Hi everyone, GL HF! I would like to highly incentive everyone to post a lot of good a analisys and be very active so we can effectively make the mafia post a lot aswell if they don't want to be lynched by inactivity. This should help town a lot by giving us a lot of material to analise. Please, avoid spamming the thread with useless post and be sure to always post your opnion and analisys.

sandroba

Canada4998 Posts

April 15 2011 04:08 GMT

#114

Well I just checked and it's actually 6 AM in sweeden/netherlands so Vain and Forumite are probably actually sleeping. However, judging from this thread varpulis is normally active around this time. Hmmm...

sandroba

Canada4998 Posts

April 15 2011 11:46 GMT

#124

Well, there's not much info right now, but my main suspicion right now is scholeosis. I want to get this thread going as soon as possible so here it goes:

On April 15 2011 11:17 Shcoleosis wrote:

Show nested quote +

Yeah, that seem logical. We don't want to kill innocent townies, though...It's the mafia we want gone! I highly doubt any mafia would be lurking or inactive when they have chances to kill. But who am I to say...I'm still learning :/

First he states the obvious: we don't want to kill town, we want to kill scum. Then he says he's newbie and that's obvious too, as this is a newbie game, and from what I read from guides that's usually a scum tell trying to justify his current and future behaviour.

On April 15 2011 13:01 Shcoleosis wrote:

Show nested quote +

Not trying to protect the inactive. I guess I just didn't really understand your logic well. But, hey, if it takes lynching the inactive to get rid of the scum, LET'S DO THIS! Lol

Here he talks about not trying to protect the inactive. Note that at this point there were 3 people inactive. Maybe he's claiming not trying to protect the inactive scum? That feels like a slip to me. Then in the last part of his post he claims he doesn't understand the clear logic of being active is pro-town as it gives us more information from which to analise.

sandroba

Canada4998 Posts

April 15 2011 11:52 GMT

#125

On April 15 2011 11:27 Zorkmid wrote:

Show nested quote +

I concur with this, there sure isn't any harm in losing inactive townies OR scum!

GLHF!

There is a lot of harm in losing any kind of townies.

sandroba

Canada4998 Posts

April 15 2011 12:06 GMT

#129

If mafia has kp 2 that's actually pretty insane as if we mislynch on day 1 we would be 4 town 2 mafia on day 2 and auto lose if we mislynch again.

sandroba

Canada4998 Posts

April 15 2011 12:08 GMT

#130

ninja'ed

sandroba

Canada4998 Posts

April 15 2011 14:19 GMT

#134

That makes no kind of sense whatsoever. How is me saying losing townies is a bad thing makes me scum? I'm obviously town. The idea of lynching inactives is really just to make sure everyone post enough so we can get a read on them.
Also attacking the one doing analisys on you is not good town play. That's called OMGUS from what I've read. If you really are town then you should either defend yourself or make a case of someone you think is scum (a decent one, not the nonsencical one you've posted) so you can actually help town.
I also have no connection with forumite and I fail to see how you could possibly have drawn this conclusion. And to say it doesn't matter if he posted that before or after he got PM'ed is just LOL.
You are looking more and more like scum to me.

sandroba

Canada4998 Posts

April 15 2011 14:26 GMT

#135

Whoa, I thought that was scholeosis posting that, and I was thinking we had a clear scum for day 1 lynch. Besides the analisys part, since I haven't done one on you, my point still stands. I don't think you are scum though, since you are actually trying to do analises, although not a good one.

sandroba

Canada4998 Posts

April 15 2011 15:08 GMT

#137

What? Really, what? You either have really bad reading comprehension or you are trying to derail this thread.

sandroba

Canada4998 Posts

April 15 2011 15:19 GMT

#139

Well, touche.

sandroba

Canada4998 Posts

April 15 2011 21:17 GMT

#155

Well, right now, I'm still waiting on some kind of response by scholeosis. And the other lurkers should come out of the shadows and post their opnion, or is the situation too confortable that the scum can sit back and realx?

sandroba

Canada4998 Posts

April 15 2011 22:05 GMT

#166

I think we should start putting pressure, because this debate of me zorkmid and forumite throwing suspicion against each other is getting too confortable for the mafia. We have to starting giving out opnions and pointing some fingers, instead of being indecive. We have to stop "Well this could be scummy, but also could be that it's not scummy" . Yes, it's really hard to analise on day 1, but we at least have to try. As of now the only one to me that has shown any kind of clear scum behaviour is scholeosis. Zorkmid chainsaw defense of scholeosis seems suspicous aswell, but if it is indeed a chainsaw defense then pressuring scholeosis should be able to reveal them both.

sandroba

Canada4998 Posts

April 15 2011 22:33 GMT

#169

On April 16 2011 07:10 VarpuliS wrote:
As it stands it's unlikely we can identify mafia day one. I think we should lynch a lurker day 1 and see who the mafia kills night 1 before trying any hardcore analysis. I've got no problem with the analysis that's been going on atm though, so keep it up guys!

I just looked though the thread, and pretty much 100% of Eternalmisfit's posts have been pushing for an inactive lynch day 1. He'd like to get everybody talking, but has yet to contribute in a meaningful way. If we're gonna lynch a lurker, it should either be him or Senj, who has been lurking since the beginning of the game, save a few posts about inactives.

This is pretty contradictory. And you conviniently forgot about scholeosis who has 2 post of utter nothingness and scumtells.
Senj really hasn't shown up much to give us his insight.

sandroba

Canada4998 Posts

April 15 2011 23:15 GMT

#173

Also note that females are extremelly socially intelligent on average, while being the masters of appearing dumb while being manipulative.

sandroba

Canada4998 Posts

April 15 2011 23:32 GMT

#176

I'm sorry if I sound sexist, I really am not and ment no offense towards you scholeosis. I love girls and admire them for the characteristics I mentioned above.
Vote: Scholeosis
As a place holder. I'm going out right now and I'll probably be back around 4'o clock in the morning here in Brazil (GMT -3).

sandroba

Canada4998 Posts

April 15 2011 23:33 GMT

#177

Oops
##Vote: Scholeosis

sandroba

Canada4998 Posts

April 16 2011 10:31 GMT

#197

Well, I particularly think zorkmid is town because of the following:
Zorkmid analised me while I was posting analisys of scholeosis so if both zorkmid and scholeosis were mafia scholeosis wouldn't try to make him a supect. It only makes sense to me if zorkmid and scholeosis are both town or scholeosis is mafia and zorkmid is town. I'm going to follow my gut instinc that they are both town for now.If zorkmid is mafia and scholeosis is town zorkmid would know that and wouldn't mind lynching him so there was no need to pressure me.
There is no way they are both mafia as they wouldn't try to buss each other so early in the game. So I'm leaning towards zorkmid being town and I don't know for sure about scholeosis.
##Unvote
##Vote: Senj

1 2 3 Next All

Please or register to reply.

Live Events Refresh