• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EST 18:16
CET 00:16
KST 08:16
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
RSL Season 3 - RO16 Groups C & D Preview0RSL Season 3 - RO16 Groups A & B Preview2TL.net Map Contest #21: Winners12Intel X Team Liquid Seoul event: Showmatches and Meet the Pros10[ASL20] Finals Preview: Arrival13
Community News
[TLMC] Fall/Winter 2025 Ladder Map Rotation13Weekly Cups (Nov 3-9): Clem Conquers in Canada4SC: Evo Complete - Ranked Ladder OPEN ALPHA8StarCraft, SC2, HotS, WC3, Returning to Blizzcon!45$5,000+ WardiTV 2025 Championship7
StarCraft 2
General
[TLMC] Fall/Winter 2025 Ladder Map Rotation Mech is the composition that needs teleportation t RotterdaM "Serral is the GOAT, and it's not close" RSL Season 3 - RO16 Groups C & D Preview TL.net Map Contest #21: Winners
Tourneys
RSL Revival: Season 3 Sparkling Tuna Cup - Weekly Open Tournament Constellation Cup - Main Event - Stellar Fest Tenacious Turtle Tussle Master Swan Open (Global Bronze-Master 2)
Strategy
Custom Maps
Map Editor closed ?
External Content
Mutation # 500 Fright night Mutation # 499 Chilling Adaptation Mutation # 498 Wheel of Misfortune|Cradle of Death Mutation # 497 Battle Haredened
Brood War
General
FlaSh on: Biggest Problem With SnOw's Playstyle BGH Auto Balance -> http://bghmmr.eu/ What happened to TvZ on Retro? SnOw's ASL S20 Finals Review BW General Discussion
Tourneys
[Megathread] Daily Proleagues Small VOD Thread 2.0 [BSL21] RO32 Group D - Sunday 21:00 CET [BSL21] RO32 Group C - Saturday 21:00 CET
Strategy
PvZ map balance Current Meta Simple Questions, Simple Answers How to stay on top of macro?
Other Games
General Games
Path of Exile Clair Obscur - Expedition 33 Should offensive tower rushing be viable in RTS games? Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread Nintendo Switch Thread
Dota 2
Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Deck construction bug Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
TL Mafia Community Thread SPIRED by.ASL Mafia {211640}
Community
General
US Politics Mega-thread About SC2SEA.COM Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine Russo-Ukrainian War Thread Canadian Politics Mega-thread
Fan Clubs
White-Ra Fan Club The herO Fan Club!
Media & Entertainment
Movie Discussion! [Manga] One Piece Anime Discussion Thread Korean Music Discussion Series you have seen recently...
Sports
2024 - 2026 Football Thread Formula 1 Discussion NBA General Discussion MLB/Baseball 2023 TeamLiquid Health and Fitness Initiative For 2023
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
SC2 Client Relocalization [Change SC2 Language] Linksys AE2500 USB WIFI keeps disconnecting Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread
TL Community
The Automated Ban List
Blogs
Dyadica Gospel – a Pulp No…
Hildegard
Coffee x Performance in Espo…
TrAiDoS
Saturation point
Uldridge
DnB/metal remix FFO Mick Go…
ImbaTosS
Reality "theory" prov…
perfectspheres
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 2196 users

PvZ: Reavers + Sair | Goon - Page 2

Forum Index > Brood War Strategy
Post a Reply
Prev 1 2 3 4 Next All
Veigh
Profile Joined November 2003
Netherlands300 Posts
October 24 2004 16:29 GMT
#21
Holy damn,
I think ShadowMaster deserves some credits for posts and answers like this.
If you like his ideas or not, at least these are the most thorough examinations in the whole strategy sections!

Good job and thanx!
Mirror matchups are imbalanced by definition
LastWish
Profile Blog Joined September 2004
2015 Posts
October 24 2004 18:41 GMT
#22
If u have corsairs quite early u can slow down zerg greatly, since he must cut down on drone production and must go eigher spores or den. I personally think that if u decide for spores, you waste 125(50 for drone) for evolution chamber, if u build 2 spores another 175*2=350 minerals. Otherwise u force zerg into using hydras early, being low on economy. Now u can try to use revear, i often see it with like 1:1 zeal,goon ,1 shuttle with revears, producing only goons from this moment.
Since perfect timing and micro is needed not many players use it.
Fisheye uses it on LT along with dropping 2 goons on expand cliff first, this way zerg must invest to another 1-2 sunken colonies to protect the cliff and withdraw drones till it's safe. Therefore on LT this strategy is quite safer i think.
- It's all just treason - They bring me down with their lies - Don't know the reason - My life is fire and ice -
Liquid`Jinro
Profile Blog Joined September 2002
Sweden33719 Posts
October 24 2004 19:53 GMT
#23
On October 24 2004 17:41 BigBalls wrote:
The ONLY thing reaver sair goon is good against is a 1 base zerg. thats it

*1 gas zerg.
But even then it's not that great, I like how kingdom zealot/reavers vs 1 gas zerg
Moderatortell the guy that interplanatar interaction is pivotal to terrans variety of optionitudals in the pre-midgame preperatories as well as the protosstinal deterriggation of elite zergling strikes - Stimey n | Formerly FrozenArbiter
klaasdebaas
Profile Joined October 2004
59 Posts
October 24 2004 20:56 GMT
#24
even mass lings > goon rvr :D
Liquid`Jinro
Profile Blog Joined September 2002
Sweden33719 Posts
October 24 2004 21:04 GMT
#25
No.

Because even if you somehow beat the attack your drones will all be dead ;o
Moderatortell the guy that interplanatar interaction is pivotal to terrans variety of optionitudals in the pre-midgame preperatories as well as the protosstinal deterriggation of elite zergling strikes - Stimey n | Formerly FrozenArbiter
SpuniasauR
Profile Joined September 2003
Australia1500 Posts
Last Edited: 2004-10-24 22:20:48
October 24 2004 22:20 GMT
#26
the real power of reaver/sair is on islands. for a few reasons. first, you dont have to worry about hydra/ling/lurker whatever rush, it will come by air and by then you should at LEAST have cannons. When going sair/reaver, what money does that leave you with if a zerg says "fuck you 3hatch hydra " before your reaver comes out?

anyway, thats early game. secondly, on islands you NEED sairs v. zerg to keep them in check, the versatility of lords, and speed of muta/scourge will beat the crap out of you if you dont have sairs covering your shuttles.
also, on islands zerg will have trouble massing ground units to combat you if you employ guerilla tactics. You have 1-2 hatches on a small island? well that wont be enough to get enough hydra to stop 3-4 reavers(microed) supported by sair and later dweb.

Then think about costs, on island pvz you need sairs, you also need shuttles (and maybe obs.). Unlike the other 2 races these are on different tech trees. So you are wasting alot of money to cover 1. the ground and 2. the air. You cant venture up the templar tree so soon to deal with zerg with storms, without 2-3 gas nodes. it just wont work. So, you need something that is dangerous, splashing, and cheaper than zealot/templar to throw at the zerg. ur answer is reavers.

That is why reaver/sair is so great. And i think on land maps reaver/goon is like terran metal v. zerg, can be good, DOES have the element of surprise, but ultimately there is only so much you can do with it, you dont have the versatility and power of templar/lot/goon, just like in tvz you dont have the microable, versatile and incredibly damaging M&M force.

My 2cents.
A firebat to your Zergling.
TH-GP
Profile Joined July 2004
Australia226 Posts
October 24 2004 22:41 GMT
#27
The involvement of reavers in PvZ is not simply just that, it requires the toss to be offensive early game with fast zeas to 3 gate zea/goons onto robo forcing z 2 sunken up and make lings 2 slow down on drone. Many of reps PvZ from T.3)Jeju involved early pressure toss then 4 gate + reaver 1 attack GG
ShadowMaster
Profile Joined September 2004
United States238 Posts
October 24 2004 23:51 GMT
#28
On October 25 2004 03:41 LastWish wrote:
If u have corsairs quite early u can slow down zerg greatly, since he must cut down on drone production and must go eigher spores or den. I personally think that if u decide for spores, you waste 125(50 for drone) for evolution chamber, if u build 2 spores another 175*2=350 minerals. Otherwise u force zerg into using hydras early, being low on economy. Now u can try to use revear, i often see it with like 1:1 zeal,goon ,1 shuttle with revears, producing only goons from this moment.
Since perfect timing and micro is needed not many players use it.
Fisheye uses it on LT along with dropping 2 goons on expand cliff first, this way zerg must invest to another 1-2 sunken colonies to protect the cliff and withdraw drones till it's safe. Therefore on LT this strategy is quite safer i think.

LastWish, that is exactly what I'm talking about Hydratech is no simple matter vs. Reavers and can easily blow up in the Zerg's face; it's really tough for even good players to keep up with Corsairs and Reavers in the early game using only hydras, and going colonies, while probably necessary, is a considerable investment that further justifies the strategy for the Protoss.

SpuniasauR, You are right, but I think that everyone will agree that generally Protoss are much easier to play on island maps than on land maps; thus we are examining this strategy on whether it is viable on a land type map. It's those early attacks that we are examining -- is Protoss okay?

ShadowMaster
Profile Joined September 2004
United States238 Posts
October 25 2004 00:17 GMT
#29
I've just updated the main post with what we seem to have established so far, and in italics, what we need to investigate next. I'll put it here, too, for good measure.

  • --Spiretech Zerg is the most dangerous for the Protoss. How should the Protoss deal with a Spireing Zerg?
  • ++Hydratech is not convincing as a strategy in the early game and might even be favorable to Protoss, but in the least offers chances to both sides.
  • ++Colonies seem to be required if the Zerg wants to ease the harrassment pressure, as most units may be out-maneuvered or spread too thin. Can Spire-Tech Zerg's safely forego investing in colonies?
  • ++Sauron Style Zerg (no colonies all game) without much Spire Tech is extremely risky for the Zerg player as he is especially vulnerable to harrassment.
  • ++The Zerg must be unusually conservative.Zerg trying to go mass expansions will have a hard time, as this strategy affords the Protoss a MUCH greater than usual degree of maneuverability.
NonYold
Profile Joined April 2004
United States2814 Posts
October 25 2004 01:56 GMT
#30
I feel like your analysis is naturally leading into an invalid direction. Allow me to explain...

Many of PvZ problems stem from the fact that Zerg is fast and versatile, and can switch units, strategy, and style very quickly. The Protoss is often left guessing what units to build and what strategy to apply to a particular game. For example, if a Protoss rushes with zealots, but can't win the game instantly, then the Zerg can effectively get lurkers, mutas, upgraded hydras, lings, or a combo of these without the Protoss knowing exactly what the Zerg is doing. So the Protoss has to prepare for all of it, generally getting storm and cannons, then reacting more specifically once the Zerg is found out.

What is the solution to this? The Protoss can make moves to force the Zerg into doing something. Corsair/goon/reaver forces a reaction out of a Zerg, which you can see in real-time. You can see what units are hatching out of the eggs, what buildings are being built, and how his current army is being allocated. Thus, in a general sense, you can counter his strategy instantly, rather than as a reaction, and see the game several moves ahead.

By playing this way, you never expect one particular move to win the game. Instead, you just expect for your moves to put you a step ahead. It could be that you win on your first advantageous move, and it could be that it takes 40 minutes. To me, this is the "correct" way to play PvZ, given all the nuances and unique qualities of the matchup.

So, if I were to go corsair -> goon/reaver, it would be so that I can possibly kill a few overlords, harrass with reaver drop, safely establish my natural, and see what my opponent is doing the entire time. In this way, I'm controlling the flow of the game. I can decide if it's a good idea to try for a "finishing blow" by actually taking my utility army of corsair/goon/reaver, and turning it into a real attacking army. Otherwise, the utility army makes a great defensive army, and allows for me to get a real attacking army (templars) while maintaining that utility.
rednob
Profile Joined October 2004
Korea (South)210 Posts
October 25 2004 02:19 GMT
#31
I believe NonY's most important points are (correct me if I am mistaken, please):

(1) In a PvZ, if Protoss goes Corsair, they know what the Zerg is doing and can react. Protoss doesn't have to build against multiple things or guess, but will have a correct, but debatably weaker (due to building the Corsair) reaction.

(2) In a PvZ, if Protoss does not Corsair, the Zerg can keep them blind until they make their first real move (Lurker, Muta, Hydra, etc.); Protoss has to build to be safe from it all or guess.

(3) ShadowMaster's excellent work is not consistent with the above two points (I have not personally checked -- this is soley from NonY's above post.
A forum is as good as its worst member, or maybe a little better than that if you are good at skimming.
ShadowMaster
Profile Joined September 2004
United States238 Posts
October 25 2004 02:31 GMT
#32
On October 25 2004 10:56 NonY wrote:
I feel like your analysis is naturally leading into an invalid direction. Allow me to explain...

Many of PvZ problems stem from the fact that Zerg is fast and versatile, and can switch units, strategy, and style very quickly. The Protoss is often left guessing what units to build and what strategy to apply to a particular game. For example, if a Protoss rushes with zealots, but can't win the game instantly, then the Zerg can effectively get lurkers, mutas, upgraded hydras, lings, or a combo of these without the Protoss knowing exactly what the Zerg is doing. So the Protoss has to prepare for all of it, generally getting storm and cannons, then reacting more specifically once the Zerg is found out.

What is the solution to this? The Protoss can make moves to force the Zerg into doing something. Corsair/goon/reaver forces a reaction out of a Zerg, which you can see in real-time. You can see what units are hatching out of the eggs, what buildings are being built, and how his current army is being allocated. Thus, in a general sense, you can counter his strategy instantly, rather than as a reaction, and see the game several moves ahead.

By playing this way, you never expect one particular move to win the game. Instead, you just expect for your moves to put you a step ahead. It could be that you win on your first advantageous move, and it could be that it takes 40 minutes. To me, this is the "correct" way to play PvZ, given all the nuances and unique qualities of the matchup.

So, if I were to go corsair -> goon/reaver, it would be so that I can possibly kill a few overlords, harrass with reaver drop, safely establish my natural, and see what my opponent is doing the entire time. In this way, I'm controlling the flow of the game. I can decide if it's a good idea to try for a "finishing blow" by actually taking my utility army of corsair/goon/reaver, and turning it into a real attacking army. Otherwise, the utility army makes a great defensive army, and allows for me to get a real attacking army (templars) while maintaining that utility.


Excellent post. You are elaborating on what I called the Physical and Psychological aspects of the strategy, as mentioned in the original post. Physically the whole game takes a different flavor than old conventional PvZ games -- as you mention in your third and fifth paragraphs. This physical change will naturally put many Zerg players into a psychological rut; as you said, suddenly it is THEY who are forced to react.

I'm confused by your first statement, though. " I feel like your analysis is naturally leading into an invalid direction. Allow me to explain...". What analysis are you referring to? Your post seems to support the strategy.
ShadowMaster
Profile Joined September 2004
United States238 Posts
October 25 2004 03:54 GMT
#33
I will reiterate, to use this strategy, the Protoss cannot be lazy and must micro and harrass like mad. Here is a perfect example of what not to do.

Game Analysis: Didi8 vs. Rabbit, Lost Temple 9 vs. 3, 1.09.
Category: The Trouble with Reavers (What Not To Do)
Replay: In the pack here.

Of Particular Interest:
  • Didi8 remembered to leave a Reaver at his entrance while he sent another 2 Reavers on a raid, not neglecting his defense and buying time if he should need to bring the others back.
  • Didi8 Reaver micro was absolutely awful, as he just let them sit vs. the Hydras when his natural was first attacked. Reavers MUST be microed.
  • Didi8 did not micro.
  • Didi8 did not counter.
  • Didi8 did a wonderful job of showing what NOT TO DO with Reavers.

Report: A highly suspect build order (available here), made possible by the conservative game Zerg chose. Protoss chooses a strange mass-Reaver strategy, having 6 Reavers and only 2 Goons, 2 Zealots by the time he expands at 10:00. Notice that Zerg went late lair and Protoss knew it. Zerg attacked with mass hydras and focused on the Reavers, and Didi8 let them die without trying to save them. Zerg switches to mass Mutes and Protoss is helpless, having gone total Reavers. Conclusion: Mass Reavers sucks. Although this is low-quality play from the Protoss, this shows the sort of thing that users of this strategy must take efforts to avoid.
NonYold
Profile Joined April 2004
United States2814 Posts
October 25 2004 05:31 GMT
#34
I think I kind of misread when I disagreed in my first line. I do have some further elaboration to make, but I'll do that after I finish my homework :O
ShadowMaster
Profile Joined September 2004
United States238 Posts
October 25 2004 05:35 GMT
#35
Game Analysis: ArtToss vs. JulyZerg (Gurince), LT 9 vs 6.
Category: Countering Sair/Reaver to Goon/Reaver (Spire)
Replay: ArtToss vs JulyZerg

Strategic Notes:
  • As has been mentioned, this strategy is best at more distant starting spots. The close position made things harder for the Protoss.
  • The Protoss efforts to deny the Zerg expansion would actually have been counter-productive in different starting positions. In positions where the Protoss has more room to move (if the Toss was in any other position). Giving the Zerg more space actually increases the effectiveness of the Reavers, as you have more potential targets. However, in these close starting positions, it wouldn't have helped much.
  • Notice how effectively the Zerg was able to counter the Reaver/Goon with his Muta/Scourge/Ling. This is what Zerg should try to do vs. this strategy.


In Conclusion:
JulyZerg met it with the timing and reflexes of a pro (hmm... wonder why?) and dealt it a real blow. It would appear that Corsair + Reaver to Reaver + Goon is very high-risk at such close positions, as Spire tech will blow the Zerg away. Notice, however, that if the Zerg had not gone spire but had tried to stick with Hydras, the close positions would instead have favored Protoss because he could drop faster while the Hydras would not get to his base any faster.

A beautifully accurate play by JulyZerg, showing why he is one of the best.
Empyrean
Profile Blog Joined September 2004
17017 Posts
October 25 2004 10:02 GMT
#36
On October 24 2004 22:10 ShadowMaster wrote:
This_is_not_a_smurf, in the example I was referring to with the original notes, it was all about two corsairs -- the only two that were made in the game. As far as Protoss units go, I don't think Corsairs are generally considered overly expensive; sure, the 150 gas Stargate + 100 gas Corsair could be usefully spent elsewhere, but countless Korean gosus seem to think that the Corsair is worth it, even just as a scout. I think that that one extra Corsair might be worth it for how much more dangerous it makes your overlord-hunting/harrassment expeditions.
Yes, shuttles are definitely higher priority targets than Corsairs. But if you check the replay I was referring to, you'll see what I mean. Again, Spiretech is a whole different game, but against Hydras, there are several AI abuse type things you can pull that give you that extra second you might need. Just an idea, though.
You've seen the way Yellow and other Zergs like to send out ovies all over the map as soon as they have the speed upgrade, surrounding the enemy base and so scanning for any shuttles or probes leaving. With just two Corsairs, this is suddenly much more difficult for the Zerg. It's like an anti-hack
The topic of whether the Corsair is worth it early game is definitely debatable, but by that very fact I think their value is apparent.


Oh sorry, I didn't check the replay :D
Moderator
ShadowMaster
Profile Joined September 2004
United States238 Posts
Last Edited: 2004-10-26 02:23:45
October 26 2004 02:17 GMT
#37
[EDIT] -- I am moving this post to a new thread. Let's keep this thread as an analysis of the early-game Reaver strategies, which, if moderately successful, will lead to the midgame strategies discussed in the next thread.
KiLLme1st
Profile Joined December 2003
United States1824 Posts
October 26 2004 02:26 GMT
#38
Shadow I sware you must be a teacher or something, and if you aren't you better look into it. You could teach a complete newb about the basics of BW, and different strategy ideas, with your detailed outlined posts. I am very very impressed !
CAPSLOCK IS AUTOPILOT FOR COOL
S(O)ME(O)NE
Profile Joined December 2002
Canada473 Posts
October 26 2004 06:27 GMT
#39
i think i would rather make zealots than goons speedy zealots. It would probably be great on a map where there is a freebee expand like biofrost. You could just turtle up and go out with reavers and millions of zealots. and if u have an citadel its not so bad to do tech switch. A siar would do great to socut also.
ShadowMaster
Profile Joined September 2004
United States238 Posts
October 27 2004 00:41 GMT
#40
On October 26 2004 15:27 S(O)ME(O)NE wrote:
i think i would rather make zealots than goons speedy zealots. It would probably be great on a map where there is a freebee expand like biofrost. You could just turtle up and go out with reavers and millions of zealots. and if u have an citadel its not so bad to do tech switch. A siar would do great to socut also.


I'm afraid I don't quite see your idea. With Zealots you are completely asking for Mutalisk, which is already the best Zerg option, and Zealots don't complement Reavers very well for main attack forces. Maybe you are talking about switching techs, like we've mentioned, to Zealots + Templar. That is definitely one of the main features of this strategy, and even of the whole game of Starcraft: knowing when to change strategies.
Prev 1 2 3 4 Next All
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
Replay Cast
23:00
WardiTV Mondays #59
CranKy Ducklings27
LiquipediaDiscussion
BSL 21
20:00
ProLeague - RO32 Group D
JDConan vs Semih
Dragon vs Dienmax
Tech vs NewOcean
TerrOr vs Artosis
ZZZero.O259
LiquipediaDiscussion
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
Nathanias 230
Ketroc 28
DisKSc2 22
StarCraft: Brood War
Artosis 284
ZZZero.O 259
yabsab 8
Dota 2
Pyrionflax187
LuMiX1
League of Legends
JimRising 355
Counter-Strike
fl0m1383
kRYSTAL_112
Super Smash Bros
hungrybox565
AZ_Axe68
Heroes of the Storm
Khaldor184
Other Games
tarik_tv10749
gofns7977
Grubby4875
ToD128
Maynarde93
Organizations
Other Games
EGCTV914
gamesdonequick775
StarCraft 2
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
sctven
[ Show 22 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• Hupsaiya 81
• RyuSc2 50
• davetesta35
• musti20045 25
• HeavenSC 22
• Adnapsc2 5
• OhrlRock 1
• Migwel
• sooper7s
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• intothetv
• Kozan
• IndyKCrew
• LaughNgamezSOOP
StarCraft: Brood War
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
• BSLYoutube
Dota 2
• masondota21610
• Ler78
League of Legends
• Doublelift3024
Other Games
• imaqtpie1676
• Shiphtur283
Upcoming Events
Wardi Open
12h 44m
Monday Night Weeklies
17h 44m
Replay Cast
23h 44m
WardiTV Korean Royale
1d 12h
BSL: GosuLeague
1d 21h
The PondCast
2 days
Replay Cast
2 days
RSL Revival
3 days
BSL: GosuLeague
3 days
RSL Revival
4 days
[ Show More ]
WardiTV Korean Royale
4 days
RSL Revival
5 days
WardiTV Korean Royale
5 days
IPSL
5 days
Julia vs Artosis
JDConan vs DragOn
RSL Revival
6 days
Wardi Open
6 days
IPSL
6 days
StRyKeR vs OldBoy
Sziky vs Tarson
Replay Cast
6 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

Proleague 2025-11-14
Stellar Fest: Constellation Cup
Eternal Conflict S1

Ongoing

C-Race Season 1
IPSL Winter 2025-26
KCM Race Survival 2025 Season 4
SOOP Univ League 2025
YSL S2
BSL Season 21
CSCL: Masked Kings S3
SLON Tour Season 2
RSL Revival: Season 3
META Madness #9
BLAST Rivals Fall 2025
IEM Chengdu 2025
PGL Masters Bucharest 2025
Thunderpick World Champ.
CS Asia Championships 2025
ESL Pro League S22
StarSeries Fall 2025
FISSURE Playground #2
BLAST Open Fall 2025

Upcoming

BSL 21 Non-Korean Championship
Acropolis #4
IPSL Spring 2026
HSC XXVIII
RSL Offline Finals
WardiTV 2025
IEM Kraków 2026
BLAST Bounty Winter 2026
BLAST Bounty Winter 2026: Closed Qualifier
eXTREMESLAND 2025
ESL Impact League Season 8
SL Budapest Major 2025
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2025 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.