Simple Questions Simple Answers - Page 40
| Forum Index > Tech Support |
|
Perryy
54 Posts
| ||
|
Rannasha
Netherlands2398 Posts
On January 21 2012 01:08 Perryy wrote: Do I need to apply the thermal paste to the top of the processor before putting this fan/heatsink over the processor? Unless the heatsink has some thermal interface pad on it already (like the Intel stock coolers do), you have to apply thermal paste. Drop a rice grain sized blob of paste on the processor and install the heatsink according to the instructions. The pressure of the heatsink will spread the thermal paste. | ||
|
Perryy
54 Posts
On January 21 2012 01:13 Rannasha wrote: Unless the heatsink has some thermal interface pad on it already (like the Intel stock coolers do), you have to apply thermal paste. Drop a rice grain sized blob of paste on the processor and install the heatsink according to the instructions. The pressure of the heatsink will spread the thermal paste. Is it extremely noticeable if the heatsink already has the thermal pad on it? | ||
|
Garnet
Vietnam9033 Posts
On January 21 2012 00:20 Rannasha wrote: No, 1280x960 is 4:3 like you said. Widescreen generally means 16: 9 or 16:10. SC2 gives you the best field-of-view with 16: 9. You should be able to see if your monitor is not running at its optimal resolution, because the rescaling it has to do should make fine details like text quite blurry. If the monitor runs at the native resolution, everything should be sharp. Post the model of the monitor if you need more info. It's a Dell SE198WFP. | ||
|
skyR
Canada13817 Posts
On January 21 2012 01:27 Perryy wrote:+ Show Spoiler + On January 21 2012 01:13 Rannasha wrote: Unless the heatsink has some thermal interface pad on it already (like the Intel stock coolers do), you have to apply thermal paste. Drop a rice grain sized blob of paste on the processor and install the heatsink according to the instructions. The pressure of the heatsink will spread the thermal paste. Is it extremely noticeable if the heatsink already has the thermal pad on it? Yes it is. You either see metal or you don't. | ||
|
Womwomwom
5930 Posts
Are you using VGA or DVI. nVidia's Flat Panel Scaling, which should solve the issue, doesn't work with VGA. | ||
|
Garnet
Vietnam9033 Posts
On January 21 2012 02:52 Womwomwom wrote: Are you using VGA or DVI. nVidia's Flat Panel Scaling, which should solve the issue, doesn't work with VGA. I'm using VGA. Apparently someone else also had this problem and he said the monitor only work in XP and Vista. Windows 7 did install the driver but it didn't seem to do anything. Still can't use the optimum resolution. So anti-climatic when my dad finally get me smt and it doesn't even work. | ||
|
Womwomwom
5930 Posts
Ditch the VGA, use DVI, and the problem will be solved. I have no idea why people are still using analogue video outputs in this day and age. Edit: I am very certain that DVI (and if required, Flat Panel Scaling in the nvidia drivers) will solve the issue unless you've screwed some video setting in the monitor's OSD or GPU driver. Its a very old monitor and I don't have a Dell monitor anymore so I can't help you if the DVI cable doesn't work. | ||
|
Perryy
54 Posts
| ||
|
Medrea
10003 Posts
On January 21 2012 05:50 Perryy wrote: Can you OC a 2nd gen Intel i5 Processor from 3.3 Ghz to 4.0 Ghz using the stock fan/heatsink that comes with it without worrying about overheating? If not, what's the most I can do with this? Not really. The stock solution is really shitty and even 3.3 to 4.0 will heat the processor up quite significantly. With that fan 4.0ghz sounds reasonable. | ||
|
TuckFexas
United States154 Posts
The Catalyst Control center says: 715MHz out of 740Mhz High Performance memory clock settings 900MHz out of 100MHz fans doing whatever (30%, 50% ect) | ||
|
skyR
Canada13817 Posts
| ||
|
Myrmidon
United States9452 Posts
But really, what are temperatures under load? | ||
|
Nabutso
351 Posts
You could try setting a manual fan speed if you don't mind the noise. | ||
|
LilClinkin
Australia667 Posts
| ||
|
Myrmidon
United States9452 Posts
On January 21 2012 07:55 LilClinkin wrote: Can the Intel Core i7-2630QM notebook processor run videos at 1920x1200 on an externally connected monitor? Yeah, unless the video is some insane (non-standard super-high-def) bitrate/resolution/fps/encoding monster. Typical content should be easily no problem and no problem for most any modern laptop or desktop processor. | ||
|
Alryk
United States2718 Posts
| ||
|
Myrmidon
United States9452 Posts
On January 21 2012 08:06 Alryk wrote: Will the 7000m or 600m series have any 28nm cards, or are they ALL redone 40nm? At the moment announced models are all 40nm, but my guess is that the highest-end models released later will be 28nm to match the desktop parts. That's just a guess and may be wrong. e.g. 7990M may use the chip used in the desktop 78xx. Desktop 77xx should also be 28nm so maybe 78xxM will correspond to those. Or maybe they'll just recycle old designs. | ||
|
Alryk
United States2718 Posts
On January 21 2012 08:25 Myrmidon wrote: At the moment announced models are all 40nm, but my guess is that the highest-end models released later will be 28nm to match the desktop parts. That's just a guess and may be wrong. e.g. 7990M may use the chip used in the desktop 78xx. Desktop 77xx should also be 28nm so maybe 78xxM will correspond to those. Or maybe they'll just recycle old designs. Hopefully not. And if the 79xxM uses the 78xx chip from the desktop, that doesn't mean that you can expect 78xx performance right? It will still be lower I would assume?I have a non tech related (in a way) question for our know it alls on the forum, (people like Mymidon, Skyr, and Medrea) - what do you do in real life? And what brought you to know so much about computers etc? Is it just a hobby, or does it have something to do with your career? | ||
|
TuckFexas
United States154 Posts
On January 21 2012 07:15 Myrmidon wrote: Hopefully the laptop has a GTX 580M as an alternate configuration option and uses the same cooling for the HD 6990M. Otherwise it's probably screwed trying to handle the extra heat. But really, what are temperatures under load? Under load as in playing skyrim, or somthing like prime95? | ||
| ||
And if the 79xxM uses the 78xx chip from the desktop, that doesn't mean that you can expect 78xx performance right? It will still be lower I would assume?