I think the absurdity and yet strange value of this heuristic makes Vivax very likely to be town. To the point that almost nothing would make me want to lynch him today.

Discuss.

I think Palmar would never make this read as scum.

Discuss

VisceraEyes

United States21171 Posts

April 21 2013 15:19 GMT

#328

On April 22 2013 00:01 Palmar wrote:

Show nested quote +

Almost correct. In theory I could, although unlikely, but if I was scum I would probably make a bigger deal of it, and not move on to more productive things like chasing oats.

The fact you're essentially correct brings mixed feelings. I'm relieved not having to argue with you. I'm also worried you were just a tad too confident and quick to reach a fairly complicated conclusion.

Feel what you must - I'm similarly uneasy about how much you're explaining your actions - but until we disagree on something I'm not letting it mess with my perception.

VisceraEyes

United States21171 Posts

April 21 2013 15:33 GMT

#332

The idea is that anyone who posted before him is invested enough to at the very least look elsewhere - unless I'm missing something.

VisceraEyes

United States21171 Posts

April 21 2013 15:39 GMT

#333

On April 22 2013 00:14 Mr. Cheesecake wrote:

Show nested quote +

On April 22 2013 00:11 TheRavensName wrote:

On April 21 2013 23:50 Palmar wrote:

On April 21 2013 23:01 TheRavensName wrote:

On April 21 2013 22:52 Vivax wrote:

On April 21 2013 22:48 TheRavensName wrote:

On April 21 2013 22:42 Vivax wrote:

On April 21 2013 22:38 TheRavensName wrote:
Huh... I was curious to see how big boys start playing the game... and less then a page's worth of posting totals I see an OMGuS. I feel somewhat surprised; apparently the way newbies open mafia games is the right way?

PS: Bill Murray yelling indoors is really mean.

Oooo, an omgus, interesting.
Are you okay with the way Oats is playing the game?

I'm not a 100% sure what hes doing, but if you want to call it playing then... maybe? Truth be told the fact that palmer just randomly takes offense to a baseless acucsation in a game that just started doesn't make a lot of since to me.

He's asking for a base to the accusation, precisely.
Do you have any ideas to get some discussion started? Your entrance kinda looked like you tried to downplay what's going on in the thread, which in turn makes me think you're trying to communicate reasons for not doing anything.
Do you think this description fits your play or did your posts have other purposes?

I thought it just genuinely showed disapointment. I've always had difficulty understand what to do at the start of day 1, and I see that there really is no good way to start day 1 in a purely productive way. So I suppose your right, I'm trying to downplay what happens because it doesn't seem productive, unless of course we need to know why Yamato has many weapons that arn' t guns.....

And I think its more suspicious to ask in that way rather than, just ask.... seeing as how he didn't even vote baselessly or hasn't made an ssue out of it yet. If we went after everyone who accused someone day 1 just kinda in passing, we'd never get anything resembling a case or something.

3. You seem confused as to what to do on day 1. I gave a short explanation not long ago on hapa/drh's podcast thingee. The goal of day 1 is to make people fear for their lives, which is precisely what I mean to do with Oats.

Which one?

https://docs.google.com/file/d/0BztYu18cOor9cTdUMTFjdmYtVXM/edit?usp=sharing

protown cheese is protown, sharing all the protown information.

On April 10 2013 10:30 Mr. Cheesecake wrote:

Show nested quote +

this

VisceraEyes

United States21171 Posts

April 21 2013 15:52 GMT

#343

Cheese is there any reason you editted out your agreement with that heuristic of Promethelax's when you quoted my post?

VisceraEyes

United States21171 Posts

April 21 2013 15:57 GMT

#345

I mean obviously it's not there so either you're lying or something weird is going on. But whatever, it IS in your sig so it's not like you can just backtrack and say "Well that's not what I meant" later.

WATCHING YOU SIR!