• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 09:27
CEST 15:27
KST 22:27
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
[ASL21] Ro4 Preview: On Course0Code S Season 1 - RO8 Preview6[ASL21] Ro8 Preview Pt2: Progenitors8Code S Season 1 - RO12 Group A: Rogue, Percival, Solar, Zoun13[ASL21] Ro8 Preview Pt1: Inheritors16
Community News
Maestros of The Game 2 announcement and schedule !7Weekly Cups (April 27-May 4): Clem takes triple0RSL Revival: Season 5 - Qualifiers and Main Event12Code S Season 1 (2026) - RO12 Results12026 GSL Season 1 Qualifiers25
StarCraft 2
General
Code S Season 1 - RO8 Preview Behind the Blue - Team Liquid History Book Weekly Cups (April 27-May 4): Clem takes triple Blizzard Classic Cup @ BlizzCon 2026 - $100k prize pool Code S Season 1 (2026) - RO12 Results
Tourneys
Sparkling Tuna Cup - Weekly Open Tournament Sea Duckling Open (Global, Bronze-Diamond) Maestros of The Game 2 announcement and schedule ! GSL Code S Season 1 (2026) RSL Revival: Season 5 - Qualifiers and Main Event
Strategy
Custom Maps
[D]RTS in all its shapes and glory <3 [A] Nemrods 1/4 players
External Content
Mutation # 524 Death and Taxes The PondCast: SC2 News & Results Mutation # 523 Firewall Mutation # 522 Flip My Base
Brood War
General
RepMastered™: replay sharing and analyzer site BGH Auto Balance -> http://bghmmr.eu/ Quality of life changes in BW that you will like ? [ASL21] Ro4 Preview: On Course Why there arent any 256x256 pro maps?
Tourneys
[ASL21] Ro8 Day 3 [Megathread] Daily Proleagues [ASL21] Ro8 Day 4 Escore Tournament StarCraft Season 2
Strategy
Fighting Spirit mining rates Simple Questions, Simple Answers Muta micro map competition What's the deal with APM & what's its true value
Other Games
General Games
Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread Path of Exile Nintendo Switch Thread Daigo vs Menard Best of 10 OutLive 25 (RTS Game)
Dota 2
The Story of Wings Gaming
League of Legends
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Deck construction bug Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
Vanilla Mini Mafia Mafia Game Mode Feedback/Ideas TL Mafia Community Thread Five o'clock TL Mafia
Community
General
Russo-Ukrainian War Thread US Politics Mega-thread The Letting Off Steam Thread European Politico-economics QA Mega-thread UK Politics Mega-thread
Fan Clubs
The IdrA Fan Club
Media & Entertainment
Anime Discussion Thread [Manga] One Piece [Req][Books] Good Fantasy/SciFi books
Sports
2024 - 2026 Football Thread McBoner: A hockey love story Formula 1 Discussion
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
streaming software Strange computer issues (software) [G] How to Block Livestream Ads
TL Community
The Automated Ban List
Blogs
How EEG Data Can Predict Gam…
TrAiDoS
ramps on octagon
StaticNine
Funny Nicknames
LUCKY_NOOB
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 1994 users

[P]Women In The Infantry

Forum Index > General Forum
Post a Reply
1 2 3 4 5 14 15 16 Next All
CharlieMurphy
Profile Blog Joined March 2006
United States22895 Posts
Last Edited: 2009-11-11 23:25:31
November 11 2009 21:57 GMT
#1
Do you think women should be allowed in the infantry?
[image loading]

*Note this is not the same as women in the army/marines/navy. There is no problem with that. This is the front lines and battles of war we are talking about. The grunt work.

So I was watching this thing on MSNBC (or some news channel) this morning and they were discussing the issues of women not being allowed to work in ranks like combat medic, and other physically demanding front line infantry positions.

Some people were calling in to voice their opinion and some brought up good points:

Women/men would be distracting to themselves. Then if something were to happen, there would possibly be emotional damage and even more distraction. Men have an inherent instinct to protect women and that is well known.
With women in the trenches of war there is a greater chance of sexual assault/harassment not only just from the fellow infantry units but in the event of capture/pow (this is especially bad in places in the middle east where women have little or no rights).
The facilities would have to be overhauled to not be unisex and more accommodating to women instead of just men.
Then there is the mess if a women was pregnant in a battle.
Health costs for women are greater and injuries are more frequent. In truth, the military budget is taking a colossal hit.
and of course, most importantly, men are faster and stronger than women.
I'm sure there are many other reasons why, please post those if you think of them.

On the pro side of the argument, people (mostly women/feminists ofc) are saying that women are equal and have equal rights and should be able to/are just as able to fight in a war as men.


Imo this is not a political or social issue, It's just a fact of nature. Nature lays down the laws, we just back them up.




When I was in boot camp more than twenty years ago, my platoon sergeant told of his experiences training women Marines. The idea, at that time, was to subject the best and most motivated women to the same training as men. "They were great women," he said, "but after a few days they were all in tears."

Women cannot endure the same training that men endure.

The United States Army was created for one purpose -- the defense of our country. It was not created as a laboratory for social experimentation. It is not an arena for correcting nature's inequities We already know from common observation that women lack upper body strength. Furthermore, the very advantages that women possess over men -- emotional intelligence and sensitivity -- work against them on the battlefield. At the same time, the very emotional cluelessness and blockheaded insensitivity of men serves them well in the most brutal of all human activities.

Last week I interviewed a retired U.S. Army sergeant. He told me that female recruits often lack the strength to pull the pin on a grenade. No women that he has trained can throw a grenade beyond its blast radius. He said that women give out during forced marches at a much higher rate than men Women cannot carry the heavy gear that men carry. Worse yet, it is unacceptable for military personnel to complain about the danger that women pose to the combat readiness of their units. According to the sergeant, the imperatives of basic military toughness and discipline have been sacrificed in the U.S. Army so that women can get through the training. This cannot fail to have a negative effect on the male troops. Sexual harassment is another difficulty that arises. Disruptions of all kinds mount on every side. In addition, women cost more than men do. Health costs for women are greater and injuries are more frequent. In truth, the military budget is taking a colossal hit.

If motherhood is not a man's right, why should manhood be a woman's right?


Obviously this OP is a little biased, but I am totally open to counter opinions and arguments.


Please don't vote hastily
+ Show Spoiler +
[image loading]

Poll: Women In The Infantry
(Vote): Yes
(Vote): No
(Vote): Undecided


+ Show Spoiler [news poll results] +
To my amazement the poll was something like 65% yes, 35% no.
..and then I would, ya know, check em'. (Aka SpoR)
NrG.NeverExpo
Profile Blog Joined December 2008
Canada2114 Posts
November 11 2009 22:00 GMT
#2
A lot of these arguments could go with 1000 other topics. LIke in any other area of work, men and women are going to mingle, and it could have a negative effect on their job. But we can't really seperate them. There are a lot of examples that are important, just like in the military.
TwitteR: @NeverExpo follow me, i'll follow back :)
Impervious
Profile Blog Joined March 2009
Canada4217 Posts
November 11 2009 22:02 GMT
#3
I'm sure there are some crazy bitches out there that could handle it (physically, mentally, emotionally, etc)..... But, how would they affect the rest of the unit they were with? Would it be positive or negative?

I can't see it being a positive..... Hence I vote "no".

However, this does not mean that I don't think women should be in the military. There are a lot of places where they could make a huge impact. Just not on the front lines.
~ \(ˌ)im-ˈpər-vē-əs\ : not capable of being damaged or harmed.
CharlieMurphy
Profile Blog Joined March 2006
United States22895 Posts
Last Edited: 2009-11-11 22:06:11
November 11 2009 22:03 GMT
#4
On November 12 2009 07:00 NrG.NeverExpo wrote:
A lot of these arguments could go with 1000 other topics. LIke in any other area of work, men and women are going to mingle, and it could have a negative effect on their job. But we can't really seperate them. There are a lot of examples that are important, just like in the military.

That is a bad argument. There is a huge difference between battling in a war then manning some machines in a factory or whatever.

Losing work proficiency is a business venture. Lives aren't at stake there.
..and then I would, ya know, check em'. (Aka SpoR)
{CC}StealthBlue
Profile Blog Joined January 2003
United States41117 Posts
Last Edited: 2009-11-11 22:10:44
November 11 2009 22:03 GMT
#5
Only problem I see with women in the infantry is what happens if a female soldier is captured during a battle and how many are going to get killed trying to get her back. I mean if the enemy, for example the Taliban, know our view on Women they might become more aggressive to capture female soldiers leading to greater harm and danger than there already is for our troops. Knowing as a country we will do everything possible to get them back.
"Smokey, this is not 'Nam, this is bowling. There are rules."
Boblion
Profile Blog Joined May 2007
France8043 Posts
November 11 2009 22:04 GMT
#6
If they have the same tests than men yes.
fuck all those elitists brb watching streams of elite players.
CharlieMurphy
Profile Blog Joined March 2006
United States22895 Posts
November 11 2009 22:05 GMT
#7
On November 12 2009 07:04 Boblion wrote:
If they have the same tests than men yes.

and they would, if you read the quote at the bottom of OP most of the women couldn't pass them.
not being able to pull a pin out of a grenade and then not being able to throw it further than it's blast radius is pretty dangerous.
..and then I would, ya know, check em'. (Aka SpoR)
Boblion
Profile Blog Joined May 2007
France8043 Posts
Last Edited: 2009-11-11 22:09:22
November 11 2009 22:07 GMT
#8
On November 12 2009 07:05 CharlieMurphy wrote:
Show nested quote +
On November 12 2009 07:04 Boblion wrote:
If they have the same tests than men yes.

and they would, if you read the quote at the bottom of OP most of the women couldn't pass them.
not being able to pull a pin out of a grenade and then not being able to throw it further than it's blast radius is pretty dangerous.

So why are they recruited if they fail the tests ?

The army should only recruit those who have the best results in tests. Women or men it doesn't matter.
fuck all those elitists brb watching streams of elite players.
Radfield
Profile Joined September 2009
Canada2720 Posts
Last Edited: 2009-11-11 22:11:45
November 11 2009 22:09 GMT
#9
Men are generally stronger and faster than women, this is true. But I would think that many women meet or exceed the physical requirements for any combat job. If this is the case(and I'd be shocked if it weren't) then any argument from a 'not strong or fast enough' position is tossed out. Set the physical standards, and anyone who meets or exceeds them is physically qualified for the job, gender is irrelevant.

Now, many of the other issues you raised are still very relevant.

EDIT: Haven't you all seen GI Jane!?

(I haven't)
Chuiu
Profile Blog Joined June 2003
3470 Posts
November 11 2009 22:09 GMT
#10
I misclicked and voted no but I wanted to vote yes. If unisex doesn't work there's no reason why they can't separate men and women in the military.
♞
Impervious
Profile Blog Joined March 2009
Canada4217 Posts
Last Edited: 2009-11-11 22:11:06
November 11 2009 22:10 GMT
#11
On November 12 2009 07:07 Boblion wrote:
Show nested quote +
On November 12 2009 07:05 CharlieMurphy wrote:
On November 12 2009 07:04 Boblion wrote:
If they have the same tests than men yes.

and they would, if you read the quote at the bottom of OP most of the women couldn't pass them.
not being able to pull a pin out of a grenade and then not being able to throw it further than it's blast radius is pretty dangerous.

So why are they recruited if they fail the tests ?

The army should only recruit those who have the best results in tests. Women or men it doesn't matter.



It's sexist to say that women can't do it.....
~ \(ˌ)im-ˈpər-vē-əs\ : not capable of being damaged or harmed.
CharlieMurphy
Profile Blog Joined March 2006
United States22895 Posts
November 11 2009 22:10 GMT
#12
On November 12 2009 07:07 Boblion wrote:
Show nested quote +
On November 12 2009 07:05 CharlieMurphy wrote:
On November 12 2009 07:04 Boblion wrote:
If they have the same tests than men yes.

and they would, if you read the quote at the bottom of OP most of the women couldn't pass them.
not being able to pull a pin out of a grenade and then not being able to throw it further than it's blast radius is pretty dangerous.

So why are they recruited if they fail the tests ?

The army should only recruit those who have the best results in tests. Women or men it doesn't matter.

They are recruited for other positions, I don't think you understand the issue here. read the op carefully.
..and then I would, ya know, check em'. (Aka SpoR)
Grobyc
Profile Blog Joined June 2008
Canada18410 Posts
November 11 2009 22:10 GMT
#13
I agree with what Boblion says.
If you watch Godzilla backwards it's about a benevolent lizard who helps rebuild a city and then moonwalks into the ocean.
graemej
Profile Joined June 2009
Canada42 Posts
November 11 2009 22:11 GMT
#14
On November 12 2009 07:03 CharlieMurphy wrote:
Show nested quote +
On November 12 2009 07:00 NrG.NeverExpo wrote:
A lot of these arguments could go with 1000 other topics. LIke in any other area of work, men and women are going to mingle, and it could have a negative effect on their job. But we can't really seperate them. There are a lot of examples that are important, just like in the military.

That is a bad argument. There is a huge difference between battling in a war then manning some machines in a factory or whatever.

Losing work proficiency is a business venture. Lives aren't at stake there.


you're saying war isn't a business venture?
CharlieMurphy
Profile Blog Joined March 2006
United States22895 Posts
November 11 2009 22:13 GMT
#15
On November 12 2009 07:11 graemej wrote:
Show nested quote +
On November 12 2009 07:03 CharlieMurphy wrote:
On November 12 2009 07:00 NrG.NeverExpo wrote:
A lot of these arguments could go with 1000 other topics. LIke in any other area of work, men and women are going to mingle, and it could have a negative effect on their job. But we can't really seperate them. There are a lot of examples that are important, just like in the military.

That is a bad argument. There is a huge difference between battling in a war then manning some machines in a factory or whatever.

Losing work proficiency is a business venture. Lives aren't at stake there.


you're saying war isn't a business venture?

that's another topic..
..and then I would, ya know, check em'. (Aka SpoR)
meeple
Profile Blog Joined April 2009
Canada10211 Posts
November 11 2009 22:15 GMT
#16
In the Canadian army at least, I know the women have different standard than men. Actually, much weaker standards, which is strange if you think about it. The standards should be the same, if you can't pull your weight, why should we rely on you in times of dire need. But the advocates of this are right, women's bodies are different and can't generally handle the same stress a mans can, but to me... this means they shouldn't be allowed to fight, not "give them different standards".
koreasilver
Profile Blog Joined June 2008
9109 Posts
Last Edited: 2009-11-11 22:19:51
November 11 2009 22:17 GMT
#17
I think a lot of feminists completely forget that women and men are not the same. Equality means equal rights and equal opportunity. If a woman can perform as proficiently as is required for men, then they should by all means be allowed to do the same job. If they can't perform what is minimally required for men, then they should not be allowed to do the same job. I mean, equality doesn't mean that everyone is the same.

I mean, if women can't pull the pins off of grenades properly or throw it beyond the blast range or carry the same amount of heavy load as other male soldiers do... while also taking more damage and costing more to deploy, then obviously women shouldn't be deployed in the front because they're just inferior for that purpose. Women should only be allowed out there if they can do everything that is required from the male soldiers.
searcher
Profile Blog Joined May 2009
277 Posts
November 11 2009 22:19 GMT
#18
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/8348243.stm

I'm sure some English soldiers are fighting harder (c wut i did thar) than ever before.
NrG.NeverExpo
Profile Blog Joined December 2008
Canada2114 Posts
November 11 2009 22:19 GMT
#19
On November 12 2009 07:03 CharlieMurphy wrote:
Show nested quote +
On November 12 2009 07:00 NrG.NeverExpo wrote:
A lot of these arguments could go with 1000 other topics. LIke in any other area of work, men and women are going to mingle, and it could have a negative effect on their job. But we can't really seperate them. There are a lot of examples that are important, just like in the military.

That is a bad argument. There is a huge difference between battling in a war then manning some machines in a factory or whatever.

Losing work proficiency is a business venture. Lives aren't at stake there.


lol, why don't you think a little more about it.

What about having a man and a women in the cockpit of a plane?

What about having men and women in an Operating room during open heart surgery? Im not talking about a fuckin cashier job at a grocery store, im talkign abotu when lives can be lost (and my examples are far more likely to have gendre conflicts then while people are shooting at you :D)
TwitteR: @NeverExpo follow me, i'll follow back :)
Boblion
Profile Blog Joined May 2007
France8043 Posts
Last Edited: 2009-11-11 22:20:42
November 11 2009 22:19 GMT
#20
On November 12 2009 07:10 CharlieMurphy wrote:
Show nested quote +
On November 12 2009 07:07 Boblion wrote:
On November 12 2009 07:05 CharlieMurphy wrote:
On November 12 2009 07:04 Boblion wrote:
If they have the same tests than men yes.

and they would, if you read the quote at the bottom of OP most of the women couldn't pass them.
not being able to pull a pin out of a grenade and then not being able to throw it further than it's blast radius is pretty dangerous.

So why are they recruited if they fail the tests ?

The army should only recruit those who have the best results in tests. Women or men it doesn't matter.

They are recruited for other positions, I don't think you understand the issue here. read the op carefully.

So why the Op is about trenche war lol ?
There are a lot of paperwork jobs in the army i don't understand what is your problem if weak men or weak women are recruited to do this.

Don't really know how the US army recruitment system works but i guess that you just need to test the physical abilities of people regarding their speciality ( infantry, telecommunications, etc ... ).

If they fail the badass grunt course with the 30kg backpack well maybe they can still apply to work in an office or as mechanic, cook etc ...
fuck all those elitists brb watching streams of elite players.
1 2 3 4 5 14 15 16 Next All
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
WardiTV Invitational
12:00
Wardi Spring Cup
ByuN vs Rogue
Solar vs Ryung
Zoun vs Percival
Cure vs SHIN
WardiTV817
IntoTheiNu 675
IndyStarCraft 215
TKL 211
LiquipediaDiscussion
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
Ryung 377
IndyStarCraft 215
TKL 211
Rex 133
Railgan 95
Vindicta 1
StarCraft: Brood War
EffOrt 1572
BeSt 969
ZerO 391
Mini 360
Rush 224
Last 170
Mind 131
hero 117
Pusan 112
ToSsGirL 64
[ Show more ]
Nal_rA 56
Sea.KH 52
Movie 39
sorry 38
Backho 35
Shinee 31
Shine 28
GoRush 20
yabsab 17
IntoTheRainbow 13
Rock 11
Noble 10
Icarus 7
Dota 2
Gorgc5115
monkeys_forever143
XcaliburYe129
Counter-Strike
x6flipin236
Heroes of the Storm
Khaldor228
Other Games
gofns27493
singsing2195
B2W.Neo1481
Liquid`RaSZi887
DeMusliM454
KnowMe215
ArmadaUGS45
MindelVK21
ZerO(Twitch)18
elazer1
Organizations
Counter-Strike
PGL34465
Other Games
gamesdonequick2833
StarCraft 2
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
[ Show 14 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• Adnapsc2 29
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• intothetv
• Kozan
• IndyKCrew
• LaughNgamezSOOP
• Migwel
• sooper7s
StarCraft: Brood War
• BSLYoutube
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
League of Legends
• Jankos1725
• TFBlade1136
Other Games
• WagamamaTV342
Upcoming Events
BSL
5h 33m
Dewalt vs DragOn
Aether vs Jimin
GSL
18h 33m
Afreeca Starleague
20h 33m
Soma vs Leta
Wardi Open
22h 33m
Monday Night Weeklies
1d 2h
OSC
1d 10h
CranKy Ducklings
1d 20h
Afreeca Starleague
1d 20h
Light vs Flash
Replay Cast
2 days
Replay Cast
3 days
[ Show More ]
The PondCast
3 days
Replay Cast
4 days
RSL Revival
4 days
Korean StarCraft League
5 days
RSL Revival
5 days
BSL
6 days
GSL
6 days
Cure vs TBD
TBD vs Maru
Liquipedia Results

Completed

Escore Tournament S2: W6
WardiTV TLMC #16
Nations Cup 2026

Ongoing

BSL Season 22
ASL Season 21
CSL 2026 SPRING (S20)
IPSL Spring 2026
KCM Race Survival 2026 Season 2
Acropolis #4
KK 2v2 League Season 1
BSL 22 Non-Korean Championship
SCTL 2026 Spring
RSL Revival: Season 5
2026 GSL S1
PGL Astana 2026
BLAST Rivals Spring 2026
IEM Rio 2026
PGL Bucharest 2026
Stake Ranked Episode 1
BLAST Open Spring 2026
ESL Pro League S23 Finals
ESL Pro League S23 Stage 1&2

Upcoming

YSL S3
Escore Tournament S2: W7
Escore Tournament S2: W8
CSLAN 4
Kung Fu Cup 2026 Grand Finals
HSC XXIX
uThermal 2v2 2026 Main Event
Maestros of the Game 2
2026 GSL S2
BLAST Bounty Summer 2026: Closed Qualifier
Stake Ranked Episode 3
XSE Pro League 2026
IEM Cologne Major 2026
Stake Ranked Episode 2
CS Asia Championships 2026
Asian Champions League 2026
IEM Atlanta 2026
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2026 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.