EPTSome Mafia Game
| Forum Index > TL Mafia |
|
sandroba
Canada4998 Posts
| ||
|
sandroba
Canada4998 Posts
On September 07 2011 13:25 iGrok wrote: Lets do this With a smurf in the game, I have nothing to base your actions off of. I want you to contribute a lot, so that I can get a good read off of you. Until then, you make me uncomfortable. ##Vote Bayonet Anderson Yo iGrok, if you are going to start a RVS why do you go out of your way to make it neat and make it seem justifiable? You ought to know that's no valid reason to vote, why make it seem so? | ||
|
sandroba
Canada4998 Posts
| ||
|
sandroba
Canada4998 Posts
| ||
|
sandroba
Canada4998 Posts
| ||
|
sandroba
Canada4998 Posts
On September 08 2011 09:47 iGrok wrote: You said you were suspicious of me and then gave no reasons. Do you have any? You pretty much started the shit fest day1 with your arbitrary vote and then tryed to make it seem it had some thought behind it, when it was clearly a random vote. Your response seem to be trying too hard to justify it, instead of just admiting it was shitty reasoning and you were only trying to get discussion going. In sumary your first post didn't sit well with me and your response did not help either. I'd actually like your opinion on someone that has posted in this thread. | ||
|
sandroba
Canada4998 Posts
On September 08 2011 11:20 iGrok wrote: First of all, I didn't "start the shit fest day1". The shitfest had been going on since Curu voted Palmer pre-game. But that specific shitfest started with WBG's Random Vote. Second of all This is trying hard to justify it? Look, if you want to tunnel someone, that's fine. Just pick someone else to fight with. Man iGrok, why so dodgy? Is it wrong of me to interrogate you to try to determine your aligment? You sure don't like the heat do you? | ||
|
sandroba
Canada4998 Posts
##Vote: TheAwesomeAll | ||
|
sandroba
Canada4998 Posts
| ||
|
sandroba
Canada4998 Posts
| ||
|
sandroba
Canada4998 Posts
##vote: xfttfc I'm feeling like shit right now because I'm extremelly hung over. You guys should actually be looking at whoever failed to call me scum or did so in an unsure fashion. Maybe I was wrong about GGQ being town day1, because now that the pressure is not on him he is not posting anymore. And yeah zona and bayonet are prob town. Don't lynch me today, I'll flip town. And I will do a lot of work the next day if left alive (by both mafia and town lol), I promisse. Today my head fucking hurts too much and reading this has been a pain. | ||
|
sandroba
Canada4998 Posts
On September 12 2011 03:14 Curu wrote: Why xt? What do you make of sinani, who hasn't done anything, or Jackal, who offers nothing but quick jumps onto other people's wagons and didn't even mention you? I don't know what to make of sinani, I always think he is scummy despite alignment. I'm leaning towards scum here, but I've been wrong about him before. | ||
|
sandroba
Canada4998 Posts
| ||
|
sandroba
Canada4998 Posts
To be quite honest with you I simply don't see bum rolling mafia so many times in a row lol and your case about rolefishing doesn't make much sense to me. I can certanly see townie reasons for posting that which I won't go into detail, but as mafia I don't think he would be so blatant and attention grabbing in his comment about roles. That first comment did the exact oposite of what mafia normally tries to do, which is avoid attention. Sinani I'm quite undecided on, because he refuses to help, yet his lynch isn't exactly being fought over. I guess lynching him is better than lynching no one because there is indeed a decent chance he is mafia. ##Unvote ##Vote:Sinani I'd much rather lynch jackal if you guys are willing to change to him. He is doing his trade mark intentionally obtuse mafia meta. | ||
|
sandroba
Canada4998 Posts
| ||
|
sandroba
Canada4998 Posts
| ||
|
sandroba
Canada4998 Posts
| ||
|
sandroba
Canada4998 Posts
1) Palmar is scum and Bum town. Makes some sense. 2) Bum is scum and Palmar is town. The odds of mafia framing wbg the night they shot him are simply ridiculous. That means Palmar is insane if really a DT. Palmar has to know this and if he was town he would be pushing for bum like a crazy man today, not suddenly deciding to go after me after he said yesterday he believed me. Doesn't make a lot of sense. Palmar just has no reason to assume bum got framed night one. Also not knowing about his sanity in the first place he would not be yelling bum is town before he confirmed it. 3) Both are scum. This makes the most sense, because palmar is not going after bum, which would make his story the most believable. 4)Both are town. For this to happen Bum needs to have been framed night one and palmar has to be behaving like an idiot as a DT. He keeps yelling Bum is town for no reason and somehow mafia doesn't pick up on this and shoot him. Not likely at all. Also I believe there is no roleblocker in this game. We have no claims so far and if you argue they have been shooting plus roleblocking people WBG was the rational roleblock for this night and we know his action went through. So no roleblockers for mafia and we have 2 vigs and a medic claims so far. They have no means to prevent a power role from claiming but if the medic wants to protect the power role he has to roleblock him and he can't do it 2 night in a row which is a clever little mechanic by Ace. But scum doesn't know this at first and leaving scum unable to counter a DT claim is not something Ace would do imo. I'll post my thought on everybody soon, aswell as huge analysis of both previous days. | ||
|
sandroba
Canada4998 Posts
1) Say you are suspicious of wbg for no reason on the previous day so it justifies your check today. 2) Conviniently WBG gets shot. Claim that lul wbg might have been framed and shot. 3) ???? 4) Profit. | ||
|
sandroba
Canada4998 Posts
On September 14 2011 01:28 Palmar wrote: your point no 4 is just plain wrong. you guys didn't shoot me because people suspect me. For 4 to happen Bum doesn't need to have been framed, all it takes is wbg being framed on day 2, and me actually being sane, that's the explanation I'd go with. But thanks, now you've just confirmed you're not using logic this game, you're scum. And why would I not defend a person who I have an innocent check on, it's only after I got the false check on wbg that I started doubting my sanity or the possibility of framers. That's because you are scum. ##Vote: Palmar Thoughts on other people still following later. | ||
| ||
