect that you'd prefer we look into instead? | ||
LoneMeow
Finland1396 Posts
| ||
LoneMeow
Finland1396 Posts
On November 16 2013 16:28 Pandain wrote: Going to vote for Yamato because I don't have faith in VE if he thinks Skanjabs is scum. Also he might lynch me so there's that. I think Yamato is going to end up lynching my scum reads and agree with me, we tend to agree on the same things actually. Why isn't Skanjab1s scum? | ||
LoneMeow
Finland1396 Posts
##Vote: VisceraEyes | ||
LoneMeow
Finland1396 Posts
On November 16 2013 18:00 Skanjab1s wrote: Why am I scum LoneMeow, for is it not on the bearer of suspicion to claim the reasoning behind it? I don't know if you are, there's not much in your filter to go by (pot calling the kettle, yeah). What I want to know, why is Pandain so certain you aren't. | ||
LoneMeow
Finland1396 Posts
On November 16 2013 18:00 Skanjab1s wrote: I think yam is town too, mostly based on him thinking that his early play was super pro-town, which is what I sometimes (incorrectly) think when I want to be a good, leadershipy townie. Its the "how could anyone ever think I'm scum" mentality that scum don't usually have (and a mentality I doubt that he would have, considering that he is supposedly pretty bad as scum). I thought yamato was town, but I'm less sure now, he hasn't really engaged with me in the mason QT and that bothers me. | ||
LoneMeow
Finland1396 Posts
On November 16 2013 18:12 Skanjab1s wrote: Why do you prefer VE over the other mayoral candidates? He looks town to me and his lynch choices have been reasonable, although I liked the earlier choices more than the current ones I think. | ||
LoneMeow
Finland1396 Posts
On November 16 2013 18:22 Skanjab1s wrote: But he is going to lynch off his current choices, not his earlier ones! His lynch choices just seem to be mainly inactives though. Surely you, being not-so-active, shouldn't find these very suitable? His current choices are also acceptable to me. And the fact that I agreed with his earlier choices makes me more certain that he's not scum - my #1 priority is getting a town player voted as mayor, getting a good lynch is secondary to that. Why should my inactivity make me not want to lynch another inactive? It is true that there's generally scum along the lurkers, and I know I'm not scum, so lynching another lurker seems like a reasonably good proposition to me. | ||
LoneMeow
Finland1396 Posts
On November 16 2013 18:24 Spaghetticus wrote: If you're all going to ignore me, I assume I'm doing something wrong. Can you at least tell me why I'm being ignored so I can go about fixing it? + Show Spoiler + On November 16 2013 03:50 Spaghetticus wrote: I’m comfortable with confirming Yamato town. This may seem redundant since that’s the general consensus, but I’m very stringent so this is actually a pretty big step. On my next readthrough I’ll be fine tooth combing for Mocsta and VE. I’ve got precious history with Mocsta, but he’s also quite active. I want to confirm him town if possible. VE seems like the next most obvious, given the amount of material he has provided. I don’t like some of VE’s towncalls, but I think they’ve already been covered by others. LoneMeow masoning incident: I find this unsuspicious. I’m probably more interested in those who tried to force this to be an issue. Artanis and SS: SS seems dense. The projected paradigm within which he claims to view the world where everyone’s decision making is based entirely on the single factor of whether or not victory is achieved, is silly. Does he seriously expect people to sit through a month of his needless abuse in order to slightly increase their chances of winning a prizeless endeavour? Does he seriously think that by espousing his (so far generally unimpressive) logic to the exclusion of compromise in the pursuit of cooperation, he will achieve his intended position of mayor? I understand that some people have difficulty getting along with others, but it seems to me a cover. I’d like to hear people’s thoughts on his meta. For someone who proclaims his own competency as a vet at the beginning of the thread, this incompetency is not consistent from my (admittedly limited) perspective. It could very easily be used to obscure scummy motives. Admittedly, there have also been town tells. I've mixed feelings here. Grack: The trolling seems a poor move. BC is hammering him, and IMO rightly so. Grack has fluffed, and Grack has not done much else. I can only think that: - Grack does not care (useless town) - Grack is in some way trying to modify his meta (unlikely) - Grack is trying to scumbait (somewhat more likely) - Grack is scum (most likely) The Kush4prez line was possibly scumbait, but honestly I don’t see how a town Grack was planning on taking that bait (if successful) and then convincing town of his plan post hoc. The inevitable arse biting his actions have reaped was entirely foreseeable. It’s difficult to see him as town, as his actions have caused little but discord. Yamato lynching BC: I’m not sure, but did I miss the case? I see BC as good, I don’t want him to be scum. I’m not sure why that makes us need to lynch him without further information, as so far he’s been valuable. Unless I’m missing something, Mocsta was right to demand more reasoning for yamato’s platform based on BC. That said, Mocsta’s reasoning about cost/benefit for lynching BC confused me. If it’s what I think it is, it’s suspiciously dull. Sharrant: I’m not entirely certain how this became a thing, I’ll look into it in my next read. There didn't seem enough information at the time to make reads, that it was mentioned so many times sort of makes me think of artificial intervention. Kushmasta: His propensity for unpredictable play makes him unsuitable for mayor. Everyone knows this, though I think some take it too far. Policy lynching him seems both poor play and in poor taste. Using him as a vehicle for lynchbait/trolling is also pretty shit. I think people attempting to bring Kush into the spotlight are hard pressed to provide a believable town motive. Other than that, there are a lot of people that are sliding around on my scale, but also a lot of undercommitment in posts. If you have a read, please don’t just state your conclusion, as it only begs the question, and junks up the thread with people demanding that you elaborate. You may feel like you’re getting straight to the point #lessismore #quietconfidence but the end result is a less cohesive discussion, and a less effective town. "Useless list post blah blah blah." Actually, you promised to look into Sharrant in that. What was the result of that? | ||
LoneMeow
Finland1396 Posts
On November 16 2013 18:32 Skanjab1s wrote: But lynching them just because they are a lurker is rather hypocritical, don't you think? Why do you agree with someone's choices when the reasoning for lynching their candidates is exactly the same for lynching you? If you are scum, then I can see how you would think this is acceptable (ie: "The reasons that I am scum are the same for them, therefore I can support this"), but as town it makes less sense (ie: "The same reasons apply to me as town, therefore they are scum"). Why should I think everyone who plays like me is of the same alignment? Like I said, in my experience there's scum among the lurkers, so a lurker lynch on D1 is a reasonably good choice. Irregardless of whether I fit the criteria myself. | ||
LoneMeow
Finland1396 Posts
On November 16 2013 19:08 Spaghetticus wrote: Thankyou SLam and Skan for listening. (1) - This is my first big game, I'm finding it difficult to get a handle. It is valuable to confirm town so that I have a platform on which to grasp the rest of the game. There is no hard confirmation that Yamato is town, but I'm comfortable betting the fate of town that he is, and will thus use this as an operationalised foundation for my understanding to follow. I do not want Yamato as mayor or pardner, I do not agree with his views of BC, not his views that the pardner role benefits town. I do not trust him to use wither role well. Wouldn't it be more important to choose a town player as the mayor over someone who might or might not be town but has good-looking lynch targets? If you're so sure yamato is town why wouldn't you want him as the mayor or pardoner over someone you're less sure of? On November 16 2013 19:08 Spaghetticus wrote: (2) - It's an incident, but I don't see much reason for it to indicate scumminess. There may be some mechanic or rule I am unaware of, but nobody made any good case for this indicating scum-hood. I don't think that this makes Meow town, but those that were pushing for it making him scum were sewing misdirection either intentionally or unintentionally (unless I am wrong to conclude that it's non-alignment indicative, in which case someone should step forward and straighten me out). You only considered one side of the incident, what do you think it makes of yamato? | ||
LoneMeow
Finland1396 Posts
On November 16 2013 21:53 Artanis[Xp] wrote: Anyone else around to bounce reads with? I'm feeling a bit of one on one read bouncing but Onegu doesn't seem to be capable of that right now on his phone I am semi here, who do you want to talk about? | ||
| ||