On June 26 2012 03:06 dAPhREAk wrote: weird that clazerxsniper gets a ban when he gets flamed by praetorial by PM, but i get an unsolicited pm, but no action is taken. i am very curious as to the moderation on PMs and how it is determined.
You have to report them!
I did. tofucake confirmed it was in some moderator queue.
Actually yeah, the one time I reported a PM it took quite a while for the guy to get banned. I was never all that sure how PMs ranked in terms of priority for mods versus threads.
On June 26 2012 03:06 dAPhREAk wrote: weird that clazerxsniper gets a ban when he gets flamed by praetorial by PM, but i get an unsolicited pm, but no action is taken. i am very curious as to the moderation on PMs and how it is determined.
Well, I just wanted to tell him he wasn't funny instead of calling him out in his thread...but then he unleashed an inferno.
i am curious how you expected him to respond to your PM?
On June 26 2012 03:06 dAPhREAk wrote: weird that clazerxsniper gets a ban when he gets flamed by praetorial by PM, but i get an unsolicited pm, but no action is taken. i am very curious as to the moderation on PMs and how it is determined.
Well, I just wanted to tell him he wasn't funny instead of calling him out in his thread...but then he unleashed an inferno.
i am curious how you expected him to respond to your PM?
With brilliant wit?
"a geniuos maaeks a funnyt therd and tehn an asshowl is stupuid cant see funny he die"
On June 25 2012 02:24 Grobyc wrote: They don't stack though. A mod would have to set a reminder to apply the second one afaik.
Or he could come back in 90 days and request a second one.
Or a mod could just ban him for 180 days lol...not like there is preset ban times that mods must choose from.
Wtf -_-
Please don't ever speak for us again, ever, ever. I'm not even joking.
Shhh..no tears..
He meant that you don't know so don't act as if you did and I don't get your reason to play with a fire.
I've seen strange bans before, so I was simply saying a mod COULD do 180 days, because its been demonstrated. As for the buttons I was wrong on that, and someone had corrected me already (the more you know!).
Being wrong is ok , no need for ETT to have responded like that.
That account was created on 2006-07-18 09:38:30 and had 1298 posts.
Reason: You've had enough chances here.
Goddamnit empyrean, now the drug-trafficking, murdering, evil blizzard who hack specific players' games will go unnoticed. Failsafe was the only one sane enough to see the truth.
On Just 26 2012 06:01 TL.net Bot wrote: toiletCAT was just temp banned for 2 days by GMarshal.
That account was created on 2012-06-06 00:13:57 and had 253 posts.
Reason: I've warned you about image macros before.
Do not post them.
Also, spell out words like "you" and "are"
The sad part about his post was that it started off passable, and then he dumbed it down each time he edited to blaspheme the English language and add image macros. Personally witnessing such regression done voluntarily is... disheartening.
frezMki was just temp banned for 1 week by Empyrean.
That account was created on 2011-01-09 09:09:05 and had 36 posts.
Reason: Alright, you've already racked up two warnings in the past three days for posting like shit in the strategy forum. Shape up when you get back or don't bother coming back.
You're also banned from the strategy forum for a week.
This caught my attention. The ban reason means he's banned from strat for another week once he comes off the ban?