RED Team's Prize
Forum Index > TL Mafia |
sinani206
United States1959 Posts
| ||
sinani206
United States1959 Posts
| ||
sinani206
United States1959 Posts
On March 26 2013 08:25 Hapahauli wrote: Did you really think he was serious about that? How is it useless/scummy to get discussion going? Like I totally hate Obvious right now as well, but for different reasons. I promote discussion, but asking someone to tell 2 truths and a lie really isn't getting us anywhere. What's the point in having people lie? | ||
sinani206
United States1959 Posts
| ||
sinani206
United States1959 Posts
On March 26 2013 09:00 Keirathi wrote: Friends. Romans. Countrymen. Lend me your ears. The hour of the scum is past. It is OUR time now. Let us take what is rightfully ours. This world is full of liars and deceivers. We must root them out, flay the skin from their bodies, and show the whole world that no one dare trifle with us. We. Are. Legion. P.S. If any man dies with a clean sword, I will fuck your corpse. P.P.S: What the hells is this? Nothing is "maybe" scummy. It either is, or it isn't. Which is it? Considering Obvious decided to "introduce" himself, and then leave, apparently without reading his role PM, it is. | ||
sinani206
United States1959 Posts
On March 26 2013 09:07 cDgCorazon wrote: Do you really believe Obvious didn't read his role pm? If he didn't he's lying about lying, which is pretty dumb. | ||
sinani206
United States1959 Posts
| ||
sinani206
United States1959 Posts
On March 26 2013 09:29 Hapahauli wrote: Sinaniplz: http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=403256¤tpage=7#140 I didn't mean that I believed he didn't read his PM. | ||
sinani206
United States1959 Posts
On March 26 2013 09:04 sinani206 wrote: Considering Obvious decided to "introduce" himself, and then leave, apparently without reading his role PM, it is. OK my wording here is a little off, I admit. I should have used "ostensibly" instead of "apparently". | ||
sinani206
United States1959 Posts
On March 26 2013 09:42 Acrofales wrote: Lets put it this way: the only people with any reason to lie about not having read their role PM are scum. However, given my experiences, the 2 previous times I encountered this phenomenon, the player had in fact not read his role PM. Once was Drazerk, so good luck figuring out his motives. And the other was Ver in Personality 2, who was trying some new and improved way of playing, which failed miserably due to time constraints. In both cases, lynching them would have been equivalent to a random lynch. I don't feel like random lynching, so lets find scum instead and IGNORE OO until he starts playing the damn game like a normal player. I don't think ANYTHING that has happened so far says anything about anybody's alignment... except Marv, whose very existence proves he's scum. I agree; didn't really mean to choose a day 1 lynch target with my first post. One suspicious intro post =/= instalynch. | ||
sinani206
United States1959 Posts
I meant that there was no point for him to say that. | ||
sinani206
United States1959 Posts
On March 27 2013 03:53 prplhz wrote: ##Vote Grackaroni Really? Generally I wouldn't bring suspicion back this far, but if you have a three post filter at the beginning of day 1 and then ninja-vote halfway through the day, that's pretty suspicious. You could be in the middle of writing some really long analysis, but it's already been 40 minutes, so that's doubtful. What's up, man? | ||
sinani206
United States1959 Posts
On March 27 2013 04:28 Nisani201 wrote: Good morning everyone. The case on Grack is really weak, and if it were made by someone other than Palmar it probably wouldn't be getting nearly as far as it is now. Just because Smurf made a bad case doesn't mean he's scum. He looks town now and there shouldn't be any suspicion on him. Acrofales is making a bit more sense but his case on me is just a bunch of OMGUS. Acro, who is your secondary suspect? How can you say such a huge blanket statement. It's day 1, what evidence do you have that Smurf is for sure town? | ||
sinani206
United States1959 Posts
On March 27 2013 06:22 prplhz wrote: @Nisani201 How do you feel about that sinani206 guy? Question for you: what's your problem with me? | ||
sinani206
United States1959 Posts
On March 27 2013 09:04 Palmar wrote: @Acrofales at the beginning of the game you claimed vanilla townie. Would you consider it fair that we lynch you if you at any point claim any other role in the game? If not, would you consider retracting your claim? So you're saying that if he claimed green to protect himself as a blue, and then claimed his true role, you would lynch him? | ||
sinani206
United States1959 Posts
| ||
sinani206
United States1959 Posts
He's been using soft reads all game to make it look like he's contributing, saying people "look" or "feel" some way or another. He uses words like "possible" and "likely", phrases like "not really." Asking others useless questions to fill up his posts. Nisani is not acting as a townie should ask. He is hesitant and incomplete in his "analysis" and has been trying to deter discussion (here and here). Not to mention voting prplhz with no reasoning and only 2 sentences mentioning him, asking for a vote count before voting. Nisani's play is not townlike. There are no third parties. Therefore he is scum. | ||
sinani206
United States1959 Posts
| ||
sinani206
United States1959 Posts
| ||
sinani206
United States1959 Posts
On March 27 2013 15:51 InsertSmurfHere wrote: [/url]It looks the fucking same. Defending himself, stupid policy lynch idea, etc. Like, can you even read? FROM GSL: FROM LIX: Looks like a fucking scum meta to me! k, using a little meta is fine, but not for your whole argument. | ||
| ||