• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 03:48
CEST 09:48
KST 16:48
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
[ASL21] Ro24 Preview Pt2: News Flash10[ASL21] Ro24 Preview Pt1: New Chaos0Team Liquid Map Contest #22 - Presented by Monster Energy18ByuL: The Forgotten Master of ZvT30Behind the Blue - Team Liquid History Book20
Community News
Weekly Cups (March 23-29): herO takes triple6Aligulac acquired by REPLAYMAN.com/Stego Research8Weekly Cups (March 16-22): herO doubles, Cure surprises3Blizzard Classic Cup @ BlizzCon 2026 - $100k prize pool51Weekly Cups (March 9-15): herO, Clem, ByuN win4
StarCraft 2
General
Rongyi Cup S3 - Preview & Info Team Liquid Map Contest #22 - Presented by Monster Energy Blizzard Classic Cup @ BlizzCon 2026 - $100k prize pool What mix of new & old maps do you want in the next ladder pool? (SC2) Aligulac acquired by REPLAYMAN.com/Stego Research
Tourneys
RSL Season 4 announced for March-April Sparkling Tuna Cup - Weekly Open Tournament StarCraft Evolution League (SC Evo Biweekly) WardiTV Mondays World University TeamLeague (500$+) | Signups Open
Strategy
Custom Maps
[M] (2) Frigid Storage Publishing has been re-enabled! [Feb 24th 2026]
External Content
The PondCast: SC2 News & Results Mutation # 520 Moving Fees Mutation # 519 Inner Power Mutation # 518 Radiation Zone
Brood War
General
so ive been playing broodwar for a week straight. BSL 22 Map Contest — Submissions OPEN to March 10 Klaucher discontinued / in-game color settings BGH Auto Balance -> http://bghmmr.eu/ Pros React To: JaeDong vs Queen
Tourneys
[Megathread] Daily Proleagues [ASL21] Ro24 Group E [ASL21] Ro24 Group F Azhi's Colosseum - Foreign KCM
Strategy
What's the deal with APM & what's its true value Fighting Spirit mining rates Simple Questions, Simple Answers
Other Games
General Games
Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread Starcraft Tabletop Miniature Game Nintendo Switch Thread General RTS Discussion Thread Darkest Dungeon
Dota 2
The Story of Wings Gaming Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
G2 just beat GenG in First stand
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Deck construction bug Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
Mafia Game Mode Feedback/Ideas TL Mafia Community Thread Five o'clock TL Mafia
Community
General
US Politics Mega-thread Russo-Ukrainian War Thread The Chess Thread NASA and the Private Sector Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine
Fan Clubs
The IdrA Fan Club
Media & Entertainment
[Manga] One Piece [Req][Books] Good Fantasy/SciFi books Movie Discussion!
Sports
2024 - 2026 Football Thread Formula 1 Discussion Cricket [SPORT] Tokyo Olympics 2021 Thread General nutrition recommendations
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
[G] How to Block Livestream Ads
TL Community
The Automated Ban List
Blogs
Broowar part 2
qwaykee
China Uses Video Games to Sh…
TrAiDoS
Funny Nicknames
LUCKY_NOOB
Iranian anarchists: organize…
XenOsky
FS++
Kraekkling
ASL S21 English Commentary…
namkraft
Electronics
mantequilla
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 15991 users

Tough times on the road to Starcraft

Forum Index > BW General
Post a Reply
1 2 3 4 5 Next All
HawaiianPig
Profile Blog Joined July 2008
Canada5155 Posts
Last Edited: 2012-09-08 07:35:12
September 08 2012 07:31 GMT
#1
Patrick Wyatt is a veteran programmer who has been making games for over 20 years. He's begun writing a series of incredibly insightful blogs on the development of Starcraft and other older Blizzard games. This is a must read for all Starcraft fans.

Here's an excerpt. Go read the whole thing!

Code of Honor

Tough times on the road to Starcraft


September 7, 2012 By Patrick Wyatt

I’ve been writing about the early development of Warcraft, but a recent blog post I read prompted me to start scribbling furiously, and the result is this three-part, twenty-plus page article about the development of StarCraft, along with my thoughts about writing more reliable game code. I’ll be posting the latter parts over the next several days.

  • This post: Why StarCraft crashed frequently during development
  • Part 2: How we could have fixed the most common causes
  • Part 3: Explaining the implementation details of the fix

The beginnings of StarCraft



During the development of StarCraft, a two and a half year slog with over a year of crunch time prior to launch, the game was as buggy as a termite nest. While its predecessors (Warcraft I and II) were far more reliable games than their industry peers, StarCraft crashed frequently enough that play-testing was difficult right up until release, and the game continued to require ongoing patching efforts post-launch.

Why? There were sooooo many reasons.

Orcs in space



StarCraft was originally envisioned as a game with modest goals that could fit into a one-year development cycle so that it could be released for Christmas, 1996.

The project leadership was comprised of the same folks who had started Shattered Nations (video), a turn-based strategy game along the lines of X-COM that Blizzard announced in May 1995 but canceled some months later.

The team members were regrouped to build something that could reach market quickly so Blizzard wouldn’t have a long gap between game launches.

Q4 1994 – Warcraft
Q4 1995 – Warcraft II
Q4 1996 – planned ship date for StarCraft
Q2 1998 – actual ship date for StarCraft

The decision to rush the game’s development seems ludicrous in retrospect, but Allen Adham, the company’s president, was under pressure to grow revenue. While Blizzard’s early games had been far more successful than expected, that just raised expectations for future growth.

Given a short timeframe and limited staff, the StarCraft team’s goal was to implement a modest game — something that could best be described as “Orcs in space”. A picture from around the time of the E3 game show in Q2 1996 shows the path the game team originally chose:

[image loading]

StarCraft as it appeared in May 1996 at the Electronic Entertainment Expo. Yeah — I wouldn’t play it either.


But a higher priority project overshadowed StarCraft and stole its developers one by one. Diablo, a role-playing game being developed by Condor Studios in Redwood City California, was in need of additional help. Condor, a company formed by Dave Brevik along with Max Schaefer and his brother Erich Schaefer, was given a budget of only $1.2 million — ridiculously small even in those days.

The Condor team had no hope of making the game they aspired to build, but they did such ground-breaking work in developing something fun that it made sense for Blizzard to acquire Condor, rename it Blizzard North, and start pouring in the money and staff the game really deserved.

Initially Collin Murray, a programmer on StarCraft, and I flew to Redwood City to help, while other developers at Blizzard “HQ” in Irvine California worked on network “providers” for battle.net, modem and LAN games as well as the user-interface screens (known as “glue screens” at Blizzard) that performed character creation, game joining, and other meta-game functions.

As Diablo grew in scope eventually everyone at Blizzard HQ — artists, programmers, designers, sound engineers, testers — worked on the game until StarCraft had no one left working on the project. Even the project lead was co-opted to finish the game installer that I had half-written but was too busy to complete.

After the launch of Diablo at the end of 1996, StarCraft development was restarted, and everyone got a chance to see where the game was headed, and it wasn’t pretty. The game was dated, and not even remotely impressive, particularly compared to projects like Dominion Storm, which looked great in demos at E3 six months before.

The massive success of Diablo reset expectations about what Blizzard should strive for: StarCraft became the game that defined Blizzard’s strategy of not releasing games until they were ready. But a lot of pain had to occur along the way to prove out this strategy.

***


Read the rest at Patrick's site


AdministratorNot actually Hawaiian.
tec27
Profile Blog Joined June 2004
United States3702 Posts
September 08 2012 07:37 GMT
#2
Awesome I really enjoyed reading the 2 Warcraft blogs as well, definitely gained some insight into the early Blizzard and reasoning for how stuff ended up how it did. Look forward to more!
Can you jam with the console cowboys in cyberspace?
Heyoka
Profile Blog Joined March 2008
Katowice25012 Posts
Last Edited: 2012-09-08 07:39:50
September 08 2012 07:39 GMT
#3
This is one of the most interesting things I've read in a long time. I love how so much of the development sounds like it was on the fly, simply gamers working hard to do something great.

The entire team worked long hours, with Bob working stretches of 40 hours, 42 hours, even 48 hours programming. As I recall no one else attempted these sorts of masochistic endeavors, though everyone was putting in massive, ridiculous hours.

My experiences developing Warcraft, with frequent all-nighters coding, and later Diablo, where I coded fourteen-plus hour days seven days a week for weeks at a time, suffered me to learn that there wasn’t any point in all-nighters. Any code submissions [ha! what an appropriate word] written after a certain point in the evening would only be regretted and rewritten in the clear light of following days.

Working these long hours made people groggy, and that’s bad when trying to accomplish knowledge-based tasks requiring an excess of creativity, so there should have been no surprises about the number of mistakes, misfeatures and outright bugs.

Incidentally, these sorts of crazy hours weren’t mandated — it was just the kind of stuff we did because we wanted to make great games. In retrospect it was foolish — we could have done better work with more reasonable efforts


Probably a lesson everyone in esports could learn from, but when you get really into something it's hard to stop even if you're in the middle of a 30 hour binge. Really excited for the next 2 parts.
@RealHeyoka | ESL / DreamHack StarCraft Lead
Dalguno
Profile Blog Joined January 2011
United States2446 Posts
September 08 2012 07:53 GMT
#4
Posting to bookmark for a read later. Can't wait!
"I'm gonna keep making drones cause I'm a baller, and ballers make drones." -Snute
Sawamura
Profile Blog Joined August 2010
Malaysia7602 Posts
September 08 2012 08:09 GMT
#5
oh goody will read this when I finish my project ^_^
BW/KT Forever R.I.P KT.Violet dearly missed ..
TheKefka
Profile Blog Joined March 2011
Croatia11752 Posts
Last Edited: 2012-09-08 08:19:05
September 08 2012 08:18 GMT
#6
I really enjoyed his wacraft blogs,can't wait to read.
Cackle™
Kiante
Profile Blog Joined December 2009
Australia7069 Posts
September 08 2012 08:20 GMT
#7
god i'd really love to play that first version of starcraft just for laughs.

great blog. it's really cool to see the design process of this game we've been playing for oh so long from the inside.
Writer
Boundz(DarKo)
Profile Joined March 2009
5311 Posts
September 08 2012 08:31 GMT
#8
Waiting for moar posts :3
Shady Sands
Profile Blog Joined June 2012
United States4021 Posts
September 08 2012 08:31 GMT
#9
Had to laugh when I got to the part about pathfinding:

More Band-Aids: path-finding in StarCraft
I wanted to mention one more example of patching over bugs instead of fixing the underlying problem: when StarCraft switched from top-down artwork to isometric artwork, the background tile-graphics rendering engine, which dated back to code I had written in 1993/4, was left unchanged.

Rendering isometric-looking tiles using a square tile engine isn’t hard, though there are difficulties in getting things like map-editors to work properly because laying down one map tile on another requires many “edge fixups” since the map editor is trying to place diagonally-shaped images drawn in square tiles.

While rendering isn’t so bad, isometric path-finding on square tiles was very difficult. Instead of large (32×32 pixel) diagonal tiles that were either passable or impassable, the map had to be broken into tiny 8×8 pixel tiles — multiplying the amount of path-searching by a factor of 16 as well as creating difficulties for larger units that couldn’t squeeze down a narrow path.

Had Brian Fitzgerald not been a stellar programmer, the path-finding problem would have prevented the game from launching indefinitely. As it was pathing was one of the problems that was only finalized at the end of the project. I plan to write more about path-finding in StarCraft because there are lots interesting technical and design bits.


Somewhere, somehow, (P)Much is crying...
Что?
imPermanenCe
Profile Joined July 2011
Netherlands595 Posts
September 08 2012 08:39 GMT
#10
Nice read, the Warcraft article linked previously was also very nice to read.

So now we finally know why Dragoons are retarded! (kinda...)
Micro at its best is like an elegant dance between two people trying to achieve a similar end.
eviltomahawk
Profile Blog Joined August 2010
United States11135 Posts
September 08 2012 08:40 GMT
#11
Loved this part, especially from the perspective of the aspiring computer science student that I am. It's a really fascinating insight, especially the parts about how buggy and convoluted the entire process turned out to be.

I can't wait for the upcoming part about pathfinding and perhaps hearing more insight into the design of the original Starcraft. He alluded to the control group selection limit design decision in his previous post about Warcraft 1, though I would be interested in his thoughts on the selection limit in Starcraft and whether the UI was limited from a technical or design standpoint.

Also, the part about voice chat was really interesting. I once went back and read archived scans of Starcraft 1 in old gaming magazines, and it was interesting to see voice chat as a planned feature along with a lot of other stuff that ended up getting cut like neutral creeps and outposts as well as random weather events. I wonder what Starcraft 1 would've looked like if the production had gone more smoothly with no limitations to what the designers planned on wanting. It might not resemble the long-standing esport that we have now, but maybe that hypothetical version of Starcraft might still be a really cool RTS in other ways.
ㅇㅅㅌㅅ
tec27
Profile Blog Joined June 2004
United States3702 Posts
September 08 2012 08:45 GMT
#12
On September 08 2012 17:40 eviltomahawk wrote:
Loved this part, especially from the perspective of the aspiring computer science student that I am. It's a really fascinating insight, especially the parts about how buggy and convoluted the entire process turned out to be.

I can't wait for the upcoming part about pathfinding and perhaps hearing more insight into the design of the original Starcraft. He alluded to the control group selection limit design decision in his previous post about Warcraft 1, though I would be interested in his thoughts on the selection limit in Starcraft and whether the UI was limited from a technical or design standpoint.

Also, the part about voice chat was really interesting. I once went back and read archived scans of Starcraft 1 in old gaming magazines, and it was interesting to see voice chat as a planned feature along with a lot of other stuff that ended up getting cut like neutral creeps and outposts as well as random weather events. I wonder what Starcraft 1 would've looked like if the production had gone more smoothly with no limitations to what the designers planned on wanting. It might not resemble the long-standing esport that we have now, but maybe that hypothetical version of Starcraft might still be a really cool RTS in other ways.

Not entirely relevant to your post, but if you check out the beta version of Starcraft (there's a few threads about it on TL, although actually getting it nowadays is quite hard to do), the voice chat capability is actually still referenced in it (and there's a document about how to set it up). The 3rd party program doesn't seem to be included though, so there's no way to try it out.

I think one of the most interesting removals (that wasn't mentioned in this blog) is that SC Beta had observer mode (as in, it had 2 observer slots in the game lobby, and you could choose to go to observer mode when all your buildings died). I'd be really interested to know why that feature was removed, as its amazingly useful (and reproduced by many mapmakers since it was no longer in the game).
Can you jam with the console cowboys in cyberspace?
KobraKay
Profile Joined March 2010
Portugal4268 Posts
Last Edited: 2012-09-08 08:48:46
September 08 2012 08:47 GMT
#13
Cool read. Im looking forward to the pathfinding section the most.

Plus...I havent put serious time into BW in a while and this made me want to get back to playing a lot.
CJ Fighting! (--.--)
bgx
Profile Joined August 2010
Poland6595 Posts
September 08 2012 08:56 GMT
#14
I can't imagine Starcraft without technological quirks. I think ironically, in a test of time it made a multiplayer competition even "more" infinite. Air unit stacking, vulture patrol micro and few others weren't intended after all yet made people rediscover starcraft many years after release.
Stork[gm]
ArvickHero
Profile Blog Joined October 2007
10387 Posts
September 08 2012 09:06 GMT
#15
On September 08 2012 17:56 bgx wrote:
I can't imagine Starcraft without technological quirks. I think ironically, in a test of time it made a multiplayer competition even "more" infinite. Air unit stacking, vulture patrol micro and few others weren't intended after all yet made people rediscover starcraft many years after release.

ya I wonder if this guy realizes that some of these "bugs" made the game so much deeper ..
Writerptrk
sluggaslamoo
Profile Blog Joined November 2009
Australia4494 Posts
September 08 2012 09:27 GMT
#16
Thanks so much for this. As a software developer I find this incredibly insightful.
Come play Android Netrunner - http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=409008
Chriscras
Profile Blog Joined March 2011
Korea (South)2812 Posts
Last Edited: 2012-09-08 09:40:53
September 08 2012 09:40 GMT
#17
I hope his next blog is on Warcraft Adventures

Followed by Starcraft Ghost of course
"En taro adun, Executor."
thezanursic
Profile Blog Joined July 2011
5497 Posts
September 08 2012 10:27 GMT
#18
Amazing
http://i45.tinypic.com/9j2cdc.jpg Let it be so!
Boundz(DarKo)
Profile Joined March 2009
5311 Posts
September 08 2012 10:29 GMT
#19
Ok I read through it with my morning coffee. I personally have been involved with starcraft since 98 and learned alot of things on the surface, but I was also familiar with Storm.DLL which made me smile when I heard more about it. Being a huge fan of the starcraft editor it was really cool to read about the programming, even though he haven't covered the editor build yet. Imagine the possibilites if the starcraft voice chat would have been implemented. Voice commands in editor makes me jizz just thinking of it. This blog also proves some long lived myths wrong and confirms other. Can't wait for next part!
chongu
Profile Blog Joined February 2009
Malaysia2594 Posts
September 08 2012 10:33 GMT
#20
Wonder if he's amazed by what progamers can do with the game and how the proscene developed over the years : S

Regardless, gggrreeaatt read!
SC2 is to BW, what coke is to wine.
1 2 3 4 5 Next All
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
Next event in 2h 12m
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
SortOf 29
StarCraft: Brood War
910 664
Pusan 277
ggaemo 147
Nal_rA 86
Larva 75
Killer 64
ToSsGirL 28
Bale 21
League of Legends
JimRising 601
Counter-Strike
shoxiejesuss392
Heroes of the Storm
Khaldor127
Other Games
summit1g12952
WinterStarcraft523
ceh9412
crisheroes1
Organizations
Counter-Strike
PGL2996
Other Games
BasetradeTV204
StarCraft 2
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
sctven
[ Show 12 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• LUISG 8
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• intothetv
• Kozan
• IndyKCrew
• LaughNgamezSOOP
• Migwel
• sooper7s
StarCraft: Brood War
• BSLYoutube
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
League of Legends
• Stunt458
Upcoming Events
Afreeca Starleague
2h 12m
Wardi Open
3h 12m
Replay Cast
16h 12m
Sparkling Tuna Cup
1d 2h
PiGosaur Cup
1d 16h
Kung Fu Cup
2 days
The PondCast
3 days
Replay Cast
3 days
Replay Cast
4 days
CranKy Ducklings
5 days
[ Show More ]
BSL
5 days
Replay Cast
5 days
Sparkling Tuna Cup
6 days
BSL
6 days
Replay Cast
6 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

CSL Elite League 2026
RSL Revival: Season 4
NationLESS Cup

Ongoing

BSL Season 22
ASL Season 21
CSL Season 20: Qualifier 2
CSL 2026 SPRING (S20)
StarCraft2 Community Team League 2026 Spring
Nations Cup 2026
PGL Bucharest 2026
Stake Ranked Episode 1
BLAST Open Spring 2026
ESL Pro League S23 Finals
ESL Pro League S23 Stage 1&2
PGL Cluj-Napoca 2026
IEM Kraków 2026
BLAST Bounty Winter 2026

Upcoming

Escore Tournament S2: W2
IPSL Spring 2026
Escore Tournament S2: W3
Acropolis #4
BSL 22 Non-Korean Championship
CSLAN 4
Kung Fu Cup 2026 Grand Finals
HSC XXIX
uThermal 2v2 2026 Main Event
RSL Revival: Season 5
IEM Cologne Major 2026
Stake Ranked Episode 2
CS Asia Championships 2026
Asian Champions League 2026
IEM Atlanta 2026
PGL Astana 2026
BLAST Rivals Spring 2026
CCT Season 3 Global Finals
IEM Rio 2026
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2026 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.