|
i haven't seen anyone comment on the opener nestea used in game 1 vs hongun in GSL july ro4 on Dual Sight, where he did:
10 OL (extractor trick drone)
12 pool
15 overlord
15 Queen + 4lings
19 hatch
2nd queen
rest of the build in that game, truncated because it's mostly reactionary due to his opponent's FFE:
+ Show Spoiler +
(scouting OL +lings sees FFE ~4min)
24OL
tumor from 2nd queen first inject
32 Hatch 3rd
35OL
37OL
3rd queen
geyserx2 at main ~6min
6:58 evo chamber time
4th queen
warren @~7min
7:45 ling speed + spore(s)
5-6 OLs
8:30, some roaches/drones, +1 ranged
8:45 3,4 geyser (nat)
60 drones @9 minutes, lair, 5, 6 gas (3rd), more roaches, fewer drones
16-20 lings, spines (x2-4 ~9:50)
1-stargate = 1 spore at each base
2-stargate = 2 spore at each base
hydra tech, roach speed, +2 range, hydra range, burrow
3-4 OLs at a time
bane nest, +1 armor, speed
1:1:1 hydra roach ling.
He did this without drone scouting (on a 2 player map).
Anyone have any comment on why he chose this opener specifically (considering it was blind)?
I've never seen anyone 12 pool in a game, but perhaps this is more efficient if you don't take a gas until 43 supply??
(edit: the general consensus so far is that this is a solid and viable opener on 2-player maps where FFE + expansion block is likely. This includes none of the current maps in the season 3 ladder pool though.)
My only thoughts on this are directly pulled from jdeesmoreglass's thread here:
http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=202464
In this thread, he shows that 12pool standard is only 10-20 minerals behind the 14 pool standard over the 6 minutes he tracked. This is essentially the identical.
(see here + Show Spoiler +
Aside from the obvious plus of having an earlier pool and hence queen + lings, the 12 pool is unique in that it has the most larva production at the time when you take your natural expansion:
![[image loading]](http://i.imgur.com/5oV8m.png)
So my question is, why don't zergs use this opener in zvp?
|
|
|
I've used this opener or the very similar 11 overpool 19 hatch for a while on maps where forge expand is likely.
|
On August 02 2011 22:10 DeltruS wrote:It is the same as the 11 pool 18 hatch build except, since normally the pool goes down the same time as the overlord pops, he gets and extra drone and delays the pool a few seconds. http://wiki.teamliquid.net/starcraft2/11_Pool_18_Hatch
Yeah, I guess that's my real question. Why is the 11 pool 18 hatch so popular against protoss when this option exists which is superior in every way I can see?
I mean in beta we saw the 13 pool give way to the 14 pool, perhaps the 11/18 will give way to 12/19? Every drone counts I suppose!
|
What's the advantage of the extra larva against FFE then? Since 15 hatch has been "proven" to be more economical on TL, AFAIK.
|
On August 02 2011 22:15 Daniel C wrote:
What's the advantage of the extra larva against FFE then? Since 15 hatch has been "proven" to be more economical on TL, AFAIK.
Well, against ZvP I can't really think of any pro who recommends opening 15hatch. (darkforce, idra, sheth come to mind). But if I'm not mistaken, all three of those guys recommend something very much like a 15gas/pool, which is what I usually try to use unless I'm feeling cheesy.
|
On August 02 2011 22:17 michaelhasanalias wrote:Show nested quote +On August 02 2011 22:15 Daniel C wrote:
What's the advantage of the extra larva against FFE then? Since 15 hatch has been "proven" to be more economical on TL, AFAIK. Well, against ZvP I can't really think of any pro who recommends opening 15hatch. (darkforce, idra, sheth come to mind). But if I'm not mistaken, all three of those guys recommend something very much like a 15gas/pool, which is what I usually try to use unless I'm feeling cheesy.
Ah you're right sorry I mixed up the builds.
|
On August 02 2011 22:15 Daniel C wrote:
What's the advantage of the extra larva against FFE then? Since 15 hatch has been "proven" to be more economical on TL, AFAIK.
Are you sure you mean 15 hatch? Losing an expansion to a cannon rush is not economical, which unfortunately is the reality against a forge first protoss.
In terms of comparing this build to a normal 14pool opener the Inherent advantage in this i think is to stop the Protoss from blocking your natural with pylon (then gate/core) delaying your natural hatch. Having the lings out that small time earlier would definitely allow for a guaranteed expansion, rather than having your timings thrown off by Protoss shenanigans.
Afaik It has less to do with the Early pool's advantage of producing additional larvae at certain points in the game and more with allowing Nestea to follow through with a set planed BO that he can have prepared before the game. If you teach yourself and invest the week of practice in a ton of timings vs forge first play only to have everything thrown off by a significant margin because the protoss decided to invest 250 minerals in stalling your expo, you can find yourself in very awkward situations. By the looks of it the 12pool has minimal side effects and certifies that Nestea has control of the early game to do what he wants.
Edit: I'm totally stealing this shit.
|
i use this build for some time now (because i read the stats from jdsee). It has similar advantages like 11 overpool, but is slightly more economic and there is no larvae idle time. However the pool is some seconds later (which is ok regarding typical cheese/attack timings).
You can safely expand fairly early with a good economy. You use lings for scouting instead of drones, which yields ~100 more mins @5'00.
Consider a slightly more economic variant compared to nestea:
9 ov, 12 pool, 16 ovie, 16 queen, 18 extracotr trick into a pair of lings to scout nat and incoming bunker/cannon cheese. 18/19/20 expand
You get a quite early queen and can put a really early spine if necessary. A very safe and reliable build especially for ladder.
|
That graph doesn't make sense. How can the vertices of the drone-count lines occur at non-integer drone numbers?
|
On August 03 2011 01:43 gastro54 wrote:
That graph doesn't make sense. How can the vertices of the drone-count lines occur at non-integer drone numbers?
The builds were played several time and the average numbers where taken. SC macro has a small amount of random
|
|
|
Holy Moly, NesTea is a Genius.
This build is ridiculously good for tournaments and games you want to prepare extensively for. It smooths out some major exploitable areas on large maps inherent in 14pool or gas/pool builds against Protoss FE's that lets a Protoss gain a considerable timing and economic advantage that leaves the zerg either behind for the early/midgame* or with the decision to allin to try to end it early, often very scoutable by top Protoss'
*The economic advantage of the protoss would be comparable to something slightly more than a 16nexx vs 14/14 gas-pool whilst also throwing off a zerg's ingrained timings and larvae management. However i might need to test this ingame more.
TLDR; Super Impressed!
It's more than viable, I would go so far as to say it's better.
|
I would say that Nestea did this 12/19 blindly because
a) combined knowledge of dual sight being a good map to FFE with studying hongun, Nestea knows that hongun will "likely" FFE with the possibility of cannon rushing if Nestea goes hatch first which would be devastating
and
b) this is a 2-player map so Nestea knows that hongun knows exactly when to send out his probe to block the normal hatch timings with pylons until lings are out, which is why Nestea got a 12 pool to get early lings.
I cannot watch the match so I have no idea why nestea would go banelings after he already got roach/hydra tech, and how he would know if hongun is doing either
a) 7gate
b) DT
c) stargate
d) standard colli ball
Did Nestea throw down blind spores after evo was done? But I still don't know how nestea would know if kiwi's 7gate +2 with blink and obs is coming or P is just going fast 3rd and turtling because he won't have ovi speed in time (I was sure he would get ovi speed along with burrow but in this game you said he didn't go for them) and slow ovi would never scout anything against a good protoss.
I'm not sure how familiar you are with nestea's opening vs protoss, but when does he get a 4th? in this case i would guess after he holds off P's first push/aggression.
If possible, do you know what hongun did that game? So I might know why Nestea makes those decisions during the mid-game.
|
I am beginning to use this build in every one of my ZvP (even on Xel Naga) because it's safe and economical.
FFE being more and more popular I think that the delayed gas is really not an issue.
Cannon rush should also become a free win.
But this build have weaknesses. The delayed gases makes you more vulnerable to gateway pressure. For example the Hister's PvZ pylon pressure is hard to defend.
As soon as you have cleared your nat with the 4 lings you have to scoot is front door to know if he is chronoing some units. In case of more than one zeal, you have to throw down a gas and a roach warren immediately.
A smart toss can also be very greedy and expand of one gate knowing that you wont have any speedlings to punish it.
On Xel Naga or as a precautionary measure if I don't know if he is FFEing or not I like to throw the first gas at 20 supply just before the expo (as his probe will delay it a little bit anyway, 19 expo is really a best case scenario). That's depending on the map obviously, don't do that on Tal Darim.
So to sum things up I would recommend this build on any FFE favorable map. The 4 lings will allow some early map control (make them active though) and you don't have to commit too early in taking your gas.
|
11pool 18hatch is the most economic pool-first build, but I remember that the programs that came to that conclusion didn't use a scouting drone. Perhaps 12pool 19hatch is more optimal if you intend to drone scout?
|
What kind of damage did he manage to do with his 8 lings? I think this is very important to add to the OP.
8 lings from a 12 pool can usually kill the zealot in the front with a little micro, but can they stop the cannon from going up in a FFE?
Also, why are people comparing the economic aspect of the build? The OP outlined a pressure build with 8 lings, not an economic build!
|
On August 12 2011 21:48 Sbrubbles wrote:
What kind of damage did he manage to do with his 8 lings? I think this is very important to add to the OP.
8 lings from a 12 pool can usually kill the zealot in the front with a little micro, but can they stop the cannon from going up in a FFE?
Also, why are people comparing the economic aspect of the build? The OP outlined a pressure build with 8 lings, not an economic build!
No he meant 4 lings as in 2 pairs of lings. So the supply jumps from 15 to 19 with the queen.
The 4 lings aren't there to do damage but to get the earlier expo (kill any pylon block) and map control. If you are lucky and the Toss doesn't complete the wall of in time you can at best sneak them in, do minor damage and get unlimited scouting but really it's not a pressure build.
|
Personally the reason I find 12 pool to be effective is that it punishes nexus first very easily even on Tal'Darim. Secondly it gets your hatch down faster than 12 pool since you secure your natural faster.
|
The build also feels very smooth. When you are at 15 supply, the next larva pops and you have exactly 100 Minerals for an overlord. The overlord finishes at the same time as the pool and you will have exactly 250 minerals for queen + 2 sets of zerglings.
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT![[image loading]](http://i.imgur.com/fc6j0.png)
