EPTwhy are there so many reasonless bans just now?
The Automated Ban List - Page 112
| Forum Index > TL Community |
This thread is for discussing recent bans. Don't discuss other topics here. Take it to website feedback if you disagree with a ban or want to raise an issue. Keep it civil. NOTE: For those of you who want to find the actual ABL thread where the bans are posted. Please look in here: https://tl.net/forum/closed-threads/ | ||
|
RAUS
210 Posts
why are there so many reasonless bans just now? | ||
|
Neobick
Sweden208 Posts
And why? If moderation is done with people with no other tasks assigned to them, wouldnt reasons for ban be much less time-consuming, if you factor the increase in moderation. | ||
CTStalker
Canada9720 Posts
| ||
Chill
Calgary25998 Posts
On July 14 2010 02:25 derpaderp wrote: when did this thread become a place to contest bans? I guess there hasnt been that many lolworthy bans lately, but still.. why are there so many reasonless bans just now? R1CH is tinkering with stuff and it's replacing what we write with "I have my reasons."  | ||
|
RAUS
210 Posts
like the automatic server status, the UDP program, and now hes fixing tl? | ||
|
semantics
10040 Posts
I'm wonder when a banling bans someone will it show up as theirs or as another mod's i'm still waiting for the first banling ban. | ||
|
Kralic
Canada2628 Posts
On July 14 2010 03:03 derpaderp wrote: why is r1ch such a baller, and why isnt there a thread dedicated to his updates/contributions? like the automatic server status, the UDP program, and now hes fixing tl? R1ch's fancy changelog thread I think the automatic server status was done by someone else but I could be wrong. Too many 0 post PBU's in the list lately. The closed section is always on when I am at work waiting for the next lolban.) I guess no bans = a smooth running forum!  | ||
|
Ichabod
United States1659 Posts
Thanks for all you contribute, keep it up! | ||
|
Zona
40426 Posts
Retribu1 was just banned by Puosu. That account was created on 2010-07-14 03:19:07 and had 2 posts.It is definitely not acceptable to commit personal harassment like that towards any member of this site. First blood drawn by our new banlings! | ||
|
Harem
United States11393 Posts
First blood was already drawn before that (twice) but there was an issue where the mod who approved the ban in queued list would be credited in actual ban list thread. | ||
|
Craton
United States17281 Posts
On July 14 2010 06:55 Ichabod wrote: Was wondering about the "reasonless" bans (freaked out a little, and started to calculate my posts/day). Good to hear that's its just part of the ongoing improvement to TL.net Thanks for all you contribute, keep it up! That particular statistic already exists in your profile -- you don't have to calculate it. | ||
|
R1CH
Netherlands10342 Posts
On July 14 2010 02:49 Chill wrote: R1CH is tinkering with stuff and it's replacing what we write with "I have my reasons." You're supposed to PM me with bugs like this so I don't have to dig through random threads . | ||
|
3clipse
Canada2555 Posts
On July 14 2010 09:22 Jumperer wrote: I agreed with your philosophy, but just because I didn't say anything about the root of the problem doesn't make me a defeatist. I was merely focusing directly on YPANG's situation rather than going into dreamland. There isn't really anything to argue about. This is what they trained me to do as a psychologist. Imagine seeing a therapist and have them say something about "changing the root of the problem." It's unneeded and unnecessary. There is only one way to settle this debate. 1v1 Starcraft. User was temp banned for this post. This is an absurd ban. Koreasilver deserved his for pulling the "you're a fucking idiot" debate trump card, but Jumperer stayed quite civil. | ||
|
Bereft
United States1007 Posts
On July 14 2010 10:00 3clipse wrote: This is an absurd ban. Koreasilver deserved his for pulling the "you're a fucking idiot" debate trump card, but Jumperer stayed quite civil. That is a bit ridiculous... What thread is it from? | ||
|
motbob
United States12546 Posts
Jumperer wrote: Congratulation, you managed to twist and turn and nerdified this issue in order to protect your badly damaged ego from a defeat. Now instead of Ypang, it's about craps nobody cares about. | ||
|
micronesia
United States24770 Posts
On July 14 2010 10:13 motbob wrote: Maybe quoting the most egregious offense from Jumperer in the thread, instead of only the last post he made, will make the ban seem more reasonable: Yes there was actually an error made. The post where the red 'user was temp banned for this post' message showed up was not where it should have been. The ban system is actually a bit confusing the first time. After being warned for an arguably bannable offense he didn't tone it down in the same thread where he had just been warned. | ||
|
semantics
10040 Posts
| ||
|
Kashmir
New Zealand178 Posts
On July 06 2010 07:28 Craton wrote: I just facepalmed after realizing you could do that. I'd been literally going through dozens of recent posts trying to find that *special one* while reading through the automated ban list. .____. That makes me the third amigo then >.< | ||
|
Saturnize
United States2473 Posts
On July 14 2010 10:07 Bereft wrote: That is a bit ridiculous... What thread is it from? YPangs blog i think I literally ROFL when I read "There is only one way to settle this debate. 1v1 Starcraft" bwahahaha | ||
|
Radnewt
United States67 Posts
On July 14 2010 02:49 Chill wrote: R1CH is tinkering with stuff and it's replacing what we write with "I have my reasons." Speaking of that, I got a pretty good chuckle out of "teamIiquid.net was just banned by Chill." Followed up by, "I have my reasons." The whole website was banned by Chill! I think this defines a paradox. lol. | ||
| ||
