|
On November 19 2010 08:09 Black Gun wrote:Show nested quote +On November 19 2010 07:51 Dacendoran wrote:
I use palmgrip and the Steelseries wow mouse has been working fine for me since release, and its extremely comofrtable, Ive had no issues and its very good looking though it may be a bit pricey. do u mean this disgraceful abomination of a mouse? http://www.blogcdn.com/de.engadget.com/media/2008/10/steelseries-wow-mouse.jpg+ Show Spoiler +no, thanks. well guys, im really desperate. i today was in the largest media markt in the world (media markt = german/european version of best buy) with a large selection of mice, and didnt find any which would be fitting my needs. the xai would be perfect if not for those retarded retarded sidebuttons on the right side, which are completely in the way of my ring and pinky fingers the way i grip my mouse.... the ikari wasnt really comfortable. this wow mouse is not comfortable... and a fucking joke of a mouse to use for anything but wow.  the rat 3/5/7 are interesting, but look very gimmicky. unfortunately, i cant adjust the exhibition model they got there to my ergonomics to see if i like it... hmmmmm the kone[+] is indeed a bit heavy, that stupid edge where i would want to rest my pinky is annoying and the rubbered surfaces are surprisingly slippery... no. the mouse whose ergonomics i like by far the most is the deathadder. well, no surprise as my habu is basically the same.... but i dont like that u cant use custom dpi steps on the DA and those slipperly sides are one of the main reasons why i dont want to buy a new habu to replace my old one... basically the DA would share the same problems as the habu... *sigh* thx for all the input guys, but i guess im a hopeless case. maybe someday a mouse like the xai will be released without the retarded ambidextrous design....
Holy fucking shit this is the ugliest mouse I've ever seen. Plus it has WoW on it. What's next, spikes that stab your hand when you grip it?
![[image loading]](http://imgur.com/LqNKl.jpg)
|
Have you looked into the microsoft sidewinders?
|
HP Laser Gaming Mouse
This HP mouse is lesser know. I bought it, but it was a bit too palmy for me (it has a little too much of a bump in your palm to me, but otherwise felt pretty good). You may like it, but I replaced it with a deathadder, which I feel has better ergonomics. Nevertheless, you can change the DPI on this one to 2400, which is close to what you wanted? (sorry, no increments.) You can also manually adjust the weight of the mouse, which is nice.
|
Also, I recommend this mouse pad: Rocketfish Mouse Pad. For 20 bucks it is made of a really sturdy steel build, and its aesthetics are great. It definitely is a lot better than the Razer Destructor and Vespula (minus wrist rest) that I have tried, which seemed sort of flimsy. It also has two different types of surfaces.
|
On November 22 2010 06:40 Encrypto wrote:Also, I recommend this mouse pad: Rocketfish Mouse Pad. For 20 bucks it is made of a really sturdy steel build, and its aesthetics are great. It definitely is a lot better than the Razer Destructor and Vespula (minus wrist rest) that I have tried, which seemed sort of flimsy. It also has two different types of surfaces.
I'd recommend one of the SteelSeries QcK line over pretty much anything else. The "mini" (which is the size of a regular mouse pad) is around $7 and the "normal" version is only around $16 or something. They're widely held to be possibly the best bang for your buck when it comes to mouse pads, and you'll see tons of people using them. I love my QcK Mini.
|
On November 22 2010 06:49 Char711 wrote:Show nested quote +On November 22 2010 06:40 Encrypto wrote:Also, I recommend this mouse pad: Rocketfish Mouse Pad. For 20 bucks it is made of a really sturdy steel build, and its aesthetics are great. It definitely is a lot better than the Razer Destructor and Vespula (minus wrist rest) that I have tried, which seemed sort of flimsy. It also has two different types of surfaces. I'd recommend one of the SteelSeries QcK line over pretty much anything else. The "mini" (which is the size of a regular mouse pad) is around $7 and the "normal" version is only around $16 or something. They're widely held to be possibly the best bang for your buck when it comes to mouse pads, and you'll see tons of people using them. I love my QcK Mini.
Just remember, though, that if you have a mouse with an Avago 9500 sensor (G500, G9X, Xai, Naos 5000, etc.), that you'll want a hard mouse pad instead of a soft one like the QcK to prevent acceleration issues. That said, the QcK is still a great pad for cheap !
|
buy a new habu ;D its an awesome mouse
|
On November 22 2010 06:49 Char711 wrote:Show nested quote +On November 22 2010 06:40 Encrypto wrote:Also, I recommend this mouse pad: Rocketfish Mouse Pad. For 20 bucks it is made of a really sturdy steel build, and its aesthetics are great. It definitely is a lot better than the Razer Destructor and Vespula (minus wrist rest) that I have tried, which seemed sort of flimsy. It also has two different types of surfaces. I'd recommend one of the SteelSeries QcK line over pretty much anything else. The "mini" (which is the size of a regular mouse pad) is around $7 and the "normal" version is only around $16 or something. They're widely held to be possibly the best bang for your buck when it comes to mouse pads, and you'll see tons of people using them. I love my QcK Mini.
The QcK Mini may be a good mouse pad, but only if you like soft, cloth/rubber mouse pads. A lot of people prefer hard ones (like me), just like Rhyick said, because soft ones have much more friction. I like my mouse to glide. Also, I read some reviews that said the QcK mini was not much different than a generic mouse pad.
The rocket fish has 2 different surfaces: one is textured and one is smooth, which is great to fit your type of style. Also, the RocketFish mat is a few inches bigger on each side. I recommended this one because you won't find a build quality like this from Razer, not to mention the price tag is unbelievable.
|
I'm still using my old MX518. It has served me well throughout my CSS days and TF2, and I dare say that FPS>SC2 in terms of requiring pixel perfect accuracy.
also using http://ncix.com/products/?sku=35882&vpn=63010&manufacture=Steelseries as a mousepad.
I still use somewhat low sensitivity from my FPS days, so it takes about 1/3 the mousepad to get from one side of the screen to the other.
|
Thanks, Rhyick, for pointing that out! Good thing for people to know. I'm surprised at the number of popular mice in that group, since I haven't heard so many complaints, though. Certainly interesting. Glad that what I'm switching to (MX518 --> DeathAdder) won't have a problem!
I'm going to have to disagree about it being the same as a generic pad, Encrypto. Not even considering the fact that it honestly costs the same as a generic pad probably would, it's the exact same make as the rest of the QcK line. Considering how popular and lauded it is, especially on this forum, I think we can reasonably say that there is a reason why. I'm not sure if I could adequately explain what makes it so nice, but just looking at it and feeling it when I use it has really impressed me, and I'm one of those people who thought that no pad and just using my desk was totally fine for years.
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT
