EPT
Ask TL Staff Anything - Page 201
| Forum Index > TL Community |
Please, if you are not staff, don't answer questions in this thread, even if you think you know the answer. Also, please take complains about bans, question about TL as a site, etc to the Website Feedback Forum. | ||
]343[
United States10328 Posts
| ||
|
Kleataurus
Australia56 Posts
On August 28 2012 05:53 flamewheel wrote: america ![[image loading]](http://i.imgur.com/Ommbc.png) Haha great successes Mr. Wheel also how many staff are from the land known as Australia | ||
Empyrean
16998 Posts
| ||
|
NewbieOne
Poland560 Posts
| ||
|
Randomaccount#77123
United States5003 Posts
| ||
Plexa
Aotearoa39261 Posts
On August 28 2012 12:50 redtooth wrote: lost in the swarm of FW's posts. still unanswered =/ I don't think you're going to get an answer on this, fyi. | ||
|
Epishade
United States2267 Posts
| ||
|
rredtooth
5460 Posts
On August 28 2012 22:11 Plexa wrote: I don't think you're going to get an answer on this, fyi. kk ty. | ||
|
marttorn
Norway5211 Posts
On August 28 2012 22:06 Barrin wrote: There is already a sorta unwritten rule about this. It's called "backseat moderating" and it is highly discouraged. I'm sure several people have been warned for multiple offenses, not sure if anyone's ever been banned for it. I agree with cracking down more on this (including making the rule more obvious). Happy Birthday yo, get anything nice? :D | ||
|
KwarK
United States42983 Posts
On August 29 2012 03:47 Epishade wrote: How did the moderators and banlings get to their status? ie. how did they become mods/who chose them? A little over two years ago Hot_Bid sent out a number of PMs inviting a select few people to become banlings, part of a reorganising of staff into specific roles rather than the previous blue and red system. Most of the current banlings were part of this wave although some more have subsequently been offered the position. Banlings, like most other staff members, generally already have a relationship with tl staff in some way, for example I had been on the writing staff for many years before I was offered the position. However some have just been notable veterans who contribute by their consistent quality posting rather than as members of staff. Since the initial wave promotion has either been a product of the mysterious processes at TL HQ or by acclamation in which they get suggested and everyone in the banling forum likes the idea. | ||
|
Epishade
United States2267 Posts
Always interesting learning the history of TL. | ||
Chill
Calgary25981 Posts
Moderators almost never lose their status unless they request it or prove they can no longer be trusted. Banlings have lost their status when they are given a trial and their moderating style doesn't fit in line with TL. Again, once they pass their trial period it's fairly difficult to lose their status. | ||
|
Bibbit
Canada5377 Posts
On August 29 2012 05:19 Chill wrote: There's also a thread in the Men in Red forum where we discuss potential Banlings. There is likely a similar thread in the administrator forum. Moderators almost never lose their status unless they request it or prove they can no longer be trusted. Banlings have lost their status when they are given a trial and their moderating style doesn't fit in line with TL. Again, once they pass their trial period it's fairly difficult to lose their status. So thats actually happened with a Banling losing their status? I can only think of incontrol and I always heard he voluntarily stepped down. Then again there was some drama around him at the time so I dont know T_T | ||
|
Probe1
United States17920 Posts
On August 28 2012 22:06 Barrin wrote: There is already a sorta unwritten rule about this. It's called "backseat moderating" and it is highly discouraged. I'm sure several people have been warned for multiple offenses, not sure if anyone's ever been banned for it. I agree with cracking down more on this (including making the rule more obvious). Funny you should say that. Anyway I just wanted to say happy birthday yo! | ||
salle
Sweden5554 Posts
On August 29 2012 03:47 Epishade wrote: How did the moderators and banlings get to their status? ie. how did they become mods/who chose them? Well you can read my one and only blog entry for a lot of it. But I guess I kept contributing to the wiki and helping people out and I wasn't too obnoxious and annoying to the other staff members. And when Aesop stepped down from the position as Head of Liquipedia I was asked if I wanted to take over, and I did, and I got red at the same time. And by who? The admins, but it was Plexa that contacted me, IIRC. | ||
|
NewbieOne
Poland560 Posts
| ||
|
Empyrean
16998 Posts
| ||
SirJolt
the Dagon Knight4004 Posts
On August 29 2012 06:11 NewbieOne wrote: Hey, guys, there is one more thing I'd like to mention, which is not purely a question, so I apologise if this is slightly off-topic from this POV. I've just got my first warning today and noticed the cute little closing line: "(Do not reply to this message. No one will receive it.)" just after a, "thank you for your cooperation." It could be taken at face value as a neutral information but I don't think anybody receiving or giving a warning (due to the emotions involved) would take it like that. So here's question: is that line really meant at face value or is it meant as an insult? This is a serious question, not a rage question. I'm sorry, maybe I'm a little slow on the uptake, but could you explain how that could be taken as an insult? | ||
|
salle
Sweden5554 Posts
I'm sure the funny guys on staff could think up something better if it was meant as an insult. And I think the phrasing is close enough to a lot of automated email messages I've gotten. | ||
|
1handsomE
United States199 Posts
| ||
| ||
