Aperture Mafia

On March 18 2012 19:58 Blazinghand wrote:


thems terrorist words

I WILL NOT NEGOTIATE WITH TERRORISTS

to my fellow townies let me explain situation to you
[spioler]


[bigAs we can clearly see, Drazerk is a terrorist, and he's trying to hold town hostage. Your hero is me, blzinghand!!!!

Drazerk is like full of terrorising and only gets his power from making us fear. We mus tbe like spock and remove our minds from fear!

DO not negotiate with terrorist

lynch drazerk D1 or ther terrorists win

On March 19 2012 19:59 Zephirdd wrote:


Worst omgus ever.

posting from phone, cant multiquote. Will answer gonzaw's questions(mostly) in about 8hrs or so. Id appreciate if you could condense it all on a recent post btw.

imo should only care about not reaching lv5 on dengine.

On March 20 2012 04:10 Jayjay54 wrote:


I defended you quite a bit, but this post is bad and OMGUS. Why would you assume that Grack is scum, just because he thinks you are? You're not exactly townie.

On March 19 2012 05:58 kitaman27 wrote:


They are rather Curious. Another game comes to Mind. To be Frank, I'm Always suspicious of people WhO hope to mislead us with Major distractions such as these. Food5

On March 19 2012 07:20 kitaman27 wrote:
Just read through blazing and Velinath's filters.

Looking at his zelblade analysis, I scratch my head and wonder if a scum player could really come up with a case that crazy. I'm confused by his insitance that cyber is scum based on his lack of posts, but his anti-terrorist stance is more than enough to win me back over.

Playing with him as scum in Resistance, he was pretty aggressive and he openly pushed his objectives. This was the only post that set off any alarms, I'd be interested in hearing his reasoning for discreditting Gonzaw.



Vel's posts have been pretty reasonable. Nothing groundbreaking, but I like his comment about wanting to control the outed third party for his kp, even if its a bad idea. He is pretty open with sharing his opinion and seems to get annoyed by things from a town midframe.

I can't say I favor one player over the other, which isn't very helpful being the deciding vote, but I'll go with Velinath.

On March 21 2012 02:58 kitaman27 wrote:
In regards to the Black Market, I'd suggest reading through the relevant posts from Insane 2. Each faction had to acquire a certain amount of currency to purchase a game breaking ability. Be careful when giving a certain amount of money to a certain faction. Additionally, does the black market use a quicktopic? As the mafia and sleeper cell leader probably have access, there is no reason for the town to not be able to read what is going on periodically as well. Being able to identify certain posting habits may lead us to their identities.

Blazinghand getting shot over Velinath somewhat confuses me. Why is the runner up getting shot, rather than the player who has access to distributing pro-town powers among the members of town?

The only reason I can think of Kenpachi having a GMarshal fake claim would be if he is the third party planar dragon. If that is the case, I don't think he should be today's lynch as we already used yesterday to eliminate a third party player.

MidnightGladius, why are you claiming vanilla town day one? Was it simply an attempt to be elected?

I'll mention my annoyance at the no flip again because I like to complain.



Could you explain what you mean here Sbrubbles? Also, who are you suspicious of right now, besides kenpachi? A lot of your focus this game is on mechanics, rather than scum hunting.

I'm considering the following people for lynch today:

Mr. Wiggles



Draz flat out claims that Wiggles has a different alignment as him and Wiggles completely ignores this. I know from my perspective, that if someone tells the thread that I'm scum or third party that I'm going to be refuting the claim 100% and going hard after him. When posting his reasoning for voting, he hardly even references draz's bizzare claim.

In fact, at one point, he even starts to back off the lynch:



Are you really willing to give a pass to a player who essentially claims they used an item to prove that you are scum? You argue that a kp might be better, but that is one less kp the mafia have to worry about and if no one shoots him or draz survives the hit, then we get to waste another day dealing with him. You buy his rage core claim after he claims to use an investigative item on you making you look bad? In addition, you never suggest an alternative for the lynch.

When sharing his few reads that he does provide, he always gives reasons that make a player look good and bad, rather than committing strongly one way or another. The strongest read he does provide is a null read.





Rather than openly share his opinion, he has to be questioned.
Today he hasn't provided any suggestions for the day two lynch.


Bluelightz

The cases Bluelightz have provided us are essentially summaries, rather than analysis. He mentions that sinani is lurking, and quotes all three of cwave's posts, but doesn't explain why these things make them scum. In the town games I've read through, he is just as spammy, but at least he is willing to openly share his opinion.

Today he wants to lynch sinani who is apparently already marked for death and kenpachi for not explaining his role (which he states is not allowed). How can kenpachi be his number one lynch candidate if he hasn't even read through his filter?

As far as his opinions, they completely lack resolve. He likes wiggles for mayor, but switches off as soon draz paints him in bad light. He argues that draz is a threat to the town, but doesn't even vote for him in the end.

blubbdavid

I would be less willing to lynch him than the above two, but I thought he was worth mentioning anyway.



Why are you trying to use anti-town behavior to enforce the idea that you are town? Are you proud of the fact that you haven't done anything but spam the thread? I know you are somewhat competent based on your play in Newbie V, so why have all your posts been a bunch of one liners without sharing your opinions?

On March 21 2012 18:38 zelblade wrote:
Dirk, I dont agree with your read on kitaman and I need to reread his filter after doing some work to come to a better conclusion.

What I would like to know is what you think of bluelightz. Considering that hes on the chopping block together with you, shouldnt you have some actual thoughts on him?

Also the fact that you have been OMGUSing pretty hard is making me suspicious of you. First on Foolishness, whose case was weak and based off thin air, and probably more of a joke if your really are smurfing, and next on grackoni who wanted to shoot you. Besides your claim of driving discussion is pretty lolzy especially if you are town, since in that case most of the discussion you are supposedly driving is in the wrong way. I dont think you are a half bad shot, and find your omgus pretty bad.