• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 13:26
CEST 19:26
KST 02:26
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
[ASL21] Ro24 Preview Pt2: News Flash10[ASL21] Ro24 Preview Pt1: New Chaos0Team Liquid Map Contest #22 - Presented by Monster Energy18ByuL: The Forgotten Master of ZvT30Behind the Blue - Team Liquid History Book20
Community News
Weekly Cups (March 23-29): herO takes triple6Aligulac acquired by REPLAYMAN.com/Stego Research8Weekly Cups (March 16-22): herO doubles, Cure surprises3Blizzard Classic Cup @ BlizzCon 2026 - $100k prize pool51Weekly Cups (March 9-15): herO, Clem, ByuN win4
StarCraft 2
General
Rongyi Cup S3 - Preview & Info Team Liquid Map Contest #22 - Presented by Monster Energy Blizzard Classic Cup @ BlizzCon 2026 - $100k prize pool What mix of new & old maps do you want in the next ladder pool? (SC2) Aligulac acquired by REPLAYMAN.com/Stego Research
Tourneys
RSL Season 4 announced for March-April Sparkling Tuna Cup - Weekly Open Tournament StarCraft Evolution League (SC Evo Biweekly) WardiTV Mondays World University TeamLeague (500$+) | Signups Open
Strategy
Custom Maps
[M] (2) Frigid Storage Publishing has been re-enabled! [Feb 24th 2026]
External Content
The PondCast: SC2 News & Results Mutation # 520 Moving Fees Mutation # 519 Inner Power Mutation # 518 Radiation Zone
Brood War
General
Gypsy to Korea ASL21 General Discussion so ive been playing broodwar for a week straight. Pros React To: JaeDong vs Queen BSL 22 Map Contest — Submissions OPEN to March 10
Tourneys
Escore Tournament StarCraft Season 2 [Megathread] Daily Proleagues [ASL21] Ro24 Group E [ASL21] Ro24 Group F
Strategy
What's the deal with APM & what's its true value Fighting Spirit mining rates Simple Questions, Simple Answers
Other Games
General Games
Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread Starcraft Tabletop Miniature Game Nintendo Switch Thread General RTS Discussion Thread Darkest Dungeon
Dota 2
The Story of Wings Gaming Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
G2 just beat GenG in First stand
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Deck construction bug Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
Mafia Game Mode Feedback/Ideas TL Mafia Community Thread Five o'clock TL Mafia
Community
General
US Politics Mega-thread The Chess Thread Russo-Ukrainian War Thread NASA and the Private Sector Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine
Fan Clubs
The IdrA Fan Club
Media & Entertainment
[Manga] One Piece [Req][Books] Good Fantasy/SciFi books Movie Discussion!
Sports
2024 - 2026 Football Thread Formula 1 Discussion Cricket [SPORT] Tokyo Olympics 2021 Thread General nutrition recommendations
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
[G] How to Block Livestream Ads
TL Community
The Automated Ban List
Blogs
Broowar part 2
qwaykee
China Uses Video Games to Sh…
TrAiDoS
Funny Nicknames
LUCKY_NOOB
Iranian anarchists: organize…
XenOsky
FS++
Kraekkling
ASL S21 English Commentary…
namkraft
Electronics
mantequilla
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 1252 users

Starcraft 2 Ultra Video Card Review - Page 2

Forum Index > Tech Support
Post a Reply
Prev 1 2 All
BeMannerDuPenner
Profile Blog Joined April 2004
Germany5638 Posts
July 21 2010 15:11 GMT
#21
9600GT @ phenom II quad 3.2 -> evrything ultra on 1680x1050 without any probs.

sure in 4v4s when maxed armys clash and motherships cloak evrything it reall drops down but opther then that it works super fine.
life of lively to live to life of full life thx to shield battery
SkullOne
Profile Joined April 2010
United States52 Posts
July 21 2010 15:51 GMT
#22
SC2 runs superbly on my Crossfired HD4870s, Q9450 @ 3.2GHz, 8GB RAM, with Windows 7 Ultimate x64. Now if only the wife would let me Crossfire some HD5870 2GB versions and move to Eyefinity.

As for AA not working with AMD cards this is because Blizzard technically doesn't have the native ability to apply AA based on DX9/DX10 specs. NV allows you to force it through their control panel. Forcing AA has always been problematic because it can sometimes lead to instability and performance drops.

AMD usually doesn't release driver updates for specifics like AA for beta software. I assume that come the actual SC2 release a future Catalyst update will provide the ability to force AA through the CCC.
I dont need no stinking quote
Sanasante
Profile Joined March 2010
United States321 Posts
July 21 2010 16:23 GMT
#23
Yeah I use a 5770 Myself and it is wonderful on my 1920 x1080. They are fair cheap as well. If you want you can buy a 2nd one and crossfire and then it would compare with the best there is out for a fraction of the price.
It is during our darkest moments that we must focus to see the light
Snuggles
Profile Blog Joined May 2010
United States1865 Posts
July 21 2010 16:51 GMT
#24
Whoa, I had no idea graphics card got so cheap. HD 5750 for around $135??

I'm playing on my laptop right now.

Here's the specs:
CPU - Intel Duo Core P8600
GPU - GeForce 9600M GT
4 GB RAM
Windows XP
-----------------------------

Where does my laptop stand compared to other gaming rigs? Average or somewhat good? I get pretty low frames when I try to play the game on Medium and high settings, like say 30 - 50 frames, it's just way too uncomfortable for me to play (I like 70 - 100 frames).

I have a Desktop with a less than decent CPU... if I stuck a HD 5750 in there would it be able to run on medium or high settings with 80 - 100 FPS? Or would the CPU hold it back? It's worse than what I have on my laptop.
route_Map
Profile Joined August 2009
United States28 Posts
July 21 2010 17:11 GMT
#25
I ran the beta with:

Win7 64-bit
6 GB RAM
Core 2 Duo 3.16 Ghz
GeForece 9800 GTX

All Settings defaulted to Ultra on install and the performance was fine. GPU fan did kick into gear when the engine loaded up.

p.s. haha, nice Nomad screenshot.
QuothTheRaven
Profile Joined December 2008
United States5524 Posts
Last Edited: 2010-07-21 17:34:00
July 21 2010 17:26 GMT
#26
On July 21 2010 22:45 Konsume wrote:
Show nested quote +
On July 21 2010 18:36 xzidez wrote:
Myself I run with an radeon card and gets a corrupt cursor every now and then. Perhaps anyone who knows something about this and how to fix it?
(Ive tried formatting and every possible driver there is out there)

Show nested quote +
On July 21 2010 19:13 tubs wrote:
I had the same problem for my ATI Radeon HD5570 card. It happened randomly in SC2 that the cursor would get corrupt each day I played the beta in phase 2. The weird thing is that it stopped happening for the last two days of the beta. The only thing that changed about my system around that time was SC2 got updated to the 0.21 patch and I installed 2 "important" updates on Windows 7 update.

I've been stressing my system with FurMark + Prime95 + using two monitors off the video card at same time + running a SC2 200 supply replay on ultra settings for the past day and can't reproduce the corrupt cursor bug. No idea if the bug for me is gone or if it just randomly isn't occuring. Frustrating to track down.


Yes I know how to fix it... it's a KNOWN bug spread around the 4xxxx, 5xxxx HD series. They fixed it on the 9.x drivers and it's back in the 10.x drivers. So basicaly what you should do it you don't want to deal with this bug is:

Delete 10.6 drivers (or what ever driver you're on)
Reinstall 9.12 drivers

Hey voila! no more corrupted pointer for you!


There has been a problem with 10.x drivers that are known they just can't fix it for some reason. So revert back to 9.12 till they fix their driver problem... which they said it will be "SOON!" That being said, 9.12 runs SUPER fine with SC2 and I run with an Eyefinity setup (tho it's not working for sc2).


here is the link if you're on Vista/Win7 x64
http://support.amd.com/us/gpudownload/windows/previous/Pages/radeonaiw_vista64.aspx


I think you might be thinking of the enlarged cursor bug, not the corrupt cursor bug. The corrupt cursor bug only occurs for users with 2+ monitors. Here are some characteristics:


+ Show Spoiler +
The glitch can be reproduced most easily on a two monitor setup, by rapidly sliding the mouse across the bottom edge of the desktop such that it crosses display boundaries repeatedly until the glitch occurs, the glitch will appear on the left monitor (the right monitor will remain unglitched), on a single monitor setup it is much more difficult to trigger but can still be triggered by very rapidly moving the mouse between the top left and bottom right corners repeatedly (a 5600 or 5700 DPI gaming mouse is ideal for this, yet still challenging), which also works for triggering it on the rightmost monitor in a multimonitor setup.

The glitch occurs separately on each display (each one has its own glitched/not-glitched/differently glitched state).

This glitch occurs when moving the mouse across monitors at the very bottom edge of the desktop.

The glitch persists regardless of which cursor image is displayed, all are displayed wrong (looks as if a scroll register is messed up), mouse pointer size becomes 16x16 even if the image appeared to be smaller previously, and the image will often repeat in some way to fill out the allotted space.

The mouse pointer size does not change (other than the padding to 16x16 pixels as described above).

The animated busy pointer illustrates how the glitch is scrambling the pointer, and is perfectly captured in Willis's picture, the animation looks kind of like it is showing on shards of broken glass, every pixel of the pointer has its place, but the placement is wrong.

The way the image is scrambled is not completely consistent, the same image might look different each time the glitch triggers - but will be consistent as long as the glitch is present.

One can cause the glitch to mutate to different forms of image scrambling by reproducing the same conditions that trigger it in the first place.

One can glitch a single monitor by itself by moving the pointer extremely rapidly (5600 or 5700 DPI gaming mice are ideal for this purpose) between the top left and bottom right corner of the monitor repeatedly until the glitch occurs.

The glitch persists across disabling/enabling monitors.

Each monitor's respective variant of the glitch belongs to the respective ACTIVE monitor list, this means that if you glitch two monitors (challenging!) you can disable the lower numbered monitor and the higher numbered one will now demonstrate the first monitor's variant of the glitch, reenabling the first monitor restores the glitch variants to their rightful places, disabling the second monitor has no effect on which variant the first monitor shows.

The glitch does not affect any displays hooked up to cards whose chipsets are not ATI.

The glitch has occurred for many people for years now, on catalyst versions ranging back to 9.11 if not earlier.

The glitch still occurs on 10.6 as of this writing.

The glitch occurs at the following resolutions: 1280x800, 2560x1600, 1920x1080, 1680x1050, and probably all others.

The glitch occurs on all types of video port.

The glitch disappears on a reboot (but of course can occur again).

The glitch occurs on Windows 7.

The glitch does not occur on Linux.

Edit: corrected earliest catalyst version to 9.11.



Taken from:
http://forums.amd.com/game/messageview.cfm?catid=279&threadid=122476&STARTPAGE=1&FTVAR_FORUMVIEWTMP=Linear


The issue has existed for 2 years, and reverting to 9.12 or older drivers will not solve it. After struggling with this for a few months, I've managed to *almost* eliminate it by flashing the BIOS on my graphics cards to the latest version and installing 10.6, which has made some improvements.

I can still corrupt the cursor by rapidly sliding the mouse left to right across the bottom of the screen between the two monitors, but it rarely happens unless I force it to.

Anyways, to the original person with this problem: If you're up to it, consider doing a VGA BIOS flash. Also, update to 10.6 if you haven't already. 10.6 won't fix the problem, but for a few people (including me) it makes it occur less frequently.


(Btw, if you only have a single monitor, then you're suffering from the "big cursor" bug, not the "cursor corruption" bug. If you're on a 1-monitor setup, ignore everything I just said and try Konsume's advice, though ATI has claimed that they "fixed" the big cursor bug in later 10.x drivers.)
. . . nevermore
Daniri
Profile Joined May 2007
387 Posts
July 21 2010 17:32 GMT
#27
Is it a requirement for media sites to use old and outdated screenshots?
"you guys are silly lol thats why i hate you people" berserkboar
PcChip
Profile Joined May 2010
United States50 Posts
July 22 2010 06:48 GMT
#28
When I first put in my dual 5850's with the new Gigabyte GA-P55-UD5 , I had issues with enlarged cursor and corrupted cursors.

After updating the motherboard's BIOS and the 5850's drivers, it has dissapeared*



* - every once in a while I do get a temporarily corrupted cursor in SC2, but it usually goes away soon
Nihilnovi
Profile Joined May 2010
Sweden696 Posts
July 22 2010 10:00 GMT
#29
I'm playing 2500x1600 everything possible on ultra/turned on and no fps drops ever(even in 200 supply battles, never noticed any type of drop), on a single oc'ed 275. I do also have 6gb of game performance ddr3 ram(cl5) and a i7 system. I really dont understand why anyone would ever need a graphic card better than 275, I run crysis with everything maxed @ 2500x1600 with Fraps with no FPS drops
IMO graphic cards are GREATLY overrated when it comes to games, the card development is years ahead of what any game can actually use, the only possible reason I can think of is that the 2xx series lacks dx11 support.
RA
Profile Joined October 2008
Latvia791 Posts
July 22 2010 10:13 GMT
#30
First test ever when I see only the cream of the crop cards taken. What's the point considering how Blizzard is always trying to squeeze the game for larger public.

And most importantly, any of these top-notch cards would run game perfectly, comparing a few minor performance differences is so elitist and quite pointless.

I have ASUS GF250GTS and I'm damn happy how it worked. I hope campaign doesn't disappoint on performance

SkullOne
Profile Joined April 2010
United States52 Posts
July 22 2010 16:02 GMT
#31
For the record AMD is looking into forcing AA. I just had that confirmed by Terry Makedon, manager of Catalyst Product Management, on his Twitter @CatalystMaker.

So those AMD owners who hate jaggies can rejoice. Frankly I'd still just rather boost my resolution with Eyefinity instead of AA.
I dont need no stinking quote
Santriell
Profile Joined June 2010
Belgium151 Posts
July 22 2010 17:24 GMT
#32
Roflcopter.

Considering I'm running an HD4670 512DDR3 perfectly on high settings, why in the hell would you buy an overpriced 1gb ddr5 card for about the same quality but five times the price ?

If you need to improve, get a mid-range card for now and wait for the super-duper cards to drop in prices in a few months. Buying things that just got out to achieve extreme resolutions is not only stupid in the PC world, it's also one of the worst ideas considering GPUs because it usually takes 1 to 2 years of driver updates for the new cards to be able to run at full performance.
By the clack smack cracking of my thumbs, something wicked this may comes.
Konsume
Profile Joined February 2010
Canada466 Posts
July 22 2010 18:06 GMT
#33
On July 22 2010 02:26 QuothTheRaven wrote:

I think you might be thinking of the enlarged cursor bug, not the corrupt cursor bug. The corrupt cursor bug only occurs for users with 2+ monitors. Here are some characteristics:
+ Show Spoiler +


+ Show Spoiler +
The glitch can be reproduced most easily on a two monitor setup, by rapidly sliding the mouse across the bottom edge of the desktop such that it crosses display boundaries repeatedly until the glitch occurs, the glitch will appear on the left monitor (the right monitor will remain unglitched), on a single monitor setup it is much more difficult to trigger but can still be triggered by very rapidly moving the mouse between the top left and bottom right corners repeatedly (a 5600 or 5700 DPI gaming mouse is ideal for this, yet still challenging), which also works for triggering it on the rightmost monitor in a multimonitor setup.

The glitch occurs separately on each display (each one has its own glitched/not-glitched/differently glitched state).

This glitch occurs when moving the mouse across monitors at the very bottom edge of the desktop.

The glitch persists regardless of which cursor image is displayed, all are displayed wrong (looks as if a scroll register is messed up), mouse pointer size becomes 16x16 even if the image appeared to be smaller previously, and the image will often repeat in some way to fill out the allotted space.

The mouse pointer size does not change (other than the padding to 16x16 pixels as described above).

The animated busy pointer illustrates how the glitch is scrambling the pointer, and is perfectly captured in Willis's picture, the animation looks kind of like it is showing on shards of broken glass, every pixel of the pointer has its place, but the placement is wrong.

The way the image is scrambled is not completely consistent, the same image might look different each time the glitch triggers - but will be consistent as long as the glitch is present.

One can cause the glitch to mutate to different forms of image scrambling by reproducing the same conditions that trigger it in the first place.

One can glitch a single monitor by itself by moving the pointer extremely rapidly (5600 or 5700 DPI gaming mice are ideal for this purpose) between the top left and bottom right corner of the monitor repeatedly until the glitch occurs.

The glitch persists across disabling/enabling monitors.

Each monitor's respective variant of the glitch belongs to the respective ACTIVE monitor list, this means that if you glitch two monitors (challenging!) you can disable the lower numbered monitor and the higher numbered one will now demonstrate the first monitor's variant of the glitch, reenabling the first monitor restores the glitch variants to their rightful places, disabling the second monitor has no effect on which variant the first monitor shows.

The glitch does not affect any displays hooked up to cards whose chipsets are not ATI.

The glitch has occurred for many people for years now, on catalyst versions ranging back to 9.11 if not earlier.

The glitch still occurs on 10.6 as of this writing.

The glitch occurs at the following resolutions: 1280x800, 2560x1600, 1920x1080, 1680x1050, and probably all others.

The glitch occurs on all types of video port.

The glitch disappears on a reboot (but of course can occur again).

The glitch occurs on Windows 7.

The glitch does not occur on Linux.

Edit: corrected earliest catalyst version to 9.11.



Taken from:
http://forums.amd.com/game/messageview.cfm?catid=279&threadid=122476&STARTPAGE=1&FTVAR_FORUMVIEWTMP=Linear


The issue has existed for 2 years, and reverting to 9.12 or older drivers will not solve it. After struggling with this for a few months, I've managed to *almost* eliminate it by flashing the BIOS on my graphics cards to the latest version and installing 10.6, which has made some improvements.

I can still corrupt the cursor by rapidly sliding the mouse left to right across the bottom of the screen between the two monitors, but it rarely happens unless I force it to.

Anyways, to the original person with this problem: If you're up to it, consider doing a VGA BIOS flash. Also, update to 10.6 if you haven't already. 10.6 won't fix the problem, but for a few people (including me) it makes it occur less frequently.


(Btw, if you only have a single monitor, then you're suffering from the "big cursor" bug, not the "cursor corruption" bug. If you're on a 1-monitor setup, ignore everything I just said and try Konsume's advice, though ATI has claimed that they "fixed" the big cursor bug in later 10.x drivers.)


No... I'm on an EYEFINITY setup so I'm definatly with not 2 but 3 monitors all samsungs HD gaming series. I had the corruption bug and was wondering what went wrong cause I went from 9.12 to 10.6 and never experienced that bug before updating to 10.6. The cursor is distorted, than transforms in wierd arrows and than lines and get back to somewhat a normal cursor with lines in it and than goes back to some type of arrows...... and the only way I could get a normal arrow was to reboot my system.

To be honest at 1st I was thinking my card was burning and that I might have to think about replacing it but... since it was an HD5870 1go... I tryed to find a solution and I found out when browsing many shooters forums that the corrupted bug is know and that the 9.12 driver set was the only drivers it was ok.

So I reverted back to 9.12 for about a month an half and... guess what? never had this bug again. So again, those with corruption bug... get the 9.12 cataclyst set and everything will run fine!
Only two things are infinite, the universe and human stupidity, and I'm not sure about the former.
Tazza
Profile Blog Joined May 2009
Korea (South)1678 Posts
July 27 2010 19:28 GMT
#34
Man, Im gonna wait till i get to college to get a new computer, which is like in 2 years. Then, ima buy the newest video card that lets you play on all ultra settings at 150 fps
SCbiff
Profile Joined May 2010
110 Posts
July 27 2010 20:16 GMT
#35
On July 22 2010 19:00 Nihilnovi wrote:
I'm playing 2500x1600 everything possible on ultra/turned on and no fps drops ever(even in 200 supply battles, never noticed any type of drop), on a single oc'ed 275. I do also have 6gb of game performance ddr3 ram(cl5) and a i7 system. I really dont understand why anyone would ever need a graphic card better than 275, I run crysis with everything maxed @ 2500x1600 with Fraps with no FPS drops
IMO graphic cards are GREATLY overrated when it comes to games, the card development is years ahead of what any game can actually use, the only possible reason I can think of is that the 2xx series lacks dx11 support.


Define "no FPS drops". I guess you mean it sucks and doesn't go any lower? Because I promise you you aren't runing Crysis @ 2560x1600 maxed with >= 4x AA without seeing abysmal frame rates. I have a gtx 480 and a 30" monitor, and I can't even run that without noticing it. Hell, even SLI can't do it and stay > 60 fps over the benchmark.
PGHammer
Profile Joined February 2010
United States132 Posts
July 28 2010 02:44 GMT
#36
On July 21 2010 22:05 Jenslyn87 wrote:
That test has a few problems... the game has gotten progressively harder to run with the patches released during the beta, and I'm not sure the test shows accurate numbers. It has very high minimum fps, but seriously during a big battle even very strong pcs will drop way down in fps.

http://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/blizzard-entertainment-starcraft-ii-benchmark,2611-6.html

is probably more representative of actual performance. But yea, the game is pretty cpu demanding


That is precisely the issue: SC2 (toward the beta's late stages, and at launch) is proving to be heavily CPU and I/O bound (as opposed to GPU bound); I've noticed that when things slow down I'm also getting a lot of hard drive I/O (Windows 7 x64). While I have 3 GB of RAM, I have about 20 GB of drive space free at present, and a SATA main drive that dates back to 2004 (therefore, drive cache and drive performance is not the best it can be by any means). How does WD's Cavbiar Black 1 TB SATA HDD perform in terms of SC2 use?
Bad news, fellas
Egnarts
Profile Joined April 2010
Denmark33 Posts
July 28 2010 04:22 GMT
#37
Good thing that the review isn't at all Nvidia biased.
Prev 1 2 All
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
Next event in 15h 34m
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
trigger 136
ProTech136
Railgan 70
StarCraft: Brood War
Calm 5078
Horang2 733
Mind 458
actioN 350
Hyuk 225
Dewaltoss 120
Shinee 79
Sexy 37
Movie 35
Hm[arnc] 31
[ Show more ]
Aegong 22
GoRush 19
yabsab 18
Terrorterran 17
soO 17
ajuk12(nOOB) 13
IntoTheRainbow 9
Dota 2
Gorgc5697
qojqva3144
420jenkins356
Counter-Strike
fl0m4790
zeus144
Heroes of the Storm
Khaldor209
MindelVK12
Other Games
Grubby1699
FrodaN1590
Beastyqt720
ArmadaUGS142
Livibee83
Trikslyr69
Organizations
Counter-Strike
PGL10063
StarCraft 2
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
sctven
[ Show 19 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• Shameless 50
• Adnapsc2 14
• Reevou 3
• intothetv
• IndyKCrew
• sooper7s
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• Migwel
• LaughNgamezSOOP
• Kozan
StarCraft: Brood War
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
• BSLYoutube
Dota 2
• WagamamaTV692
• lizZardDota257
League of Legends
• Nemesis1857
• Jankos1811
Other Games
• imaqtpie491
• Shiphtur176
Upcoming Events
CranKy Ducklings
15h 34m
Sparkling Tuna Cup
16h 34m
PiGosaur Cup
1d 6h
Replay Cast
1d 15h
Kung Fu Cup
1d 18h
Replay Cast
2 days
The PondCast
2 days
CranKy Ducklings
3 days
WardiTV Team League
3 days
Replay Cast
4 days
[ Show More ]
CranKy Ducklings
4 days
WardiTV Team League
4 days
uThermal 2v2 Circuit
4 days
BSL
5 days
Sparkling Tuna Cup
5 days
WardiTV Team League
5 days
BSL
6 days
Replay Cast
6 days
Replay Cast
6 days
Wardi Open
6 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

Escore Tournament S2: W1
RSL Revival: Season 4
NationLESS Cup

Ongoing

BSL Season 22
CSL Elite League 2026
ASL Season 21
CSL Season 20: Qualifier 2
CSL 2026 SPRING (S20)
StarCraft2 Community Team League 2026 Spring
Nations Cup 2026
PGL Bucharest 2026
Stake Ranked Episode 1
BLAST Open Spring 2026
ESL Pro League S23 Finals
ESL Pro League S23 Stage 1&2
PGL Cluj-Napoca 2026
IEM Kraków 2026
BLAST Bounty Winter 2026

Upcoming

Escore Tournament S2: W2
IPSL Spring 2026
Escore Tournament S2: W3
Acropolis #4
BSL 22 Non-Korean Championship
CSLAN 4
Kung Fu Cup 2026 Grand Finals
HSC XXIX
uThermal 2v2 2026 Main Event
uThermal 2v2 Last Chance Qualifiers 2026
RSL Revival: Season 5
IEM Cologne Major 2026
Stake Ranked Episode 2
CS Asia Championships 2026
Asian Champions League 2026
IEM Atlanta 2026
PGL Astana 2026
BLAST Rivals Spring 2026
CCT Season 3 Global Finals
IEM Rio 2026
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2026 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.