• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 08:54
CEST 14:54
KST 21:54
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
BGE Stara Zagora 2025: Info & Preview27Code S RO12 Preview: GuMiho, Bunny, SHIN, ByuN3The Memories We Share - Facing the Final(?) GSL47Code S RO12 Preview: Cure, Zoun, Solar, Creator4[ASL19] Finals Preview: Daunting Task30
Community News
Weekly Cups (June 2-8): herO doubles down1[BSL20] ProLeague: Bracket Stage & Dates9GSL Ro4 and Finals moved to Sunday June 15th13Weekly Cups (May 27-June 1): ByuN goes back-to-back0EWC 2025 Regional Qualifier Results26
StarCraft 2
General
The SCII GOAT: A statistical Evaluation How does the number of casters affect your enjoyment of esports? CN community: Firefly accused of suspicious activities Serious Question: Mech The Memories We Share - Facing the Final(?) GSL
Tourneys
$3,500 WardiTV European League 2025 Bellum Gens Elite: Stara Zagora 2025 Sparkling Tuna Cup - Weekly Open Tournament SOOPer7s Showmatches 2025 Master Swan Open (Global Bronze-Master 2)
Strategy
[G] Darkgrid Layout Simple Questions Simple Answers [G] PvT Cheese: 13 Gate Proxy Robo
Custom Maps
[UMS] Zillion Zerglings
External Content
Mutation # 477 Slow and Steady Mutation # 476 Charnel House Mutation # 475 Hard Target Mutation # 474 Futile Resistance
Brood War
General
BGH auto balance -> http://bghmmr.eu/ BW General Discussion Mihu vs Korea Players Statistics Will foreigners ever be able to challenge Koreans? [BSL20] ProLeague: Bracket Stage & Dates
Tourneys
[ASL19] Grand Finals NA Team League 6/8/2025 [Megathread] Daily Proleagues [BSL20] ProLeague Bracket Stage - Day 2
Strategy
I am doing this better than progamers do. [G] How to get started on ladder as a new Z player
Other Games
General Games
Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread What do you want from future RTS games? Armies of Exigo - YesYes? Nintendo Switch Thread Path of Exile
Dota 2
Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
LiquidLegends to reintegrate into TL.net
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
TL Mafia Community Thread Vanilla Mini Mafia
Community
General
US Politics Mega-thread Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine Russo-Ukrainian War Thread Vape Nation Thread European Politico-economics QA Mega-thread
Fan Clubs
Maru Fan Club Serral Fan Club
Media & Entertainment
Korean Music Discussion [Manga] One Piece
Sports
2024 - 2025 Football Thread Formula 1 Discussion NHL Playoffs 2024
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread
TL Community
The Automated Ban List
Blogs
Cognitive styles x game perf…
TrAiDoS
StarCraft improvement
iopq
Heero Yuy & the Tax…
KrillinFromwales
I was completely wrong ab…
jameswatts
Need Your Help/Advice
Glider
Trip to the Zoo
micronesia
Poker
Nebuchad
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 22635 users

TL Mafia XLIII

Forum Index > TL Mafia
Post a Reply
1 2 3 Next All
ghrur
Profile Blog Joined May 2009
United States3786 Posts
August 01 2011 06:41 GMT
#19
/in
PMs.
Normal Game ^_^
darkness overpowering
ghrur
Profile Blog Joined May 2009
United States3786 Posts
August 01 2011 19:09 GMT
#79
/confirm
darkness overpowering
ghrur
Profile Blog Joined May 2009
United States3786 Posts
August 01 2011 23:50 GMT
#160
Okay, so we weight the benefits of confirmed townie vs possibly hitting a townie.
Confirmed townie is definitely better. Have you heard how Ace talked about Masons in that Mafias #1 targets thread? It's because they're confirmed so easily. A confirmed townie is valuable, and that's just 1 person less to shoot at.

Furthermore, even hitting a townie can give us a lot of information for our first official lynch. It also gives us new information to re-evaluate our thoughts.

If he dies because mafia stacks, all the better. This means, if we miss, we killed 1 extra townie day 1, but also saved 1 extra townie night 1. Pretty even. If the Day Vig doesn't shoot, there is a chance that he gets sniped night 1, especially with all the talk about him.

I think it's beneficial to have him shoot. The problem is... is there a Day Vig? o.O
darkness overpowering
ghrur
Profile Blog Joined May 2009
United States3786 Posts
August 01 2011 23:55 GMT
#164
On August 02 2011 08:50 heist wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 02 2011 08:27 DoctorHelvetica wrote:
On August 02 2011 08:25 sandroba wrote:
How is that going to keep discussion focused on blues? We'll have 2 lynches to discuss and basically skip night 1. If you say it's rare to hit mafia that way day1 it's exactly the same way as a day1 lynch and we go straight into the next lynch with info from the flip/wagons.

so we should kill more townies to get more information? the best thing to do imo is save the town kp for the end when it becomes safer to use, that's how games get won lol'

it isnt a skip night 1 simple mafia stack hits on vig ruining everything no wthere are probably 3 dead townies and a wasted town kill power thats a great plan i support it 100%.....


Are you opposed to this plan in general? Or its use day 1? I fully support this plan day 2, and tentatively day 1 depending on town's conviction of the victim.

After 24 hours if we don't have a strongly suitable candidate, I don't think we should use the day vig just yet. The soldier is the most powerful role for the town: a day vig that can confirm himself. Let's not waste it on someone who is sorta fishy/lurky just to get a confirmed townie. We can wait till day 2.

I can't see mafia not double stacking the day vig night 1 if he is revealed. He provides an easy outlet for dt checks and the ability to coordinate all roleblocks and protections. If we wait till day 2, it'll be a lot clearer for the day vig to coordinate who to roleblock/kill/protect etc. Also if we wait till day 2, the night 1 DT checks will provide confirmed townie/scum. So if the day vig is doublestacked, he can pass his entire network to the confirmed townies. That way everything isn't completely destroyed if the day vig dies.


Wait, what? No, there wouldn't be confirmed townies aside from the Dayvig unless you're risking letting the info fall into the hands of the godfather. Why would you suggest that? I understand picking townie isn't likely, but it's still a possibility we CANNOT rule out. There are confirmed scum through DT checks, but no confirmed townies.

Also, day2 reveals a problem as well. If the DT checks the dayvig, he's essentially wasted a DT check.
darkness overpowering
ghrur
Profile Blog Joined May 2009
United States3786 Posts
August 02 2011 00:08 GMT
#176
On August 02 2011 09:00 Curu wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 02 2011 08:54 redFF wrote:
On August 02 2011 08:51 Curu wrote:
Huh? I don't understand your post. The confirmed Townie tells the player who he is going to shoot or protect, he doesn't tell all Medics what every Medic is doing.

Since we know how much KP Mafia has I very much doubt any of them are going to be able to claim Vig.

So you want one townie conducting every single vig hit/medic protect/hatter bomb?

k here's an example.

Mafia-I will be protecting player x
Confirmed townie-no someone else is protecting him.

now mafia know's to not hit player x.


I would be more open to this plan day 2 or 3. But all i see is 2 townies getting lynched and losing a dayvig and that person most likely dying the next night.


No, it goes like this:

Mafia-I will be protecting player x
Confirmed townie-stfu I choose who you protect, you'll be protecting player y
Mafia-Okay...


Yup, and if Mafia shoots player Y, and player Y dies, then clearly the medic isn't a medic but is mafia. :/ So if mafia tries to be medic, it effectively hurts them.
darkness overpowering
ghrur
Profile Blog Joined May 2009
United States3786 Posts
August 03 2011 08:35 GMT
#356
On August 03 2011 12:42 JeeJee wrote:
actually screw it let's get the ball rolling.
anyone disagree with drazerk as a candidate?


Yeah, I do. I played with Drazerk AA and he acted the same way. If I recall, it was basically a "Lynch Wiggles" post and then afk.

I'm down for either varpulis or Kenpachi.
I don't get why sandroba's supposed to have seemed town. I mean, looking back on the plan, I realize it's incredibly bad.
and this post by sandroba
docH, how is the simple fact that it's no longer day1 is going to make lynches more acurate down the line? If we can speed up the process and basically skip night 1 how is it possibly bad for town?

What? He knows better than this. So the plan basically becomes let's out the dayvig and give mafia a free blue. :/
darkness overpowering
ghrur
Profile Blog Joined May 2009
United States3786 Posts
August 03 2011 22:18 GMT
#425
Wow, towns are getting better at Day 1. :O
darkness overpowering
ghrur
Profile Blog Joined May 2009
United States3786 Posts
August 03 2011 22:21 GMT
#428
On August 04 2011 07:19 youngminii wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 04 2011 07:18 ghrur wrote:
Wow, towns are getting better at Day 1. :O

or scum is getting worse


Don't be a pessimist. I support the shooting of JeeJee
darkness overpowering
ghrur
Profile Blog Joined May 2009
United States3786 Posts
August 03 2011 23:19 GMT
#449
Redff:
Yes, I understand lynching for information was bad. I was making the point that losing 3 townies is losing 3 townies until I realized day-vigis get 2 shots so we still effectively lose a vigi, and later shots are more accurate. Why did I change positions? I argued with DrH about this in Mafia IRC and reconsidered my position.


Still supports the plan, but here he actually makes a nonsensical point. Nobody was suggesting the mafia would claim protecting someone and then shoot them instead...

Neither was I... I was stating how fake-claims by mafia would hurt them under the plan... Like, do you not understand that that was a continuation of thought from what Curu said? >_>

Also, you're tunneling by the third "point." Did you not read "looking back?" I re-evaluated my position. Would you like to hear why I realize it's a bad plan?
A. It lures out a confirmed townie and ends up with him getting shot.
B. We lose a vigi shot early with the opportunity cost of getting a better shot later on.
C. Vigis get 2 shots, so even if Dayvig dies, it's not a confirmed townie that dies, but a confirmed blue.
D. Instead of ending up with 3 greens dead if mafia stacks, we end up with 2 greens dead and 1 blue dead. Much worse.
So what does this effectively do? Lure out a blue for mafia to kill! Why would Sandroba suggest such a plan then! Why was I stupid enough to support it? Because I was stupid.

I never mentioned JeeJee before... except in IRC and talking about it to TAA. Guess what? I also find Munk-E scummy but I've never mentioned him before in thread either. I don't post everything I think.
darkness overpowering
ghrur
Profile Blog Joined May 2009
United States3786 Posts
August 03 2011 23:25 GMT
#456
On August 04 2011 08:23 redFF wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 04 2011 08:19 ghrur wrote:
Redff:
Yes, I understand lynching for information was bad. I was making the point that losing 3 townies is losing 3 townies until I realized day-vigis get 2 shots so we still effectively lose a vigi, and later shots are more accurate. Why did I change positions? I argued with DrH about this in Mafia IRC and reconsidered my position.


Still supports the plan, but here he actually makes a nonsensical point. Nobody was suggesting the mafia would claim protecting someone and then shoot them instead...

Neither was I... I was stating how fake-claims by mafia would hurt them under the plan... Like, do you not understand that that was a continuation of thought from what Curu said? >_>

Also, you're tunneling by the third "point." Did you not read "looking back?" I re-evaluated my position. Would you like to hear why I realize it's a bad plan?
A. It lures out a confirmed townie and ends up with him getting shot.
B. We lose a vigi shot early with the opportunity cost of getting a better shot later on.
C. Vigis get 2 shots, so even if Dayvig dies, it's not a confirmed townie that dies, but a confirmed blue.
D. Instead of ending up with 3 greens dead if mafia stacks, we end up with 2 greens dead and 1 blue dead. Much worse.
So what does this effectively do? Lure out a blue for mafia to kill! Why would Sandroba suggest such a plan then! Why was I stupid enough to support it? Because I was stupid.

I never mentioned JeeJee before... except in IRC and talking about it to TAA. Guess what? I also find Munk-E scummy but I've never mentioned him before in thread either. I don't post everything I think.

lol ur scum
I got called scummy for talking about stuff on the public irc channel, your talking about all your reads in pms to a couple of people. that is scummy as fuck.

Please post your thoughts on both JeeJee and Munk-E. you have 10 minutes because if you already talked about it to other then i assume you will be able to post about it..


What? I talked about it in the public IRC channel except for TAA whom i just talked in IRC privately.

And to be honest, I don't really care. Lol. I'm not gonna bullshit an analysis in 10 minutes to protect you so you can tunnel me harder.
darkness overpowering
ghrur
Profile Blog Joined May 2009
United States3786 Posts
August 03 2011 23:26 GMT
#459
Oh, and no, I didn't save those IRC logs because I just closed chrome without copy/pasting. If anyone saved those logs... I'd be happy? :D
darkness overpowering
ghrur
Profile Blog Joined May 2009
United States3786 Posts
August 03 2011 23:27 GMT
#461
DrH, can you at least confirm the fact that I argued against you in IRC about the sandroba plan and got utterly demolished?
darkness overpowering
ghrur
Profile Blog Joined May 2009
United States3786 Posts
August 04 2011 02:32 GMT
#499
+ Show Spoiler +
On August 04 2011 08:53 redFF wrote:
alanismorisette:
ghrur ur mafia too stfu
[7:57pm] alanismorisette:
post that analysis
[7:57pm] alanismorisette:
its not bullshit if you have already discussed it with people
[7:57pm] alanismorisette:
just post what you talked about with them
[7:57pm] alanismorisette:
quick!
[7:57pm] ghrur:
It's been past 10 minutes
[7:57pm] ghrur:
My deadline is gone
[7:58pm] ghrur:
and I wanna play basketball
[7:58pm] alanismorisette:
...
[7:58pm] ghrur:
Besides, I already said
[7:58pm] chaos13 joined the chat room.
[7:58pm] ghrur:
I didn't save the chat log
[7:58pm] alanismorisette:
doesnt matter
[7:58pm] ghrur:
Ask TAA if he has it
[7:58pm] alanismorisette:
just post the gist of ur position on them
[7:58pm] alanismorisette:
easy
[7:58pm] alanismorisette:
just do that for me
[7:58pm] ghrur:
Sure, I'll do it
[7:58pm] ghrur:
But I'd rather play basketball
[7:58pm] alanismorisette:
...
[7:58pm] ghrur:
I'll post it afterwards kay?
[7:58pm] alanismorisette:
do it please
[7:58pm] alanismorisette:
no
[7:58pm] alanismorisette:
now
[7:58pm] ghrur:
No, real life > mafia
[7:58pm] alanismorisette:
im sorry but everyone is seeing this right
[7:59pm] alanismorisette:
it will take
[7:59pm] alanismorisette:
like 5 minutes
[7:59pm] alanismorisette:
dude
[7:59pm] youngmin:
i'm laughing my ass off
[7:59pm] alanismorisette:
you could have finished it by now
[7:59pm] ghrur:
??? YM?
[7:59pm] ghrur:
Cya later
[7:59pm] ghrur:
<3
[7:59pm] alanismorisette:
but instead you are gonna go think about it
[7:59pm] ghrur:
I'll post it after
[7:59pm] youngmin:
lolololol
[7:59pm] alanismorisette:
then post it
[7:59pm] alanismorisette:
...
[7:59pm] ghrur:
Yes, I didn't need to think about my defense
[7:59pm] ghrur:
<3
[7:59pm] ghrur:
Cya
[8:00pm] alanismorisette:
...

fuck this guy

HAHAHAHAHAHA, sorry red. xD No, I really did go play basketball, hahaha. I didn't mean any ill will. Hahahaha. I'm glad YM had a good laugh though. Besides, 10 minutes had passed and nothing happened.

Anyway, down to business. Why Munk-E?

+ Show Spoiler +
+ Show Spoiler [monk-e's analysis] +
On August 03 2011 07:21 Munk-E wrote:
Below is some analysis of varpulis' posts i'll do more people later.


Show nested quote +
Alright guys, it's game on. I'd like to start with a suggestion. It's very basic, but very vital.

Vig's, be you day or night, holster your gun and try to ignore the itch of your trigger finger. This holds true in every game, but it's especially important in this one. Look at the role list, and see how much kp we potentially have in the game. Every vig role has two shots, half of them can shoot during the day. That's a lot of kp that will be a lot more useful later on.

Dayvigs: If you must shoot, claim and let us discuss. If you're willing to shoot, make sure that you've got approval from the town. Gut shots are wrong as often as they're right.

Hatters: You guys are special, because even if the scumbag mafia doesn't kill you, your bob-ombs will still go off. You also can't move them, so I don't think it's a smart idea to place them from the get go. Wait a day/night cycle, at least. It's for the good of everybody.

With that said, let's get to the game and kill us some scum. As an aside, i'm currently very dissapointed that Kurumi didn't give me my favorite class, though I guess it can't be helped, he wasn't in the game anyways.


Here he says to not shoot day 1, unless you want to that is, then just reveal your plan forcing you to shoot anyways because you're gonna die, because you revealed your role. I don't see his opinion, because he keeps changing it in this post. at the beginning he says to not shoot, as always and it is especially important in this game, followed by him saying it's okay for dayvigs to shoot.
Furthermore he tells them to claim before shooting! Claiming is a death sentence, and it means they'd have to shoot to take people down with them, because they're gonna die anyway.

As an aside, does anyone know what his favorite role is?

Show nested quote +
My only real qualm about the plan is the possibility of 2 dead townies day 1, but I don't see a huge problem with setting up a town circle around a confirmed dayvig.

People shouldn't be expecting shitloads of blues though. If we have a medic, which we might not, (21 players, remember) they will be tied up making sure the only confirmed player doesn't kick the bucket.

Nothing should be shared in IRC that would not be shared in thread, by the way. If our confirmed town wants to direct blues or if people want to claim to him, do it in PMs, for the love of god, and don't start talking in thread or irc like you're a confirmed blue.

The only one who should know is the confirmed townie. Information leaks kills blues in PM games.

Should we use the plan, I suggest a very simple system: vote normally. Whoever has the most votes dies.


So, here he fully supports the plan again despite his own extra important rule of not shooting day 1. He first says no shooting, then says maybe IF you make sure your going to get yourself killed, and finally now he's all for it!

Show nested quote +
Anybody who is publicly known to be controlling the blues/leading the town is going to get shot eventually, especially if they've got kp.

I'll eat my hat if we've got more than 1 medic in a 20 player game.

Here he will eat his hat if his plan that he loves so much which goes against his extra important rule actually works...
Show nested quote +
hmm, it's a good point actually.

A serious question: Do you guys think we'll have a better chance of killing scum if we do this day 1?

If we can kill scum it's worth it (durr) but otherwise I have a safer suggestion:

Why don't we wait until there are only 2 mafia left. That way they can't doublestack and we don't lose a blue role night 1.

this is after being asked why he likes the plan after he gave his own piece of evidence against it (above)! He gives no answer. Instead, he reverts to a compromise of his beloved plan. and no varpulis, it's a 20% chance. I'm not willing to take that risk, especially because it's roughly the same odds we'll hit a blue.



Show nested quote +
I'm fairly sure that i'm not scum, unless I have a serious problem with reading pms.

RedFF I'm not so sure on. I'm leaning scum because he started off his "no plan" campaign without evidence or an argument, and then just picked up DrH's and copied it, it seems.

That said, I don't disagree with DrH. Our confirmed townie will be dead night 1, and we'll be back to square one, possibly with 2 dead townies. Again, the plan is really good, but only if we wait for mafia to not have enough kp to override the medic protect we will most likely be able to slap on the confirmed townie.

To address Mig's accusation: In irc sandroba didn't explain his plan entirely. I read it as "double lynch day 1" period. That in itself is very bad. The good part of the plan is the confirmed townie. When he posted and explained that point, It sounded good.

Then I realized that mafia can double stack and just kill the confirmed townie, it sounded bad again, until i figured out a solution.

Is there a real reason that we need to use the plan right now? With patience, it will work better, i guarantee.


Here his is accusing redff for taking the position of the argument HE'S taking! (Maybe he lost track by now!) It seems like he's just trying to accuse someone for the sake of accusing!

Wishy-washy doesn't even begin to explain this. He just won't make up his mind! While I'm not sure this indicates him 100% as being scum, it is VERY suspicious. Unfortunately however, I don't think it's possible to brand him as scum from JUST this. but he's certainly quite possibly scum.



+ Show Spoiler [missed post] +
On August 03 2011 07:34 Lucidity wrote:
I think you missed one of Varpulis' important posts Munk-E:

Show nested quote +
On August 03 2011 03:23 Varpulis wrote:
On August 03 2011 02:43 Mig wrote:
Varp every post you make screams wishy washy to me. Where is the confident Varpulis I have played with in the past? Every opinion you give you list the pros and cons and then you end up taking a pretty neutral stance. I haven't seen you have a strong opinion of anything yet.

If you had to vote for someone right now who would it be for and why? Do you find anyone besides red scummy?

I got called out for wishy washiness in PTP (day 1) as well. Day 1 nothing is solid, there's rarely anything to base arguments off of until late in the day, and I'm usually focused on proving my activity, not calling people scum. I haven't taken a stance because I don't have a really strong feeling about anybody yet.

By the way, if we're going ahead with the plan, could we have a soldier/sniper claim? If there are none we need to reevaluate.




Well, in his analysis of Varpulis, notice first that he misses an important post which Lucidity points out. He seemed to be doing a post-by-post style analysis (which btw, is bad), yet misses that important post? Why? To hid Varpulis's scumminess. To be nicer to his teammate.

Also notice in this analysis how adamant he is with the attack on Varpulis. He uses multiple exclamation points, capitalization for emphasis, and even calls him VERY suspicious. BUT WAIT! He backs out of it. Notice:

I'm not sure this indicates him 100% as being scum

but he's certainly quite possibly scum.


Certainly quite possibly scum. LOL. I have never seen more wishy-washyness than that. Hahaha, god. That's just backing out of it completely man. Oh, and notice how there's no vote until nearly the end of the day, probably to bus. Oh, and he never votes in the voting thread (booooooooooo).

Now, on Munk-E's next analysis, his style totally changes! Someone in Loonybin pointed this out:
Munk-E's posts go like this - 1. Stuff about plan. 2. Play-by-play "analysis" 3. Normal, concise analysis. How does one person's posting style change that much? I don't know, seems like he has a team behind him.

Look at his arguments as well. Are they new? Are they original? Or are they just parroting OriginalName? Yeah, they're just parroting ON's analysis that Varp was wishy-washy.

Note this remark too.
On August 04 2011 03:53 Munk-E wrote:He seems VERY eager to get everyone's opinion on everyone, he PMed me asking my opinion on chaos and varp, to which i responded blandly and generically.
I don't get why that's bad. It's good that Mig is trying to get people's opinions out and into the open. It's also good that he's pressuring people and using PMs well. Calling that scummy is just trying to stifle PMs and opinions.

On August 04 2011 03:53 Munk-E wrote:I don't see why activity is a "town" thing to do. and why lurking is a mafia thing really, especially if being a lurker makes them suspected as being mafia. (Meta, huh?) Anyway, i might vote for him depending on if i think lucidity is more scummy or not


Activity is of course good for town because this means we get more to analyze. Stifling activity and supporting lurking is just trying to ruin the town atmosphere. Mig did nothing wrong, even with his words, yet he's attacking him randomly. Why? Why is he also jumping from person to person and throwing out random accusations that don't even make sense? Why doesn't h vote for either of the people he analyzed? To get the town in chaos. To get votes off of Varpulis. Also, if he suspected Lucidity, why doesn't he analyze HIM instead? Now, keep this in mind when you read this:

On August 04 2011 06:33 Munk-E wrote:
TBH, It would have been a toss up between varp and lucid for me, but I haven't done proper analysis of lucid, so voting for him would look VERY suspicious. I think both are scum anyway.


Where is Mig in this equation? Why wouldn't he mention Mig if he did a full blown analysis calling him suspicious? That makes no sense... unless he did it just to seem town. If he found Lucid suspicious, he should've analyzed Lucidity first instead of going after Mig. Unless he's just trying to cast doubt, out one of our top scumhunters, seem town in the process through analysis posts, and end up not voting for them until the end of the day. :/ Yeah, seems about right.


Now, onto JeeJee.

+ Show Spoiler +
On August 03 2011 01:41 JeeJee wrote:
pressure votes are stupid, where did this trend come from? you know when you say "yeah this is a pressure vote", that's pretty much equivalent to "idk who to vote so i'm voting you, but i'm not actually suspicious of you because all you need to do is say something and i'll remove my vote from you".
nobody can seriously feel threatened from a pressure vote, so there's no 'pressure' it's just a throwaway vote


Okay, this post was stupid. yes, pressure votes are bad. No, you do not need to point them out. If the person being pressured doesn't know this, they might slip up. Now that he knows this, the chances are lessened. Why would you post this? It provides no benefit to town, and only serves to help mafia. I'm not arguing against the logic here, but the purpose. It serves no good purpose.

i see re-evaluation there, not wishy-washiness. do you see otherwise? random fos are just as useless as pressure votes. sandro and varp are both bad in that department as far as i'm concerned. by itself though, it doesn't mean much, and there's nothing else yet.

as for me, i don't have scum leanings on anyone. town leans yes, scum leans no.

Defense of Varp, and aside from that, no information really. I mean, he seems to suspect YM at this point, but doesn't say anything about it. Not even a scum lean? Really? Hmmmmm, Idk.

still not voting, but i'll be here before the deadline tomorrow, no worries.

Wishy washyyyyyyyyyyy. Yeah... why would you call someone scum and then not vote? I don't know.

On August 03 2011 12:42 JeeJee wrote:
actually screw it let's get the ball rolling.
anyone disagree with drazerk as a candidate?

Why would you ask if other people disagree? Who cares if other people disagree? You still push them anyway. They'll voice their disagreements anyway. Do you need town's permission or something? No! So why all the caution? Serves no purpose.

On August 04 2011 05:14 JeeJee wrote:
i still think the case against varp is terrible. it's pretty much equivalent to redff's case, which is equally bad. drazerk is still deliberately avoiding this thread while posting in others but sadly not enough people care. seems to be off to a wonderful start.


This is just saying, yes, you lynched a mafia, but you're still not off to a good start. It doesn't mean much. Well, why wouldn't it? We lynched scum, we have voting records, and we have defenses. He defended Varp. He's trying to justify it in this post. He's trying to throw off suspicion. I don't like it. He also shifts the attention off the Varp lynch and onto Drazerk again. Why do that? The lynch means a lot since a red just died. Focus on it. :/ Seems like he's throwing doubt around with that remark.
darkness overpowering
ghrur
Profile Blog Joined May 2009
United States3786 Posts
August 04 2011 02:37 GMT
#502
On August 04 2011 11:33 DoctorHelvetica wrote:
really you pick munke over sevryn or bc


Idk what BC's up to to be honest.
darkness overpowering
ghrur
Profile Blog Joined May 2009
United States3786 Posts
August 04 2011 02:46 GMT
#507
On August 04 2011 11:43 redFF wrote:
Show nested quote +
He seemed to be doing a post-by-post style analysis (which btw, is bad)

Ghrur then goes on to do a pbpa on jeejee


??? It wasn't post by post...
darkness overpowering
ghrur
Profile Blog Joined May 2009
United States3786 Posts
August 04 2011 02:48 GMT
#508
On August 04 2011 11:43 DoctorHelvetica wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 04 2011 11:37 ghrur wrote:
On August 04 2011 11:33 DoctorHelvetica wrote:
really you pick munke over sevryn or bc


Idk what BC's up to to be honest.

so weak


Well, it's true, lol. Like, I haven't even PMed the guy yet.


On August 04 2011 11:45 JeeJee wrote:
oh ghrur you're so amusing. i'd do a rebuttal but everything you wrote is so pointless, it works as its own rebuttal! hurrah.


Ty, ty. *bow* I try.
darkness overpowering
ghrur
Profile Blog Joined May 2009
United States3786 Posts
August 04 2011 02:55 GMT
#510
On August 04 2011 11:54 redFF wrote:
btw so ghrur lied about playing basketball so he could have time to make up fos's on 2 people he told me he had fos's of already. RIIIIIIIIIGHT


Okay, now it's just getting retarded.
darkness overpowering
ghrur
Profile Blog Joined May 2009
United States3786 Posts
August 04 2011 17:52 GMT
#525
On August 04 2011 22:29 TheAwesomeAll wrote:
cb and jeejee could both be scum, this is chaos 13

Show nested quote +
On August 03 2011 06:42 chaos13 wrote:
On August 03 2011 06:28 youngminii wrote:
nah i was just kidding

Anyway, I'd rather Mig die than Lucidity/Varpulis. I dunno, the latter two just seem so.. Normal? While Mig is screaming "I'M SCUM".

Maybe it's just me.


What is Mig doing? He is scumhunting. I would not be okay with a lynch on Mig unless he makes some sort of blatantly obvious scum slip. Lucidity and Varpulis are being far more scummy than Mig is.

protecting mig (might be a scum hug of dead)


Show nested quote +
On August 03 2011 09:22 chaos13 wrote:
On August 03 2011 07:21 Munk-E wrote:
Below is some analysis of varpulis' posts i'll do more people later.


Don't forget about this. I really hate when players say they will and then fail to contribute, because then I have to get them lynched. They're usually scum though, so it works out well in the end.

fossing for very weak reasons

Show nested quote +
On August 03 2011 21:14 chaos13 wrote:
On August 03 2011 21:09 youngminii wrote:
I'm sticking to Varp. If he flips scum then BC/JeeJee should be looked at for a weird chainsaw defence. The attack on Drazerk was a bit unnecessary and looks as if they wanted to shift attention away from Varp without attacking Lucidity. Mentioned this on IRC already but might as well post it here too.

Nothing is concrete though.


This is quite possible, and Varp is looking really really bad right about now. On a scum scale I would put Varp and Drazerk at the same level, but there is one difference: Varp is relatively active, whereas Drazerk has managed to come across as scum in 4 posts and then vanished completely. Varp tomorrow, or maybe a vig hit on him tonight. Today I feel better voting for Draz

for very weak reasons voting on drazerk, a trend weve been seeing with all scummy people.
Imo chaos is very likely scum. He hasnt formed a real opinion the whole game the 2 people he accused were munk e for not delivering and drazerk for lurking.
Also there was a logical flaw in why he accused drazerk namely that people thought he drazerk scum because of the lurking, but chaos went a step further by saying drazerk is scum BECAUSE hes lurking AND hes lurking on top of that so he was more scummy then varp. ( he counted the lurking twice)
imo there is a clear line between jee jee and chaos, both calling out drazerk for lurking. Its their talking point.
If there are vigis in the house hit one of those two, you cant miss.



You know, at first, Chaos's posts seemed okay, but that last post you quoted along with this:

On August 03 2011 22:02 chaos13 wrote:
No, something doesn't sit right with me about Drazerk. Read over some of his past stuff and he's usually quite active as scum. He may disappear for a while, but when he's around, he posts a lot. Varp doesn't fit his meta this time. As someone already mentioned, he's usually very confident with his opinions, but this time he's really being wishy-washy. I'm gonna have to go with Varpulis here, and hope I'm not making a mistake.

I'm not a fan of Munk-E either. Remember earlier when he promised to post some analysis on more players? Still haven't seen it. If we had more time I would make a case against him for today, but there is no point bringing in another suspect this late in the day.


Make him seem really fish. He said he was going to go with Varp, but he never did. He also seems really hesitant about voting varp. "Hope I'm not hiding a mistake." Townies shouldn't feel that careful about making a mistake, especially since everything was pretty much decided by then.

He also calls him out for being wishy-washy, against meta, and scummy. Meanwhile, he says Drazerk's meta doesn't fit his scum. Idk why a vote wasn't placed on Varp by him unless he is scum.
darkness overpowering
ghrur
Profile Blog Joined May 2009
United States3786 Posts
August 04 2011 17:52 GMT
#526
EBWODP: Fishy*** Really fishy, not fish. lol
darkness overpowering
ghrur
Profile Blog Joined May 2009
United States3786 Posts
August 05 2011 17:45 GMT
#637
On August 06 2011 02:37 Lucidity wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 06 2011 01:32 Curu wrote:
On August 06 2011 01:31 Lucidity wrote:
That's simply not true. He "breadcrumbs" that he's going to kill X. X dies. Mafia killed X -.-


Then there's only 2 KP in the night and he's not confirmed Vig.

Herp.

Not true. Another Vig could have killed a 3rd player. Scum/Vigs could hit a Vet/Med protected player etc. The fact is there are too many variables to confirm the player at night.

But MAFIA can't rely on that. Have you forgotten the beginning of Curu's argument?
Mafia wouldn't fake-claim Vig without being pressured because they cannot RELY on creating a third KP. It would be too dangerous.

Oh, and if they hit a vet/med prot, then the hit person claims and the KPs add up.

You're also forgetting the fact that if Mig is red, then he'd die the next day and force the mafia down to 1 KP. So they'll have 1 KP to kill, idk, maybe 2 blues? It's horrible for mafia whatever alignment Mig is.
darkness overpowering
1 2 3 Next All
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
Wardi Open
11:00
$400 Mondays 39
WardiTV1025
OGKoka 523
IndyStarCraft 186
CranKy Ducklings169
IntoTheiNu 44
Liquipedia
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
OGKoka 523
mouzHeroMarine 458
Rex 187
IndyStarCraft 186
ProTech77
mcanning 34
EnDerr 30
StarCraft: Brood War
Rain 13808
Hyuk 7116
Sea 5047
Horang2 969
EffOrt 649
Larva 493
Mini 326
Stork 309
firebathero 296
Snow 185
[ Show more ]
Pusan 79
ToSsGirL 76
sorry 63
Sharp 62
Hyun 61
Sea.KH 59
[sc1f]eonzerg 58
sSak 49
Backho 33
GoRush 31
Icarus 30
Aegong 29
Movie 27
Barracks 20
Shine 16
yabsab 11
Hm[arnc] 6
Bale 5
Terrorterran 4
Dota 2
Gorgc6065
qojqva1523
BananaSlamJamma481
XcaliburYe306
syndereN119
League of Legends
Dendi1754
Counter-Strike
x6flipin531
allub229
byalli179
markeloff176
FunKaTv 19
Super Smash Bros
Mew2King114
Other Games
singsing2098
B2W.Neo1485
Fuzer 613
crisheroes395
Lowko285
XaKoH 177
ArmadaUGS53
QueenE28
KnowMe10
Organizations
StarCraft: Brood War
UltimateBattle 45
StarCraft 2
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
sctven
[ Show 14 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• StrangeGG 36
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• intothetv
• Kozan
• IndyKCrew
• LaughNgamezSOOP
• Migwel
• sooper7s
StarCraft: Brood War
• BSLYoutube
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
Dota 2
• C_a_k_e 1377
• WagamamaTV394
League of Legends
• Nemesis2685
Upcoming Events
Replay Cast
11h 6m
Replay Cast
21h 6m
WardiTV Invitational
22h 6m
WardiTV Invitational
22h 6m
PiGosaur Monday
1d 11h
GSL Code S
1d 20h
Rogue vs GuMiho
Maru vs Solar
Online Event
2 days
Replay Cast
2 days
GSL Code S
2 days
herO vs Zoun
Classic vs Bunny
The PondCast
2 days
[ Show More ]
Replay Cast
3 days
WardiTV Invitational
3 days
OSC
4 days
Korean StarCraft League
4 days
CranKy Ducklings
4 days
WardiTV Invitational
4 days
Cheesadelphia
5 days
GSL Code S
5 days
Sparkling Tuna Cup
5 days
Replay Cast
6 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

CSL Season 17: Qualifier 2
BGE Stara Zagora 2025
Heroes 10 EU

Ongoing

JPL Season 2
BSL 2v2 Season 3
BSL Season 20
KCM Race Survival 2025 Season 2
NPSL S3
Rose Open S1
CSL 17: 2025 SUMMER
2025 GSL S2
BLAST.tv Austin Major 2025
ESL Impact League Season 7
IEM Dallas 2025
PGL Astana 2025
Asian Champions League '25
ECL Season 49: Europe
BLAST Rivals Spring 2025
MESA Nomadic Masters
CCT Season 2 Global Finals
IEM Melbourne 2025
YaLLa Compass Qatar 2025
PGL Bucharest 2025
BLAST Open Spring 2025

Upcoming

Copa Latinoamericana 4
CSLPRO Last Chance 2025
CSLPRO Chat StarLAN 3
K-Championship
SEL Season 2 Championship
Esports World Cup 2025
HSC XXVII
Championship of Russia 2025
Murky Cup #2
Esports World Cup 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall Qual
IEM Cologne 2025
FISSURE Playground #1
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2025 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.