EPT/in
Lord of the Rings Mafia
| Forum Index > TL Mafia |
|
Vain
Netherlands1115 Posts
/in | ||
|
Vain
Netherlands1115 Posts
| ||
|
Vain
Netherlands1115 Posts
| ||
|
Vain
Netherlands1115 Posts
On September 17 2011 05:28 iGrok wrote: Oh, you. no, not me | ||
|
Vain
Netherlands1115 Posts
| ||
|
Vain
Netherlands1115 Posts
On September 17 2011 09:26 Drazerk wrote: I actually had stated my reasons regarding the ring earlier I just didn't vote for you then. On September 17 2011 08:53 Drazerk wrote: No one should just get given the ring especially this early in the game. We should use it in the same fashion that the hallows was used in PTP2. How the fuck is that a reason? | ||
|
Vain
Netherlands1115 Posts
On September 17 2011 19:23 xtfftc wrote: Also, none of the currently discussed lynch targets are viable. They are all easy ones. I'd rather go for a random lynch out of the remaining players. Well who do you suggest then? | ||
|
Vain
Netherlands1115 Posts
On September 17 2011 20:57 prplhz wrote: So if the ring bearer is lynched the ring goes to a random person who voted for him. This will encourage all scum to all vote for the person who is most likely to get lynched, so scum will have a bigger chance of procuring the ring. This makes it twice as important to have at least two candidates with as many votes as each other. So you mean we should get 2 targets and let scum decide who gets the lynch? Sounds like a plan | ||
|
Vain
Netherlands1115 Posts
I don't think any of the three leading lynches are good idea's. WBG isn't posting total crap anymore, yes his start was a bit iffy but you can't point to that as scum behaviour. He could be 3rd party but why would we lynch a maybe-3r party at day one when he could also help us get rid of the ring? Then we have jackal who is voted for because he didn't contribute enough? Really? There are many more players who haven't contributed at all but are not due to be lynched. I find that the players that voted for Wbg in the first place are much more suspicious than any of those three for now. I had a very uneasy feeling with Dr.H when i started reading all the pages i was behind and i still have it now. I can't really put my finger on it but to me it's the best target we have. When players say things like "We can't spend this whole game talking about roles. Scumhunting is #1"i always get uneasy. So my vote goes to him for now | ||
|
Vain
Netherlands1115 Posts
On September 19 2011 04:48 Radfield wrote: Errandor is a fantastic Day 1 vote. Lets break down what we're looking for: 1. Low-Mid range activity 2. Vote Contradictions 3. Paragraphy vote posts with BS reasoning 4. 'Contribution' posts that say nothing + Show Spoiler + Lol I think Wbg is just trying to be palmar right now (which is a pretty fucking stupid idea) If there are post restrictions I would be really surprised because Curu really hates those things . But then he might just take it out on us or do it for some sort of balance reasons so its pure speculation. First post details that WBG is probably just trolling, and while stupid, isn't really worth much attention. Frankly I agree, but whoops with his second real post Errandor is now willing to vote out WBG: We've gone from WBG trolling to now being worthy of getting lynched day 1. This is the most BS post in the thread right now. First we have the contradiction. Second we have the justification that even if he is town, he's worth getting rid of. NOPE. I realize that's not precisely what's been written, but that is absolutely the intent. Third, this is a complete and utter bandwagon. WBG picks up a couple votes, and Erandorr slides into the scene. Fourth you add in a bit of extra post restriction business which does nothing but cut him down. This is not why we vote! This entire post is showing that Errandor justification for voting WBG is not in fact that he's scum, but rather a bad townie who deserves to die. An hour and a half later, Errandor posts this: "Okay I read the whole thread now." Whoops scum slip. Why are you voting for a player AND THEN reading the thread? Not how townies play. This is all followed by a bunch more suspicion on WBG, but no actual points against him: + Show Spoiler + I forgot to vote earlier but lets just get wbg out of the game, I feel really uncomfortably by what he was doing. The reason I want you out is that you clearly have an agenda other than catching scum. That just makes me uncomfortable. To paraphrase: "You're actually playing good now, but you trolled before. You're targets are all good, but your behaviour is bad" It's hard to justify killing townies when you're scum isn't it? Errandor is very scummy, and likely the best vote we'll get: ##Vote: Erandorr Well at least this looks better than than the 3 other cases. I didn't even know he posted that much>.> I will be switching votes due to my first suspicion only being based on a feeling. Though i'll be weary of dr. H | ||
|
Vain
Netherlands1115 Posts
| ||
|
Vain
Netherlands1115 Posts
On September 19 2011 08:09 sandroba wrote: I just got here and got a fuckton to read. Curu told me 10pm but now I see it's in fact 8pm =/ Did I get modkilled? Well start posting already:p God i wanna know:\ | ||
| ||
