World at War 2 Mafia

On July 06 2011 04:00 syllogism wrote:

What's with people making wild assumptions just to avoid voting for objectively the most pro-town campaign

On July 06 2011 04:20 deconduo wrote:


I was in the middle of writing a huge fuck you post when I realised you weren't in the game -_-

On July 06 2011 10:51 Curu wrote:


Willing to give the benefit of the doubt for now. If you notice, I'm the one that called him out on the scumslip first so believe me I'm putting weight into it. sandroba's been more active than most though and his posts actually have content in them.

My vote on him hinged on what operation he voted for and the one he did choose didn't set off my alarms.

Nothing is more dangerous than scum being able to hide amongst Townie lurkers so that's my modus operandi until all the lurkers start doing something useful.

On July 06 2011 11:00 Curu wrote:


lol? Why would I even point out his scumslip if I didn't want to draw attention to it?

How cute, you ignore all the accusations on you in this thread and instead try to divert attention on me with something completely stupid and baseless. Seems like you're in a hurried panic, hmm?

My vote hinged on what operation he voted for because he had a whole argument formed based on Mafia's nukes being useless. If sandroba had gone against that whole line of argument he was making (and he was quite involved with it) then he would have appeared scummy as fuck. But he didn't.

Instead you now appear scummy as fuck. Saying a lurker excuse is bullshit without providing any reasoning? Proposing to nuke me because I didn't lynch based on a scumslip that I FIRST POINTED OUT? If I had wanted that scumslip unavoided I wouldn't have posted anything about it.

I still want to draw the lurkers out but I'd suggest everyone keeping a firm eye on you.

On July 06 2011 11:14 Curu wrote:


Ok explain one thing to me. Why did I point it out in the first place if we are both scum then? The whole bandwagon against sandroba is starting because of that scumslip. I POINTED OUT THAT SCUMSLIP. I'm not trying to back up and I'm not trying to cover my tracks. I drew attention to that scumslip because I wanted everyone to be aware of it. I just don't think it's as much grounds for serious pressuring yet based purely off of that.

You STILL haven't posted anything explaining your scummy posting that's getting you pressured and instead try to draw attention to me. That's just creating more confusion for Town. You're looking scummier by the second.

I'm not trying to draw attention away from sandroba. I'm going in with guns blazing. Every single one of my posts at him has mentioned his scumslip. I just don't think he's shown to be more dangerous (yet) than many other people. You very much included.

On July 06 2011 11:42 Curu wrote:


Uhh, go look at the accusations against you. Don't pretend you haven't seen them, you acknowledged that you were being pressured but didn't post anything to explain yourself.

If I didn't want to lose a "teammate" day one I never would have mentioned that scumslip in the first place. Honestly what advantage would that give to me? Explain it. If we're both scum, what advantage would me pointing out his scumslip give me? Town cred? I could only gain that if I followed up immediately with a full-out conviction to lynch him and the lynch went through.

I don't know that he's scum. He has a scumslip but he gave his reasoning for that. You, on the other hand, have done nothing but try to redirect attention to me when there's pressure on you. Even then, you haven't brought up one legitimate reason against me besides that I pointed out a scumslip but am not foaming-at-mouth lynching the person responsible behind it. I explained my reasoning. Hell, sandroba even explained his reasoning for the slip. The only person who hasn't done anything constructive is you.

I'm done arguing with you. We're just distracting the Town now and you don't seem to want to throw up anything constructive besides rehashing your non-points.

On July 06 2011 09:00 syllogism wrote:
I'm not happy with how quite a few approached the campaign options (by the way GMarshal, do you still think Gunnerside is the best one?), but I'm going to highlight Sinani206 first as he has been lurking.

Many players were guilty of this kind of hasty/shallow/poor analysis, but this seems particularly worrisome as it looks like an attempt to gain town cred rather than a town person voting for the best option. All nukes are lethal without nuclear resistance/extra lives and I think it's safe to assume few roles will have such perks. Thus, these "special" nukes aren't really a bigger threat than regular ones, especially as scum doesn't know who is resistant. Moreover, there's no reason to think only scum roles could have such nukes or that the campaign would prioritize "special nukes".

Sinani206 would you explain why you put so little effort into this?

Kurumi's analysis of the options was strange as well.

##vote Sinani206

On July 06 2011 13:57 heist wrote:
I really hope to hear prplhz in why advocated all those poor decisions, but I'm willing to change my vote to someone more realistic, either Sinani or Palmar. I'm still keeping an eye out for him.

In regards to Palmar, I don't really see how it does the mafia any good to send out a dud-nuke. He had to know that it would cause unwanted suspicion AND he didn't yet know it would go through extra lives.

Sinani's response to pressure is just so wild and accusatory that I can't help become more suspicious. He still has said nothing of himself to ease our suspicions. Therefore, I will be changing my vote to Sinani.