EPT/in
Werewolves Invade TeamLiquid
| Forum Index > TL Mafia |
|
Forumite
Sweden3280 Posts
/in | ||
|
Forumite
Sweden3280 Posts
On August 11 2011 11:11 Curu wrote: Ciryandor this looks a bit icky: 5. In the event of a TIE ALL candidates that are part of that tie are killed. Can't Town manipulate this to double lynch every day? It´s not a bug, it´s a feature. | ||
|
Forumite
Sweden3280 Posts
| ||
|
Forumite
Sweden3280 Posts
| ||
|
Forumite
Sweden3280 Posts
| ||
|
Forumite
Sweden3280 Posts
On August 15 2011 00:16 Jackal58 wrote: Has this thing started? The night before the first turn has started, so anyone with night actions can do them. It should be about 23 hours left on this night, before we begin with the first day with a day post. | ||
|
Forumite
Sweden3280 Posts
On August 15 2011 03:54 DropBear wrote:- If there are any rivals in play, please delay your tunnelling until a bit later in the game. We don't want early lynches being concentrated on someone who only helps one person win the game, we need them to be Mafia. Worry about your evil twin later on. It´s very hard to win as a Rival, you need to make sure the other one dies AND you need to survive, so I doubt that any rivals will follow your advice. Waiting to kill the rival helps town more than the surviving rival. They might, just don´t count on it. | ||
|
Forumite
Sweden3280 Posts
There might be benefit to Rival claiming, if they all claim, and that is that scum can´t claim rival later on, to defend themselves when they are accused of tunneling without reason. We can´t know if everyone claims, though, so people can still do it. | ||
|
Forumite
Sweden3280 Posts
In case it wasn´t clear, I´m against mass claiming. | ||
|
Forumite
Sweden3280 Posts
On August 15 2011 07:14 TheAwesomeAll wrote: What´s your reasoning? XYZ i dont have an opinion, people seem to agree with it though. What if scum scums out? Maybe its good though. Buy maybe it isnt. ##vote forumite | ||
|
Forumite
Sweden3280 Posts
On August 15 2011 07:40 TheAwesomeAll wrote: I´m not answering your riddles. When you have a real FoS, tell me. i kinda agree, you have to figure my incredibly subtle accusations out yourself. | ||
|
Forumite
Sweden3280 Posts
On August 15 2011 08:33 Sknowman wrote: Sounds good, great idea Sknowman. Dude, I think we should hold off discussion on Varp's FoS on Slam until Slam gets a chance to defend himself. | ||
|
Forumite
Sweden3280 Posts
| ||
|
Forumite
Sweden3280 Posts
| ||
|
Forumite
Sweden3280 Posts
| ||
|
Forumite
Sweden3280 Posts
See you all after the Day post. I´ll probably be online about 6 hours into the new day. | ||
|
Forumite
Sweden3280 Posts
| ||
|
Forumite
Sweden3280 Posts
On August 16 2011 08:19 Jackal58 wrote: We used that logic in the game I mention above, we ended up lynching both the first target, the second target and the one who changed the vote that first night. 3 days, 3 lynches, 3 Towns dead... See that's part of the beauty of it. If there is a tie and somebody votes to change it we have a scumbunny on our hands. If the consensus of town is Player X and Player Y should be lynched and then Player Z changes it up in the last minute we have a definitive lynch or vig shot. Player X= Nisani Player Y = GreYMisT Player Z = JeeJee (I can hear fine sir) | ||
|
Forumite
Sweden3280 Posts
On August 16 2011 08:33 Jackal58 wrote: That´s just one more thing that can ruin an attempt to get a multilynch, it´s not a good thing if you want to facilitate a multilynch. It´s a powerfull role, but he´s a player like everyone else, if he doesn´t want a multilynch, he can change it, and immediately become the next suspect. But this game has a pardoner type role that could undo a last minute lynch if he's on top of things. On August 16 2011 08:32 Navillus wrote: Our scumhunting was based on the assumption that the one who changed the lynch must be scum, it didn´t work in that game, even though it´s a common tactic. Well forumite that seems like more of a problem with the scumhunting than the method of killing, so what do you think of the 3 people on jackels list? As for the 3 candidates, I got a scumwibe from JeeJees low posting the first day, since then it´s picked up, at least with the accusing, nisani201 said a few things that might be a slip, or just a noob mistake, could warrant a check at least. I haven´t found what Jackal was accusing Greymist of, I would appreciate if someone could point it out. | ||
|
Forumite
Sweden3280 Posts
On August 16 2011 09:04 JeeJee wrote: I don´t use the irc, I don´t post there, I don´t read it. So, you're certainly here often enough to write many posts. Trouble is, none of them say a damn thing. Not a one. You started off talking about roles, and taking a stance against mass claiming, then spam/joke some more in the thread. Finally, you finish off the day with another pointless post about roles before going to sleep! If I may use foolishness' patented quote: NOBODY CARES Discussing obscure role mechanics that don't affect anything even IF the roles were in the game (which they may very well not be) is a total waste of space. Discuss people not roles. Ah but then you wake up and ... talk about other irrelevant mechanics such as telling us all that multilynching is going to be difficult! In other news, water is wet. For being here quite a lot, and making quite a lot of posts, you sure said fuck-all in the thread, and certainly nothing at all in irc. Can we vote yet? ##vote:forumite As for the rest, I´m giving my opinion when I feel like it, which has been about mechanics and tactics so far. True, I haven´t found anyone I feel is a good candidate for a lynch yet, but there´s still 39 (?) hours left to vote. I´m not in a rush. | ||
| ||
