The Sum of All Fears Mafia
Forum Index > TL Mafia |
Sinensis
United States2513 Posts
| ||
Sinensis
United States2513 Posts
On March 26 2012 12:47 johnnywup wrote: Oh never mind then. So what's the point of having US and SU instead of just one 'faction' then? Because it influences your role. | ||
Sinensis
United States2513 Posts
Like that. Also I agree that NO ONE should claim Nationality for any reason, as that information can only hurt us. | ||
Sinensis
United States2513 Posts
So VisceraEyes, "what's" "with" "all" "these" "quotation" "marks" you use whenever you talk about "liars" or "scum" or "bad play"? Several Examples + Show Spoiler + On March 27 2012 07:17 VisceraEyes wrote: Cool guys, am I really one of the only "vets" in this game? ATTENTION SCUM! IT WILL BE IN YOUR BEST INTEREST TO PUT ME ON THE BACK FOOT IMMEDIATELY! IF YOU ATTEMPT TO HIDE I WILL FIND YOU! That being said, I'm in favor of lynching a lurker if we can't find a good scum candidate (fat chance) and I'm not in favor of lynching "liars". Lynching is for killing scum, not for punishing "bad play". "But VE, isn't lynching a lurker the same thing as lynching to punish bad play?" No kind sir, lurking isn't just bad play...lurking is a very viable strategy that scum often employ to hide. For my part, I'll be keeping my eye on C_C and to a lesser extent BH due to them being among the only names I recognize as players who have played more than like 2 games here. This is one of the first games I've played where the average experience level is so low...so I'm probably not going to be on the offensive as much this game...but I make no guarantees. On March 27 2012 08:14 VisceraEyes wrote: Yes, lying is situational and obviously we need to scrutinze any inconsistencies we find...but lynching by policy anyone found to have been untruthful about anything? Not today sir. Not ever as far as I'm concerned. If someone is scummy because they lied, they should be scummy for other reasons. If someone's lying is the only thing that makes them "scummy", then I'm not on-board with a lynch of said person. That's what I meant by "I'm not in favor of lynching "liars". Policy lynches, on the whole, are a bad idea and allow scum to control the lynch. On March 27 2012 10:07 VisceraEyes wrote: Maybe if you accompanied your question with reasoning as to why I'm "so scum this game" instead of empty threats, I'd be more inclined to answer your question fully. What part of my play so far indicates that I'm "so scum"? On March 27 2012 11:38 VisceraEyes wrote: I'll prod whomever I want whenever I want for whatever reason whether you think it's helpful for you or not gonzaw. Now, let's talk about this generic/obvious advice you gave. I know why you did it (glare @ C_C) but the part that concerns me is bolded in your quote. As a member of town, I happen to know for a FACT that I don't know what "nationality" people are. So that begs the question...why preface your "advice" with the statement "As far as I know..."? It seems to me like you're trying too hard to appear clueless. | ||
Sinensis
United States2513 Posts
On March 27 2012 11:51 VisceraEyes wrote: What a perfectly useless "question"! Perhaps I have "quotation tourettes" and can't help "myself". Perhaps I'm "communicating" with my "scum-team" in code, in spite of the fact that if I were scum I'd have a "quicktopic" or something to "communicate" with them in. Perhaps you're trying to appear to be helpful. Perhaps you can comment on something useful. Perhaps not. <3 I'm sorry you feel it's a useless question. I wondering if there were any more clarifications coming on what the words you are quoting mean to you, or if it was just this post below. On March 27 2012 08:14 VisceraEyes wrote: Yes, lying is situational and obviously we need to scrutinze any inconsistencies we find...but lynching by policy anyone found to have been untruthful about anything? Not today sir. Not ever as far as I'm concerned. If someone is scummy because they lied, they should be scummy for other reasons. If someone's lying is the only thing that makes them "scummy", then I'm not on-board with a lynch of said person. That's what I meant by "I'm not in favor of lynching "liars". Policy lynches, on the whole, are a bad idea and allow scum to control the lynch. | ||
Sinensis
United States2513 Posts
On March 27 2012 12:01 VisceraEyes wrote: In general, the quotations are there to emphasize that I doubt the words are sincere. For example, in the post you quoted, the word "scummy" is quoted because I don't feel like catching someone in a minor lie is enough to make them scummy alone, so I quoted the word scummy. I have a conversational style of posting, so if you see a word in quotes, you should envision me making finger-quotes around any single words that are in quotes...if that helps. It helps. So if I'm understanding you're just trying to make your posts more subjective and less specific? Right? | ||
Sinensis
United States2513 Posts
On March 27 2012 12:09 VisceraEyes wrote: I think if I wanted to make unclear, nonspecific posts I could do better than I'm doing. So no, that's not the intent at all. If it bothers you, I can try to tone it down, but I make no guarantees. I have a style of posting that works for me. I don't care how you post. I just think lots of quotes is suspicious, because it leaves room for: "But this is what I meant when I quoted this..." or "But THAT is what I meant when I quoted that..." Just don't do that. | ||
Sinensis
United States2513 Posts
On March 27 2012 12:22 Nemesis wrote: Lol, ok one last post before I go to sleep. Stop misrepresenting what I said to defend your scummate: 1. I never said that town should take a unified stance. Just that they should take a stance on important things. 2. I never said we shouldn't adapt. In fact, I explicitly said that stances do change, and you just need to explain it when they change. 3. I never said that discussing policy lynches are important. Sinensis, would you please stop inflating useless topics? Just as soon as you are in a position to tell me what to do. I will ask whatever questions I want of whoever I want. Deal with it. | ||
Sinensis
United States2513 Posts
| ||
Sinensis
United States2513 Posts
On March 27 2012 13:01 EchelonTee wrote: new topic! sinensis do you think blzinghand's vote on nemesis is resonable or not? Happy to have a new topic . Reasonable? No. Harmful to the town? Also no. It's the beginning of day 1. A vote, some stuff about bed times, and a power rangers gif doesn't seem very suspect to me. I'll be watching though. | ||
Sinensis
United States2513 Posts
On March 27 2012 14:24 Bluelightz wrote: No Fucking Idea, I'm gonna take more looks at people, Has anyone took a look at ccalf? He has posted NOTHING! besides his /in post. IMO I find Sinensis generally unhelpful with his posts, he has only posted some useless question, and said hes gonna watch Blazinghand, I feel he needs to step up. IMO I find Bluelightz generally unhelpful with his posts, he has only posted some useless question, I feel he needs to step up. Did you notice I couldn't even mock you fully because you've managed to contribute less than me? | ||
Sinensis
United States2513 Posts
On March 27 2012 14:38 Bluelightz wrote: Sinensis, what do you think of Blazinghand now with his vote on Johhny? also srsly cool down we're all friends ==". I think he is being aggressive and unreasonable. Johhny wasn't wrong about anything he said about Blazinghand as far as I'm concerned. I don't think Blazinghand's vote possesses any substance. I think he is just trying to see who goes after him, and to what end they will continue to go after him. As of now I will be watch his vote the closest toward the vote deadline. | ||
Sinensis
United States2513 Posts
I think he is ballsy to go after BlazingHand because BlazingHand is seemingly going after anyone who will pay him any attention. I don't think a mafia player would go after BlazingHand, because doing so risks being in the spotlight; BlazingHand being a very aggressive player at the moment. | ||
Sinensis
United States2513 Posts
On March 27 2012 15:47 EchelonTee wrote: ##Unvote So what changed? Or do you not like being in the same voting boat as johnny? You defended him earlier. | ||
Sinensis
United States2513 Posts
On March 28 2012 11:00 Cyber_Cheese wrote: I've been using a simple system to keep track of people, and I have the game solved. It's just a matter of waiting it out now. + Show Spoiler [gg] + So you just alignment claimed soviet for the second time? You are also grouping people based on Nationality. Only one class benefits from grouping based on Nationality, so indeed, gg Nazi. ##vote: Cyber_Cheese | ||
Sinensis
United States2513 Posts
On March 28 2012 11:53 Blazinghand wrote: Let me get this straight: you think that this post you've quoted somehow has anything to do with anyone's nationality? C_C only knows his own nationality... and he's already soft-claimed AND backtracked SU. There's literally no way he was gonna align-fish anything with this latter post that he wouldn't have already with the first post, assuming people are reading the thread. This is a bad and scummy reason to vote for C_C. Was the flag not enough, but somehow this graphic is? It is the combination of the flag and the graphic, and the fact that he is segregating names in his graphic based on nationality. | ||
Sinensis
United States2513 Posts
On March 28 2012 11:57 Blazinghand wrote: Explain how the segregating names in his graphic based on nationality does anything to help scum or hurt town? Mafia wins if they kill every citizen of one nationality. Dividing reads by nationality supports that agenda. | ||
Sinensis
United States2513 Posts
On March 28 2012 12:04 Blazinghand wrote: Sinensis either knows something I don't, or literally doesn't understand the way nationality works. Nobody has claimed any nationalities, and nobody will. It's literally impossible to have a read on anyone's nationality at this point. Please sir explain your reasoning? C_C, the "soviet scientist's," posts would have me beg to differ. | ||
Sinensis
United States2513 Posts
The flag and writing "me" in the soviet side of the graphic was flavor too, right? Have all your posts been flavor only? Maybe we should all give you a clean slate and unvote you since I seem to have voted based on something you posted only for flavor. | ||
Sinensis
United States2513 Posts
On March 28 2012 12:18 Blazinghand wrote: Assuming CC is indeed town and not scum, I currently do not have a read on whether or not he is US or SU, and nobody who is reasonable does either. I consider myself reasonable and I have a read on his alignment. I think he's a nazi. Based on votes, 5 other people thing he's a nazi. | ||
| ||