Resurrection Mafia
Forum Index > TL Mafia |
Sknowman
55 Posts
| ||
Sknowman
55 Posts
| ||
Sknowman
55 Posts
On August 31 2011 10:03 redFF wrote: i am actually very excited for this game looking at player list Must have missed where it said "Chaos13" | ||
Sknowman
55 Posts
On September 01 2011 06:03 wherebugsgo wrote: *masturbates furiously* *watches passionately* | ||
Sknowman
55 Posts
On September 02 2011 11:36 bumatlarge wrote: We should be reading more into the role list we have. This is an extremely odd set-up where lynching and killing is not completely based around eliminating scum. In fact, basing our tactics on that is short-sighted and I mean to remedy this. Dead players create a "pool" of suspects that a coroner can utilize. I am fairly certain we have 1 or 2 coroners, or else the game has a ridiculous set-up. In a way, the first lynch is really important, yet not as cruel with the Resurrection mechanic. We immediately lynch two players, and the coroner(s) must choose between them. I don't see how intentionally misleading roles like millers or sanity can be in this game, so I'm assuming what a coroner get's is 100%. So this is what I'm thinking, and I'm sure I haven't been the first person to speculate. If we have an unlynchable claim, and we put a few votes on him along with someone else we deem scummy, we can economically manage our now chaotic lynching power into something very useful and organized at this point in the game. The priest and coroner can double team the other dead person and hold on to what they get. Most likely the unlynchable will get shot, and the high priest can devote his power in keeping that person alive, while the coroner can go to town, and if mafia ever stop shooting the unlynchable, we get a confirmed town. Its extremely unlikely for mafia to have an unlynchable themselves without town having a direct counter to such shenanigans. Think about it, that one mafia member would have to be shot by the unlynchable, or he wins the game by himself. There are multiple loopholes to this plan, like perhaps a 1 lynch immune mafia that could "prove" himself, or perhaps a mafia watcher who can see who visits a dead person (goodbye priest and coroner :X) Thoughts on this? Also varpulis wagon is hilarious, though I'm not taking my eyes off him, the fact that that many people gunned on him from the little thing I picked up without questioning everything else gives us some great partners for unlynchable if this can follow through. I mean at worst mafia figures out who they can't push a lynch on? Can a High Priest revive the same person more then once? I don't agree with focusing on the mechanics/roles so much. Yes, it is good to understand them. But mechanic/role analysis is such an easy way for scum to get solid town points, make big posts and derail conversation. I am not convinced anybody is town at this point. I am not liking Ace's play, not because he's scummy but because he's not playing. Seriously, what the fuck is that? Varpulis doesn't look too scummy to me. I've been attacked at the beginning of games for making similar posts to Varp's first post as town. Just trying to get the game rolling. redFF is playing his usual town self, I think. Short, concise posts and being blunt and to the point. jcarlsoniv looks scummiest to me. His defense was not good. At all. Really scummy. On September 01 2011 22:35 jcarlsoniv wrote:If you absolutely wanted to lynch me, whatever. It would be a waste of a lynch, AND I would like to see some reasoning behind it. If you're lynching me because I'm lurking, well then read the last 2 freaking pages again. I'm not lurking even a little bit. I don't necessarily disagree, but chaos13 has not posted much at all that would let me lean either way. I'm neutral on him at the moment. And I'll also be watching Red. While I agree with him that Varp seems scummy, some of the best scum hunters can turn out to be scum. They kinda cheat =) "Don't lynch me because I'm a townie." Jesus, how many times have I heard that defense from scum? It's either scum or derby town who just don't know how to defend, but I believe he is experienced (correct me if I'm wrong). Then he defends himself from a lurker accusation that literally nobody made. Then his analysis on other players is almost identical to some of my scum posts. "Not enough info to go off... I'll keep an eye on this player... X probably isn't scum, but also could be!" Nope, I'm voting him. ##VOTE jcarlsoniv | ||
Sknowman
55 Posts
I am still sticking with my vote on jcarlwateverthefuckhisnameis. The lynches all seem pretty weak to me. | ||
Sknowman
55 Posts
| ||
Sknowman
55 Posts
| ||
| ||