• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 08:44
CEST 14:44
KST 21:44
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
[ASL22] Ro8 Preview: In A Tizzy9[ASL22] Ro16 Preview: Holy Diver5[ASL22] Ro16 Preview: Rough Waters10[ASL22] Ro24 Preview: Siren's Call8[ASL22] Ro24 Preview: Summer's End9
Community News
Weekly Cups (Sep 13-20): herO scores triple2BSL Season 236Weekly Cups (Sep 7-12): SHIN, ByuN, MaxPax double down1StarCraft open world shooter announced at BlizzCon101Weekly Cups (Aug 30-Sep 7): herO thrives amid growing schism10
StarCraft 2
General
Weekly Cups (Sep 13-20): herO scores triple Balance hotfix patch 5.0.16b (July 16) Blizzard Classic Cup @ BlizzCon 2026 - $100k prize pool How do you feel about the StarCraft shooter announcement at BlizzCon 2026? The Death of Cheese: From a Professional Cheeser
Tourneys
Stellar Fest TWO the Moon (Dec 16-20) Sparkling Tuna Cup - Weekly Open Tournament 2026 GSTL Announcement RSL Revival: Season 6 - Qualifiers and Main Event RSL goes to London! 2026 Offline Finals Nov 21-22
Strategy
[H] ZvP Mid-Late Game: Stalkers Collossi HT
Custom Maps
[M] (2) Frigid Storage
External Content
Mutation # 544 Double Trouble The PondCast: SC2 News & Results Mutation # 543 Enhanced Defenses Mutation # 542 The Ascended
Brood War
General
BW General Discussion NaDa's Body BSL Season 23 screpdb: new Starcraft reporting tool an AI researcher's take on the ladder bot
Tourneys
[ASL22] Ro8 Day 2 [ASL22] Ro16 Group D [ASL22] Ro8 Day 1 [IPSL] IPSL is Back With Winter 26-27!
Strategy
Cliff Jump Revisited (1 in a 1000 strategy) Replay Review Process - What do you do? Simple Questions, Simple Answers Odyssey Mineral Stack Saturation
Other Games
General Games
Nintendo Switch Thread Diablo IV Warcraft III: The Frozen Throne Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread EVE Corporation
Dota 2
Dota 2 Champions League Season 3 Begins April 25! Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
[TL LoL EUW IHs] Teemo shall perish
Heroes of the Storm
Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Deck construction bug
TL Mafia
TL Mafia Community Thread
Community
General
US Politics Mega-thread Russo-Ukrainian War Thread Artificial Intelligence Thread Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine All you football fans (soccer)!
Fan Clubs
MarineLorD Fan Club The Creator Fan Club The ShoWTimE Fan Club
Media & Entertainment
Movie Discussion! [Manga] One Piece Diablo Animated Series on Netflix
Sports
Football (Soccer) Thread TeamLiquid Health and Fitness Initiative For 2023 MLB/Baseball 2023
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread
TL Community
Recent Gifted Posts
Blogs
Gaming Intensity, Problemati…
TrAiDoS
38 yo Retired SWE loo…
PurE)Rabbit-SF
Can Bots Beat Pros?? Starcr…
namkraft
[meme] I finally understa…
LUCKY_NOOB
Regacy Esports:Our Goa…
regacyesports
Dreaming of BW patches (mod…
c3rberUs
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 7707 users

[P]Women In The Infantry

Forum Index > General Forum
Post a Reply
1 2 3 4 5 14 15 16 Next All
CharlieMurphy
Profile Blog Joined March 2006
United States22895 Posts
Last Edited: 2009-11-11 23:25:31
November 11 2009 21:57 GMT
#1
Do you think women should be allowed in the infantry?
[image loading]

*Note this is not the same as women in the army/marines/navy. There is no problem with that. This is the front lines and battles of war we are talking about. The grunt work.

So I was watching this thing on MSNBC (or some news channel) this morning and they were discussing the issues of women not being allowed to work in ranks like combat medic, and other physically demanding front line infantry positions.

Some people were calling in to voice their opinion and some brought up good points:

Women/men would be distracting to themselves. Then if something were to happen, there would possibly be emotional damage and even more distraction. Men have an inherent instinct to protect women and that is well known.
With women in the trenches of war there is a greater chance of sexual assault/harassment not only just from the fellow infantry units but in the event of capture/pow (this is especially bad in places in the middle east where women have little or no rights).
The facilities would have to be overhauled to not be unisex and more accommodating to women instead of just men.
Then there is the mess if a women was pregnant in a battle.
Health costs for women are greater and injuries are more frequent. In truth, the military budget is taking a colossal hit.
and of course, most importantly, men are faster and stronger than women.
I'm sure there are many other reasons why, please post those if you think of them.

On the pro side of the argument, people (mostly women/feminists ofc) are saying that women are equal and have equal rights and should be able to/are just as able to fight in a war as men.


Imo this is not a political or social issue, It's just a fact of nature. Nature lays down the laws, we just back them up.




When I was in boot camp more than twenty years ago, my platoon sergeant told of his experiences training women Marines. The idea, at that time, was to subject the best and most motivated women to the same training as men. "They were great women," he said, "but after a few days they were all in tears."

Women cannot endure the same training that men endure.

The United States Army was created for one purpose -- the defense of our country. It was not created as a laboratory for social experimentation. It is not an arena for correcting nature's inequities We already know from common observation that women lack upper body strength. Furthermore, the very advantages that women possess over men -- emotional intelligence and sensitivity -- work against them on the battlefield. At the same time, the very emotional cluelessness and blockheaded insensitivity of men serves them well in the most brutal of all human activities.

Last week I interviewed a retired U.S. Army sergeant. He told me that female recruits often lack the strength to pull the pin on a grenade. No women that he has trained can throw a grenade beyond its blast radius. He said that women give out during forced marches at a much higher rate than men Women cannot carry the heavy gear that men carry. Worse yet, it is unacceptable for military personnel to complain about the danger that women pose to the combat readiness of their units. According to the sergeant, the imperatives of basic military toughness and discipline have been sacrificed in the U.S. Army so that women can get through the training. This cannot fail to have a negative effect on the male troops. Sexual harassment is another difficulty that arises. Disruptions of all kinds mount on every side. In addition, women cost more than men do. Health costs for women are greater and injuries are more frequent. In truth, the military budget is taking a colossal hit.

If motherhood is not a man's right, why should manhood be a woman's right?


Obviously this OP is a little biased, but I am totally open to counter opinions and arguments.


Please don't vote hastily
+ Show Spoiler +
[image loading]

Poll: Women In The Infantry
(Vote): Yes
(Vote): No
(Vote): Undecided


+ Show Spoiler [news poll results] +
To my amazement the poll was something like 65% yes, 35% no.
..and then I would, ya know, check em'. (Aka SpoR)
NrG.NeverExpo
Profile Blog Joined December 2008
Canada2114 Posts
November 11 2009 22:00 GMT
#2
A lot of these arguments could go with 1000 other topics. LIke in any other area of work, men and women are going to mingle, and it could have a negative effect on their job. But we can't really seperate them. There are a lot of examples that are important, just like in the military.
TwitteR: @NeverExpo follow me, i'll follow back :)
Impervious
Profile Blog Joined March 2009
Canada4222 Posts
November 11 2009 22:02 GMT
#3
I'm sure there are some crazy bitches out there that could handle it (physically, mentally, emotionally, etc)..... But, how would they affect the rest of the unit they were with? Would it be positive or negative?

I can't see it being a positive..... Hence I vote "no".

However, this does not mean that I don't think women should be in the military. There are a lot of places where they could make a huge impact. Just not on the front lines.
~ \(ˌ)im-ˈpər-vē-əs\ : not capable of being damaged or harmed.
CharlieMurphy
Profile Blog Joined March 2006
United States22895 Posts
Last Edited: 2009-11-11 22:06:11
November 11 2009 22:03 GMT
#4
On November 12 2009 07:00 NrG.NeverExpo wrote:
A lot of these arguments could go with 1000 other topics. LIke in any other area of work, men and women are going to mingle, and it could have a negative effect on their job. But we can't really seperate them. There are a lot of examples that are important, just like in the military.

That is a bad argument. There is a huge difference between battling in a war then manning some machines in a factory or whatever.

Losing work proficiency is a business venture. Lives aren't at stake there.
..and then I would, ya know, check em'. (Aka SpoR)
{CC}StealthBlue
Profile Blog Joined January 2003
United States41117 Posts
Last Edited: 2009-11-11 22:10:44
November 11 2009 22:03 GMT
#5
Only problem I see with women in the infantry is what happens if a female soldier is captured during a battle and how many are going to get killed trying to get her back. I mean if the enemy, for example the Taliban, know our view on Women they might become more aggressive to capture female soldiers leading to greater harm and danger than there already is for our troops. Knowing as a country we will do everything possible to get them back.
"Smokey, this is not 'Nam, this is bowling. There are rules."
Boblion
Profile Blog Joined May 2007
France8043 Posts
November 11 2009 22:04 GMT
#6
If they have the same tests than men yes.
fuck all those elitists brb watching streams of elite players.
CharlieMurphy
Profile Blog Joined March 2006
United States22895 Posts
November 11 2009 22:05 GMT
#7
On November 12 2009 07:04 Boblion wrote:
If they have the same tests than men yes.

and they would, if you read the quote at the bottom of OP most of the women couldn't pass them.
not being able to pull a pin out of a grenade and then not being able to throw it further than it's blast radius is pretty dangerous.
..and then I would, ya know, check em'. (Aka SpoR)
Boblion
Profile Blog Joined May 2007
France8043 Posts
Last Edited: 2009-11-11 22:09:22
November 11 2009 22:07 GMT
#8
On November 12 2009 07:05 CharlieMurphy wrote:
Show nested quote +
On November 12 2009 07:04 Boblion wrote:
If they have the same tests than men yes.

and they would, if you read the quote at the bottom of OP most of the women couldn't pass them.
not being able to pull a pin out of a grenade and then not being able to throw it further than it's blast radius is pretty dangerous.

So why are they recruited if they fail the tests ?

The army should only recruit those who have the best results in tests. Women or men it doesn't matter.
fuck all those elitists brb watching streams of elite players.
Radfield
Profile Joined September 2009
Canada2720 Posts
Last Edited: 2009-11-11 22:11:45
November 11 2009 22:09 GMT
#9
Men are generally stronger and faster than women, this is true. But I would think that many women meet or exceed the physical requirements for any combat job. If this is the case(and I'd be shocked if it weren't) then any argument from a 'not strong or fast enough' position is tossed out. Set the physical standards, and anyone who meets or exceeds them is physically qualified for the job, gender is irrelevant.

Now, many of the other issues you raised are still very relevant.

EDIT: Haven't you all seen GI Jane!?

(I haven't)
Chuiu
Profile Blog Joined June 2003
3470 Posts
November 11 2009 22:09 GMT
#10
I misclicked and voted no but I wanted to vote yes. If unisex doesn't work there's no reason why they can't separate men and women in the military.
♞
Impervious
Profile Blog Joined March 2009
Canada4222 Posts
Last Edited: 2009-11-11 22:11:06
November 11 2009 22:10 GMT
#11
On November 12 2009 07:07 Boblion wrote:
Show nested quote +
On November 12 2009 07:05 CharlieMurphy wrote:
On November 12 2009 07:04 Boblion wrote:
If they have the same tests than men yes.

and they would, if you read the quote at the bottom of OP most of the women couldn't pass them.
not being able to pull a pin out of a grenade and then not being able to throw it further than it's blast radius is pretty dangerous.

So why are they recruited if they fail the tests ?

The army should only recruit those who have the best results in tests. Women or men it doesn't matter.



It's sexist to say that women can't do it.....
~ \(ˌ)im-ˈpər-vē-əs\ : not capable of being damaged or harmed.
CharlieMurphy
Profile Blog Joined March 2006
United States22895 Posts
November 11 2009 22:10 GMT
#12
On November 12 2009 07:07 Boblion wrote:
Show nested quote +
On November 12 2009 07:05 CharlieMurphy wrote:
On November 12 2009 07:04 Boblion wrote:
If they have the same tests than men yes.

and they would, if you read the quote at the bottom of OP most of the women couldn't pass them.
not being able to pull a pin out of a grenade and then not being able to throw it further than it's blast radius is pretty dangerous.

So why are they recruited if they fail the tests ?

The army should only recruit those who have the best results in tests. Women or men it doesn't matter.

They are recruited for other positions, I don't think you understand the issue here. read the op carefully.
..and then I would, ya know, check em'. (Aka SpoR)
Grobyc
Profile Blog Joined June 2008
Canada18410 Posts
November 11 2009 22:10 GMT
#13
I agree with what Boblion says.
If you watch Godzilla backwards it's about a benevolent lizard who helps rebuild a city and then moonwalks into the ocean.
graemej
Profile Joined June 2009
Canada42 Posts
November 11 2009 22:11 GMT
#14
On November 12 2009 07:03 CharlieMurphy wrote:
Show nested quote +
On November 12 2009 07:00 NrG.NeverExpo wrote:
A lot of these arguments could go with 1000 other topics. LIke in any other area of work, men and women are going to mingle, and it could have a negative effect on their job. But we can't really seperate them. There are a lot of examples that are important, just like in the military.

That is a bad argument. There is a huge difference between battling in a war then manning some machines in a factory or whatever.

Losing work proficiency is a business venture. Lives aren't at stake there.


you're saying war isn't a business venture?
CharlieMurphy
Profile Blog Joined March 2006
United States22895 Posts
November 11 2009 22:13 GMT
#15
On November 12 2009 07:11 graemej wrote:
Show nested quote +
On November 12 2009 07:03 CharlieMurphy wrote:
On November 12 2009 07:00 NrG.NeverExpo wrote:
A lot of these arguments could go with 1000 other topics. LIke in any other area of work, men and women are going to mingle, and it could have a negative effect on their job. But we can't really seperate them. There are a lot of examples that are important, just like in the military.

That is a bad argument. There is a huge difference between battling in a war then manning some machines in a factory or whatever.

Losing work proficiency is a business venture. Lives aren't at stake there.


you're saying war isn't a business venture?

that's another topic..
..and then I would, ya know, check em'. (Aka SpoR)
meeple
Profile Blog Joined April 2009
Canada10211 Posts
November 11 2009 22:15 GMT
#16
In the Canadian army at least, I know the women have different standard than men. Actually, much weaker standards, which is strange if you think about it. The standards should be the same, if you can't pull your weight, why should we rely on you in times of dire need. But the advocates of this are right, women's bodies are different and can't generally handle the same stress a mans can, but to me... this means they shouldn't be allowed to fight, not "give them different standards".
koreasilver
Profile Blog Joined June 2008
9109 Posts
Last Edited: 2009-11-11 22:19:51
November 11 2009 22:17 GMT
#17
I think a lot of feminists completely forget that women and men are not the same. Equality means equal rights and equal opportunity. If a woman can perform as proficiently as is required for men, then they should by all means be allowed to do the same job. If they can't perform what is minimally required for men, then they should not be allowed to do the same job. I mean, equality doesn't mean that everyone is the same.

I mean, if women can't pull the pins off of grenades properly or throw it beyond the blast range or carry the same amount of heavy load as other male soldiers do... while also taking more damage and costing more to deploy, then obviously women shouldn't be deployed in the front because they're just inferior for that purpose. Women should only be allowed out there if they can do everything that is required from the male soldiers.
searcher
Profile Blog Joined May 2009
277 Posts
November 11 2009 22:19 GMT
#18
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/8348243.stm

I'm sure some English soldiers are fighting harder (c wut i did thar) than ever before.
NrG.NeverExpo
Profile Blog Joined December 2008
Canada2114 Posts
November 11 2009 22:19 GMT
#19
On November 12 2009 07:03 CharlieMurphy wrote:
Show nested quote +
On November 12 2009 07:00 NrG.NeverExpo wrote:
A lot of these arguments could go with 1000 other topics. LIke in any other area of work, men and women are going to mingle, and it could have a negative effect on their job. But we can't really seperate them. There are a lot of examples that are important, just like in the military.

That is a bad argument. There is a huge difference between battling in a war then manning some machines in a factory or whatever.

Losing work proficiency is a business venture. Lives aren't at stake there.


lol, why don't you think a little more about it.

What about having a man and a women in the cockpit of a plane?

What about having men and women in an Operating room during open heart surgery? Im not talking about a fuckin cashier job at a grocery store, im talkign abotu when lives can be lost (and my examples are far more likely to have gendre conflicts then while people are shooting at you :D)
TwitteR: @NeverExpo follow me, i'll follow back :)
Boblion
Profile Blog Joined May 2007
France8043 Posts
Last Edited: 2009-11-11 22:20:42
November 11 2009 22:19 GMT
#20
On November 12 2009 07:10 CharlieMurphy wrote:
Show nested quote +
On November 12 2009 07:07 Boblion wrote:
On November 12 2009 07:05 CharlieMurphy wrote:
On November 12 2009 07:04 Boblion wrote:
If they have the same tests than men yes.

and they would, if you read the quote at the bottom of OP most of the women couldn't pass them.
not being able to pull a pin out of a grenade and then not being able to throw it further than it's blast radius is pretty dangerous.

So why are they recruited if they fail the tests ?

The army should only recruit those who have the best results in tests. Women or men it doesn't matter.

They are recruited for other positions, I don't think you understand the issue here. read the op carefully.

So why the Op is about trenche war lol ?
There are a lot of paperwork jobs in the army i don't understand what is your problem if weak men or weak women are recruited to do this.

Don't really know how the US army recruitment system works but i guess that you just need to test the physical abilities of people regarding their speciality ( infantry, telecommunications, etc ... ).

If they fail the badass grunt course with the 30kg backpack well maybe they can still apply to work in an office or as mechanic, cook etc ...
fuck all those elitists brb watching streams of elite players.
1 2 3 4 5 14 15 16 Next All
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
Kung Fu Cup
11:00
2026 Week 24
IntoTheiNu 1009
RotterdaM426
SteadfastSC119
Rex117
CosmosSc2 0
LiquipediaDiscussion
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
RotterdaM 463
ProTech138
SteadfastSC 128
Rex 112
CosmosSc2 1
StarCraft: Brood War
Britney 32313
Shuttle 2785
Bisu 1850
firebathero 1638
BeSt 529
Mini 325
Rush 296
Light 282
Stork 267
Last 143
[ Show more ]
Snow 135
JYJ 91
hero 64
Hyun 57
Shine 57
Shinee 54
PianO 49
ToSsGirL 34
Sharp 32
HiyA 24
Hm[arnc] 23
sorry 22
zelot 21
Aegong 19
Sexy 18
Icarus 5
Terrorterran 3
Dota 2
Gorgc6447
Dendi961
qojqva151
Counter-Strike
kRYSTAL_550
Other Games
olofmeister1339
B2W.Neo707
hiko392
XBOCT361
Lowko326
crisheroes307
DeMusliM232
Livibee160
Mew2King110
ArmadaUGS55
QueenE47
Organizations
Dota 2
PGL Dota 2 - Main Stream12721
StarCraft: Brood War
Afreeca ASL 451
[ Show 13 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• Berry_CruncH152
• mYiSmile118
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• intothetv
• Kozan
• IndyKCrew
• Migwel
StarCraft: Brood War
• BSLYoutube
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
Dota 2
• C_a_k_e 4696
League of Legends
• Nemesis867
Other Games
• WagamamaTV181
Upcoming Events
The PondCast
21h 16m
Replay Cast
1d 11h
Korean StarCraft League
2 days
CranKy Ducklings
2 days
GSL
3 days
Yamato Cup
4 days
Replay Cast
4 days
Afreeca Starleague
4 days
Soma vs Jaedong
WardiTV Weekly
4 days
Sparkling Tuna Cup
5 days
[ Show More ]
Afreeca Starleague
5 days
Leta vs Soulkey
PiGosaur Cup
6 days
Kung Fu Cup
6 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

Super Anchor Qualifying S3
Blizzard Classic Cup 2026
Big Dog Cup 2026 Div 1

Ongoing

ASL Season 22
CSL 2026 AUTUMN (S22)
Acropolis #5
Acropolis #5 - GSA
Calamity Invitational
Logitech G Play Connect 2026
SL StarSeries Fall 2026
FISSURE Playground #3
BLAST Open Fall 2026
Esports World Cup 2026
BLAST Bounty Summer 2026
BLAST Bounty Summer Qual
Stake Ranked Episode 3
XSE Pro League 2026

Upcoming

Acropolis #5 - GSB
Acropolis #5 - GSC
BSL Season 23
SC4ALL II: Brood War
BSL 23: Non-Korean Championship
HSC XXX
Stellar Fest 2: Lunar Cup
SC4ALL II: StarCraft II
Kung Fu Cup 2026 Grand Finals
RSL Offline Finals
Custodian Cup
Copium Cup
PGL Major Singapore 2026
Stake Ranked Episode 6
BLAST Rivals Fall 2026
IEM Beijing 2026
Stake Ranked Episode 5
PGL Masters Bucharest 2026
1win Private Club #2
Thunderpick World Champ. '26
ESL Pro League Season 24
Stake Ranked Episode 4
1win Private Club #1
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2026 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.