EPTNever played this online before.
Played it a couple of times irl though and it was great fun.
Newbie Mini Mafia XXXV
| Forum Index > TL Mafia |
|
zebezt
185 Posts
Never played this online before. Played it a couple of times irl though and it was great fun. | ||
|
zebezt
185 Posts
| ||
|
zebezt
185 Posts
| ||
|
zebezt
185 Posts
A last night with 4 people including a vigilante also could lead to a winning scenario. | ||
|
zebezt
185 Posts
Are we supposed to roleplay cucumbers etc now?  I'll start with Mocsta's questions: On January 12 2013 13:09 Mocsta wrote: 1) Stance on Lurkers: i.e. Do you policy lynch? It seems to me like policies are a way to keep people from having to think things over. I suppose that can be useful for some people, but I hope we're all smart veggies here. If there is no scum read i'd go for the most scummy lurker though. 2) How do you think scum would try to get influence with us? No idea, I suppose I gotta read the scum guides. Havent gotten round to that yet. There is so much reading material in this forum 3) [fluff] DONT BUY A POOL. I wasted all my time today with pools and hate it ! It's snowing here, what would I do with a pool? [fluff]Anyways, a little something about myself. I'm from the Netherlands. I work at a consultancy firm. I won't be able to post around end of day, because I'll be sleeping. I'll mostly be posting during my evenings, maybe a short post in mornings too. | ||
|
zebezt
185 Posts
Anyway, I read a lot of the previous mini mafia, to get some info on some of the players. Mocsta seems like a very active player in last game and he was town then. Activity by itself is not a good measure though. Anyone with a lot of time can write a lot of posts. What matters is how your posts contribute. We'll have to keep a critical eye on everyone's contributions. | ||
|
zebezt
185 Posts
Spag is not in this game though. I expect great things from you based on last game, at least to keep the conversation going. I wish some of the other players would wake up though. It seems very quiet now. I hope that is not the trend, or we are gonna have trouble finding scum. I must say I find it difficult finding questions to get the conversation started. I think we gotta make sure we don't let people get away with easy bandwagon votes. If you vote for somebody, make sure you state the reasons why, even if you think others have already stated those. Try finding a new piece of incriminating info to go with your vote. This way people will hopefully be critical of who they vote for and it should give us extra information that everyone can benefit from. | ||
|
zebezt
185 Posts
 | ||
|
zebezt
185 Posts
However we probably have to do it ourselves though, but I suppose if people really don't say anything they get modkilled. So I think we should be able to get at least a little bit of info to see who is the scummiest. | ||
|
zebezt
185 Posts
It's nice that you try a different/funny approach here, however don't wait too long with some serious contributions. It's otherwise easy to hide as scum behind your act. | ||
|
zebezt
185 Posts
If somebody thinks the right questions are not being asked, by all means, ask what YOU think are the right questions. | ||
|
zebezt
185 Posts
Seems there is finally some activity going on. Oats seems to be either playing scum or is acting like an idiot. Not easy to decide which it is. I think a scum would not stick his neck out this much so early on though. My top list of people to vote for is: 1: sn0_man 2: bringaniga 3: oats There is still very little activity by some people so of course I don't have all the info I want yet. My explanations: 1: Sn0_man was the first one to attack mocsta in a way that would lead to a bad town atmosphere. After oats took over this case he conveniently hung back though. A nice way to not draw attention to himself. He makes excuses for himself: Not sure, never played mafia before. I didn't have much interest in leading but if nobody did I'd have figured out something to start discussion. Being this apologetic, but not actually doing anything: pretty scummy. Another hint: What is a common Townie/Blue/Mafia ratio? Something like 3/1/1? or 2.5/1.5/1? He does not seem interested in the town/scum ratio. Both of his options seem fix the scum/townie ration at 1:4. He would know this ratio if he is scum. As a townie there is no need to know the ratio's anyway. As a scum it is important to know how many blues you have to hunt for though. 2: bringaniga seems to be hiding behind his little act. No idea if he is scum, but he isn't helping. His professor doesn't turn up in google except for someone that lived a few centuries ago, making bringaniga a vampire?! 3: Oats' idiocy has been outlined by mocsta and omni already. Even for scum play it seems pretty bad though. Therefore he is not so high on my list. | ||
|
zebezt
185 Posts
On January 13 2013 20:05 OmniEulogy wrote: I've gotta jump in and say one thing Zebezt. Him mentioning the townie/blue/mafia ratio was before the game even started. Oops Got a bit carried away with my newly discovered filter skills | ||
|
zebezt
185 Posts
It's hard coming up with good questions early in the game though. I came up with some though: I would like to know from everyone who their top 2 vote targets are. These are not necessarily the same as top scum reads. Mocsta: You said you were going to play this game differently than your previous one. How exactly? Oats: Why does Mocsta's activity level mean you don't vote for him anymore? Sn0_man: What do you think of the points I brought up against you earlier? (minus the scum/town ratio thing) | ||
|
zebezt
185 Posts
On Mandalor: He was gone the first day, but this seems excusable since anyone can have a busy saturday. After that he seems to be trying to contribute. I don't read his play as particulary scummy just yet. On your confirmation bias: You did seem to be stuck on Oats a little too long. You gave that up though which I think is a good sign. | ||
|
zebezt
185 Posts
| ||
|
zebezt
185 Posts
##Vote: Sn0_Man There is a lot of lurky people that also should be kicked out of this game if they keep it up, but I'm gonna give them a little more time. I detailed my problems with Sn0 in an earlier post and since then he added only more lurkiness to his resume. | ||
|
zebezt
185 Posts
On January 13 2013 22:17 Oatsmaster wrote: A question for you zebezt, Why wouldnt our top 2 vote targets be our top scum reads?? Forgot to answer this. Some people like to policy vote out lurkers. For example Acid has a vote now, while he didnt even post a thing, making it impossible to have any read on him at all. | ||
|
zebezt
185 Posts
| ||
|
zebezt
185 Posts
Torn if I should change my vote, but Laguerta might still say something and I'm off to bed now. Sticking with my vote on sn0_man since he is a good candidate. | ||
| ||
