• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 13:19
CEST 19:19
KST 02:19
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
RSL Season 1 - Final Week6[ASL19] Finals Recap: Standing Tall15HomeStory Cup 27 - Info & Preview18Classic wins Code S Season 2 (2025)16Code S RO4 & Finals Preview: herO, Rogue, Classic, GuMiho0
Community News
Esports World Cup 2025 - Brackets Revealed14Weekly Cups (July 7-13): Classic continues to roll8Team TLMC #5 - Submission extension3Firefly given lifetime ban by ESIC following match-fixing investigation17$25,000 Streamerzone StarCraft Pro Series announced7
StarCraft 2
General
The GOAT ranking of GOAT rankings Who will win EWC 2025? RSL Revival patreon money discussion thread Server Blocker Weekly Cups (July 7-13): Classic continues to roll
Tourneys
FEL Cracov 2025 (July 27) - $8000 live event Sparkling Tuna Cup - Weekly Open Tournament Sea Duckling Open (Global, Bronze-Diamond) RSL: Revival, a new crowdfunded tournament series $5,100+ SEL Season 2 Championship (SC: Evo)
Strategy
How did i lose this ZvP, whats the proper response
Custom Maps
External Content
Mutation # 482 Wheel of Misfortune Mutation # 481 Fear and Lava Mutation # 480 Moths to the Flame Mutation # 479 Worn Out Welcome
Brood War
General
BGH Auto Balance -> http://bghmmr.eu/ Soulkey Muta Micro Map? Flash Announces (and Retracts) Hiatus From ASL [ASL19] Finals Recap: Standing Tall BW General Discussion
Tourneys
Starcraft Superstars Winner/Replays [Megathread] Daily Proleagues Cosmonarchy Pro Showmatches CSL Xiamen International Invitational
Strategy
Simple Questions, Simple Answers I am doing this better than progamers do.
Other Games
General Games
Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread Path of Exile Nintendo Switch Thread CCLP - Command & Conquer League Project The PlayStation 5
Dota 2
Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
TL Mafia Community Thread Vanilla Mini Mafia
Community
General
US Politics Mega-thread Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine Russo-Ukrainian War Thread Stop Killing Games - European Citizens Initiative Summer Games Done Quick 2025!
Fan Clubs
SKT1 Classic Fan Club! Maru Fan Club
Media & Entertainment
Korean Music Discussion [Manga] One Piece Movie Discussion! Anime Discussion Thread [\m/] Heavy Metal Thread
Sports
2024 - 2025 Football Thread Formula 1 Discussion TeamLiquid Health and Fitness Initiative For 2023 NBA General Discussion NHL Playoffs 2024
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread
TL Community
The Automated Ban List
Blogs
Ping To Win? Pings And Their…
TrAiDoS
momentary artworks from des…
tankgirl
from making sc maps to makin…
Husyelt
StarCraft improvement
iopq
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 661 users

Tough times on the road to Starcraft

Forum Index > BW General
Post a Reply
1 2 3 4 5 Next All
HawaiianPig
Profile Blog Joined July 2008
Canada5155 Posts
Last Edited: 2012-09-08 07:35:12
September 08 2012 07:31 GMT
#1
Patrick Wyatt is a veteran programmer who has been making games for over 20 years. He's begun writing a series of incredibly insightful blogs on the development of Starcraft and other older Blizzard games. This is a must read for all Starcraft fans.

Here's an excerpt. Go read the whole thing!

Code of Honor

Tough times on the road to Starcraft


September 7, 2012 By Patrick Wyatt

I’ve been writing about the early development of Warcraft, but a recent blog post I read prompted me to start scribbling furiously, and the result is this three-part, twenty-plus page article about the development of StarCraft, along with my thoughts about writing more reliable game code. I’ll be posting the latter parts over the next several days.

  • This post: Why StarCraft crashed frequently during development
  • Part 2: How we could have fixed the most common causes
  • Part 3: Explaining the implementation details of the fix

The beginnings of StarCraft



During the development of StarCraft, a two and a half year slog with over a year of crunch time prior to launch, the game was as buggy as a termite nest. While its predecessors (Warcraft I and II) were far more reliable games than their industry peers, StarCraft crashed frequently enough that play-testing was difficult right up until release, and the game continued to require ongoing patching efforts post-launch.

Why? There were sooooo many reasons.

Orcs in space



StarCraft was originally envisioned as a game with modest goals that could fit into a one-year development cycle so that it could be released for Christmas, 1996.

The project leadership was comprised of the same folks who had started Shattered Nations (video), a turn-based strategy game along the lines of X-COM that Blizzard announced in May 1995 but canceled some months later.

The team members were regrouped to build something that could reach market quickly so Blizzard wouldn’t have a long gap between game launches.

Q4 1994 – Warcraft
Q4 1995 – Warcraft II
Q4 1996 – planned ship date for StarCraft
Q2 1998 – actual ship date for StarCraft

The decision to rush the game’s development seems ludicrous in retrospect, but Allen Adham, the company’s president, was under pressure to grow revenue. While Blizzard’s early games had been far more successful than expected, that just raised expectations for future growth.

Given a short timeframe and limited staff, the StarCraft team’s goal was to implement a modest game — something that could best be described as “Orcs in space”. A picture from around the time of the E3 game show in Q2 1996 shows the path the game team originally chose:

[image loading]

StarCraft as it appeared in May 1996 at the Electronic Entertainment Expo. Yeah — I wouldn’t play it either.


But a higher priority project overshadowed StarCraft and stole its developers one by one. Diablo, a role-playing game being developed by Condor Studios in Redwood City California, was in need of additional help. Condor, a company formed by Dave Brevik along with Max Schaefer and his brother Erich Schaefer, was given a budget of only $1.2 million — ridiculously small even in those days.

The Condor team had no hope of making the game they aspired to build, but they did such ground-breaking work in developing something fun that it made sense for Blizzard to acquire Condor, rename it Blizzard North, and start pouring in the money and staff the game really deserved.

Initially Collin Murray, a programmer on StarCraft, and I flew to Redwood City to help, while other developers at Blizzard “HQ” in Irvine California worked on network “providers” for battle.net, modem and LAN games as well as the user-interface screens (known as “glue screens” at Blizzard) that performed character creation, game joining, and other meta-game functions.

As Diablo grew in scope eventually everyone at Blizzard HQ — artists, programmers, designers, sound engineers, testers — worked on the game until StarCraft had no one left working on the project. Even the project lead was co-opted to finish the game installer that I had half-written but was too busy to complete.

After the launch of Diablo at the end of 1996, StarCraft development was restarted, and everyone got a chance to see where the game was headed, and it wasn’t pretty. The game was dated, and not even remotely impressive, particularly compared to projects like Dominion Storm, which looked great in demos at E3 six months before.

The massive success of Diablo reset expectations about what Blizzard should strive for: StarCraft became the game that defined Blizzard’s strategy of not releasing games until they were ready. But a lot of pain had to occur along the way to prove out this strategy.

***


Read the rest at Patrick's site


AdministratorNot actually Hawaiian.
tec27
Profile Blog Joined June 2004
United States3696 Posts
September 08 2012 07:37 GMT
#2
Awesome I really enjoyed reading the 2 Warcraft blogs as well, definitely gained some insight into the early Blizzard and reasoning for how stuff ended up how it did. Look forward to more!
Can you jam with the console cowboys in cyberspace?
Heyoka
Profile Blog Joined March 2008
Katowice25012 Posts
Last Edited: 2012-09-08 07:39:50
September 08 2012 07:39 GMT
#3
This is one of the most interesting things I've read in a long time. I love how so much of the development sounds like it was on the fly, simply gamers working hard to do something great.

The entire team worked long hours, with Bob working stretches of 40 hours, 42 hours, even 48 hours programming. As I recall no one else attempted these sorts of masochistic endeavors, though everyone was putting in massive, ridiculous hours.

My experiences developing Warcraft, with frequent all-nighters coding, and later Diablo, where I coded fourteen-plus hour days seven days a week for weeks at a time, suffered me to learn that there wasn’t any point in all-nighters. Any code submissions [ha! what an appropriate word] written after a certain point in the evening would only be regretted and rewritten in the clear light of following days.

Working these long hours made people groggy, and that’s bad when trying to accomplish knowledge-based tasks requiring an excess of creativity, so there should have been no surprises about the number of mistakes, misfeatures and outright bugs.

Incidentally, these sorts of crazy hours weren’t mandated — it was just the kind of stuff we did because we wanted to make great games. In retrospect it was foolish — we could have done better work with more reasonable efforts


Probably a lesson everyone in esports could learn from, but when you get really into something it's hard to stop even if you're in the middle of a 30 hour binge. Really excited for the next 2 parts.
@RealHeyoka | ESL / DreamHack StarCraft Lead
Dalguno
Profile Blog Joined January 2011
United States2446 Posts
September 08 2012 07:53 GMT
#4
Posting to bookmark for a read later. Can't wait!
"I'm gonna keep making drones cause I'm a baller, and ballers make drones." -Snute
Sawamura
Profile Blog Joined August 2010
Malaysia7602 Posts
September 08 2012 08:09 GMT
#5
oh goody will read this when I finish my project ^_^
BW/KT Forever R.I.P KT.Violet dearly missed ..
TheKefka
Profile Blog Joined March 2011
Croatia11752 Posts
Last Edited: 2012-09-08 08:19:05
September 08 2012 08:18 GMT
#6
I really enjoyed his wacraft blogs,can't wait to read.
Cackle™
Kiante
Profile Blog Joined December 2009
Australia7069 Posts
September 08 2012 08:20 GMT
#7
god i'd really love to play that first version of starcraft just for laughs.

great blog. it's really cool to see the design process of this game we've been playing for oh so long from the inside.
Writer
Boundz(DarKo)
Profile Joined March 2009
5311 Posts
September 08 2012 08:31 GMT
#8
Waiting for moar posts :3
Shady Sands
Profile Blog Joined June 2012
United States4021 Posts
September 08 2012 08:31 GMT
#9
Had to laugh when I got to the part about pathfinding:

More Band-Aids: path-finding in StarCraft
I wanted to mention one more example of patching over bugs instead of fixing the underlying problem: when StarCraft switched from top-down artwork to isometric artwork, the background tile-graphics rendering engine, which dated back to code I had written in 1993/4, was left unchanged.

Rendering isometric-looking tiles using a square tile engine isn’t hard, though there are difficulties in getting things like map-editors to work properly because laying down one map tile on another requires many “edge fixups” since the map editor is trying to place diagonally-shaped images drawn in square tiles.

While rendering isn’t so bad, isometric path-finding on square tiles was very difficult. Instead of large (32×32 pixel) diagonal tiles that were either passable or impassable, the map had to be broken into tiny 8×8 pixel tiles — multiplying the amount of path-searching by a factor of 16 as well as creating difficulties for larger units that couldn’t squeeze down a narrow path.

Had Brian Fitzgerald not been a stellar programmer, the path-finding problem would have prevented the game from launching indefinitely. As it was pathing was one of the problems that was only finalized at the end of the project. I plan to write more about path-finding in StarCraft because there are lots interesting technical and design bits.


Somewhere, somehow, (P)Much is crying...
Что?
imPermanenCe
Profile Joined July 2011
Netherlands595 Posts
September 08 2012 08:39 GMT
#10
Nice read, the Warcraft article linked previously was also very nice to read.

So now we finally know why Dragoons are retarded! (kinda...)
Micro at its best is like an elegant dance between two people trying to achieve a similar end.
eviltomahawk
Profile Blog Joined August 2010
United States11135 Posts
September 08 2012 08:40 GMT
#11
Loved this part, especially from the perspective of the aspiring computer science student that I am. It's a really fascinating insight, especially the parts about how buggy and convoluted the entire process turned out to be.

I can't wait for the upcoming part about pathfinding and perhaps hearing more insight into the design of the original Starcraft. He alluded to the control group selection limit design decision in his previous post about Warcraft 1, though I would be interested in his thoughts on the selection limit in Starcraft and whether the UI was limited from a technical or design standpoint.

Also, the part about voice chat was really interesting. I once went back and read archived scans of Starcraft 1 in old gaming magazines, and it was interesting to see voice chat as a planned feature along with a lot of other stuff that ended up getting cut like neutral creeps and outposts as well as random weather events. I wonder what Starcraft 1 would've looked like if the production had gone more smoothly with no limitations to what the designers planned on wanting. It might not resemble the long-standing esport that we have now, but maybe that hypothetical version of Starcraft might still be a really cool RTS in other ways.
ㅇㅅㅌㅅ
tec27
Profile Blog Joined June 2004
United States3696 Posts
September 08 2012 08:45 GMT
#12
On September 08 2012 17:40 eviltomahawk wrote:
Loved this part, especially from the perspective of the aspiring computer science student that I am. It's a really fascinating insight, especially the parts about how buggy and convoluted the entire process turned out to be.

I can't wait for the upcoming part about pathfinding and perhaps hearing more insight into the design of the original Starcraft. He alluded to the control group selection limit design decision in his previous post about Warcraft 1, though I would be interested in his thoughts on the selection limit in Starcraft and whether the UI was limited from a technical or design standpoint.

Also, the part about voice chat was really interesting. I once went back and read archived scans of Starcraft 1 in old gaming magazines, and it was interesting to see voice chat as a planned feature along with a lot of other stuff that ended up getting cut like neutral creeps and outposts as well as random weather events. I wonder what Starcraft 1 would've looked like if the production had gone more smoothly with no limitations to what the designers planned on wanting. It might not resemble the long-standing esport that we have now, but maybe that hypothetical version of Starcraft might still be a really cool RTS in other ways.

Not entirely relevant to your post, but if you check out the beta version of Starcraft (there's a few threads about it on TL, although actually getting it nowadays is quite hard to do), the voice chat capability is actually still referenced in it (and there's a document about how to set it up). The 3rd party program doesn't seem to be included though, so there's no way to try it out.

I think one of the most interesting removals (that wasn't mentioned in this blog) is that SC Beta had observer mode (as in, it had 2 observer slots in the game lobby, and you could choose to go to observer mode when all your buildings died). I'd be really interested to know why that feature was removed, as its amazingly useful (and reproduced by many mapmakers since it was no longer in the game).
Can you jam with the console cowboys in cyberspace?
KobraKay
Profile Joined March 2010
Portugal4231 Posts
Last Edited: 2012-09-08 08:48:46
September 08 2012 08:47 GMT
#13
Cool read. Im looking forward to the pathfinding section the most.

Plus...I havent put serious time into BW in a while and this made me want to get back to playing a lot.
CJ Fighting! (--.--)
bgx
Profile Joined August 2010
Poland6595 Posts
September 08 2012 08:56 GMT
#14
I can't imagine Starcraft without technological quirks. I think ironically, in a test of time it made a multiplayer competition even "more" infinite. Air unit stacking, vulture patrol micro and few others weren't intended after all yet made people rediscover starcraft many years after release.
Stork[gm]
ArvickHero
Profile Blog Joined October 2007
10387 Posts
September 08 2012 09:06 GMT
#15
On September 08 2012 17:56 bgx wrote:
I can't imagine Starcraft without technological quirks. I think ironically, in a test of time it made a multiplayer competition even "more" infinite. Air unit stacking, vulture patrol micro and few others weren't intended after all yet made people rediscover starcraft many years after release.

ya I wonder if this guy realizes that some of these "bugs" made the game so much deeper ..
Writerptrk
sluggaslamoo
Profile Blog Joined November 2009
Australia4494 Posts
September 08 2012 09:27 GMT
#16
Thanks so much for this. As a software developer I find this incredibly insightful.
Come play Android Netrunner - http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=409008
Chriscras
Profile Blog Joined March 2011
Korea (South)2812 Posts
Last Edited: 2012-09-08 09:40:53
September 08 2012 09:40 GMT
#17
I hope his next blog is on Warcraft Adventures

Followed by Starcraft Ghost of course
"En taro adun, Executor."
thezanursic
Profile Blog Joined July 2011
5478 Posts
September 08 2012 10:27 GMT
#18
Amazing
http://i45.tinypic.com/9j2cdc.jpg Let it be so!
Boundz(DarKo)
Profile Joined March 2009
5311 Posts
September 08 2012 10:29 GMT
#19
Ok I read through it with my morning coffee. I personally have been involved with starcraft since 98 and learned alot of things on the surface, but I was also familiar with Storm.DLL which made me smile when I heard more about it. Being a huge fan of the starcraft editor it was really cool to read about the programming, even though he haven't covered the editor build yet. Imagine the possibilites if the starcraft voice chat would have been implemented. Voice commands in editor makes me jizz just thinking of it. This blog also proves some long lived myths wrong and confirms other. Can't wait for next part!
chongu
Profile Blog Joined February 2009
Malaysia2585 Posts
September 08 2012 10:33 GMT
#20
Wonder if he's amazed by what progamers can do with the game and how the proscene developed over the years : S

Regardless, gggrreeaatt read!
SC2 is to BW, what coke is to wine.
1 2 3 4 5 Next All
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
Big Brain Bouts
16:00
#99
sebesdes vs TBD
Harstem vs YoungYakov
GgMaChine vs uThermal
RotterdaM787
IndyStarCraft 161
Liquipedia
Epic.LAN
12:00
Epic.LAN 45 Group Stage
Liquipedia
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
RotterdaM 787
Hui .326
IndyStarCraft 161
SpeCial 121
mcanning 115
UpATreeSC 75
BRAT_OK 41
StarCraft: Brood War
EffOrt 1301
Larva 984
Hyuk 608
firebathero 528
Barracks 409
TY 85
Snow 68
Mind 53
sSak 50
Sharp 49
[ Show more ]
Aegong 45
scan(afreeca) 24
sas.Sziky 24
Free 17
Terrorterran 16
SilentControl 15
Bale 6
Shinee 3
Dota 2
qojqva3714
syndereN415
Counter-Strike
sgares1648
flusha177
markeloff116
Other Games
FrodaN2703
Beastyqt459
Scarlett`368
Lowko299
Fuzer 180
oskar153
ArmadaUGS150
KnowMe140
NeuroSwarm89
Trikslyr74
ROOTCatZ47
Organizations
Other Games
gamesdonequick2620
StarCraft 2
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
sctven
[ Show 17 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• poizon28 25
• tFFMrPink 14
• Kozan
• LaughNgamezSOOP
• sooper7s
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• intothetv
• Migwel
• IndyKCrew
StarCraft: Brood War
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
• BSLYoutube
Dota 2
• lizZardDota266
League of Legends
• Nemesis6790
• Jankos1944
Other Games
• Shiphtur234
• imaqtpie226
Upcoming Events
CranKy Ducklings
16h 41m
Epic.LAN
18h 41m
CSO Contender
23h 41m
Sparkling Tuna Cup
1d 16h
Online Event
1d 22h
Esports World Cup
3 days
ByuN vs Astrea
Lambo vs HeRoMaRinE
Clem vs TBD
Solar vs Zoun
SHIN vs Reynor
Maru vs TriGGeR
herO vs Lancer
Cure vs ShoWTimE
Esports World Cup
4 days
Esports World Cup
5 days
Esports World Cup
6 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

JPL Season 2
RSL Revival: Season 1
Murky Cup #2

Ongoing

BSL 2v2 Season 3
Copa Latinoamericana 4
Jiahua Invitational
BSL20 Non-Korean Championship
CSL Xiamen Invitational
CSL Xiamen Invitational: ShowMatche
Championship of Russia 2025
FISSURE Playground #1
BLAST.tv Austin Major 2025
ESL Impact League Season 7
IEM Dallas 2025
PGL Astana 2025
Asian Champions League '25

Upcoming

2025 ACS Season 2
CSLPRO Last Chance 2025
CSLPRO Chat StarLAN 3
BSL Season 21
RSL Revival: Season 2
SEL Season 2 Championship
uThermal 2v2 Main Event
FEL Cracov 2025
Esports World Cup 2025
Underdog Cup #2
ESL Pro League S22
StarSeries Fall 2025
FISSURE Playground #2
BLAST Open Fall 2025
BLAST Open Fall Qual
Esports World Cup 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall Qual
IEM Cologne 2025
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2025 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.