The Automated Ban List - Page 111

On July 12 2010 15:51 Chill wrote:
Use the search function. The clear explanation has been given multiple times.

On July 12 2010 19:21 7mk wrote:
here's a nice football related ban by brood :

http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=32696&currentpage=331#6620

On July 12 2010 08:14 baller wrote:
yah man we cant let this forum be destroyed by liars.

if starcraft nerds can lie about girls, whats next? how much $$ they make? their ladder rank?

its a slippers elope

On July 13 2010 03:03 derpaderp wrote:
i havent seen idra post recently. Is it because of his ban from the smuft ordeal? or is he just pissed off that he doesnt get respect from the sc2 newbs

On July 13 2010 03:49 Megalisk wrote:


Maybe its cause hes practicing his ass off in sc2.

On July 13 2010 04:03 motbob wrote:

I think there is a significant flaw in your hypothesis.

On July 13 2010 03:36 derpaderp wrote:
he had to get his 15000 posts somehow. Theres definitely a change of rate between "now" and "the rest of the time," and i'm wondering what might have caused it.

On July 13 2010 22:42 H wrote:
The "NSFW pic thread" isn't going away, it's just turning into the "pic thread".

Africa is poor because they had a giant fucking dessert running through it cutting off trade and expansion for the last couple thousand years, and the economic and social development that goes along with it. Northern africa isn't that bad. In fact, some small northern african countries along the coast have standards of living that rival many european countries.


Canada is wealthy because you have 10x the amount if natural resources that had never been touched or developed upon then any other nation save America, as well as continuous trade with the most power and wealthy nation throughout most of the last couple centuries.


Stop being a smug little bitch.

User was temp banned for this post.

On June 28 2010 01:31 sikyon wrote:
Alot of people are mad because they decided to host in toronto. CLEARLY they should have GIVEN IN to the protestors and moved the conference elsewhere.

SCREW THAT. That's letting violence and intimidation win. I refuse to allow my government to give into that shit. These violent protesters do not speak for me and I want to see them arrested and do time in jail. I want to see their lives ruined as they can't get decent jobs or leave the country upon release and learn what it means to live in a developed nation - what sorts of responsibilities you have to the public order.



THIS is why the rich countries are rich and why the poor countries are poor.

User was temp banned for this post.

On June 28 2010 06:21 travis wrote:


That's funny, there are plenty of super rich countries in the middle east and they are IN THE MIDDLE OF A DESERT. Guess why? They had resources they are able to sell, for their own country's economy. If you think exploitation of africa has played no role regarding their current economic state you are about as ignorant as you can get. From the slave trade, to goods like sugar and tobacco, to minerals and gemstones(diamonds anyone?), to metals, to oil - to even warfare(selling of weapons - leads to western profits), exploitation of africa has held that region down for centuries. How much money has africa made off of the things I listed compared to how much money the west has made off of them? God damn, you're just so clueless I really don't even want to put much effort into this post because it's so freaking obvious.

I've stopped caring if I hurt people's sensitivities. I am just going to say it as it is. You deserve to have your sensitivities hurt when you post like you're an expert or something when it's clear you've actually done little to no research at all.

On July 14 2010 01:29 travis wrote:
I don't think I misread it, but I think you edited your post or something. I recall that whoever I was replying to claimed that exploitation of africa had very little to do with it's current economic state.

(though I am sorry if I am mistaken about this... but I really don't think I am)

well I read it again and I guess if you didn't edit your post then I did misinterpret you, though that isn't really my fault though is it? sorry anyways if that's the case.

On July 14 2010 01:30 zatic wrote:
Well, unluckily for you there is nothing about justified insults in our rule book. Moderators may let things slide sometimes but I wouldn't bet on it.

Dealing with racists is also not your job, but the moderator's. You could have just PMd one about it.

This doesn't mean you can't get verbally medieval on someone's ass every once in a while. We don't run the place like a monestary. But, flames are generally discouraged and we expect people to have a damn good reason for resorting to harsh language in the forums. This means gratuitous swearing is a no-no. Generic trolling will get you banned. If you must flame, be smart or creative about it, and make sure the flame was warranted to begin with. Generally, you'll never go wrong by being nice, polite and mature. All just common sense, people.

Generally, you'll never go wrong by being nice, polite and mature. All just common sense, people.